On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
>
> Adam Vande More wrote:
> >
> > > It does seem like a bit
> > > of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
> > > gone. Seems like it could do the others.
> > >
> >
&
On Mon 14 Oct 2013 Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 14 oct 2013, Warren Block wrote:
> >> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Actually, the last time I updated my po
Adam Vande More wrote:
>
> > It does seem like a bit
> > of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
> > gone. Seems like it could do the others.
> >
>
> So it should continue on and potentially build 1000's of ports with broken
> linki
t port. It does seem like a bit
of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
gone. Seems like it could do the others.
Some of them. It could not update any ports that depend on missing
ports, which conflicts with the "-a" meaning "all".
If you have ports that f
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
>
>
> I understand why portmaster quits that port.
Because it has no choice.
> It does seem like a bit
> of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
> gone. Seems like it could do the others.
>
So
ase-f10. portmaster sees no way to upgrade that port, so
> evidently it quits.
I understand why portmaster quits that port. It does seem like a bit
of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
gone. Seems like it could do the others.
> If you have ports that far out of date
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm not s
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
> > reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
> > past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
> > involving deleted p
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
Hi,
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm no
Hi,
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm not sure how to deal with this
easily. If the po
Cool, thanks Mark. Guess that's also a reason to learn new pkg tools.
.
On 2013-08-31, at 1:41 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013, at 14:19, Dale Scott wrote:
>> I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to
>> reduce
>>
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013, at 14:19, Dale Scott wrote:
> I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to
> reduce
> ports in use and simplify system updating (deleting postfix with
> pkg_delete). Is it possible that deleting postfix will leave ports
> installe
I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to reduce
ports in use and simplify system updating (deleting postfix with
pkg_delete). Is it possible that deleting postfix will leave ports installed
that aren't required anymore? Will pkg_delete also delete any dependenci
t;> installation. The package was downloaded automatically and it exists in
>>> /usr/ports/distfiles, yet it keeps giving an error stating that the file
>>> doesn't exist.
>>>
>>> Please help.
>>> *Harpreet Singh Chawla*
>>> __
tomatically and it exists in
> /usr/ports/distfiles, yet it keeps giving an error stating that the file
> doesn't exist.
>
> Please help.
> *Harpreet Singh Chawla*
> ___
>
No idea about virtualbox port, but have you tried dele
I have been trying to install virtualbox support for my FreeBSD 9.1. A
package named v4l_compat-1.0.20120501.tar.gz is causing problems in the
installation. The package was downloaded automatically and it exists in
/usr/ports/distfiles, yet it keeps giving an error stating that the file
doesn&#
On 27/08/2013 13:04, Koslov Sergey wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've noticed that many ports are using ${.CURDIR}/../../some/port
> construction in their Makefiles.
>
> But if you copy on of these ports elsewhere it won't work as expected
> because of the relative path.
Hello
I've noticed that many ports are using ${.CURDIR}/../../some/port
construction in their Makefiles.
But if you copy on of these ports elsewhere it won't work as expected
because of the relative path.
Shouldn't they use ${PORTSDIR}/some/port instead?
Thanks for the r
* to clear
everything out and then reinstall all of the ports?
If you've had WITH_PKGNG="YES" ever since the server was built then you
shouldn't have any of the old-style pkg_tools entries in /var/db/pkg.
Unless, that is, you've been using pkg_add(1) directly. Don't d
n reinstall all of the ports?
If you've had WITH_PKGNG="YES" ever since the server was built then you
shouldn't have any of the old-style pkg_tools entries in /var/db/pkg.
Unless, that is, you've been using pkg_add(1) directly. Don't do that.
You just end up wi
On 08/06/2013 11:58 am, Paul Macdonald wrote:
On 06/08/2013 17:25, dweimer wrote:
I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing
I forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is
finding vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed on the
On 06/08/2013 17:25, dweimer wrote:
I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing
I forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is
finding vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed on
the system. These may have been installed at one
I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing I
forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is finding
vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed on the system.
These may have been installed at one point and removed. Firefox is
one
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:47:47AM -0400, Carmel wrote:
> I am having a problem updating some ports since installing the
> "print/texlive-full" port a few days ago. I have: "TEX_DEFAULT=texlive"
> sans quotes at the top of my "/etc/make.conf" file.
>
[..
I am having a problem updating some ports since installing the
"print/texlive-full" port a few days ago. I have: "TEX_DEFAULT=texlive"
sans quotes at the top of my "/etc/make.conf" file.
For instance, the "en-freebsd-doc-42326,1", and in fact all of the
*-
On 13/07/2013 11:17, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> 2013-07-12 13:25, Leslie Jensen skrev:
>>
>> When I run
>>
>> portsnap fetch update
>>
>> pkg version -vIL=
>>
>>
>> It returns
>>
>> pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports
2013-07-12 13:25, Leslie Jensen skrev:
When I run
portsnap fetch update
pkg version -vIL=
It returns
pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory
The directory is there and I can list the contents.
What's going on?
Thanks
/L
When I run
portsnap fetch update
pkg version -vIL=
It returns
pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory
The directory is there and I can list the contents.
What's going on?
Thanks
/Leslie
___
freebsd-ques
Is anyone else having problems installing pear with PHP 5.5? Or do I
just have a misconfiguration on my system that is causing the install
process to look at my /tmp directory. My ports tree is updated to svn
revision 322502, and the system is running FreeBSD 9.1p4, so everything
is up to
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
>> On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>>
>>> If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
>>> own ports index based on yo
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>
>> If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
>> own ports index based on your own local ports tree. At least you can
>> set it up how you wa
On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
own ports index based on your own local ports tree. At least you can
set it up how you want.
a simple quick-together script running on my computer:
https://dx.burplex.com/FreeBSD
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:08:15 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
>
>> I can not get current version of the ports system.
>> The ports web page http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
>> is almost 2 years out of date. Says the port I am
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:08:15 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote:
I can not get current version of the ports system.
The ports web page http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
is almost 2 years out of date. Says the port I am interested in is at
1.7 version when just 2 weeks ago it was at 2.2. Portsnap is also messed
I can not get current version of the ports system.
The ports web page http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
is almost 2 years out of date. Says the port I am interested in is at
1.7 version when just 2 weeks ago it was at 2.2. Portsnap is also messed
up showing the 1.7 version
On Tue, 28 May 2013 15:06:15 +0200
Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 28/05/2013 ? 14:50:25+0700, Olivier Nicole a écrit
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or
> > > easyinstall (python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or
> >
Albert,
> > > I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
> > > (python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ?
> > As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.
> Me too. But what you do when you cannot ? (Like the po
15b3
> rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
> vendor = 'Mellanox Technologies'
> device = 'MT27500 Family [ConnectX-3]'
> class = network
>
> I want to create Bond on the two ports (ib0 and ib1) of this device:
>
> [root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig
>
Le 28/05/2013 ? 14:50:25+0700, Olivier Nicole a écrit
> Hi,
>
> > I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
> > (python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ?
>
> As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.
Me t
;MT27500 Family [ConnectX-3]'
class = network
I want to create Bond on the two ports (ib0 and ib1) of this device:
[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=209b
ether 00:50:56:23:1e:06
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe23:1e06%em0
Hi,
> I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
> (python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ?
As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.
But I am using mostly Perl and CPAN is very well integrated in FreeBSD
ports.
Voila.
O
Hi everybody,
I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
(python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ?
For exemple when you want install some software with lots of dependances
you can use (if the software use easy_install) just one
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Ed Flecko wrote:
Since I want to know the "correct" way (or one of I'm sure many correct
ways) of initially installing the OS and then getting it up to date (and
staying up to date), can you tell me what I did wrong and/or what I might
want to do differently?
A short overv
t; want to do differently?
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> On 27/05/2013 19:00, Ed Flecko wrote:
>> > Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
>> >
>> > :-)
>> >
>> > I thought I was using s
013 at 11:16 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 27/05/2013 19:00, Ed Flecko wrote:
> > Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date, but
> > pkg_version seems to disagree.
> &g
On 27/05/2013 19:00, Ed Flecko wrote:
> Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
>
> :-)
>
> I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date, but
> pkg_version seems to disagree.
>
> I'm running 9.1 and I've installed ports, src, and docs
On Mon, 27 May 2013 11:00:52 -0700
Ed Flecko wrote:
> Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
>
> :-)
>
> I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date,
> but pkg_version seems to disagree.
>
> I'm running 9.1 and I've installed ports
Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
:-)
I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date, but
pkg_version seems to disagree.
I'm running 9.1 and I've installed ports, src, and docs as part of my
install. After that, I use subversion to (I thought) make sure ev
El día Wednesday, May 08, 2013 a las 02:58:18PM -0700, Waitman Gobble escribió:
> > Please be kind and give me some hints about best options I have:
> >
> > - Do we have another Xserver in the ports to try?
> > - Should I post a bug report in our Gnats?
> > -
"Matthias Apitz" wrote:
>
> El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 02:45:39PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
>
> > xorg-server-1.7.7_6,1 X.Org X server and related programs
> >
> > all ports are from r315646 (1st of April);
> >
> > I ran
El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 02:45:39PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
> xorg-server-1.7.7_6,1 X.Org X server and related programs
>
> all ports are from r315646 (1st of April);
>
> I randomly face X11 crashes with the following symtoms:
>
> - the display is fil
Hi,
I've seen that texlive has finally landed in the ports tree and as I
had a fresh and clean setup system ready I tried it out.
I tried to install texlive-full which started out okay but the last
line in my terminal is:
fmtutil: running `ptex -ini -jobname=ptex -progname=ptex ptex.ini
rmann wrote:
root@compaq:/usr/ports/finance/trytond # portlint -AC
[...]
FATAL: Package conflicts with itself. You should remove "trytond-*" from
CONFLICTS.
1 fatal error and 4 warnings found.
root@compaq:/usr/ports/finance/trytond #
So it looks like I need to explicitly specify the confl
On 21/04/2013 10:24, Matthias Petermann wrote:
> root@compaq:/usr/ports/finance/trytond # portlint -AC
> [...]
> FATAL: Package conflicts with itself. You should remove "trytond-*" from
> CONFLICTS.
> 1 fatal error and 4 warnings found.
> root@compaq:/usr/ports/financ
Hello,
I am the maintainer of most of the Tryton ports. Tryton is a python
based application framework where you can easily build your own business
modules on top. It also provides some default modules for common uses.
Currently Tryton 2.4 series is in the ports. From upstream the successor
On 17/04/2013 19:27, Andrei Brezan wrote:
> You can try:
> portupgrade -m -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES chromium
>
> From what I can see there is no update yet for the mentioned security
> vulnerability.
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
Hi Andrei
It seems there is an update in the sou
.html
Latest ports update as of 1630 UTC - 315981
I try to update it. I get:
portupgrade chromium
---> Upgrading 'chromium-25.0.1364.160' to 'chromium-25.0.1364.172'
(www/chromium)
--
Hello list,
In my daily vulnerability report, I'm seeing this:
Affected package: chromium-25.0.1364.160
Type of problem: chromium -- multiple vulnerabilities.
Reference:
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bdd48858-9656-11e2-a9a8-00262d5ed8ee.html
Latest
Andre Goree wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:52:41 -0400, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>> On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree wrote:
>>
>>> I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
>>>
>>>
>
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:52:41 -0400, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree wrote:
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion'
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:56:12 -0400, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Andre Goree writes:
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion'. This doesn't seem
Andre Goree writes:
> I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
> /usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
> 'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
> seem l
John Levine wrote:
> When I do portsnap update and try building stuff, I get errors like this:
^^
> "Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 5: warning: You are using a ports file that
> originated from CVS!! "Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6: warni
When I do portsnap update and try building stuff, I get errors like this:
"Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 5: warning: You are using a ports file that originated
from CVS!!
"Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6: warning: The FreeBSD project has switched from CVS to
SubVersion.
"Mk/bsd.port.m
On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree wrote:
> I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
> /usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
> 'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsn
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
seem like a much better tool. Perhaps I should be
On 26/03/2013 11:53, Shane Ambler wrote:
Either the man pages list is incorrect or heimdal installs a
duplicate copy of the openssl man pages - maybe this could be
disabled if openssl from ports is used.
For reference - heimdal includes source for libhcrypto which it uses if
openssl is not
On 26/03/2013 00:42, Jim Ballantine wrote:
Hi
I had removed the port, but it was reinstalled as a dependency of
other ports. I have WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in /etc/make.conf, and
after I do a pkg delete -f heimdal openssl installs fine, but when I
try to install heimdal from ports (with
On 23/03/2013 00:21, Jim Ballantine wrote:
Both openssl and heimdal install fine from the base system src, it's
only when I try to install openssl from the ports, with heimdal
installed by the base system that I get the error.
When I run make install, what I get before the conflict messa
The port is newer than the base version:
port is 1.0.1_8 and the base is 0.9.2
Both openssl and heimdal install fine from the base system src,
it's only when I try to install openssl from the ports, with heimdal
installed by the base system that I get the error.
When I run make install, w
On 22/03/2013 04:36, Jim Ballantine wrote:
But when I attempt to install the latest openssl for the
port system, it fails with a conflict (installs file in the same place)
with heimdal.
Take a close look at the message and what happens before. openssl only
gives a conflict message if the base
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:06:52 -0400
Jim Ballantine articulated:
> Hi,
>
> I understand that heimdal and openssl are both port of the base
> system and both install
> fine with a system build/install. But when I attempt to install the
> latest openssl for the
> port system, it fails with a conflic
Hi,
I understand that heimdal and openssl are both port of the base system and
both install
fine with a system build/install. But when I attempt to install the latest
openssl for the
port system, it fails with a conflict (installs file in the same place)
with heimdal. I've search
the web for an
I did something dumb I think with ports on my box. In the process of
upgrading Perl, for every package that depended on Perl, via pkgdb, I
somehow managed to delete the fact that the package depends on Perl
itself. So now I have a bunch of packages that no longer reference
Perl in it's ups
d perl since you typed make deinstall in that parent
> port tree.
>
> You can type make install in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14 to install it
> again. You don't need to reinstall FreeBSD, you're not on Windows
> here, you can repair everything :)
>
> Note: there is no perl in
On 19/03/2013 07:54, Rob Navarro wrote:
> Hi Chaps,
>
> I typed "make deinstall" within the /usr/ports/lang directory of a
> FreeBSD 9.0 and mistakenly lost Perl, Python, Ruby and a whole host of
> default compiled languages.
>
> How can I get back to the de
lang/ contains all languages and so on ruby, lua, python, perl.. Of course
you removed perl since you typed make deinstall in that parent port tree.
You can type make install in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14 to install it again.
You don't need to reinstall FreeBSD, you're not on Windows her
Hi Chaps,
I typed "make deinstall" within the /usr/ports/lang directory of a
FreeBSD 9.0 and mistakenly lost Perl, Python, Ruby and a whole host of
default compiled languages.
How can I get back to the default FreeBSD default installed language
state (with Perl installed etc)?
C
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> is there a site or other location that lists *NEW* (not updated) ports
> since a given date?
http://www.freshports.org/
has some limited options (24hrs, 48hrs, 7days, one month)...
but since the ports tree is now under SVN, it'
is there a site or other location that lists *NEW* (not updated) ports
since a given date?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ques
t; no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at
>>> the RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need non-default
>>> options or when there are no packages. Would it be possible to get the
>>> ports snapshot that was used to comp
Jeff Tipton writes:
> Thank you, Damien, for the reply. AFAIK, STABLE gets updated every 2
> weeks but not every day, and it seems to be that because of the
> intrusion, it has not been updated for long. The versions of the ports
> that come with the 9.1-RELEASE are even slightl
to make a successful
replication. As far as I understand, the streaming mechanism of
PostgreSQL 9.X expects the "slaves" to be always online, to which the
replication.
I was said that Bucardo (http://bucardo.org/) would be the tool of
choice, but FreeBSD ports seem not not have this tool. SLONY
On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no
packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the RELEASE
versions, so I only have to comp
On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no
> packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the
> RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need n
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there
are no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and
packages at the RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need
non-default options or when there are no packages. Would it be possible
to
r as I understand, the streaming mechanism of
PostgreSQL 9.X expects the "slaves" to be always online, to which the
replication.
I was said that Bucardo (http://bucardo.org/) would be the tool of
choice, but FreeBSD ports seem not not have this tool. SLONY also is a
way to complicated for my fo
On 9 February 2013 05:45, Mike Clarke wrote:
>
> I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
> started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
> were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed and
> left it to
I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed and
left it to get on with it.
The next morning I discovered that
Hello,
I run rkhunter from time to time and have warnings about the diff between
sockstat and netstat like this:
[11:33:31] Warning: Differences found between sockstat and netstat output:
[11:33:31] Sockstat output (ports in use): 0 1124 22 25 514 587
[11:33:31] Netstat output
On Sunday 03 February 2013 23:40:46 Olivier Smedts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/2/3 ajtiM :
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51.
> > I am not sure how is working:
> > I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are
Hi,
2013/2/3 ajtiM :
> Hi!
>
> I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51.
> I am not sure how is working:
> I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last time I
> saw many update for KDE 4.8.4 which "update" KDE 4.9.5 ports an
Hi!
I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51.
I am not sure how is working:
I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last time I
saw many update for KDE 4.8.4 which "update" KDE 4.9.5 ports and so on.
Does anyone knows when KDE 4.9.5 will
It were > 20 directories/files with a wrong owner.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I don't use space in filenames, I just wanted to ensure, that file names
with spaces will be handled partly correctly.
At the moment I'm not working intensively. Every once in a while I take a
look at a directory and compare it with the backups. If there's something
wrong, I manually run chow
of always starting from the beginning. ;)?
The fix to your issue is, in pseudocode:
for part in ( OS , ports ) do:
determine owner rocketmouse:* for all files
compare with list with correct owner
for each deviating file do:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:54:55 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:41:34 +0100, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > On 1/28/2013 7:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> Still not perfect, I guess I need something similar to ls -RAl for some
> >> directories :S and I didn't test what awk will do with na
I'm surprised, there's no /bin/sh for the backup:
# ls -ld /bin/sh
-r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 142952 Dec 23 18:38 /bin/sh
# ls -ld /usr/TMP4DIFF/bin/sh
ls: /usr/TMP4DIFF/bin/sh: No such file or directory
This is an error in reasoning :D. I compared the original /bin, with a
restore from
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:58:18 +0100, wrote:
mtree
I was confused, since the existing files only provide directories. Ok, I
guess I understand, I can let mtree generate new files using the backup. I
anyway need to take care about files that are missing by the backup.
Thank you.
--
Sent fr
I suspect it's less effort to use Thunar and instead of scrolling, as I
did before (when I missed some wrong owners), to switch sorting by owner
between ascending and descending, to ensure not to miss a bad owner again.
I'm surprised, there's no /bin/sh for the backup:
/bin
# find /usr/TMP4
1 - 100 of 6569 matches
Mail list logo
