El día Wednesday, May 08, 2013 a las 02:58:18PM -0700, Waitman Gobble escribió:
> > Please be kind and give me some hints about best options I have:
> >
> > - Do we have another Xserver in the ports to try?
> > - Should I post a bug report in our Gnats?
> > - Should I go to the lists.x.org?
> > -
"Matthias Apitz" wrote:
>
> El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 02:45:39PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
>
> > xorg-server-1.7.7_6,1 X.Org X server and related programs
> >
> > all ports are from r315646 (1st of April);
> >
> > I randomly face X11 crashes with the following symtoms:
> >
> > - the
El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 02:45:39PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
> xorg-server-1.7.7_6,1 X.Org X server and related programs
>
> all ports are from r315646 (1st of April);
>
> I randomly face X11 crashes with the following symtoms:
>
> - the display is filled with some colored patt
On 20/11/2012 19:18, Hooman Oroojeni wrote:
Try to rebuild Xorg with WITHOUT_NOUVEAU. That maybe helpfull.
Cheers
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:38 PM, David Demelier
mailto:demelier.da...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi there,
Sometimes, Xorg got stuck but I can't reproduce it always. When it
On 20/11/2012 20:11, David Demelier wrote:
On 20/11/2012 19:18, Hooman Oroojeni wrote:
Try to rebuild Xorg with WITHOUT_NOUVEAU. That maybe helpfull.
Cheers
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:38 PM, David Demelier
mailto:demelier.da...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi there,
Sometimes, Xorg got stuck bu
On 20/11/2012 19:18, Hooman Oroojeni wrote:
Try to rebuild Xorg with WITHOUT_NOUVEAU. That maybe helpfull.
Cheers
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:38 PM, David Demelier
mailto:demelier.da...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi there,
Sometimes, Xorg got stuck but I can't reproduce it always. When it
On 20/11/2012 19:18, Hooman Oroojeni wrote:
Try to rebuild Xorg with WITHOUT_NOUVEAU. That maybe helpfull.
Cheers
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:38 PM, David Demelier
mailto:demelier.da...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi there,
Sometimes, Xorg got stuck but I can't reproduce it always. When it
a
Try to rebuild Xorg with WITHOUT_NOUVEAU. That maybe helpfull.
Cheers
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:38 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Sometimes, Xorg got stuck but I can't reproduce it always. When it
> appears, Xorg just stop being usable and mouse / keyboard can't be used
> also, switch
I'm probably being stupid here, and I should have mentioned that I had
already tried 'man Xorg' and 'man Xsession'. I appreciate that the answer
is probably to put '-nolisten tcp' somewhere, but where?
As far as I can see, XDM invokes /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession, which
at Xservers file
s
Xorg -nolisten tcp to disable at all
to disable wan only use firewall
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Walter Hurry wrote:
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE
I think Xorg is listening on external addresses:
$ sockstat -46 |grep Xorg
root Xorg 1573 1 tcp6 *:6000*:*
root Xorg 1573
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:05:50 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, June 25, 2012 a las 09:58:37PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
> escribió:
>
>> El día Monday, June 25, 2012 a las 07:51:02PM +, Walter Hurry
>> escribió:
>>
>> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:22:57 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> >
El día Monday, June 25, 2012 a las 09:58:37PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
> El día Monday, June 25, 2012 a las 07:51:02PM +, Walter Hurry escribió:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:22:57 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > > $ man Xorg | col -b | fgrep -- -nolisten
> >
> > Thanks for the p
El día Monday, June 25, 2012 a las 07:51:02PM +, Walter Hurry escribió:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:22:57 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> > $ man Xorg | col -b | fgrep -- -nolisten
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> I'm probably being stupid here, and I should have mentioned that I had
> alread
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:22:57 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> $ man Xorg | col -b | fgrep -- -nolisten
Thanks for the pointer.
I'm probably being stupid here, and I should have mentioned that I had
already tried 'man Xorg' and 'man Xsession'. I appreciate that the answer
is probably to put '-nol
El día Monday, June 25, 2012 a las 06:58:25PM +, Walter Hurry escribió:
> $ netstat -a|grep x11
> tcp4 0 0 *.x11 *.*LISTEN
> tcp6 0 0 *.x11 *.*LISTEN
>
> I'm new to FreeBSD, but if I interpret this
Hi,
On Saturday 14 April 2012 15:53:16 Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, April 13, 2012 a las 08:10:09PM +0700, Erich Dollansky
> escribió:
>
> > I did but it is too short to see the error. After creating this file, I
> > tried to close X and got into the usual problems. It seems that X do
El día Friday, April 13, 2012 a las 08:10:09PM +0700, Erich Dollansky escribió:
> I did but it is too short to see the error. After creating this file, I tried
> to close X and got into the usual problems. It seems that X does not switch
> properly back to console video mode (whatever name it ha
Hi,
On Friday 13 April 2012 14:18:32 Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, April 13, 2012 a las 01:34:53PM +0700, Erich Dollansky
> escribió:
>
> > On Friday 13 April 2012 12:24:04 Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > El día Friday, April 13, 2012 a las 11:50:39AM +0700, Erich Dollansky
> > > escribió:
El día Friday, April 13, 2012 a las 01:34:53PM +0700, Erich Dollansky escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 13 April 2012 12:24:04 Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día Friday, April 13, 2012 a las 11:50:39AM +0700, Erich Dollansky
> > escribió:
> >
> >
> > Please show your ~/.xinitrc and ~/.xserverrc; min
Hi,
On Friday 13 April 2012 12:24:04 Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Friday, April 13, 2012 a las 11:50:39AM +0700, Erich Dollansky
> escribió:
>
>
> Please show your ~/.xinitrc and ~/.xserverrc; mine look like this:
I do not have an .xserverrc. The .xinitrc looks like this without the comments
El día Friday, April 13, 2012 a las 11:50:39AM +0700, Erich Dollansky escribió:
> > I've noticed this same behavior for a while now, when running X using
> > xinit (startx). Upon exiting my X session, the X server doesn't
> > shutdown, but has to be manually killed.
> >
> it is the same for 8.3
Hi,
On Friday 13 April 2012 09:10:22 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:00 -0300
> Gabriel Marchi wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I´m running 9.0-RELEASE on my laptop, everything works fine, except
> > when I try go back to console I get a black screen.
> >
> > dmesg: http://pastebi
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:00 -0300
Gabriel Marchi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I´m running 9.0-RELEASE on my laptop, everything works fine, except
> when I try go back to console I get a black screen.
>
> dmesg: http://pastebin.com/U45duS5n
> xorg.conf: http://pastebin.com/qERavJs0
> Xorg.0.log: http://pa
Hello first of all. This is my first post here.. a test..
i stream on line as i read todays post. So about xorg file cause i make 6
months with nvidia 9200fx let talk first for the card. second there is no
xorg need it so u can back up and delete it, and test you X with xrandr -q
man xrandr and mor
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Apr 6, 2012 10:40 AM, wrote:
>
> This is 9.0-RELEASE with all else installed via pkg_add. Xorg is 7.5.1; xdm is
1.1.11. When logging out or terminating Xorg the screen flashes a line that is
the
login pattern at the top of the screen. The rest of th
On Apr 6, 2012 10:40 AM, wrote:
>
> This is 9.0-RELEASE with all else installed via pkg_add. Xorg is 7.5.1;
xdm is 1.1.11. When logging out or terminating Xorg the screen flashes a
line that is the login pattern at the top of the screen. The rest of the
screen is black. ctrl-alt-F1 switches to the
On 12/21/11 07:39, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
The laptop is a compaq cq62 with a quad core phenom and a ATI 4200
Radeon mobility GPU, as well as 6300 GPU.
Sorry, I can't find any specs for a CQ62 with both ATI and NVidia.
There's a trademark name for the dual GPU
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
The laptop is a compaq cq62 with a quad core phenom and a ATI 4200 Radeon
mobility GPU, as well as 6300 GPU.
Sorry, I can't find any specs for a CQ62 with both ATI and NVidia.
There's a trademark name for the dual GPU systems, at least the
Intel-plus-somet
On 12/20/11 14:33, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
Some newer laptops have dual GPUs, an onboard Intel combined with
one from another vendor for higher performance. There's
hot-switching between the two, but AFAIK it's not supported in
FreeBSD. There may be a BIOS op
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
Some newer laptops have dual GPUs, an onboard Intel combined with one from
another vendor for higher performance. There's hot-switching between the
two, but AFAIK it's not supported in FreeBSD. There may be a BIOS option
to disable one or the other. There
On 12/20/11 03:05, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
On 12/19/11 21:31, Da Rock wrote:
I hate to come with this kind of a query, but my googling hasn't
come across a satisfactory answer.
I'm running an install on a brand new laptop for a client, and I'm
trying to get X
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
On 12/19/11 21:31, Da Rock wrote:
I hate to come with this kind of a query, but my googling hasn't come
across a satisfactory answer.
I'm running an install on a brand new laptop for a client, and I'm trying
to get X up using xdm- nothing. The logs says it
On 12/19/11 21:31, Da Rock wrote:
I hate to come with this kind of a query, but my googling hasn't come
across a satisfactory answer.
I'm running an install on a brand new laptop for a client, and I'm
trying to get X up using xdm- nothing. The logs says it failed to load
fbdev because there i
Yuri writes:
> I saw this with firefox, now I see the same with chrome.
>
> After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, Xorg
> begins to consume 100% CPU and all graphics apps get
> sluggish. Quitting the browser brings situation back to normal.
[...]
Have you tried to reprodu
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:03 AM, wrote:
> "C. P. Ghost" wrote:
>
>> ... when mplayer plays some (rare) video files.
>>
>> Xorg then stays at 100% CPU, and it is impossible to kill it,
>> neither from the inside, nor from the outside (logged in via
>> ssh) with SIGKILL. Only a reboot helps here.
"C. P. Ghost" wrote:
> ... when mplayer plays some (rare) video files.
>
> Xorg then stays at 100% CPU, and it is impossible to kill it,
> neither from the inside, nor from the outside (logged in via
> ssh) with SIGKILL. Only a reboot helps here.
An unkillable process is almost certainly hung in
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, C. P. Ghost wrote:
Running:
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 r222832 amd64
with
xorg-server-1.7.7_1,1
xorg-drivers-7.5.1
and the radeonhd driver:
radeonhd is defunct. Everything it does should be done better by the
radeon driver from xf86-video-ati.
_
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Yuri wrote:
> I saw this with firefox, now I see the same with chrome.
>
> After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, Xorg begins
> to consume 100% CPU and all graphics apps get sluggish. Quitting the browser
> brings situation back to normal.
>
Its confirmed dead with 20 - 60 blocks un referenced i nodes in HDD.
I had to fsck -y using option 4 from boot menu ( the single user mode).
And I thing as Unix it should not be able to that right?
Its happening tried this that etc.
In the process I found that doing "Xorg -config xorg.conf.new
-
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Maybe of no relevance, but I think the
default for "Xorg -config xorg.conf.new" is to show
blank screen. You have to type CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE to
get back to the terminal.
Depending on key mapping, that may not work. But ctrl-alt-f1 to switch
back
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:32:32PM +, Aftab Jahan Subedar wrote:
> Xorg -configure
> Xorg -config xorg.conf.new
>
> After doing that on Toshiba Tecra A1 FreeBSD 8.2 Stable.
> FreeBSD totally hanged + hard boot few times.
> Hence stressing and fdisking with y option every try.
>
> Any one suce
On 03/08/11 19:32, Roland Smith wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:16:05PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
Since the last update of Xorg stuff, including the
xf86-video-ati-6.14.0, the video performance of all of our
AMD/ATi-driven boxes went worse.
The bad performance also occur with the recommendatio
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:16:05PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since the last update of Xorg stuff, including the
> xf86-video-ati-6.14.0, the video performance of all of our
> AMD/ATi-driven boxes went worse.
> The bad performance also occur with the recommendations made in
> ports/UPDATING for
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Thanks. The [latest] BIOS has one VGA option:
Video DAC Snoop Controls how VGA and graphics devices on the PCI or AGP
bus respond to palette register accesses.
* On - forces VGA and graphics device
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Thanks. The [latest] BIOS has one VGA option:
Video DAC Snoop Controls how VGA and graphics devices on the PCI or AGP
bus respond to palette register accesses.
* On - forces VGA and graphics devices to snoop VGA palette register
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Fbsd8 wrote:
doug wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, doug wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use t
doug wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, doug wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to
my D
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, doug wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to
my Dell PE300 bui
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to
my Dell PE300 built in the last century. I was told
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:08:23 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
> When I slid froward from FreeBSD 7.2 and Xorg (whatever) to 8.0 and
> xorg-7.4_4 I lost the ability to use the graphics card I had added to
> my Dell PE300 built in the last century. I was told the ability to
> have two card
Dear William,
excellent! The patch you pointed me to works for me too. Thank you
so much for your help, I am going to send an email to the port
maintainers to see whether they can fix this in the ports tree.
very best
giuseppe
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:43 PM, William Bulley wrote:
> Accordin
According to Giuseppe Pagnoni on Mon, 10/11/10 at 10:57:
>
> thank you very much for your reply, it does seem to be the same type
> of bug. However, and I apologize for being dense here, it is not
> immediate to me how to proceed practically to apply the patch from
> within the ports framework.
Dear William,
thank you very much for your reply, it does seem to be the same type
of bug. However, and I apologize for being dense here, it is not
immediate to me how to proceed practically to apply the patch from
within the ports framework. Also, I still wonder why the patch hasn't
been incorp
Giuseppe Pagnoni wrote:
>
> I am resending this because it seems to me a really critical bug
> (prevents you from using OpenMotif or lesstif applications), but
> apparently nothing has been changed since last july. Upgrading xorg
> to 1.7.7 does fix the problem, but I wonder if this may cause
> d
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 04:11:27PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> I used make install as I had no way of knowing that additional drivers
> >> could be selected. Perhaps that should be an option to the sysinstall
> >> program when FBSD is initially being installed.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, people can't gu
>> I used make install as I had no way of knowing that additional drivers
>> could be selected. Perhaps that should be an option to the sysinstall
>> program when FBSD is initially being installed.
>>
>
> Yes, people can't guess what are the names of the drivers, it's in my
> opinion a problem for
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 07:17:48AM -0700, Fred Boatwright wrote:
> >
> > For x11/xorg-minimal installation you issued the command:
> >
> > "make install" or "make install VIDEO_DRIVER=your_video_driver" ?
> >
> > Without the mention of the driver it installs the vesa driver only.
> > This is sub
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending
it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following
link:
[1]Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Webmaste
On 08/23/10 16:59, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 7:53 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
First, let's try the "vesa" thing.
Eureka! I changed Driver to "vesa" in both of the "Device" sections and
X now loads. I doubt that "vesa" is the ideal entry in the
configuration, but at this point I'm not going
On 8/23/10 7:53 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> First, let's try the "vesa" thing.
>>
>
> Eureka! I changed Driver to "vesa" in both of the "Device" sections and
> X now loads. I doubt that "vesa" is the ideal entry in the
> configuration, but at this point I'm not going to complain.
>
Great. It
On 08/23/10 16:33, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 7:01 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Ok, one quick question. When your screen goes blank, can you
[ctrl][alt][fN] to a different TTY, where N is anything between 2-7?
I'm curious about the machine's state when you start X.
No, when the screen goes bl
On 8/23/10 7:33 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> In addition, it might be helpful to build debugging options into your
> GENERIC kernel. If you're willing to go down this path, I'll help you
> get set up,
I should mention, though - I used to have issues with the nVidia driver
putting my machine in an unu
On 8/23/10 7:01 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> Ok, one quick question. When your screen goes blank, can you
>> [ctrl][alt][fN] to a different TTY, where N is anything between 2-7?
>> I'm curious about the machine's state when you start X.
>>
>
> No, when the screen goes blank the whole computer free
On 08/23/10 15:31, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 5:51 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
On 8/23/10 5:51 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>>>
>>> I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
>>> was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
>>> install. The screen goe
On 08/23/10 14:34, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
install. The screen goes blank and the computer freezes, just as
happens when
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot. The version of PCBSD that I had installed on the Thinkpad
was the legacy version. The latest version, PCBSD 8.1, won't
install. The screen goes blank and the computer freezes, just as
happens when trying to install X11 with FreeBSD 8.1
On 08/23/10 12:11, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot to mention that previous to my installing 8.1 I had PCBSD
8.1 installed just to check it out (no likee), and the PCBSD
installer had no problem configuring X. Unfortunately, I don't have
a copy of that
On 08/23/10 12:14, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 3:08 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Dev
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:08:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block
wrote:
Interesting, two device sections. Some notebooks actually do have two
video cards, although the R51 might not and this might just be
misdetected.
Doesn't have to be - maybe it's one VGA and
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
On 08/23/10 10:51, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Here is the xorg.conf that was created by Xorg -configure:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:08:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block
wrote:
> Interesting, two device sections. Some notebooks actually do have two
> video cards, although the R51 might not and this might just be
> misdetected.
Doesn't have to be - maybe it's one VGA and one DVI output? It's also
possible
On 8/23/10 3:08 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
>> Section "Device"
>> Identifier "Card0"
>> Driver "intel"
>> VendorName "Intel Corporation"
>> BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device"
>> BusID
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
I forgot to mention that previous to my installing 8.1 I had PCBSD 8.1
installed just to check it out (no likee), and the PCBSD installer had
no problem configuring X. Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of that
xorg.conf.
PCBSD has a live mode to ru
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device"
BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier
On 08/23/10 10:59, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:51 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&confi
On 08/23/10 10:51, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
Here is the xo
On 8/23/10 1:51 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>>
>>> The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
>>> xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
>>>
>>> http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
On 8/23/10 1:44 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
>> The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
>> xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
>>
>> http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
>>
>>
>
> Here is the xorg.conf that was cre
The R51 should have Mobility Radeon 7500 or 9000 graphics. Here's the
xorg.conf from my T42 with a 7500:
http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/index.html?action=show_config&config=xconfig&laptop=12947
Here is the xorg.conf that was created by Xorg -configure:
---
On 08/23/10 09:21, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on
this new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program,
copyin
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so on my
Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this new 8.1
installation, and have run the xorg configure program, copying the
xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11 as x
On 8/23/10 11:53 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/23/10 11:44 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>> Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
>> on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this
>> new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program,
On 8/23/10 11:44 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> Thanks to the list X11 is now running perfectly on my desktop; not so
> on my Thinkpad R51. Here's what's happening. I installed xorg on this
> new 8.1 installation, and have run the xorg configure program, copying
> the xorg.conf.new file to /etc/X11
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Fred Boatwright wrote:
Until FBSD X is working on the pc I have to use Netscape 4.79 on
a Sun running Solaris 2.6 (which I would prefer to keep using if
only a modern browser was available) ...
If the problems with X on FBSD are limited to the X "server"
Fred Boatwright wrote:
> Until FBSD X is working on the pc I have to use Netscape 4.79 on
> a Sun running Solaris 2.6 (which I would prefer to keep using if
> only a modern browser was available) ...
If the problems with X on FBSD are limited to the X "server"
(display subsystem), perhaps you ca
Frank Shute wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 07:19:36PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday 22 August 2010 06:22:48 Fred Boatwright wrote:
> > > The .xinitrc file:
> > > xrdb
> > > xsetroot -solid gray &
> > > xterm -geometry +0-100 &
> > > xconsole -geometry -0+0 -fn 5x7 &
> > >
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 07:19:36PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>
> On Sunday 22 August 2010 06:22:48 Fred Boatwright wrote:
> > The .xinitrc file:
> > xrdb
> > xsetroot -solid gray &
> > xterm -geometry +0-100 &
> > xconsole -geometry -0+0 -fn 5x7 &
> > #exec olvwm #complained about a missin
On Sunday 22 August 2010 06:22:48 Fred Boatwright wrote:
> The .xinitrc file:
> xrdb
> xsetroot -solid gray &
> xterm -geometry +0-100 &
> xconsole -geometry -0+0 -fn 5x7 &
> #exec olvwm #complained about a missing font
> exec fvwm
Is this file executable?
signature.asc
Description: This
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 07:42:35 -0700
Fred Boatwright articulated:
> Hi Jerry,
> I do not have the driver you suggest on the CD. I have:
> nividia-driver
> nividia-driver-173
> nividia-driver-71
> nividia-driver-96
> Which should be used? I was not able to find the version you
> mentioned with the
Jerry wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:22:40 -0600 (MDT)
> Warren Block articulated:
>
> > Those would be the nVidia binary drivers. There's also
> > x11-drivers/xf86-video-nv. I avoid nVidia cards, so someone else
> > will have to comment on those.
>
> I came to this party late, so please e
Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>
> On Sunday 22 August 2010 06:22:48 Fred Boatwright wrote:
> > Eitan Adler wrote:
> >>> The actual problem I am having is that startx produces only a completely
> >>> black screen.  Xorg -config xorg.conf.new -retro  produces the expected
> >>> grid and mouse pointer. Â A
Marc Fonvieille wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 07:41:49PM -0700, Fred Boatwright wrote:
> > Warren Block wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Warren Block wrote:
> > >
> > > > Log file is at http://wonkity.com/~wblock/tmp/Xorg.0.log
> > >
> > > First notes:
> > >
> > > You're running the ol
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:22:40 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block articulated:
> Those would be the nVidia binary drivers. There's also
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-nv. I avoid nVidia cards, so someone else
> will have to comment on those.
I came to this party late, so please excuse me if this has been
discu
On Sunday 22 August 2010 06:22:48 Fred Boatwright wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> The actual problem I am having is that startx produces only a completely
>>> black screen.  Xorg -config xorg.conf.new -retro  produces the expected
>>> grid and mouse pointer. Â A .xinitrc file is supposed to start
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 07:41:49PM -0700, Fred Boatwright wrote:
> Warren Block wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Warren Block wrote:
> >
> > > Log file is at http://wonkity.com/~wblock/tmp/Xorg.0.log
> >
> > First notes:
> >
> > You're running the old version of X, 1.6.1.
> >
> > Something
in message <4c70a618.d6d35...@blakemfg.com>,
wrote Fred Boatwright thusly...
>
> The .xinitrc file:
> xrdb
> xsetroot -solid gray &
> xterm -geometry +0-100 &
> xconsole -geometry -0+0 -fn 5x7 &
> #exec olvwm #complained about a missing font
> exec fvwm
...
> I don't understand why xterm and
Eitan Adler wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Fred Boatwright wrote:
> > Eitan Adler wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Something odd is going on with some of the fonts.
> >> >
> >> > I installed ports/x11/xorg-minimal as the full Monty appeared to be a
> >> > huge amount of software that will never
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Fred Boatwright wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>> >> Something odd is going on with some of the fonts.
>> >
>> > I installed ports/x11/xorg-minimal as the full Monty appeared to be a
>> > huge amount of software that will never get used. Ā I don't want all the
>>
Eitan Adler wrote:
>
> >> Something odd is going on with some of the fonts.
> >
> > I installed ports/x11/xorg-minimal as the full Monty appeared to be a
> > huge amount of software that will never get used. Â I don't want all the
> > stuff for gnome and kde as I will never use them.
> >
> > It ap
1 - 100 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
