On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:10:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 10/7/04 1:15:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:41:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscurity > Kris > > writes: > > Well, it's vast :) > > Kris > > We're waiting..5.3 is in beta and ready for your tests. Other benchmarks > > show very good results compared to 4.x. > > > > Kris > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > Quite a bunch of scientists on the FreeBSD team these days, eh? :) > > > > why don't you post some of these impressive benchmarks to substantiate > > your seemingly flimsy position? On a single processor system please, for > > the 99% of us who don't use SMP. Hopefully the only good reason to run > > 5.x won't be if you run 4 processor systems. > > Already done so. > > Kris > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Is it really too difficult for you to post a pointer or reference for those > of us who > don't have the time to spend our entire lives reading mailing lists archives?
Uh, it was in a reply to your message. Kris
pgpErcHlXTq1y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
