Reko Turja wrote:
Ports are not to be mixed with packages.
If you are using "ports" and "packages" solely in
"FreeBSD Terms", then this isn't correct*. Once installed,
there is no/little-if-any difference; /var/db/pkg is
common to both, and the standard package tools operate
equally well for
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Charles Farinella wrote:
[...]
> For reasons having to do with our particular operation, it is our custom
> to build many packages from source code no matter the operating system,
> so I don't want to install from the ports tree.
Short answer: to get it
For reasons having to do with our particular operation, it is our
custom to build many packages from source code no matter the
operating system, so I don't want to install from the ports tree.
The ports tree is just there for installation from source and putting
the software after compile into
For reasons having to do with our particular operation, it is our
custom to build many packages from source code no matter the operating
system, so I don't want to install from the ports tree.
Did you know that when you install from the ports tree, it will actually
download the sources, make
Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Charles Farinella wrote:
I built PostgreSQL from source
In other words, not from ports? Or if it was from ports, which port?
and copied the supplied startup script to /etc/rc.d/postgresql. The
script works as expected.
Yes, but that's not where it
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Charles Farinella wrote:
I built PostgreSQL from source
In other words, not from ports? Or if it was from ports, which port?
and copied the supplied startup script to
/etc/rc.d/postgresql. The script works as expected.
Yes, but that's not where it should be in FreeBSD
Execute rights, yes, but you shouldn't rename it to foo.sh under
6.2 -- that's not how things are supposed to work in recent releases.
Without the PROVIDE: in the rc script, it won't get executed unless it
has an .sh extension. man rc has details, but .sh should still work
and I think is require
Nagy László Zsolt wrote:
> Try to rename it to "postgresql.sh" and give execute rights.
Execute rights, yes, but you shouldn't rename it to foo.sh under
6.2 -- that's not how things are supposed to work in recent releases.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
Charles Farinella írta:
Hi all,
FreeBSD 6.2:
I built PostgreSQL from source and copied the supplied startup script
to /etc/rc.d/postgresql. The script works as expected.
In /etc/rc.conf I've added the following:
postgresql_enable="YES"
expecting this to automatically start PostgeSQL at bo
Hi all,
FreeBSD 6.2:
I built PostgreSQL from source and copied the supplied startup script to
/etc/rc.d/postgresql. The script works as expected.
In /etc/rc.conf I've added the following:
postgresql_enable="YES"
expecting this to automatically start PostgeSQL at boot, yet this
doesn't hap
10 matches
Mail list logo
