The same as in 9-STABLE?
$ cc -v
FreeBSD clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) 20120523
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0
Thread model: posix
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/version
There are two advantages that come to mind quickly.
With amd64 you could install more than 4 gigs of ram and have it
recognized. With i386 if you need to do this pae would need to be
installed, which FreeBSD doc pages say is if beta quality.
I bet that amd64 will get more dev attention.
On Jun 1
On 11/06/2012 07:20, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I have a number of servers that I am about to upgrade to FreeBSD 9.0.
> The processors all have the ability to run i386 or amd64. The
> machines all have 2 GB memory which is more than adequate for their
> intended use. Some of these are replacing very ol
Tim Dunphy wrote:
> I will put /usr/local/libexec/ on my path when I get a chance ...
This is not necessarily a good idea. Usually things are installed
into libexec instead of into bin to keep them _out of_ the path.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
That did it!!!
[bluethu...@lbsd2:~]#pkg_info | grep openldap
openldap-sasl-client-2.4.23 Open source LDAP client implementation with SASL2
support
openldap-sasl-server-2.4.23 Open source LDAP server implementation
I will put /usr/local/libexec/ on my path when I get a chance btw, thanks for
me
Hi,
> [r...@lbsd2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#/usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd -V
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd: unknown directive '-V'.
> Usage: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd
> [fast|force|one](start|stop|restart|rcvar|status|poll)
> [r...@lbsd2:/usr/home/bluethundr]#su - root
> Password:
> Last login: Thu Nov 4 1
On 12/05/2010 06:25, Lacsap Ona wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to download the FreeBSD but am unsure which version to download.
> I have a Pentium dual core t4200 processor.
>
> thanks
>
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.f
2010/5/11 Lacsap Ona :
> Hello,
Hi welcome to the jungle :)
> I would like to download the FreeBSD but am unsure which version to download.
> I have a Pentium dual core t4200 processor.
>
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/8.0/
Dont forget read the handbook:
http://w
Lacsap Ona wrote:
Hello,
I would like to download the FreeBSD but am unsure which version to download. I
have a Pentium dual core t4200 processor.
thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
There's also a fuse-svnfs port for NetBSD, but I don't know its status,
nor if it is usable at all:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/filesystems/fuse-svnfs/
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2005-04/0210.shtml
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
_
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:34:19PM +0300, Dan Naumov wrote:
>
> I've looked at SVN and it looks reasonably easy to grok, but reading
> the "Version Control with Subversion" book... it seems there is no
> actual way to truly erase/delete/destoy/purge a part of an existing
> repository? This sounds
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:34:19 +0300, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I've looked at SVN and it looks reasonably easy to grok, but reading
> the "Version Control with Subversion" book... it seems there is no
> actual way to truly erase/delete/destoy/purge a part of an existing
> repository? This sounds rather w
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I've looked at SVN and it looks reasonably easy to grok, but reading
> the "Version Control with Subversion" book... it seems there is no
> actual way to truly erase/delete/destoy/purge a part of an existing
> repository? This sounds ra
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Gene wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:08:49 +0300, Dan Naumov wrote
>> I think I am reaching the point where I want to have some kind of
>> sane and easy to use version/revision control software for my
>> various personal files and small projects. We are talking abo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/04/2010 18:08:14, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 06:37:10PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>> I'd recommend subversion for this -- configure it using HTTPS and with
>> Apache's basic auth for access control. Use ViewVC for exploti
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:08:49 +0300, Dan Naumov wrote
> I think I am reaching the point where I want to have some kind of
> sane and easy to use version/revision control software for my
> various personal files and small projects. We are talking about
> varied kind of data, ranging from binary fo
I should have mentioned this in my previous email:
If you don't think you actually need a full-blown VCS, you can get a
certain amount of roll-back capability out of rsync too. To ensure you
get the best tools for the job, it pays to compare your actual needs with
the capabilities of the tools yo
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 06:37:10PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> I'd recommend subversion for this -- configure it using HTTPS and with
> Apache's basic auth for access control. Use ViewVC for exploting your
> repos via the web -- if you take care to set appopriate MIME types as
> properties,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/04/2010 16:08:49, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I think I am reaching the point where I want to have some kind of sane
> and easy to use version/revision control software for my various
> personal files and small projects. We are talking about varied kind
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 06:08:49PM +0300, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I think I am reaching the point where I want to have some kind of sane
> and easy to use version/revision control software for my various
> personal files and small projects. We are talking about varied kind of
> data, ranging from binar
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 06:08:49PM +0300, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I think I am reaching the point where I want to have some kind of sane
> and easy to use version/revision control software for my various
> personal files and small projects. We are talking about varied kind of
> data, ranging from binar
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I think I am reaching the point where I want to have some kind of sane
> and easy to use version/revision control software for my various
> personal files and small projects.
You're looking for a versioning file system?
http://en.wikipedia.org
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Dennis Kirschling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a customer running BSD that has been informed that he needs to
> upgrade his Apache product. I have a wealth of experience with SCO
> products but very little with BSD. The Apache that they are ope
brom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a short question, how I can determinate version of syslogd?
> FreeBSD 6.2
>
> I need version for resolve some issues.
> Thanks in advance!
For the binary:
> ident /usr/sbin/syslogd | grep syslogd
/usr/sbin/syslogd:
$FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c,v
I have a short question, how I can determinate version of syslogd?
FreeBSD 6.2
it is part of FreeBSD 6.2, there are no versions for it's components
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
brom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a short question, how I can determinate version of syslogd?
> FreeBSD 6.2
By looking at the source code, just below the copyright note:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c?rev=1.144.2.3;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup;only_with
Ham, Jason B. [C] wrote:
I have a question as to whether there is support for the free bsd
version 5.4. Please advise.
The latest and last release on the RELENG_5 branch is 5.5, 5.4 is not
supported as I understand. In any case it is a good idea to plan
migration to 6.x or 7.0. 6.x will beco
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:21:50PM -0600, Ham, Jason B. [C] wrote:
> I have a question as to whether there is support for the free bsd
> version 5.4. Please advise.
Officially, 5.4 isn't supported by the FreeBSD project anymore. See
http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html#freeze
Having said th
On 2007-09-04 22:08, Bruce Cran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that the version of top included in FreeBSD is 3.5beta12
> and a new version 3.6 was released last year (see
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/unixtop). I realise fixes and
> improvements have been made locally in the 3 yea
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bruce Cran
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Version of top included in FreeBSD
>
>
> I've noticed that the version of top included in FreeBSD is 3.5beta12
After realizing how long I made this little explanation, I decided it might
be helpful to someone if I made it available on the freebsd-questions
mailing list. List: take the following for what it's worth.
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 07:00 pm, ntkonn wrote:
> Crap amighty, I just upgraded FreeB
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 09:42, Glenn Dawson wrote:
> At 02:10 AM 7/31/2005, Justin Wert wrote:
> >To whom it may concern,
> >
> >im just a little confused, im seeing a many referances to version 6 on
> >your website, but i can't physically find it anywhere. is this a
> >version currently being worke
At 02:10 AM 7/31/2005, Justin Wert wrote:
To whom it may concern,
im just a little confused, im seeing a many referances to version 6 on
your website, but i can't physically find it anywhere. is this a
version currently being worked on? or released for certain
architectures? some more informat
On 2004-09-07 15:50, Mmaist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I\'ve looked for a macro showing FreeBSD version in sys/* but I\'ve not met
> something interesting. Somebody knows where I could find something of this
> genre?
This should print an important version number.
#include
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 08:39:58PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> Now to decide whether to change my IMAP server. Any recommendations?
Try mail/dovecot -- works very nicely for me, and seems to be able to
cope with the ideosyncracies of pretty much every commonoly used IMAP
client out there.
S
Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now to decide whether to change my IMAP server. Any recommendations?
>
> I'm using Cyrus now, but I suspect it may be paramount to using a
> shotgun to kill a gnat. I have like 3 users, and each one has a login
> anyway (to accomodate Samba shares). I
On 06/11/04 08:18 PM, Bill Moran sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I know nobody is going to "guarantee" their answer to this one, but is
> > RELENG_5_2 reliable enough for a moderately loaded system? If it is,
> > are the gains worth the supposedly l
Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone. After my CPU fan (or was it the hard drive?) spent a
> day or two screeching constantly at high frequencies (and volume), I
> finally broke down and ordered a new PC. The problem is what to
> install on it.
>
> The new system is a Dell Dim
On Monday March 31 2003, Jeff Jirsa wrote (AND Andrew Boothman concurred
with);
> apache2 is the newest version, but I'm not sure it supports
> all of the modules yet. apache13 is "stable" and well known,
> and you could probably get away with installing that.
>
Apache13 is in...serving pages a
Jeff Jirsa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Colin J. Raven wrote:
Hi all!
FINALLY got FreeBSD installed and playing nice.
Now to set some stuff up. I could use some help here if someone could
spare a few minutes
1. Apache: what version should I inst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Colin J. Raven wrote:
> Hi all!
> FINALLY got FreeBSD installed and playing nice.
> Now to set some stuff up. I could use some help here if someone could
> spare a few minutes
> 1. Apache: what version should I install from /u
HI
PHP4 can be found under /usr/ports/www/mod_php4, have a look at
www.php.net section documentation
mysql is in /usr/ports/databases/mysql see www.mysql.com for
documentation
greez moe
Von:"Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dat
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:00:52 +0200
> From: Niklas Gertoft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Version of copyright on regexp?
>
> Looking at regexp there is one copyright in the package on the
> FTP server while there is another one on the web site.
>
> In package on FTP
43 matches
Mail list logo
