Hi,
I am trying to create a virtual machine of PC-BSD release 9.1 64 bit in VMware
Workstation Version 98.02 build-1031769 based on PCBSD9.1-x64-DVD.iso
downloaded from ftp://mirrors.isc.org/pub/pcbsd/9.1/amd64/PCBSD9.1-x64-DVD.iso
in Windows 7 64 bits system. The screen resolution is
On 2012-09-28 12:06, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Mike Jeays wrote:
I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a
VirtualBox VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle,
driving up my CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle
machine. (It is an
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Mike Jeays wrote:
I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox
VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU
temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an
Intel i5 quad four). Is this to be expected
On 2012-09-28 07:03, Rares Aioanei wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:56:42 -0400
Mike Jeays wrote:
I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a
VirtualBox
VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my
CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 22:56:42 -0400
Mike Jeays wrote:
> I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox
> VM, and notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my
> CPU temperature about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is
> an Intel i5 qu
[ Mike Jeays wrote on Thu 27.Sep'12 at 22:56:42 -0400 ]
> I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and
> notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature
> about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an Inte
I have been running PC-BSD 9.0 with the KDE interface in a VirtualBox VM, and
notice that it uses CPU resources when idle, driving up my CPU temperature
about 15 degrees on an otherwise idle machine. (It is an Intel i5 quad four).
Is this to be expected
quite
> impressive. Also, the support page URL for PC-BSD:
> <http://www.ixsystems.com/quote-request> is now apparently working.
Ah -- no. The page I was referring to is:
http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/support/software/pc-bsd-support
which is still 404. It's linked to from here:
http
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:52:15 +
Matthew Seaman articulated:
> On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote:
> >> That's also an obligation to test it.
> >> PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is
> >> on them.
>
> > PC-BSD is an or
On 03/05/12 19:52, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote:
That's also an obligation to test it.
PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on
them.
PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them
a private company
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:52:15 +
Matthew Seaman articulated:
> No, the company behind PC-BSD is called iXsystems. They do an awful
> lot in the FreeBSD sphere, and PC-BSD is one of their products. While
> PC-BSD is a community driven project, iXsystems employs the project
> foun
On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote:
>> That's also an obligation to test it.
>> PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on
>> them.
> PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them
> a private company.
No, t
On 03/04/2012 12:27 AM, jb wrote:
But ..., the charm disappeared when I (intentionally ?) pulled ethernet plug
and started update manager ...
Classic example of fallacious reasoning. update manager needs the
internet to access the updates
___
freeb
7;", instead of requiring CLI sysadmin
experience, reading error logs, and running diagnostic commands to fix things.
...
Well, the PC-BSD team set these goals for themselves:
"PC-BSD has as its goals to be an easy-to-install-and-use desktop operating
system, based on FreeBSD. To accompli
of requiring CLI sysadmin
> experience, reading error logs, and running diagnostic commands to fix things.
> ...
Well, the PC-BSD team set these goals for themselves:
"PC-BSD has as its goals to be an easy-to-install-and-use desktop operating
system, based on FreeBSD. To accompl
different issue.
[ ... ]
A few days ago I read this, from a good, minimum-functional-tests-must-pass,
some wit but no-nonsense reviewer:
http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/pc-bsd-9.html
Well, "Radioactive", "The shortest experience ever!".
Does it matter to FreeBSD ?
That's
Hi,
some month ago I saw PC-BSD 9 release announcement and was curious enough to
try it. Also, it received a good review on some mostly Linux oriented web site.
The installation was very pleasant thanks to its installer - a very impressive
software component (considering rather spartan
I am actually amazed nobody nor the handbook mentioned OSS to me,
because after learned this, it suddenly become obvious this option
should be tried right after failure of snd_driver. In fact, the sound
card in-topic is Ali M5455, the first on the list of sound card
supported by OSS.
http://m
Hi,
On Saturday 16 April 2011 14:42:43 Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:42:38AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > >
> > > # kldload snd_driver
> >
> > this will never work.
>
> Yes, it will. 'snd_driver' is a meta-module which depends on, and
> therefore will pull in, all the
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:42:38AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did you really get no other answer?
>
> On Friday 15 April 2011 22:11:05 Zhang Weiwu, Beijing wrote:
> > Hello. I intend to use FreeBSD instead of PC-BSD. The sound card doesn't
> > work o
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:42:38 +0700 Erich Dollansky wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2011 22:11:05 Zhang Weiwu, Beijing wrote:
> > Hello. I intend to use FreeBSD instead of PC-BSD. The sound card doesn't
> > work on FreeBSD 8.2. I tried to follow the manual and loaded all sou
Hi,
On Saturday 16 April 2011 11:16:39 Zhang Weiwu, Beijing wrote:
> On 04/16/2011 10:42 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > On Friday 15 April 2011 22:11:05 Zhang Weiwu, Beijing wrote:
> >> # kldload snd_driver
> > this will never work.
> >
> > You must load the driver for your sound card. Something l
On 04/16/2011 10:42 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
On Friday 15 April 2011 22:11:05 Zhang Weiwu, Beijing wrote:
# kldload snd_driver
this will never work.
You must load the driver for your sound card. Something like
kldload snd_hda
I am confused, because the handbook says the opposite:
http://
Hi,
did you really get no other answer?
On Friday 15 April 2011 22:11:05 Zhang Weiwu, Beijing wrote:
> Hello. I intend to use FreeBSD instead of PC-BSD. The sound card doesn't
> work on FreeBSD 8.2. I tried to follow the manual and loaded all sound
> card drivers
>
>
Hello. I intend to use FreeBSD instead of PC-BSD. The sound card doesn't
work on FreeBSD 8.2. I tried to follow the manual and loaded all sound
card drivers
# kldload snd_driver
But no driver works:
# cat /dev/sndstat
FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386)
Installed de
We can live forever looking to my eyes, freebsd-questions!
I can install world into a jail as it is spelled in jail(2).
I can install freebsd as a binary from dvd as I can use its install.sh
How could I install a binary pcbsd from dvd into a jail?
Thank you.
73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 287
Good Day;
I just completed a new PC-BSD install on the same machine I last posted
a success message for FreeBSD 8.1.
I do not have time to fiddle much right now and upgrading FreeBSD 8.1
from ports was giving me fits. But, living on the edge has it's price.
I took the advise provid
I am sorry to bother you with such a question, but I cannot seem to install
the live version or the boot/install versions of PC BSD to an already
formatted GUID/GPT hdd. The drive shows up as a whole drive but does not
recognize the fat32 formatted partitions. I install about 6 Linux distros
to
radio streams about 5 to 1, but the standalone BBC || NPR
radio deals wouldn't play on freebsd. And none of the
video streams played here. it was partly mucking with that
proprietary Sun stuff, and maybe the flashit too.
nutshell, only on linux did
Gary Kline wrote:
i ask here? [i'm trying to add my beloved zsh [[heart-throbs]],
and ff3, and others. i thought i had installed the ports stuff.
nope.
When I looked at PCBSD some while ago it had 3 ways of doing ports. #1
is standard (make install) FreeBSD ports, #2 is also standard FreeBSD
while it installed faitly easily, the ssh studd failed; so is
there any easy way of doing this? and more important, am i going
to have to join thepc-bsd list or will you guys be pissed off if
i ask here? [i'm trying to add my beloved zsh [[heart-throbs]],
and ff3, and others. i thought i had ins
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Charles Oppermann wrote:
> > If your willing to buy books concerning FreeBSD I'd suggest Absolute
> > FreeBSD 2nd edition (if you have use Unix like systems) or FreeBSD
> > Unleashed 6 (though it was published at the of FreeBSD 6 it is still
> > very applicable and
> If your willing to buy books concerning FreeBSD I'd suggest Absolute
> FreeBSD 2nd edition (if you have use Unix like systems) or FreeBSD
> Unleashed 6 (though it was published at the of FreeBSD 6 it is still
> very applicable and provides introduction to Unix like systems).
Second the recommend
On Friday 24 April 2009 11:06:03 am Michael Jr. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering what are the major differences between freebsd
> and pc-bsd and is it harder or just as easy to setup freebsd as a
> desktop compared to pc-bsd?
Hi there Michael =)
In regards to the differe
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Ricardo Jesus wrote:
> Michael Jr. wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was just wondering what are the major differences between freebsd and
>> pc-bsd and is it harder or just as easy to setup freebsd as a desktop
>> compared to pc-bsd?
Michael Jr. wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering what are the major differences between freebsd and
pc-bsd and is it harder or just as easy to setup freebsd as a desktop
compared to pc-bsd? Will freebsd work with sager laptops, and will
freebsd recognize 4 gigs of ddr3 memory and if it does not
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Michael Jr. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering what are the major differences between freebsd and
> pc-bsd and is it harder or just as easy to setup freebsd as a desktop
> compared to pc-bsd? Will freebsd work with sager laptops, and will freebs
Hi,
I was just wondering what are the major differences between freebsd
and pc-bsd and is it harder or just as easy to setup freebsd as a
desktop compared to pc-bsd? Will freebsd work with sager laptops, and
will freebsd recognize 4 gigs of ddr3 memory and if it does not
regularly, how
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
I would just like to know :
Is that a system as SCIM (system hwo allow to switch between keaboards)
under PC-BSD ? What is the name of this software ?
Thank you all.
Luigi
--- End Message ---
___
freebsd-questions
Hi all,
I would just like to know :
Is that a system as SCIM (system hwo allow to switch between keaboards)
under PC-BSD ? What is the name of this software ?
Thank you all.
Luigi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Friday 10 August 2007 01:16:48 Gary Kline wrote:
> Guys,
>
> A couple years ago I got a hold of Ubuntu and until recent months
> thought it was the best thing since [[ fill-in ]].
> Long-story-shot, I am wedged at 6.06 (a Long Term Support)
> version, and because th
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:24:00PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
> My experience with PC-BSD was that it was just different enough to
> break alot of FreeBSD's documentation, and they don't have enough of
> their own. I was a newbie, of course, but I went with vanilla FreeB
close. Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
What about a "desktop-BSD"??
tested both when i needed some humour :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questi
My experience with PC-BSD was that it was just different enough to
break alot of FreeBSD's documentation, and they don't have enough of
their own. I was a newbie, of course, but I went with vanilla FreeBSD
because of the handbook and freebsd-questions, and I've no regrets.
Been at
On 8/9/07, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Guys,
>
>close. Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
>What about a "desktop-BSD"??
>
> suggestion? advice?
I've used PC-BSD, and agree with Jonathan - it&
On 8/9/07 8:16 PM, "Gary Kline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
> What about a "desktop-BSD"??
I gave them both a try when I first got into FreeBSD. I didn't particularly
care for their package management system. DesktopBSD has a really cool
li
Guys,
A couple years ago I got a hold of Ubuntu and until recent months
thought it was the best thing since [[ fill-in ]].
Long-story-shot, I am wedged at 6.06 (a Long Term Support)
version, and because the *next* "LTS" isn't due until 2009
and *mo
Hi All,
I installed PC-BSD 1.2 (FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2) on a PC with i810
chipset. Well, as you might have guessed from the subject, X did not
start, with an error indicating the /dev/agpgart was not present.
AFAIK, agp, drm support is built-in for FreeBSD 6.1 - so I am not sure
why /dev
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 11:46:06 +0200
"Gonzalo Martinez-Sanjuan Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> Im supporting the english and spanish PC-BSD Community, an Operating
> System based on FreeBSD and would like to ask some features about
> FreeBSD. Ill tell:
>
Hi.
Im supporting the english and spanish PC-BSD Community, an Operating System
based on FreeBSD and would like to ask some features about FreeBSD. Ill tell:
In Madrid exists SIMO (an anual famous computering fair) and was thinking in
asking for a stand of FreeBSD/PC-BSD just for giving some
- Original Message -
From: "Victor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: PC-BSD
Can PC-BSD be installed in a logical partition? I understand
FreeBSD can
only be installed
> Can PC-BSD be installed in a logical partition? I understand
> FreeBSD can
> only be installed in a primary partition.
>
> Teilhard.
I'm quite sure you are correct, but I'd ask on the PC-BSD forums, as
this list deals with
Can PC-BSD be installed in a logical partition? I understand FreeBSD can
only be installed in a primary partition.
Teilhard.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
x. With that,a couple questions:
After reading the message subject and this paragraph, I'm not sure
what you're running, exactly. You mention Linux -- FreeBSD is not
Linux. You also mention PC-BSD. FreeBSD is also not PC-BSD (although
PC-BSD is based on FreeBSD). All the different *nixes can b
Hi,
I'm fairy new to Linux and I'm in the process of installing Request Tracker
(RT) for trouble tickets with staff members. The RT website stated I needed to
be running PERL 5.8.3 or higher on my BSD box. With that,a couple questions:
1) Can RT be ran from PC-BSD if you are fam
55 matches
Mail list logo
