Здравствуйте, Matthew. Вы писали 21 февраля 2012 г., 14:10:37:
MS> On 20/02/2012 20:06, Коньков Евгений wrote: >> >> vlan74: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM> >> ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 >> inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd >> inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 >> inet 10.1.26.3 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 >> nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>) >> status: active >> vlan: 74 parent interface: re0 >> >> ifconfig vlan74 delete 10.1.26.1 >> >> will delete these static routes from route table: >> >> 10.3.0.1 10.7.26.2 UGHS 8 367 vlan74 >> 10.1.6.0/23 10.7.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74 10.3.0.1 10.1.26.2 UGHS 8 367 vlan74 10.1.6.0/23 10.1.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74 I had mistake. >> >> Does this a bug? MS> Hmmm... how have you managed to have a next hop address of 10.7.26.2 on MS> your vlan74 interface, when the local network appears to be 10.1.26.0/23 MS> ? What's the route to 10.7.26.2 -- presumably this is also accessible MS> on vlan74 ? MS> It certainly seems odd that your routes have disappeared, but I'm MS> wondering if they were culled from the routing table because the system MS> thought they weren't logically connected to the local system? Given MS> that they have seen traffic, perhaps this was connected to a different MS> change that the deletion of 10.1.26.1 that you highlighted? -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
