Will the font from the new logo be available for download as TTF, Type1,
or in a vector format?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
Danial Thom wrote:
> The reason that BSD is what it is (that is, an
obscure OS to the masses) is because BSD camps
are run by a bunch of geeky programmers that have
no sense of marketing. LINUX, which we'll all
agree is an inferior technical product, gets a
lot of milage out of their stupid peng
ot really on one side or another on this,
> but it occurs to me that
> a lot of people may be missing a subtle
> distinction. From what I
> understand "Beastie" is a mascot and not a logo
> although he may have
> been used in place of a logo since there was no
>
> >>So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
> > >>It sucks big time.
> > >>
> > >>When you have a contest and none of the entrees are any good
> > >>you do not have to pick any of then, you could have just
> > &
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 05:01:43PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> >On 6/3/06 14:56, "fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
> >>
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Is there a reason why both the old and new logos cannot be used in
tandem? I'd rather leave the old one up on my web site, since,
personally, I like it better ... I understand the argument for a 'new
logo', but, quite frankly, after looking at the new one
On Monday 06 March 2006 13:01, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
> it better ... I understand the argument for a 'new logo', but, quite
> frankly, after looking at the new one, I'm surprised the same arguments
> (being associated with a de
fbsd_user wrote:
So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
It sucks big time.
When you have a contest and none of the entrees are any good
you do not have to pick any of then, you could have just
closed the contest with no winner.
I am sadden that the new logo is so
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
On 6/3/06 14:56, "fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
It sucks big time.
When you have a contest and none of the entrees are any good
you do not have to pick any of then
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:43:25AM -0800, Danial Thom wrote:
> The entire FreeBSD experience has become a
> nightmarish ride. I've never seen a project team
> so unable to learn from their mistakes both
> technically and marketing-wise. Its a damn
> tragedy what they're doing.
People who contribut
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:56:06AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
> It sucks big time.
Well, yes, it does (many people don't like it, including myself;
then again others think differently).
Unfortunately that's politics,
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:17:33PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
> Since there in now a new logo for FreeBSD,
> what about the people who have the powered by old logo icon
> on their website home pages?
>
> Will the old logo still be valid?
Hi fbsd_user,
why would you bother? Just us
On 6/3/06 14:56, "fbsd_user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
> It sucks big time.
>
> When you have a contest and none of the entrees are any good
> you do not have to pick any of then, you could have ju
--- fbsd_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears
> is the new logo.
> It sucks big time.
>
> When you have a contest and none of the entrees
> are any good
> you do not have to pick any of then, you could
> have
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, DAve wrote:
fbsd_user wrote:
So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
It sucks big time.
This was cussed and discussed earlier I believe. I did get bored with the
thread and stopped reading it, so I can't say what the final outcome of the
t
fbsd_user wrote:
So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
It sucks big time.
This was cussed and discussed earlier I believe. I did get bored with
the thread and stopped reading it, so I can't say what the final outcome
of the thread was or what the final outco
fbsd_user wrote:
Check here to see new logo and then post your thoughts.
http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/
Been there, done that.
With all due respect to those with opinions, and their right to
voice those opinions, this is not a question and in fact the subject
is a horse that&#
So a little red ball with 2 little pointed ears is the new logo.
It sucks big time.
When you have a contest and none of the entrees are any good
you do not have to pick any of then, you could have just
closed the contest with no winner.
I am sadden that the new logo is so plain.
Being pressured
On 3/6/06, Sven Rütz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi FreeBSD-Team,
>
> about 4 months ago Anton K. Gural won the freebsd-logo-competition. After
> that I heared nothing new about the l33t new look (it turned out really
> well ;) ). I want to ask some questions concerning the "look":
>
> 1) What i
Sven Rütz wrote:
Hi FreeBSD-Team,
about 4 months ago Anton K. Gural won the freebsd-logo-competition. After
that I heared nothing new about the l33t new look (it turned out really
well ;) ). I want to ask some questions concerning the "look":
1) What is the licensing of the logo-design by Gural
Sven Rütz wrote:
Hi FreeBSD-Team,
about 4 months ago Anton K. Gural won the freebsd-logo-competition. After
that I heared nothing new about the l33t new look (it turned out really
well ;) ). I want to ask some questions concerning the "look":
1) What is the licensing of the logo-design by Gura
Hi FreeBSD-Team,
about 4 months ago Anton K. Gural won the freebsd-logo-competition. After
that I heared nothing new about the l33t new look (it turned out really
well ;) ). I want to ask some questions concerning the "look":
1) What is the licensing of the logo-design by Gural?
Is it under th
ill still be valid and can
> be used, but I don't think there is a place to download the new logo
> yet, somebody mentioned something on here about the Copyright stuff
> still being finalized.
>
> fbsd_user wrote:
> > Since there in now a new logo for FreeBSD,
> > what
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, fbsd_user wrote:
Since there in now a new logo for FreeBSD,
what about the people who have the powered by old logo icon
on their website home pages?
Will the old logo still be valid?
I hope so ... I've always proudly run displayed Beastie ...
Marc G. Fou
The FreeBSD website says that the old logo will still be valid and can
be used, but I don't think there is a place to download the new logo
yet, somebody mentioned something on here about the Copyright stuff
still being finalized.
fbsd_user wrote:
Since there in now a new logo for Fr
Since there in now a new logo for FreeBSD,
what about the people who have the powered by old logo icon
on their website home pages?
Will the old logo still be valid?
Are powered by icon using the new logo available someplace for
download.
Do we need to get written permission to use it?
Where
I agree.
I always wanted to buy the freebsd merch but I wasnt into this whole
"daemon" thing.
On 3/3/06, John Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On 3/3/06 18:01, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Ansar Mohammed wrote:
> >>
> >>> Does anyone know
Ceri Davies wrote:
On 3/3/06 18:01, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Does anyone know where I can get apparel with the new FreeBSD Logos?
On a related note:
What's the status of the winner of the logo contest?
Is it encumbered, is it fre
On 3/3/06 18:01, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ansar Mohammed wrote:
>> Does anyone know where I can get apparel with the new FreeBSD Logos?
>>
>>
>>
> On a related note:
> What's the status of the winner of the logo contest?
> Is it encumbered, is it free to use?
Copyright
Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Does anyone know where I can get apparel with the new FreeBSD Logos?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Does anyone know where I can get apparel with the new FreeBSD Logos?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 2/28/06, Kristian Vaaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You like the logo?
>
> Speaking as a lecturer at the Royal Academy of Arts, on behalf
> of myself and a lot of other designers, the new FreeBSD logo is worthless.
>
> It's useless eyecandy. As if we don't have enough of that already.
>
> The
You like the logo?
Speaking as a lecturer at the Royal Academy of Arts, on behalf
of myself and a lot of other designers, the new FreeBSD logo is worthless.
It's useless eyecandy. As if we don't have enough of that already.
The logo competition wasn't held properly. It was only announced
inte
I'm wondering when the new logo will officially be used for FreeBSD
and I'm also wondering if you have the contact info for Anton Gural,
the designer who created the new logo.
Thanks,
DON POYNTER
President & Creative Director
D'ZINE ALASKA
3705 Arctic Blvd #2445
Anchora
Allen D. Tate wrote:
Very disappointing. I prefer the current logo over a ball with two
horns!!! and the font used to write FreeBSD is very unprofessional.
It is interesting to see differing opinions. I kinda like the new logo
and new font and think that it does look professional. I am not
> Very disappointing. I prefer the current logo over a ball with two
> horns!!! and the font used to write FreeBSD is very unprofessional.
It is interesting to see differing opinions. I kinda like the new logo
and new font and think that it does look professional. I am not saying
tha
> > Well, the winner of the FreeBSD logo competition has been
> announced -
> > see http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/
> >
> > So what's the verdict then? I have to say I've very impressed, love
> > the horns!
I'm sorry to disagree. Is this the best they were able to come up with ?
Very disa
Nick Withers wrote:
Well, the winner of the FreeBSD logo competition has been
announced - see http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/
So what's the verdict then? I have to say I've very impressed,
love the horns!
hello,
i wonder where i could see the other entries ??
also, while looking at
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Barniskis
>Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 3:56 PM
>To: Jim Pazarena
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New Logo
>
>
>
>If the process gets reversed
Yes, the decision can be reversed.
Simply do not use the new logo on anything you produce for
FreeBSD, such as CDROM copies for customer server installs,
web pages you may create that discuss FreeBSD, graphic images
you might use as backgrounds, computer presentations, etc.
Do not purchase or
On 11/4/05, Greg Barniskis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems to me like those who are up in arms over this:
> (a) had every chance to participate in the process
> (b) did not participate in the process except to heartily denounce
> the very existence of the process and its goal
> (c) even now out
On 11/4/05, Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Clutton wrote:
>
> >>Ted wrote:
> >>
> >>Your opinion, they probably wouldn't agree. If you decide Beastie isn't
> >>important enough to bother defending, that's your choice. Of course I
> >>will note that you had no problem getting the
rtunate to have a Jack in the Box on every other
> street corner, see:
>
>http://www.jacks-gear.com/
>
> [On third thought, I think I'd like my bikeshed in flame red.]
>
>
> --
> Jerry Dunham
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
This is an awesome idea! But then some of us
>
> > it would be interesting to learn the total # of "core" members, and how
> > the vote went, yay and nay, and whether, it at all, the "core" is
> > hearing the message which seems to be emanating from the "non-core"..
>
> Sigh. "*the message*"? Mixed messages at best. Some like it. A few
> m
>
> On 2 Nov 2005 at 19:31, Jerry McAllister wrote:
>
> > Although it may be reasonable to create a FreeBSD logo to supplant
> > the Beastie mascot, unfortunately this thing that has seemingly won
> > a contest is not a logo. It is really just another mascot, this
> > time with a kind of Pok
On 2 Nov 2005 at 19:31, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> Although it may be reasonable to create a FreeBSD logo to supplant
> the Beastie mascot, unfortunately this thing that has seemingly won
> a contest is not a logo. It is really just another mascot, this
> time with a kind of Pokemon kind of lo
On 2 Nov 2005 at 1:33, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:15 PM
> >To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> >Cc: Free BSD Questions list
> >Subject: Re: Ne
On 1 Nov 2005 at 22:13, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Sounds a bit high-handed to me, don't you think?
You're asking us how it sounds to you?
[Make my bikeshed mint green.]
--
Jerry Dunham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
Jim Pazarena wrote:
after reading the original competition posting, it seems that it was
orchestrated by the "core" @ freebsd
it would be interesting to learn the total # of "core" members, and how
the vote went, yay and nay, and whether, it at all, the "core" is
hearing the message which seems
On Thursday, 3 November 2005 at 14:26:24 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> after reading the original competition posting, it seems that it was
> orchestrated by the "core" @ freebsd
Since this is a question, I suppose it's worth answering here.
No, this wasn't orchestrated by the FreeBSD Core Team.
after reading the original competition posting, it seems that it was
orchestrated by the "core" @ freebsd
it would be interesting to learn the total # of "core" members, and how
the vote went, yay and nay, and whether, it at all, the "core" is
hearing the message which seems to be emanating from
e logo argument has been going on for years.
There have been suggestions about getting a new logo,
both to thwart the religious bigots and to "be more professional"
for a long time before that particular person worried about his/her
church response.
There have been good reasons and bad
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 03:34:27PM -0600, Lars Eighner wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >I point out that removing beastie was not the point of the exercise
> >(contrary to Ted's paranoid fantasies of a right-wing Christian
> >fundamentalist cabal dictating policy to the core
The thought occurs that the annoying religious fundamentalists are those
that revere an amateurishly drawn cartoon. (Of all things.)
Idol worship, sect-like fulmination, and blind allegiance to mere
symbols representing obscure events in ancient history were never more
in evidence.
_
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I point out that removing beastie was not the point of the exercise
(contrary to Ted's paranoid fantasies of a right-wing Christian
fundamentalist cabal dictating policy to the core team).
In point of fact, the "logo" idea started right here when
a righ
is "the Devil", or
> >>something, will sooner or later look at the new logo and think:
> >>
> >> ``It looks like a head. A horned head. A red, horned head.
> >> OH MY FRIGGIN' GOD! THAT'S THE DEVIL HIMSELF!''
> >>
>
cpghost wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I am not 100% convinced, but if you say so. It seems to be that the
religious fundamentalist who thinks Beastie is "the Devil", or
something, will sooner or later look at the new logo and think:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> I am not 100% convinced, but if you say so. It seems to be that the
> religious fundamentalist who thinks Beastie is "the Devil", or
> something, will sooner or later look at the new logo and think:
>
&
>
> Hello,
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:32:20PM -0700 or thereabouts, Chad Leigh -- Shir=
> e.Net LLC wrote:
> > Even though I was in favor of a logo being made for FreeBSD (we can keep =
> beastie as a mascot), the winner is not what I would call a good=20
> > logo for the purposes for whic
Peter Clutton wrote:
Ted wrote:
Your opinion, they probably wouldn't agree. If you decide Beastie isn't
important enough to bother defending, that's your choice. Of course I
will note that you had no problem getting the attention for your books
by using Beastie images on their covers.
[
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
"Offense" is in the eye of the beholder. If you choose to be
offended, don't make us all suffer from your sufferings.
Similarly, if you choose to be offensive, go somewhere else.
--
Duo
___
freebsd-question
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com/
Seems to me a fairly nice contribution to the project,
It is all irrelevant. I am sure it is a nice book and Ted is
knowledgeable in a lot of areas I am sure. Neither he nor I are
members of the project and ha
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:32:20PM -0700 or thereabouts, Chad Leigh --
Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> Even though I was in favor of a logo being made for FreeBSD (we can keep
> beastie as a mascot), the winner is not what I would call a good
> logo for the purposes for which logos are used...
On 11/2/05, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:15 PM
> >To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> >Cc: Free BSD Questions lis
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:04:11PM -0800, stheg olloydson wrote:
> it was said by stanb:
>
> >YUK!
> >
> >--
> >U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout
> >Despite Vietcong Terror
> >- New York Times 9/3/1967
>
> Look on the bright side! Everyone expected this to tur
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry
>McAllister
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:31 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New Logo
>
>
>Folks,
>Re: the new "logo"
>
>
Folks,
Re: the new "logo"
Although it may be reasonable to create a FreeBSD logo to supplant
the Beastie mascot, unfortunately this thing that has seemingly won
a contest is not a logo. It is really just another mascot, this
time with a kind of Pokemon kind of look to it.
N
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:50 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New Logo
>
>
>
>I think the critism is a bit harsh. Any log
that want a more 'professional'
> logo. I think this logo does the job very well, all beastie fans can
> immediatly recognise it for what it is, while someone who is unaware (i.e.
> the PHB) will only see it as a generic logo.
I am not 100% convinced, but if you say so. It s
bullshit. First of all the ENTIRE point of this new
logo is
to increase USE of FreeBSD among the people that allegedly will not
use it because of religious "devil" objections. IN SHORT, this logo
is FOR THE USERS, NOT FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE PROJECT.
This is factually incorrect.
The
e often, lest I ask a question, but I appreciate these
sorts of comments by people we 'observe' make reliable, wholesome and
always to-the-point-from-experience posts day in and day out.
Keep the FBSD lists clean of flames. I haven't followed this entire
thread, but opinions a
community and documentation. Public
fits on the maillists do more damage to any attempt at large corporate
acceptance than a new logo might help.
Yes, because PHBs and non-techs spend much of their time researching
and culling through online forums and archives when making decisions
about what
e say.
Then why was the logo contest opened to all users of FreeBSD (or
non-users)?
That's no reason to discard one's opinion, especially
if that person arguably has the same stake/interest/influence as you
do.
I am not trying to defend the new logo or beastie or anything as it is
hine up other user's butts over the logo.
Whether you like it or not, you should respect that.
The people who run the project decided to create a new logo. It sucks
but hey, it is better than beastie as a logo. Beastie is a fine
mascot but he is not a logo.
This is your opinion, and it a
On Nov 1, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
Ted, you are an *sshole
Please try not to top post...you're being rather vague on what part
exactly makes him an "*sshole", in your opinion...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
l beastie fans can
immediatly recognise it for what it is, while someone who is unaware (i.e.
the PHB) will only see it as a generic logo.
Too much importance is given to logos, read some of the press releases
about new logo designs to see some of the crap marketing drones come out
with. It i
>-Original Message-
>From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:15 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Free BSD Questions list
>Subject: Re: New Logo
>
>
>On Tuesday, 1 November 2005 at 21:48:57 -0800
IMHO a logo, or a new logo, was necessary for technical reasons.
Less colors, "vectorable", more modern look.
I really like the Beastie character, but it's too complicated a design
to use directly as a logo, at least I think so.
I actually don't believe this logo was c
stan wrote:
> YUK!
>
To My disappointed ... but FreeBSD itself really rocks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>-Original Message-
>From: Jun Kuriyama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 10:43 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New Logo
>
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>A
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Traver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:03 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Steve Bertrand; 'FreeBSD Questions'
>Subject: Re: New Logo
>
>
>
>Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>>
>>A
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Anyway, instead of simply looking at the questioner with an expression
like "what kind of fucking moron are you" and ignoring it, or better yet
using it as an opportunity to initiate a discussion of the rich UNIX
history,
this committer started making a horses-ass of hi
efore does not have say.
Chad this is bullshit. First of all the ENTIRE point of this new
logo is
to increase USE of FreeBSD among the people that allegedly will not
use it because of religious "devil" objections. IN SHORT, this logo
is FOR THE USERS, NOT FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE PRO
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Bertrand
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:28 PM
>To: 'Greg 'groggy' Lehey'
>Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions'
>Subject: RE: New Logo
>
>
>-- snip
all the ENTIRE point of this new logo is
> to increase USE of FreeBSD among the people that allegedly will not
> use it because of religious "devil" objections. IN SHORT, this logo
> is FOR THE USERS, NOT FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE PROJECT.
>
> And for the users that AREN'T E
this new
logo is
to increase USE of FreeBSD among the people that allegedly will not
use it because of religious "devil" objections. IN SHORT, this logo
is FOR THE USERS, NOT FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE PROJECT.
This is factually incorrect.
The purpose of having a logo to replace the m
On Tuesday, 1 November 2005 at 21:48:57 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> [missing attribution to Greg Lehey]
>> On Tuesday, 1 November 2005 at 14:15:30 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:32 PM, Chad Leigh wrote:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 1:21 PM, Peter Matulis wro
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad
>Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 3:48 PM
>To: Danny Pansters
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New Logo
>
>
>And I am not tryi
On Nov 1, 2005, at 10:48 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 November 2005 at 14:15:30 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
wrote:
On Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:32 PM, Chad Leigh wrote:
On Nov 1, 2005, at 1:21 PM, Peter Matulis wrote:
Even though I was in favor of a logo being made for Fr
>On Tuesday, 1 November 2005 at 14:15:30 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:32 PM, Chad Leigh wrote:
>>> On Nov 1, 2005, at 1:21 PM, Peter Matulis wrote:
>>>
>>> Even though I was in favor of a logo being made for FreeBSD (we can
>>> keep beastie as a mascot), the
2005 2:22 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Free BSD Questions list
>Subject: Re: New Logo
>
>
>
>On Nov 1, 2005, at 3:15 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>>
>> Of course not. You got what you deserved though so shut the hell up.
>
>Ted, you need to shut the hell
On Nov 1, 2005, at 8:11 PM, tim cle wrote:
Hello, when I was first introduced to BSD, the very
first thing that I noticed was Beastie. It got my
attention. I pointed to Beastie and asked "Whats
that?", and after my initial introduction one of the
things that stayed in my mind was Beastie. So,
is own project.
> >
> >> That's no reason to discard one's opinion, especially
> >> if that person arguably has the same stake/interest/influence as
> >> you do.
> >
> > I am not trying to defend the new logo or beastie or anything as it
> > is
On 11/1/05, Clayton Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/1/05, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > YUK!
> >
> it appears to be vaguely similar to this:
> http://www.gamedaemons.net/ (saw it in a post on slashdot)
>
In fact, it is so similiar and product related that the FreeBSD logo
is
Hello, when I was first introduced to BSD, the very
first thing that I noticed was Beastie. It got my
attention. I pointed to Beastie and asked "Whats
that?", and after my initial introduction one of the
things that stayed in my mind was Beastie. So, as
symbol, it fullfilled all the requirements f
On 11/1/05, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> YUK!
>
it appears to be vaguely similar to this:
http://www.gamedaemons.net/ (saw it in a post on slashdot)
c
> --
> U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
> Terror
> - New York Times 9/3/1967
>
On Nov 1, 2005, at 6:04 PM, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Ted may not be on the project but he is the author of
"The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide"
http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com/
Seems to me a fairly nice contribution to the project,
It is all irrelevant. I am sure it is a nice
On Wednesday 2 November 2005 02:05, you wrote:
This mailing list is for technical questions, not discussions.
Yes, I'll stop discussing, but once a discussion has started it's not fair to
kill it by merely stating that this is not a discussion mailing list on
-questions (while it fact it very of
> > It's like a hockey game. Does the whole bench need to be
> involved, or
> > can it be solved between a few players who are in the kerfluffel?
>
> You're babbling. Let me wake you up gently here. What the
> heck is your point dude?
Point well taken. I will not say right/wrong here, becaus
On Wednesday 2 November 2005 01:34, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I understand the frustration and anger here, but let's please think of
I don't have any frustration or anger. I just state my opinion. I'm glad you
value it highly.
> the newbies (people who are just joining in, lurkers if you will) who
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
