On 10/21/12 18:36, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 21/10/2012 18:10, Arthur Chance wrote:
Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running
R
On 10/22/12 11:17, andrew clarke wrote:
On Sun 2012-10-21 18:10:06 UTC+0100, Arthur Chance (free...@qeng-ho.org) wrote:
Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTO
On 22/10/2012 11:57, mbsd wrote:
> I have tried it. There's my report ;)
>
> Without pkg_*, pkg2ng doesn't work.
> pkg info shows only himself (pkg-1.0.1). And I have no idea how to
> register all this stuff which I have already into pkgng database.
Correct. You need pkg_tools to run pkg2ng. Bu
I have tried it. There's my report ;)
Without pkg_*, pkg2ng doesn't work.
pkg info shows only himself (pkg-1.0.1). And I have no idea how to
register all this stuff which I have already into pkgng database.
New [re]installations from ports and directly from pkg work fine.
So for new installation
On Sun 2012-10-21 18:10:06 UTC+0100, Arthur Chance (free...@qeng-ho.org) wrote:
> Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
> it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
> delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm runnin
On 21/10/2012 18:10, Arthur Chance wrote:
> Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
> it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
> delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running
> RELEASE-9.0 on amd64 and will update
