Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Is there a reason why both the old and new logos cannot be used in
tandem? I'd rather leave the old one up on my web site, since,
personally, I like it better ... I understand the argument for a 'new
logo', but, quite frankly, after looking at the new one, I'm surprised
the same arguments (being associated with a demon) isn't still being
made, since the new one *still* gives that same connotation ...
My preference is to keep using the old logo ("Beastie") on my web site,
and I imagine there are others that feel the same way ... are we going
to be "shunned" as a result? I would hope not ...
I'm not really on one side or another on this, but it occurs to me that
a lot of people may be missing a subtle distinction. From what I
understand "Beastie" is a mascot and not a logo although he may have
been used in place of a logo since there was no logo previously. The
addition of a logo should allow FreeBSD to appear more professional. The
new logo should be complementary to Beastie and live along side it.
Peace
- Sam
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
