arm as everything (presumably) is running at full throttle.
>>> Is there any way to disable the ACPI partially, i.e. allow spin-down
>>> for disks etc, but keep the NICs running?
>>
>>
>> This is IMHO not about FreeBSD support of ACPI but possible BIOS
settings
s.
Furthermore, when ACPI is disabled, no network problem arises. This
suggests, at least to me, that ACPI is somehow involved.
gets very warm as everything (presumably) is running at full throttle.
Is there any way to disable the ACPI partially, i.e. allow spin-down
for disks etc, but keep t
m as everything (presumably) is running at full throttle.
Is there any way to disable the ACPI partially, i.e. allow spin-down
for disks etc, but keep the NICs running?
This is IMHO not about FreeBSD support of ACPI but possible BIOS settings
that turn on some kind of hibernation.
Hope that th
etc, but keep the NICs running?
Hope that this question was understandable. Thanks.
Regards,
Ronny Mandal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Da Rock
wrote:
> On 02/24/12 21:39, Ronny Mandal wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share
>> is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the
>> computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet o
On 02/24/12 21:39, Ronny Mandal wrote:
Hi!
I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share
is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the
computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet on the FreeBSD
and establish a direct connection (cross-link) to th
Hi!
I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share
is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the
computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet on the FreeBSD
and establish a direct connection (cross-link) to the W7. I gave the
new connection a static
based on 10+ exprience and working with a dozen models,
I recommend intel cards:
- Intel explicitly supports freebsd.
- the cards are highly stable
- have best performance among all other cards on freebsd
and if you look for best performance, buy a card
based on 82575 or 82576 controllers.
On
ntel cards. Intel is
a safe choice of NIC -- basically you can be sure that it will not only
be supported, but it will work very well.
Of the other branded NICs there, unfortunately it is impossible to say
much about them based on the manufacturers name. The important thing is
the chipset. If
I have several Intel multi-port, (2 port, 4 port and even some 2 port
fibre-optic), cards in use. All have been rock-solid, stable performers, and
have hardware VLAN tagging and trunking capability. I have some 4 port cards
in use with LACP+VLAN Trunking, and then use vlan interfaces in FreeBSD
con
Ryan Coleman writes:
> Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new
> system but I haven't purchased the guts for the server yet.
>
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100010064+600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Con
Any thoughts? I need/want to get a multi-port NIC for my new system but I
haven't purchased the guts for the server yet.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100010064+600013872+600016290&QksAutoSuggestion=&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Configurator=&IsNodeId=1&Subcategory=27&d
Hi, I am setting up a freebsd box to act as a snort sensor on a network. The
box has three nics, one internal nic for talking on the network and to the
management server, and two nics on a single pci card that each connect to SPAN
ports on my switch. I am trying to bind the two adapters on the
s that mean that all NICs are pretty much
> commodity with all the good features (unaligned scatter/gather,
> etc), or does it just mean that machine performance has grown to
> the point where we don't care anymore? The hardware.html page
> tells me what may owrk, but not what
C. C. Tang writes:
> >Let me add my vote for Intel: I have a dual-port Pro/1000, and
> > the thing is a rock:
>
> I am planning to get a Pro/1000 MT dual port card, do you know
> that will it works well in 32bit PCI slot on FreeBSD?
I have one of these:
Pro/1000 GT Dual
Let me add my vote for Intel: I have a dual-port Pro/1000, and
the thing is a rock:
I am planning to get a Pro/1000 MT dual port card, do you know that will
it works well in 32bit PCI slot on FreeBSD?
Thanks,
C.C.
___
freebsd-questions@freeb
Personally, I've had the best success with fxp and em cards (Intel), and the
worst with broadcom-based on-board nics, but have tried and worked with many
different cards over the years on FreeBSD. Hands-down though, I prefer
Intel's NIC offerings.
IIRC - Intel contributed to the devel
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:20:34PM -0600, John wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:12:29AM -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >
> > Intel (fxp, em) and Broadcom (bce, bge) make fine NICs, and the
> > older DEC/Intel 21x4x Tulip series (dc/de) was quite good as well.
> >
on in firmware (which generally wasn't around
until gigabit).
> Just curious, though - you don't mention 3Com cards one way or the other,
> yet there's a lot of them out there. Any comment on those?
The older 3com NICs used by ed/vx (including 3c5xx & NE2000 clones) tended
Chuck Swiger writes:
> > This used to be a hot topic long ago, but now seems to have become
> > rather dormant.
>
> Intel (fxp, em) and Broadcom (bce, bge) make fine NICs, and the
> older DEC/Intel 21x4x Tulip series (dc/de) was quite good as
> well.
Let
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:12:29AM -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:27 AM, John wrote:
> > This used to be a hot topic long ago, but now seems to have become
> > rather dormant. Does that mean that all NICs are pretty much
> > commodity
Hi--
On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:27 AM, John wrote:
> This used to be a hot topic long ago, but now seems to have become
> rather dormant. Does that mean that all NICs are pretty much
> commodity with all the good features (unaligned scatter/gather,
> etc), or does it just mean
This used to be a hot topic long ago, but now seems to have become
rather dormant. Does that mean that all NICs are pretty much
commodity with all the good features (unaligned scatter/gather,
etc), or does it just mean that machine performance has grown to
the point where we don't care an
ve sense only if station is associated. Reported driver signal
is to low to be usefull.
> 1) The XP box works fine with the Linksys NIC in it.
> 2) Both the XP and FBSD boxes are Dell Optiplex GX270, so they have
> identical hardware aside from the wireless NICs.
> 3) The md5 checksu
t
at least part of the scan function doesn't work and I know that it's
not detecting changes in rate and signal that are being reported by
the XP box.
1) The XP box works fine with the Linksys NIC in it.
2) Both the XP and FBSD boxes are Dell Optiplex GX270, so they have
identical hardware a
On 7/2/09, Robert Hall wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> On 7/2/09, Robert Hall wrote:
And what about TX/RX signal?
>>>
>>> I don't know where to look for that. :)
>>
>> It is part of scan output.
>
> I don't remember seeing that in the output. I'll put the Lin
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 7/2/09, Robert Hall wrote:
>>> And what about TX/RX signal?
>>
>> I don't know where to look for that. :)
>
> It is part of scan output.
I don't remember seeing that in the output. I'll put the Linksys back
in the FBSD box and look for it.
On 7/2/09, Robert Hall wrote:
>> And what about TX/RX signal?
>
> I don't know where to look for that. :)
It is part of scan output.
>> Could you put backtrace somewhere?
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html
>
> Backtrace from crashing with a Belkin ndi
> And what about TX/RX signal?
I don't know where to look for that. :)
> Could you put backtrace somewhere?
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html
Backtrace from crashing with a Belkin ndis:
(kgdb) backtrace
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196
#1 0xc055bcc3 in b
On 7/1/09, Robert Hall wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> On 7/1/09, Robert Hall wrote:
>>> I've been trying to get a Linksys WMP54G v. 4.1 to work on FBSD 7.2.
>>> It sort of works with the ral driver; I can set the ssid and inet and
>>> other values, but it won't a
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 7/1/09, Robert Hall wrote:
>> I've been trying to get a Linksys WMP54G v. 4.1 to work on FBSD 7.2.
>> It sort of works with the ral driver; I can set the ssid and inet and
>> other values, but it won't associate with the access point or
>>
On 7/1/09, Robert Hall wrote:
> I've been trying to get a Linksys WMP54G v. 4.1 to work on FBSD 7.2.
> It sort of works with the ral driver; I can set the ssid and inet and
> other values, but it won't associate with the access point or
> establish a useful connection.
Does it get any scan result
I've been trying to get a Linksys WMP54G v. 4.1 to work on FBSD 7.2.
It sort of works with the ral driver; I can set the ssid and inet and
other values, but it won't associate with the access point or
establish a useful connection.
I've tried compiling ndis drivers for both the Linksys and a Belki
>I've a server box with four NICs addressing different subnets:
>
>NIC1: one class c subnet of same class b network
>NIC2: another class c subnet of same class b network
>NIC3: local unrouted network
>NIC4: local unrouted network
>
>In the current configuration
At 06:26 AM 10/9/2008, Konrad Heuer wrote:
Hello,
I've a server box with four NICs addressing different subnets:
NIC1: one class c subnet of same class b network
NIC2: another class c subnet of same class b network
NIC3: local unrouted network
NIC4: local unrouted network
I
Hello,
I've a server box with four NICs addressing different subnets:
NIC1: one class c subnet of same class b network
NIC2: another class c subnet of same class b network
NIC3: local unrouted network
NIC4: local unrouted network
In the current configuration I use a default ga
>
>> I just inherited a second dsl line and don't have a
>> server to connect
>> it too so I have it connected to a third nic that I have in
>> the Dell
>> that has the first dsl connection and the LAN. I have been
>> running pf
>> on the two ni
Quoting Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I just inherited a second dsl line and don't have a
server to connect
it too so I have it connected to a third nic that I have in
the Dell
that has the first dsl connection and the LAN. I have been
running pf
on the two nics with nat a
> I just inherited a second dsl line and don't have a
> server to connect
> it too so I have it connected to a third nic that I have in
> the Dell
> that has the first dsl connection and the LAN. I have been
> running pf
> on the two nics with nat and squid i
I just inherited a second dsl line and don't have a server to connect
it too so I have it connected to a third nic that I have in the Dell
that has the first dsl connection and the LAN. I have been running pf
on the two nics with nat and squid in transparent proxy mode without
any i
Hi guys. I have a little usb nic, and I would like to be able to attach
it for service purposes from time to time. Unfortunately, there doesn't
seem to be any clear instructions on how to do this, and my time is
short.
The nic is an AXIS 88772 which I think might be covered by drivers.
Cheers
__
Hello,
I've finally gotten emulators/qemu to work with bridge/tap networking on
FreeBSD-7.0-BETA1 i386 using bfe0:
For reference, I used the tutorial listed at:
http://forums.bsdnexus.com/viewtopic.php?id=1563
My issue is, however, that QEMU/bridge/tap does not work with my
wireless NIC (
"Len Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, thanks for the response; It's nice to see some community support.
>
> Here is what I am trying to do:
>
> I am building a custom MAC protocol for a wireless system that has different
> software on
> the "head end" and the "clients." It is not peer-
; getting
> > to the Internet via a default route.via a wireless connection.
> > I want to develop some custom link protocols and I have placed two
> Ethernet
> > NICs in the box.
> > I want to be able to send packets from one NIC to the other and maintain
> the
> >
"Len Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a host on my local 192.168.0 / 24 subnet that works fine in getting
> to the Internet via a default route.via a wireless connection.
> I want to develop some custom link protocols and I have placed two Ethernet
> NIC
I have a host on my local 192.168.0 / 24 subnet that works fine in getting
to the Internet via a default route.via a wireless connection.
I want to develop some custom link protocols and I have placed two Ethernet
NICs in the box.
I want to be able to send packets from one NIC to the other and
On Friday 31 August 2007 20:55:13 Tobias Ernst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have further news on this problem. It really seems to be a
> driver/hardware issue.
>
> As I said, the two servers have 6 NICs each. These are:
>
> bge0, bge1: BCM5750, integrated on the motherboard
> bge
Nikos Vassiliadis schrieb:
>> I don't think this is an auto negotiation issue. How can a Windows
>> machine that is connected to the same switch as my two FreeBSD machines
>> and does not even talk to them explicitly influence the autonegotation
>> of the FreeBSD NIC?
> I didn't say that a Windo
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:48:35 +0200, Tobias Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this is an auto negotiation issue. How can a Windows
> machine that is connected to the same switch as my two FreeBSD machines
> and does not even talk to them explicitly influence the autonegotation
> of t
Nikos Vassiliadis schrieb:
> On Friday 31 August 2007 22:30, I correctly wrote:
>> Did you try without forcing a link speed(check ifconfig -m)
> s/without //
>
> anything useful in dmesg?
No, nothing at all in dmesg.
I don't think this is an auto negotiation issue. How can a Windows
machine that
On Friday 31 August 2007 22:30, I correctly wrote:
> Did you try without forcing a link speed(check ifconfig -m)
s/without //
anything useful in dmesg?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ques
On Friday 31 August 2007 21:55, Tobias Ernst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have further news on this problem. It really seems to be a
> driver/hardware issue.
>
> As I said, the two servers have 6 NICs each. These are:
>
> bge0, bge1: BCM5750, integrated on the motherboard
> bge
Hi,
I have further news on this problem. It really seems to be a
driver/hardware issue.
As I said, the two servers have 6 NICs each. These are:
bge0, bge1: BCM5750, integrated on the motherboard
bge2, bge3: BCM5704, PCIX card
bge4, bge5: BCM5704, PCIX card
I have now greatly simplified the
resses configured on the bge1 NICs. I cannot ping the other machine
when using the IP addresses configured on the bge5 NICs as ARP entries
remain incomplete. I can then configure bge5 to promiscous mode on one
machine, and after about 10 seconds the ping starts working.
Here's what ipconfig
Hi,
I found an issue for a long time.
For test requirement without any switch/hub:
One host has two NICs and with the same subnet setting.
(local)NIC1: 10.0.0.1/8
(local)NIC2: 10.0.0.2/8
(direct connect peer) 10.0.0.10/8
(direct connect peer) 10.0.0.20/8
ping
John Nielsen wrote:
Quoting Ivan Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netma
Quoting Ivan Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0"
Th
ne 05, 2007 6:55 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: How to correctly use 2 on board nics
Hello
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="ine
6:55 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: How to correctly use 2 on board nics
Hello
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="ine
Ivan Carey wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Ivan Carey wrote:
Hello
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netma
Tom Judge wrote:
Ivan Carey wrote:
Hello
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0"
Ivan Carey wrote:
Hello
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0"
The question, is t
Hello
I have a server board with 2 onboard nic's
I have set them up in rc.conf as follows
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
network_interfaces="em0 em1 lo0"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0"
The question, is this the correct con
Hello,
Running 6.2-STABLE on i386...
Anyone know if there is support for USB Wireless NICs? I have a Netgear
WG111 that is recognized as /dev/ugen0, but that's it.
Netgear also makes their "T" model (WG111T) that has their "Super G"
technolgy that often uses Atheros
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 06:53:28PM +0100, Paul Eskello wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> looking for any recommendations regarding wireless lan pci cards and
> freebsd, please.
It is impossible to give a general recommendation like "buy brand X,
model Y". Manufacturers sometimes switch chipsets on their cards
Don't get the motorolas; you can check, but classically, they all have
non-open-source (and therefore unsupported) broadcom chipsets. My
usual method is to type in the model number of the card and "chipset"
into a google search, which ususally works. I'd say the atheros cards
are most widely use
Hi all,
looking for any recommendations regarding wireless lan pci cards and
freebsd, please.
Thx in advance.
Cheers,
Paul
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
loppy, you couldn't install freebsd on it.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom N
stem Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992)
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> Is the bge dr
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992)
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> Is the bge driver enabled by default?
>
> -Dan
>
> > I don't know what broadcom chip your MB has b
IL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992)
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The
ED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: Broadcom Nics in Tyan Transport GT24 (B3992)
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> > Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in
6.1
> > release is buggy.
>
> Which driver is
nfer any extra benefit to you if you just have a
normal 32-bit PCI slot.)
Both the MT and GT NICs should work fine for you but the GT model is
probably both easier and cheaper to find in stores today.
FWIW I have a PRO/1000 GT card in one of my machines and it
I have a machine that's getting re-purposed, and - based on
comments made here - I'd like to replace the RealTek-based NIC with
Intel.
However ... I've never dealt with Intel cards before, and I'm
not certain which model is the right choice. A search of the Intel
web site suggest
--On January 13, 2007 8:34:50 AM -0500 "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in
6.1 release is buggy.
Which driver is that? My 6.1 install won't see them at all:
river attached)
Also, I'm running 6.1-RELEASE, will the cvs drivers from CURRENT work?
-Dan
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:02 PM
Subject: Broadcom Nics in Ty
Use the latest Broadcom driver from FreeBSD CVS. The one included in 6.1
release is buggy.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:02 PM
Subject: Broadcom Nics in Tyan
Hey all, I have a Transport GT24 (B3992 Motherboard), and while it has one
intel nic which works well, I'd like to be able to use the onboard
broadcom network cards. Is there a known way of making them work? I seem
to recall some dealy where you could use a windows driver?
-Dan
--
"I love
I'm posting this for documentary purposes in case someone has this problem
and wants to find the answer.
Under the 6.1 RELEASE, with all sources cvsup'd to current, both world and
kernel rebuilt, the Broadcommm NetExtreme 5708 NICs will fall over under
very light load when usin
In the last episode (Aug 16), Derrick T. Woolworth said:
> Is there currently any way to bind three network interfaces to a
> single IP address? With our NetApp (yeah, I realize its a whole
> different animal, but still), we can use the vif interface or virtual
> interface to increase bandwidth to
Is there currently any way to bind three network interfaces to a single IP
address? With our NetApp (yeah, I realize its a whole different animal, but
still), we can use the vif interface or virtual interface to increase
bandwidth to the device. I've looked at carp and bridging and I don't think
WITH
fixed IP. But basicly you can only pull/push 1mbit, since there is a
300GB traffic limit imposed. :)
So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to 100/10
Mbps to serve the pages and one which would be bound with 24/1 Mbps
connection with Fixed-IP to litsen the req
Fixed-IP, I am getting a 24/1 Mbps internet line through
> Telephone line. But I am just in doubt that my webserver might not be
able
> to server the documents with good serving speed due to 1 Mbps
upstream...
>
> So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to
100/10
>
internet line through
Telephone line. But I am just in doubt that my webserver might not be able
to server the documents with good serving speed due to 1 Mbps upstream...
So, I came to an idea that if I use two NICs, one NIC bounded to 100/10
Mbps to serve the pages and one which would be bound with 24
(My apologies if you're recieving this email for the third time. It
doesnt seem as the previous ones reached the list)
Hi,
I run a FreeBSD 6.0 at home in my closet.
Yesterday, while I was linking IRCd services with a friend of mine, my router
completely stopped routing any packets between the inter
Hi,
I rebooted my machine last night, and everything started working again.
But no, I didnt check that. And after I was looking at some sysctls
late last night, I did speculate about whether those you mention were
right or not.
Problem resolved, and thanks for the help :)
ps. Sorry I accidentall
Daniel A. wrote:
Hi,
I run a FreeBSD 6.0 at home in my closet.
Yesterday, while I was linking IRCd services with a friend of mine, my router
completely stopped routing any packets between the internal nic (sis0) and
the external nic (rl0).
The only thing that I can think of, whoich could have cau
Hi,
I run a FreeBSD 6.0 at home in my closet.
Yesterday, while I was linking IRCd services with a friend of mine, my router
completely stopped routing any packets between the internal nic (sis0) and
the external nic (rl0).
The only thing that I can think of, whoich could have caused this, is that I
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:55:29 -0800 (PST), in
sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote:
>I have a tyan k8wd with dual bge nics but they are painfully slow on transfer
>rates.
> Is there something I need to put in the hints file to fix this??
> Thanks!
Hi,
There are a lot
Busby
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:55 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: dual bge nics slow transfer - no transfer
I have a tyan k8wd with dual bge nics but they are painfully slow on
transfer rates.
Is there something I need to put in the hints file to fix this??
Thanks!
dm
I have a tyan k8wd with dual bge nics but they are painfully slow on transfer
rates.
Is there something I need to put in the hints file to fix this??
Thanks!
dmesg output
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993
hing like:
> > ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.17.1 netmask 0xff00"
> > ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 0x"
> > ifconfig_vge0="dhcp"
> > ...to give you the general idea. It's enough to bring
> > the NICs up and running, but t
172.17.0.1 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_vge0="dhcp"
...to give you the general idea. It's enough to bring
the NICs up and running, but then consider DNS
and other issues that provide for a networking environment.
Yes, the main entry, i.e., the one for the outside world is set-up lik
On 10/12/05, Olaf Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a short and surely straightforward question: I want to set-up two
> NICs on two of my FBSD 5.x servers. Each server will have a dedicated
> NIC for all "outside world" traffic, and between the tw
Hi,
I have a short and surely straightforward question: I want to set-up two
NICs on two of my FBSD 5.x servers. Each server will have a dedicated
NIC for all "outside world" traffic, and between the two machines I want
to set-up a 192.168.1.x local network via a cross-wire cable,
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Thank you for the offer, but I thought people had some simple test results
in mind. If you next time use rdump or large NFS transfers to another GbE
connected (and fast enough) box just watch the system load (I use systat
-vm 1) and see what card causes what interrupt lo
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2005 10:51 CEST schrieb Dmitry Mityugov:
> On 8/31/05, Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
> > GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
> > AFA
On 8/31/05, Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
> GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
> AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't saturate a [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
On 2005-08-31 00:46, Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other GigaBit
> NICs (1000baseTX only). AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which
> doesn't saturate a [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello,
I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't saturate a [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
at 200mbit/s with interrupt load (like em does)?
I heard that the re is way better than
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
