Hi,
it seems your question got lost in nirvana.
Darryl Hoar wrote:
Greetings,
Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to
be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should
I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability.
If stability is your main concern, you will have to stick
Subject: Re: What version of Freebsd to run
David Alanis wrote:
> Darryl:
>
> How dare you ask such question? I mean, if you need to ask such question
> maybe Windows XP will be a solution for you?
>
> Just kidding, I run a similiar dell http/mail/asterisk/dns/IPv6 amd64
David Alanis wrote:
Darryl:
How dare you ask such question? I mean, if you need to ask such question
maybe Windows XP will be a solution for you?
Just kidding, I run a similiar dell http/mail/asterisk/dns/IPv6 amd64
7.0 pre-release under zfs and I couldn't be happier!!!
David
Quoting Dar
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:05:48PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >Greetings,
> >Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to
> >be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should
> >I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability.
>
> what you are al
be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should
I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability.
Use FreeBSD 6.3 and Apache 2.xxx
well i use apache 1.*
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Greetings,
Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to
be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should
I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability.
what you are already using and is rock-stable.
like 6.2 for me (actually 6.2+freebsd-update=6.2p10
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:04:57PM -0600, Darryl Hoar wrote:
> Greetings,
> Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to
> be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should
> I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability.
Use FreeBSD 6.3 and Apache 2.xxx
jerry
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Greetings,
Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to
be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should
I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability.
thanks,
Darryl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
Greetings,
Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to
be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should
I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability.
thanks,
Darryl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Dan Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A friend gave me a laptop with a Pentium 100 and 24 megs of ram. It only
> has a floppy drive. What version of FreeBSD do you recommend and would you
> send me the link to download it.
First, you should realize that this is seriously ou
m. It
>>> only has a floppy drive. What version of FreeBSD do you recommend
>>> and would you send me the link to download it.
>>
>> It's possible to run FreeBSD on a machine like that (in fact, I intend
>> to start doing so on a very similar machine
On Monday, 27 December 2004 at 13:21:51 -0600, Dan Thomas wrote:
> A friend gave me a laptop with a Pentium 100 and 24 megs of ram. It
> only has a floppy drive. What version of FreeBSD do you recommend
> and would you send me the link to download it.
It's possible to run FreeBS
A friend gave me a laptop with a Pentium 100 and 24 megs of ram. It only
has a floppy drive. What version of FreeBSD do you recommend and would you
send me the link to download it.
Thanks for your help,
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED
In a message dated 10/9/04 3:26:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 9:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Note that it also took quite a
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:07:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/9/04 12:56:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >"I just hope that pounding packets through a socket and
> >timing mySQL selects aren't the entirety of OUR team's arsenal."
>
> >And
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 9:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Note that it also took quite a bit a beating to get them to admit that
>
> 1) They dont know the answer to the Sub
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 10:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
>
>
> In a
In a message dated 10/9/04 12:56:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>"I just hope that pounding packets through a socket and
>timing mySQL selects aren't the entirety of OUR team's arsenal."
>And it's not just this sentence although this is one of the most
>blatent. You are
In a message dated 10/9/04 1:15:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>dang, how long is this thread gonna go on? Is it that important? I see
>a lot of good questions and equally good answers on this list, but I
>think this particular thread is starting to stoop beneath us all..
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of NetAdmin
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
>
>
> dang, how long is this thread gonna
OK, first of all this thread is not worthwhile to people in this forum.
I'm sorry for having initially added to the noise, but I do want to try
to salvage something useful from this. If your request is sincere, then
please hear me out.
On Friday 08 October 2004 07:39 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
essage-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 7:40 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
> >
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
>
>
> In a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 8:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
>
>
> In a message dated 10/8/04 2:42:
In a message dated 10/8/04 2:25:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is "going to be
> so great". I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you
> don't have any definitive tests. I dont have a release to test, so
> when i
>
> On Friday 08 October 2004 16:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A very simple request - I do respect peoples right to state their point of
> view - but there FreeBSD has through its entire life spam aimed (at least for
> the time I have been following the delvelopment - and that goes far long
On Friday 08 October 2004 16:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A very simple request - I do respect peoples right to state their point of
view - but there FreeBSD has through its entire life spam aimed (at least for
the time I have been following the delvelopment - and that goes far longer
back that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is "going to be
so great". I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you don't
have any definitive tests. I dont have a release to test, so when its done
I'll test it.
6.0 is much, much better. And try downloading
On Friday 08 October 2004 08:54 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is "going to be
> so great". I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you
> don't have any definitive tests. I dont have a release to test, so
> when its done I'll test it.
Why
Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:45:09AM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
: Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
:
: >On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:39:05PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
: >: I'm sure that Yahoo, like any large commercial enterprise, has a whole
: >: host of speci
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:45:09AM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
: Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
:
: >On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:39:05PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
: >: I'm sure that Yahoo, like any large commercial enterprise, has a whole
: >: host of specific customizations that th
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:44:13PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote:
: Apart from that: Why do you actually want to know? It's better not to
: know the exact version since others might abuse that information and
: hack into the company. That does not feel right, well not with me :-).
I was just wonderin
Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:39:05PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
: I'm sure that Yahoo, like any large commercial enterprise, has a whole
: host of specific customizations that they have applied to FreeBSD,
: and their version of FreeBSD doesen't look like what we have, a
On Oct 8, 2004, at 8:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must be a democrat Kris, because you always spin what people say
in a way such that is completely wrong when you say it. I said "the
99% of us
If there was any doubt in my mind that TM4525 was a troll, he's just
removed it.
I think it's tim
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:39:05PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
: I'm sure that Yahoo, like any large commercial enterprise, has a whole
: host of specific customizations that they have applied to FreeBSD,
: and their version of FreeBSD doesen't look like what we have, at least not
: where the go
On Friday 08 October 2004 11:05 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2004, at 11:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is "going to be
> > so great". I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you
> > don't have any definitive tests. I dont h
On Oct 8, 2004, at 11:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is "going to be
so great". I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you don't
have any definitive tests. I dont have a release to test, so when its
done
I'll test it.
I think it sums it
In a message dated 10/8/04 2:37:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kris and all,
Sorry for the top post but would you quit feeding the trolls?
Ted Mittelstaedt
PS: TM, shut up and post some benchmarks proving your side of
the argument. Not that we would believe them but
In a message dated 10/8/04 2:42:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Here is a thought.
> Why would they be running a pre-production release as a production
> server
> I have no idea what yahoo does, but I think it would be irrespondsible
> for them to attempt using 5.x on
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard Samuel
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 6:32 AM
> To: Jonathon McKitrick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kris Kennaway
> Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
&g
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 3:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 07, 20
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 05:35:18PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/7/04 4:06:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> Here's one benchmark, showing UDP packet/second generation
> rate from userland on a dual xeon machine under various
> target lo
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:05:21PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> But when he asked for a "pointer or reference", I was expecting
> to see a URL which pointed to some additional benchmarks. I did
> not notice any URL's in any of your replies in this thread. Did
> you think that you had includ
In a message dated 10/7/04 4:06:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Here's one benchmark, showing UDP packet/second generation
rate from userland on a dual xeon machine under various
target loads:
Desired Optimal 5.x-UP 5.x-SMP 4.x-UP 4.x-SMP
5 5000
At 11:15 AM -0700 10/7/04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > why don't you post some of these impressive benchmarks to
> > substantiate your seemingly flimsy position? On a single
> > processor system please, for the 99% of us who don't use
> > SMP. Ho
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:10:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/7/04 1:15:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:41:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscu
In a message dated 10/7/04 1:15:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:41:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscurity
Kris
> writes:
> Well, it's vast :)
> Kris
> We're waiting..5.3 is
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:41:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscurity Kris
> writes:
> Well, it's vast :)
> Kris
> We're waiting..5.3 is in beta and ready for your tests. Other benchmarks
> show very good results compared to
In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscurity Kris
writes:
Well, it's vast :)
Kris
We're waiting..5.3 is in beta and ready for your tests. Other benchmarks
show very good results compared to 4.x.
Kris
--
Quite a bunch of scienti
OTECTED]; 'Kris Kennaway'
> Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:04:59AM -0400, Bigelow, Andrea L. wrote:
> > Can anyone speak to performance improvement if the debug flags are
> removed?
>
> Well, it's vast :
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 07:04:10AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:55:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In a message dated 10/6/04 6:47:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:42:24PM -0400, Bigelow, Andrea L. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: 07 October 2004 15:10
To: Bigelow, Andrea L.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Kris Kennaway'
Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:04:59AM -0400, Bigelow, Andrea L. wrote:
> Can anyone speak to performance improvement if the debug flags are removed?
Well, it's vast :) 5.3 (i.e. the RELENG_5 branch) has them turned off
already in preparation for the release.
Kris
pgpBqbH2Kp87m.pgp
Description: P
Can anyone speak to performance improvement if the debug flags are removed?
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:55:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/6/04 6:47:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:42:24PM -0400, Bigelow, Andrea L. wrote:
> > Where's the documentation? I'd like to see this for myself.
>
>
In a message dated 10/6/04 6:47:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:42:24PM -0400, Bigelow, Andrea L. wrote:
> Where's the documentation? I'd like to see this for myself.
There is none, because Mr./Ms. TM4525 is making up his/her "facts" to
suit the
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:42:24PM -0400, Bigelow, Andrea L. wrote:
> Where's the documentation? I'd like to see this for myself.
There is none, because Mr./Ms. TM4525 is making up his/her "facts" to
suit their assertion. The last time this claim was made it was
refuted and TM4525 promised to g
Considering that its been well documented and admitted that 5.x is 1/3 the
speed of 4.x at this point, do you really think they've migrated production
boxes?
Most likely this is in reference to a few lines in /usr/src/UPDATING,
stating that all of the debug features are turned on by default in 5.
ssage-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 4:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
> >
> > Considering that its been well docu
Bigelow, Andrea L. wrote:
Where's the documentation? I'd like to see this for myself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What version of FBSD
Where's the documentation? I'd like to see this for myself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run?
Considerin
Considering that its been well documented and admitted that 5.x is 1/3 the
speed of 4.x at this point, do you really think they've migrated production
boxes?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 09:32:27AM -0400, Gerard Samuel wrote:
: Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
: >On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:07:44AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
: >: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:01:32PM +0100, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
: >: >
: >: > I would expect they are running 4.x, but does anyone k
Gerard Samuel wrote:
Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:07:44AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:01:32PM +0100, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
: > : > I would expect they are running 4.x, but does anyone know if
they have
: > migrated any production boxes to 5.
Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:07:44AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:01:32PM +0100, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
: >
: > I would expect they are running 4.x, but does anyone know if they have
: > migrated any production boxes to 5.x? Are they contribu
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:07:44AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:01:32PM +0100, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
: >
: > I would expect they are running 4.x, but does anyone know if they have
: > migrated any production boxes to 5.x? Are they contributing any code to
: > eithe
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:01:32PM +0100, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
>
> I would expect they are running 4.x, but does anyone know if they have
> migrated any production boxes to 5.x? Are they contributing any code to
> either branch?
Yes, a number of committers work for Yahoo.
kris
pgpwOBwad7
I would expect they are running 4.x, but does anyone know if they have
migrated any production boxes to 5.x? Are they contributing any code to
either branch?
jm
--
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:26:55AM +0200, Arno Haverlach wrote:
> Currently were going to reinstall all servers we have from redhat 9 to
> freebsd because redhat 9 is EOL...
>
> But after reading a few mails here that 4.9 is most likely not supported
> for a long time.. what ve
Currently were going to reinstall all servers we have from redhat 9 to
freebsd because redhat 9 is EOL...
But after reading a few mails here that 4.9 is most likely not supported
for a long time.. what version should we take then?
We will be using it for multiple servers (mail, database, app
.
Cheers,
Paul Hamilton
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2003 11:26 PM
To: Paul Hamilton
Cc: horio shoichi; Freebsd-Questions
Subject: Re: How to find our what version of ports your running?
"
"Paul Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way to find out the ports version, from a CD upgrade? i.e..
> initial install was 4.2 then a 4.6 upgrade, then a 4.7 and then a 4.8
> upgrade. Hmm, was the ports tree upgraded along with main upgrades or not?
Ports are not updated along w
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of horio shoichi
Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:47 AM
To: Paul Hamilton
Cc: Freebsd-Questions
Subject: Re: How to find our what version of ports your running?
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:14:23 +0800
"Paul Hamilton&quo
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:14:23 +0800
"Paul Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to print out the base version of when you last installed the
> ports base, or cvs'ed it?
>
> cheers,
>
> Paul Hamilton
>
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:14:23PM +0800, Paul Hamilton wrote:
> Is it possible to print out the base version of when you last installed the
> ports base, or cvs'ed it?
cvsup keeps a log of it's activity in the directory you specify as your
cvsup base:
*default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup
on my sy
Hi,
Is it possible to print out the base version of when you last installed the
ports base, or cvs'ed it?
cheers,
Paul Hamilton
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any ma
wrote:
> > So I could upgrade system Openssh. However, when I run
> ssh
> > -V it tells me that the version on the system is 3.5p1
> and
> > no the updated version. Anyone know if this technique
> > works in this page, if so, how do I update my box so it
> > kn
> So I could upgrade system Openssh. However, when I run ssh
> -V it tells me that the version on the system is 3.5p1 and
> no the updated version. Anyone know if this technique
> works in this page, if so, how do I update my box so it
> knows what version is running. Where is t
echnique
works in this page, if so, how do I update my box so it
knows what version is running. Where is the file located
where Openssh stores its banner info?
I'm running FreeBSD 5.0
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
>
> Hi all!
>
> I am beginner in FreeBSD and in Unix at all.
> I know just Windows:
> Do u recommended me FreeBSD 5.1 Release? Or i must start learn FreeBSD
> from 4.8 stable?
You can do whichever you want. But, start with V 4.8 and learn it
quite well before moving on to V 5.x. Probab
"Denis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am beginner in FreeBSD and in Unix at all.
> I know just Windows:
> Do u recommended me FreeBSD 5.1 Release? Or i must start learn FreeBSD from 4.8
> stable?
4.8
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://list
Hi all!
I am beginner in FreeBSD and in Unix at all.
I know just Windows:
Do u recommended me FreeBSD 5.1 Release? Or i must start learn FreeBSD from 4.8 stable?
Rgrds, Denis.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
Denis wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I am beginner in FreeBSD and in Unix at all.
> I know just Windows:
> Do u recommended me FreeBSD 5.1 Release?
5.1-RELEASE is less stable than 4.8-RELEASE.
Particularly, you may have to do some tweaking
to get the kernel booting on install and thereafter.
However
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:03:05 -0400
Lucas Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lol.
>
> Sendmail configuration is terrible.
>
> Some days i dream of a mail server that integrates smtp, pop and imap
> into one server that is easy to configure with built in spam filtering.
> (oh and it has to work
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:00:47 -0500, george donnelly wrote:
> [David Benfell wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 7/25/03 12:44 PM]
>
> > It does other things as well. A starting place for more information
> > would be http://www.djbdns.org/
>
> actually that's now http://www.tinydns.org/ now.
>
My bad.
[Lucas Holt wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 7/25/03 1:03 PM]
> Some days i dream of a mail server that integrates smtp, pop and imap
> into one server that is easy to configure with built in spam filtering.
> (oh and it has to work). Then I realize I'm stuck with 6 different
> programs to handle ess
[David Benfell wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 7/25/03 12:44 PM]
> It does other things as well. A starting place for more information
> would be http://www.djbdns.org/
actually that's now http://www.tinydns.org/ now.
<-->
george donnelly ~ http://www.zettai.net/ ~ "Quality Zope Hosting"
Shared an
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:54:15 +0200, Peter Rosa wrote:
> >> And what should I do with my new book
> >> (900 pages about configuring this mega program) ?
> >
> >900 pages about configuring which mega program?
>
> Of course, it is about sendmail.
>
To my knowledge, the only reason for using sendmai
lol.
Sendmail configuration is terrible.
Some days i dream of a mail server that integrates smtp, pop and imap
into one server that is easy to configure with built in spam filtering.
(oh and it has to work). Then I realize I'm stuck with 6 different
programs to handle essentially 1 service (
>> And what should I do with my new book
>> (900 pages about configuring this mega program) ?
>
>900 pages about configuring which mega program?
Of course, it is about sendmail.
Peter Rosa
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
When I posted earlier, I was referring to bind 9. It is a complete
rewrite..
bind 4 was terrible.
As for sendmail, from my understanding the biggest problem in the past
was that the entire thing ran as root. Didn't they setup the delivery
agent in 8.12 to run as a different user with lower p
> > Well, but what about djbdns ?
> > Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
> > I think it is, as you use it :-)
> > I have never heard about it.
>
>
> no, try powerdns instead :)
Depends on what he means by compatible. I took this to mean "will it
communicate with bind servers" and the answer is "ye
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:06:50 +0200, Peter Rosa wrote:
> Well, but what about djbdns ?
> Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
> I think it is, as you use it :-)
> I have never heard about it.
>
djbdns does two things which may be of interest to you:
1) It is a secure, rock-solid alternative to BIND,
> > Well, but what about djbdns ?
>
> Decent program, but the license is awful.
yeah, the licence is wierd.
>
> > Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
>
> No, it is not. The configuration is not even remotely close, and the author
> refuses to support parts of the RFC that he feels to be problemati
> Well, but what about djbdns ?
> Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
> I think it is, as you use it :-)
> I have never heard about it.
>
It's complient with whatever standards there are governing DNS. And it
works very well for me.
Ken
___
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:06:50 +0200
"Peter Rosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, but what about djbdns ?
> Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
> I think it is, as you use it :-)
> I have never heard about it.
no, try powerdns instead :)
___
[EMAIL PRO
At 2003-07-25T16:54:22Z, Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a big program with lots of past exploits, and new ones being
> discovered very often.
No comment about old versions. Do you think that BIND 9 is as bad?
--
Kirk Strauser
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
At 2003-07-25T17:06:50Z, "Peter Rosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, but what about djbdns ?
Decent program, but the license is awful.
> Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
No, it is not. The configuration is not even remotely close, and the author
refuses to support parts of the RFC that
Well, but what about djbdns ?
Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
I think it is, as you use it :-)
I have never heard about it.
And what should I do with my new book
(900 pages about configuring this mega program) ?
Peter Rosa
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mai
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Rosa
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:30 AM
> To: freebsd-questions
> Subject: What version of BSD should I use
> Importance: High
>
>
> Hello everybody,
>
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
