Re: Portupgrade status

2011-01-05 Thread Jud
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:04:03 -0500, Warren Block wrote: On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote: No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild ports taht have already been built on this run (I believe from reading man portmaster). The

Re: Portupgrade status

2011-01-04 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote: No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild ports taht have already been built on this run (I believe from reading man portmaster). The -R flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which the named

Re: Portupgrade status

2011-01-04 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote: > No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild > ports taht have already been built on this run (I > believe from reading man portmaster). The -R > flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which > the named port depends > -R > --upward-recursi

Re: Portupgrade status

2011-01-03 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:51:48PM -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote: > No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild > ports taht have already been built on this run (I > believe from reading man portmaster). The -R > flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which > the named port depends

Re: Portupgrade status

2011-01-03 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 3 January 2011 18:39, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ill...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: >> > so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool >> > recommended over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgr

Re: Portupgrade status

2011-01-03 Thread Chris Brennan
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ill...@gmail.com wrote: > On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > > so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool > recommended over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my > ports soon and in the 18 months i've bee

Re: Portupgrade status

2011-01-03 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool recommended > over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my ports soon and   > in the 18 months i've been using FreeBSD i've always used portupgrade but > sounds l

Re: Portupgrade status

2011-01-03 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool recommended over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my ports soon and in the 18 months i've been using FreeBSD i've always used portupgrade but sounds like it's best to change now. jamie

Re: Portupgrade status

2010-12-27 Thread doug
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 27/12/2010 01:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Rob" == Rob Farmer writes: Rob> Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for Rob> over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On Rob> the other hand, Doug

Re: Portupgrade status

2010-12-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 27/12/2010 01:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >> "Rob" == Rob Farmer writes: > > Rob> Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for > Rob> over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On > Rob> the other hand, Doug Barton has been very responsive to

Re: Portupgrade status

2010-12-26 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Randal L. Schwartz on Sunday, 26 December 2010: > > "Rob" == Rob Farmer writes: > > Rob> Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for > Rob> over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On > Rob> the other hand, Doug Barton has been very respo

Re: Portupgrade status

2010-12-26 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Rob" == Rob Farmer writes: Rob> Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for Rob> over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On Rob> the other hand, Doug Barton has been very responsive to issues with Rob> portmaster and fixed this problem less

Re: Portupgrade status [Was Re: Portmaster general questions and problems]

2010-12-26 Thread Rob Farmer
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 13:42, Bob Hall wrote: > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:39:58AM -0800, Ron (Lists) wrote: >> But, due to portupgrade no longer being maintained and failing to work >> anymore, > > I'm a bit confused about this. I did a quick google search and saw that > someone had stopped main

Portupgrade status [Was Re: Portmaster general questions and problems]

2010-12-26 Thread Bob Hall
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:39:58AM -0800, Ron (Lists) wrote: > But, due to portupgrade no longer being maintained and failing to work > anymore, I'm a bit confused about this. I did a quick google search and saw that someone had stopped maintaining portupgrade, but I also saw things that suggeste