icedtea plugin alongside linux-sun-jdk

2013-03-27 Thread Andre Goree
I have linux-sun-jdk16 installed on my workstation at my workplace due to certain linux-based software that I need to be able to run. This works flawlessly, however I'm wondering what caveats I'll run into by now installing the icedtea web browser plugin, since it seems to depend on FreeBS

changing a dependent jdk port out for an equivalent one

2012-11-12 Thread Gary Aitken
I've got diablo-jdk installed, and it is deprecated. openjdk6 and openjdk7 should be substitutable for diablo-jdk. Is there a way to swap the one out for the other? e.g. portmaster -e java/diablo-jdk portmaster java/openjdk7 and then a miracle occurs... I see in the ant makefile

Re: openoffice on 9.0 (JDK issues)

2012-05-23 Thread Gary Aitken
. Therefore some may not be available. Try to build OpenOffice.org from ports. It takes time, be patient. ok, attempting that... After copying the jdk-6u3-fcs... files that it complained about from the oracle site: OO requires ant, but the ant install fails: 123 /usr/ports/devel/apache-ant#make

Re: openoffice on 9.0 (JDK issues)

2012-05-23 Thread Gary Aitken
On 05/22/12 14:45, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote: The OpenOffice.org package is a big one and consumes a lot of bandwith. Therefore some may not be available. Try to build OpenOffice.org from ports. It takes time, be patient. ok, attempting that... After copying the jdk-6u3-fcs... files that it

Re: diablo-jdk-1.6 firefox plugin... doesn't work

2010-05-26 Thread Rolf Nielsen
2010-05-26 17:02, Neil Short skrev: New installation. having some problems. diablo-jdk-1.6 plugin isn't working in firefox. Some pertinent output: carmen# java -version java version "1.6.0_07" Diablo Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_07-b02) Diablo Java HotSpot(TM) 6

diablo-jdk-1.6 firefox plugin... doesn't work

2010-05-26 Thread Neil Short
New installation. having some problems. diablo-jdk-1.6 plugin isn't working in firefox. Some pertinent output: carmen# java -version java version "1.6.0_07" Diablo Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_07-b02) Diablo Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 10.0-b23, mixe

Re: diablo-jdk not installing correctly

2010-04-25 Thread Sergio Tam
2010/4/25 herbey zepeda : > Hi, > > I want to install java and tomcat. After some time trying I could not > install the JDK, I first tried to install diablo jdk 1.6. > I go to /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk1.6, turns out that I have to go through > further step due to licensing, &g

Re: diablo-jdk not installing correctly

2010-04-25 Thread Charlie Kester
On Sun 25 Apr 2010 at 17:57:27 PDT Jonathan Chen wrote: On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 07:34:19PM -0400, herbey zepeda wrote: [...] I am concerned because according to the literature diablo is supposed to be the maintained jdk for FreeBSD. And I realize that I am having to download version 7.1 when

Re: diablo-jdk not installing correctly

2010-04-25 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 07:34:19PM -0400, herbey zepeda wrote: [...] > I am concerned because according to the literature diablo is supposed to > be the maintained jdk for FreeBSD. And I realize that I am having to > download version 7.1 when we are already on version 8.0 of FreeBS

diablo-jdk not installing correctly

2010-04-25 Thread herbey zepeda
Hi, I want to install java and tomcat. After some time trying I could not install the JDK, I first tried to install diablo jdk 1.6. I go to /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk1.6, turns out that I have to go through further step due to licensing, I do that step and go to http://www.freebsdfoundation.org

why use diablo JDK/JRE ?

2010-04-05 Thread Robert Huff
Masoom Shaikh writes: > what is the need for FreeBSD Foundation to maintain dialbo JDK/JRE > binaries when packages for openjdk are available on ftp servers ? > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8-stable/java/openjdk-7.0.86.tbz > > stup

why use diablo JDK/JRE ?

2010-04-05 Thread Masoom Shaikh
what is the need for FreeBSD Foundation to maintain dialbo JDK/JRE binaries when packages for openjdk are available on ftp servers ? ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8-stable/java/openjdk-7.0.86.tbz stupid me, never realized, just assumed that openjdk binaries cannot be

Diablo JDK & Undefined symbol "gethostbyname_r"

2010-03-23 Thread Sigmar Muuga
Hello, my freebsd version is 6.1-RELEASE, I have installed diablo jdk1.6 and when I run maven, I got the following error: Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/2.2/maven-clean-plugin-2.2.pom /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/jre/lib

RE: Diablo JDK threads implementation

2009-07-29 Thread Gary Gatten
Subject: Diablo JDK threads implementation We've developed a server platform around FreeBSD 7.0 consisting of several applications written in C and one primary application written in Java (JDK 1.6). We're seeing cases in some of ouor stress tests where some threads in our JAVA application app

Diablo JDK threads implementation

2009-07-29 Thread Peter Steele
We've developed a server platform around FreeBSD 7.0 consisting of several applications written in C and one primary application written in Java (JDK 1.6). We're seeing cases in some of ouor stress tests where some threads in our JAVA application appear to get no CPU time for extended

Re: JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.3.12

2009-06-02 Thread twelcome
I managed to work around this by plugging the package name into google and downloading it from non-Sun sites. --Original Message-- From: kenneth hatteland Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Sent: Jun 2, 2009 2:31 PM Subject: re: JDK US DST

re: JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.3.12

2009-06-02 Thread kenneth hatteland
I have had the same problem when trying to compile OO this weekend. it is still unavailable. I have just noticed Sun about the problem and hopefully within a reasonable amount of time we have the tze tool back online Kenneth ___ freebsd-questions@fre

Re: JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.3.12

2009-06-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Kyle Grieb writes: > I get a dead link from [http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp] to > download the required file [tzupdater-1_3_12-2009a.zip]. It's up to /usr/ports/distfiles/tzupdater-1_3_15-2009g.zip now. You need to update your ports. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking soft

JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.3.12

2009-06-01 Thread Kyle Grieb
I get a dead link from [http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp] to download the required file [tzupdater-1_3_12-2009a.zip]. This is a dep for 'ftp/jftp'. Google has failed me. -- ~ ##The United States of America is a Slave Nation## ##The Human race is a Slave race## !!InfoWars.com!! ___

Re: install both jdk15 and jdk 16 from port

2009-05-15 Thread vuthecuong
Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (May 14), vuthecuong said: >> do I will have conflict etc problems when install both jdk15 and jdk 16 >> from ports? > > Nope; all the jdk ports install into separate directories. There is a > javavmwrapper port that inst

Re: install both jdk15 and jdk 16 from port

2009-05-14 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 14), vuthecuong said: > do I will have conflict etc problems when install both jdk15 and jdk 16 > from ports? Nope; all the jdk ports install into separate directories. There is a javavmwrapper port that installs as /usr/local/bin/java and decides on the best jvm

install both jdk15 and jdk 16 from port

2009-05-14 Thread vuthecuong
do I will have conflict etc problems when install both jdk15 and jdk 16 from ports? regards -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/install-both-jdk15-and-jdk-16-from-port-tp23553116p23553116.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: eclipse-3.2.2 issue with diablo-jdk-1.5.0 in FreeBSD-7.0

2008-09-23 Thread Frank Staals
Jonathan Chen wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:57:21AM +, dhaneshk k wrote: Hi ; I installed eclipse(3.2.2) from ports , in my FreeBSD-7.0 RELEASE box , where diablo-jdk-15.0 installed but when I start eclipsegetting a splash message as follows ... #eclipse JVM

Re: eclipse-3.2.2 issue with diablo-jdk-1.5.0 in FreeBSD-7.0

2008-09-23 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:57:21AM +, dhaneshk k wrote: > > Hi ; > > I installed eclipse(3.2.2) from ports , in my FreeBSD-7.0 RELEASE box , > where diablo-jdk-15.0 installed > > but when I start eclipsegetting a splash message as follows ... > >

eclipse-3.2.2 issue with diablo-jdk-1.5.0 in FreeBSD-7.0

2008-09-23 Thread dhaneshk k
Hi ; I installed eclipse(3.2.2) from ports , in my FreeBSD-7.0 RELEASE box , where diablo-jdk-15.0 installed but when I start eclipsegetting a splash message as follows ... #eclipse JVM terminated. Exit code=1 /usr/local/bin/java -Xms40m -Xmx256m -jar /usr/local/eclipse

Re: Installing jdk on 7-Release: Has known vulnerabilities from 2005?

2008-07-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
Torgeir Hoffmann wrote: Hi again! when I try to install linux-sun-jdk16 from ports I get: ===> linux-sun-jdk-1.6.0.07 has known vulnerabilities: => jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability. Reference: <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/18e5428f-ae7c-11d9-837d-000e0c2e

Re: Installing jdk on 7-Release: Has known vulnerabilities from 2005?

2008-07-23 Thread Torgeir Hoffmann
Hi again! >> when I try to install linux-sun-jdk16 from ports I get: >> >> ===> linux-sun-jdk-1.6.0.07 has known vulnerabilities: >> => jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability. >>Reference: >> <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portau

Re: Installing jdk on 7-Release: Has known vulnerabilities from 2005?

2008-07-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
Torgeir Hoffmann wrote: Hi, when I try to install linux-sun-jdk16 from ports I get: ===> linux-sun-jdk-1.6.0.07 has known vulnerabilities: => jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability. Reference: <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/18e5428f-ae7c-11d9-837d-000e0c2e

Installing jdk on 7-Release: Has known vulnerabilities from 2005?

2008-07-23 Thread Torgeir Hoffmann
Hi, when I try to install linux-sun-jdk16 from ports I get: ===> linux-sun-jdk-1.6.0.07 has known vulnerabilities: => jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability. Reference: <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/18e5428f-ae7c-11d9-837d-000e0c2e438a.html> => Please update

Re: Help Installing Sun JDK on FreeBSD

2008-06-16 Thread triggerme2ice
Ok so it seems i still have some other issues... :( I have previously successfully installed the diablo JDK on the official compatible versions (FreeBSD 5.5 and 6.1) But I need to have JDK installed in numerous versions of FreeBSD. In this case i need it on 5.0 version The problem I have now is

Re: Help Installing Sun JDK on FreeBSD

2008-06-04 Thread eculp
openoffice. ed Vince Hoffman wrote: triggerme2ice wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if anyone would know of a brute force way of installing the (newest possible) sun JDK on FreeBSD 5.0 (or any other versions for further info) Help a freeBSD user in need :teeth: The latest version in ports is 1

Re: Help Installing Sun JDK on FreeBSD

2008-06-04 Thread triggerme2ice
anyone would know of a brute force way of installing >> the >> (newest possible) sun JDK on FreeBSD 5.0 (or any other versions for >> further >> info) >> >> Help a freeBSD user in need :teeth: > > The latest version in ports is 1.6.0.3p4 if you need more

Re: Help Installing Sun JDK on FreeBSD

2008-06-04 Thread Vince Hoffman
triggerme2ice wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone would know of a brute force way of installing the > (newest possible) sun JDK on FreeBSD 5.0 (or any other versions for further > info) > > Help a freeBSD user in need :teeth: The latest version in ports is 1.6.0

Help Installing Sun JDK on FreeBSD

2008-06-03 Thread triggerme2ice
Hi all, I was wondering if anyone would know of a brute force way of installing the (newest possible) sun JDK on FreeBSD 5.0 (or any other versions for further info) Help a freeBSD user in need :teeth: -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Help-Installing-Sun-JDK-on-FreeBSD

Re: Best Java 1.6 JDK for FreeBSD?

2008-05-07 Thread Pollywog
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 15:44:50 Toomas Aas wrote: > Gunther Mayer wrote: > > Does anybody use 1.6 in production on FreeBSD? What have your > > experiences been? > > Our Tomcat-based website, which currently gets ca 75000 requests per day, > has been running with native jd

Re: Best Java 1.6 JDK for FreeBSD?

2008-05-07 Thread Toomas Aas
Gunther Mayer wrote: Does anybody use 1.6 in production on FreeBSD? What have your experiences been? Our Tomcat-based website, which currently gets ca 75000 requests per day, has been running with native jdk-1.6.0.3p3 for 6 months. I haven't noticed any problems -- Toomas Aas ... I&#

Best Java 1.6 JDK for FreeBSD?

2008-05-07 Thread Gunther Mayer
Hi guys, We're currently running a busy java web application with diablo-jdk 1.5 and jboss 4.0.5 on FreeBSD 6.2 (yes it's outdated, will upgrade to 6.3 very soon). That combination has proven to be very stable in the past. Now we'd like to start making use of some 1.6 only feat

Re: where do i find jdk-1_5_0_14-fcs-bin-b03-jrl-05_oct_2007.jar /

2008-04-19 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:33:18PM +1000, Gary Newcombe wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:09:14 -0700, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > People, > > I've been looking all over sun-country a nd can't find > > > >jd

Re: where do i find jdk-1_5_0_14-fcs-bin-b03-jrl-05_oct_2007.jar /

2008-04-18 Thread Gary Newcombe
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:09:14 -0700, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > People, > I've been looking all over sun-country a nd can't find > >jdk-1_5_0_14-fcs-bin-b03-jrl-05_oct_2007.jar http://www.java.net/download/tiger/tiger_u14/jdk-1_5_0_14-fcs-bin-b0

where do i find jdk-1_5_0_14-fcs-bin-b03-jrl-05_oct_2007.jar /

2008-04-18 Thread Gary Kline
People, I've been looking all over sun-country a nd can't find jdk-1_5_0_14-fcs-bin-b03-jrl-05_oct_2007.jar Any clues? thanks much. -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.t

Re: Which one should I use diablo-jdk1.5.0 or jdk-1.6

2008-04-03 Thread Kemian Dang
sure your code runs on both. > > > > On 02/04/2008, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> "Kemian Dang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > I am not sure which version of jdk should I use, do they have the same >

Re: Which one should I use diablo-jdk1.5.0 or jdk-1.6

2008-04-03 Thread Lowell Gilbert
diablo versus regular port, you're trying to choose between java 1.5 and 1.6. For maximum portability, I would recommend installing both, and making sure your code runs on both. > On 02/04/2008, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Kemian Dang" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Which one should I use diablo-jdk1.5.0 or jdk-1.6

2008-04-02 Thread Kemian Dang
tes: > > > I am not sure which version of jdk should I use, do they have the same > > functionality? > > > > I know jdk-1.6 is compiled by diablo-jdk and has no run dependency on > > diablo, but if diablo is the same as the original sun jdk, why should > >

Re: Which one should I use diablo-jdk1.5.0 or jdk-1.6

2008-04-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Kemian Dang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not sure which version of jdk should I use, do they have the same > functionality? > > I know jdk-1.6 is compiled by diablo-jdk and has no run dependency on > diablo, but if diablo is the same as the original sun jdk

Which one should I use diablo-jdk1.5.0 or jdk-1.6

2008-04-01 Thread Kemian Dang
Dear all, I am not sure which version of jdk should I use, do they have the same functionality? I know jdk-1.6 is compiled by diablo-jdk and has no run dependency on diablo, but if diablo is the same as the original sun jdk, why should there be another one, or to say, why I need to install

Re: Which jdk port should I use?

2008-03-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
Steven Friedrich wrote: But it appears that it only helps as long as your're using prior to FreeBSD 7. I believe these guys are telling me that if I'm running FreeBSD 7 (and I am), that I need to use jdk15 (but it appears that it installs/depends on diablo-jdk. You need a java c

Re: Which jdk port should I use?

2008-03-06 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 12:48:49PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote: [...] > My question was "which port should I use" and so far, it appears the answer > is > jdk15, but it appears it depends on diablo-jdk. > > You might take a look at: > http://www.freebsdfoundat

Re: Which jdk port should I use?

2008-03-06 Thread Steven Friedrich
On Thursday 06 March 2008 12:28:33 pm you wrote: > its there any JDK for amd64 arch from sun ? > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Steven Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > On Thursday 06 March 2008 05:42:05 am Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Jonathan Chen

JDK for FreeBSD 7

2008-03-06 Thread vincenzo romero
A quick question: 1. Based on the following available downloads: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml seems like there is no SW available for the FreeBSD 7 stable release?... pls confirm? 2. Is there a way of (sorry for the naive question) running the latest for FBSD6 into 7?

Re: Which jdk port should I use?

2008-03-06 Thread Steven Friedrich
On Thursday 06 March 2008 05:42:05 am Kris Kennaway wrote: > Jonathan Chen wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:05:34PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote: > >> I have two installed: > >> diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_9 > >> jdk-1.5.0.14p8,1 > > > > The na

Re: Which jdk port should I use?

2008-03-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
Jonathan Chen wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:05:34PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote: I have two installed: diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_9 jdk-1.5.0.14p8,1 The native JDK is the one to use in most cases; eg: if you're running FreeBSD-7, eclipse won't work properly unless you're u

Re: Which jdk port should I use?

2008-03-05 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:05:34PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I have two installed: > diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_9 > jdk-1.5.0.14p8,1 The native JDK is the one to use in most cases; eg: if you're running FreeBSD-7, eclipse won't work properly unless you're using the

Re: Which jdk port should I use?

2008-03-05 Thread Ivan "Rambius" Ivanov
Hello, On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Steven Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have two installed: > diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_9 > jdk-1.5.0.14p8,1 > > I looked at the freebsd java pages, but I still don't know... It seems that you have diablo jdk and sun jdk

Which jdk port should I use?

2008-03-05 Thread Steven Friedrich
I have two installed: diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_9 jdk-1.5.0.14p8,1 I looked at the freebsd java pages, but I still don't know... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe,

Re: adding diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_8.tbz package in a script

2007-12-26 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Omer Faruk Sen wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to add a package that requires the acceptance of the license > (such as diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_8.tbz) in a script. > > I have made a yes "yes" | pkg_add diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.0

adding diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_8.tbz package in a script

2007-12-26 Thread Omer Faruk Sen
Hi, Is there a way to add a package that requires the acceptance of the license (such as diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_8.tbz) in a script. I have made a yes "yes" | pkg_add diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_8.tbz but it didn't work. Maybe there is an option that can be used somewhere

Re: RELENG_7 and diablo-jdk

2007-12-12 Thread Heiko Wundram (Beenic)
e and run that dynamically. Because of the new operating system version (and changes it introduced), this simply doesn't work properly anymore without a recompile of the JDK for the current system (I haven't dug deeper into the actual cause of the "brokenness" yet, but the probable cause

Re: RELENG_7 and diablo-jdk

2007-12-12 Thread Tino Engel
Daniel Molina Wegener schrieb: Hello, ¿Is there any problem if I run diablo-jdk-1.5_07 under RELENG_7? I mean, ¿is the diablo-jdk binary compatible with RELENG_7? Thanks in advance... for me, java apps always segfault under releng_7. They never did under releng_6. Have not found out yet

Re: RELENG_7 and diablo-jdk

2007-12-12 Thread Heiko Wundram (Beenic)
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 11:06:13 schrieb Daniel Molina Wegener: > ¿Is there any problem if I run diablo-jdk-1.5_07 under RELENG_7? > I mean, ¿is the diablo-jdk binary compatible with RELENG_7? Yes, there are/were quite some problems (which may not become immediately apparen

Re: RELENG_7 and diablo-jdk

2007-12-12 Thread Daniel Bye
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:06:13AM -0300, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > > Hello, > > ??Is there any problem if I run diablo-jdk-1.5_07 under RELENG_7? > I mean, ??is the diablo-jdk binary compatible with RELENG_7? It's working here fine: --->$ uname -a FreeBSD torus.

RELENG_7 and diablo-jdk

2007-12-12 Thread Daniel Molina Wegener
Hello, ¿Is there any problem if I run diablo-jdk-1.5_07 under RELENG_7? I mean, ¿is the diablo-jdk binary compatible with RELENG_7? Thanks in advance... -- .O. | Daniel Molina Wegener | C/C++ Developer ..O | dmw [at] unete [dot] cl | FOSS Coding Adict OOO | FreeBSD & Linux

Re: Ports: Outdatet dependencies on jdk-1.5 (OpenOffice 2.3.*)

2007-11-30 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Tino Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dear Freebeasties, > > I am trying to install openoffice. > The dependency jdk-1.5 tells me as follows: > > Please open http://download.java.net/tiger/ > in a web browser. Download the > Update 13 Source

Ports: Outdatet dependencies on jdk-1.5 (OpenOffice 2.3.*)

2007-11-30 Thread Tino Engel
Dear Freebeasties, I am trying to install openoffice. The dependency jdk-1.5 tells me as follows: Please open http://download.java.net/tiger/ in a web browser. Download the Update 13 Source, jdk-1_5_0_13-fcs-src-b05-jrl-25_sep_2007.jar and the Source Binaries, jdk-1_5_0_13-fcs-bin-b05-jrl

Re: FreeBSD Native JDK/JRE

2007-04-14 Thread Garrett Cooper
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-August/129252.html Which addresses most of my issues, now I just have to work past a compiler error (I think due to sun-jdk-1.4 having been installed).. Thanks. Chris Bowlby wrote: > Hi, > > I've been attempting to install ja

Re: FreeBSD Native JDK/JRE

2007-04-14 Thread patrick
sd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-August/129252.html Which addresses most of my issues, now I just have to work past a compiler error (I think due to sun-jdk-1.4 having been installed).. Thanks. Chris Bowlby wrote: > Hi, > > I've been attempting to install java/jdk15 into a jail

Re: FreeBSD Native JDK/JRE

2007-03-03 Thread Chris Bowlby
Hi, As luck would have it, 2 minutes after posting this message, I managed to find this URL: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-August/129252.html Which addresses most of my issues, now I just have to work past a compiler error (I think due to sun-jdk-1.4 having been

FreeBSD Native JDK/JRE

2007-03-03 Thread Chris Bowlby
ust do a native installation. Can anyone offer up any help? mail# portinstall java/jdk15 ---> Installing 'jdk-1.5.0p4' from a port (java/jdk15) ---> Building '/usr/ports/java/jdk15' ===> Cleaning for unzip-5.52_2 ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4.8_1 ===> Cleaning

Re: Sun jdk 1.6? Any port?

2007-02-21 Thread n j
Is there any plan to port Sun JDK 1.6 to FreeBSD? FYI, I'm running JDK6 in Linux compatibility mode for an application that uses RMI, JDBC, threads and runs as a daemon (24/7) and I had no problems so far, the setup looks very stable. Hope it helps, --

Re: Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source?

2007-02-20 Thread Daniel Tourde
Hello, > > Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source code? > > If yes, how to do that? > > > > To be honest, I would like to avoid to install a binary that requires > > Linux support packages. It's not that I do not like Linux (I have 3 > >

Re: Sun jdk 1.6? Any port?

2007-02-20 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:21:58PM +0100, Daniel Tourde wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any plan to port Sun JDK 1.6 to FreeBSD? Yes, it's in the works; but the porters have other priorities as well (eg: life). You may try checking the arhives of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and querying ther

Re: Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source?

2007-02-20 Thread Vince
Daniel Tourde wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source code? > If yes, how to do that? > > To be honest, I would like to avoid to install a binary that requires Linux > support packages. It's not that I do not like Linux (I have 3 Gent

Re: Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source?

2007-02-20 Thread Daniel Tourde
Hello, > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:20:45PM +0100, Daniel Tourde wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source code? > > If yes, how to do that? > > Yes, use the port. > > > To be honest, I would like to avoid to instal

Re: Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source?

2007-02-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:20:45PM +0100, Daniel Tourde wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source code? > If yes, how to do that? Yes, use the port. > To be honest, I would like to avoid to install a binary that requires Linux > support package

Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source?

2007-02-20 Thread Daniel Tourde
Hello, Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source code? If yes, how to do that? To be honest, I would like to avoid to install a binary that requires Linux support packages. It's not that I do not like Linux (I have 3 Gentoo Linux at my disposal), it's simply that my ma

Sun jdk 1.6? Any port?

2007-02-20 Thread Daniel Tourde
Hello, Is there any plan to port Sun JDK 1.6 to FreeBSD? Would it be possible to build it from scratch, without the need for a Java Linux-based binary JDK. Daniel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source?

2007-02-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:09:41PM +0100, Daniel Tourde wrote: > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:20:45PM +0100, Daniel Tourde wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Is it possible to build sun-jdk-1.5 from the source code? > > > If yes, how

Re: diablo-jdk 1.5.0 problem

2007-01-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:54:34AM +0100, scaligeracarni wrote: > I made : > pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.01.tbz > > on a freebsd 6.1 but when I try to run java the computer say that I need > libz.so.2! > How can resolve my problem? Are you absolutely sure y

Re: diablo-jdk 1.5.0 problem

2007-01-09 Thread Oliver Fromme
scaligeracarni wrote: > I made : > pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.01.tbz > > on a freebsd 6.1 but when I try to run java the computer say that I need > libz.so.2! > How can resolve my problem? Install the compat5x package. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver

diablo-jdk 1.5.0 problem

2007-01-09 Thread scaligeracarni
I made : pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.01.tbz on a freebsd 6.1 but when I try to run java the computer say that I need libz.so.2! How can resolve my problem? -- Passa a Infostrada. ADSL e Telefono senza limiti e senza canone

Re: jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability (CVE-2005-1080).

2006-09-13 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 9/13/06, Jacques Vidrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006-09-12, at 13:52:40, Remko Lodder wrote: > David Robillard wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> Are there any workaround or a patch for this security problem? >> FreeBSD Foundation's Java JDK and JRE 5.0 Upda

Re: jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability (CVE-2005-1080).

2006-09-12 Thread Jacques Vidrine
On 2006-09-12, at 13:52:40, Remko Lodder wrote: David Robillard wrote: Hi everyone, Are there any workaround or a patch for this security problem? FreeBSD Foundation's Java JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 7 binaries for FreeBSD 6.1/i386: Affected package: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 Ty

Re: jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability (CVE-2005-1080).

2006-09-12 Thread Remko Lodder
David Robillard wrote: Hi everyone, Are there any workaround or a patch for this security problem? FreeBSD Foundation's Java JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 7 binaries for FreeBSD 6.1/i386: Affected package: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 Type of problem: jdk -- jar directory trav

jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability (CVE-2005-1080).

2006-09-12 Thread David Robillard
Hi everyone, Are there any workaround or a patch for this security problem? FreeBSD Foundation's Java JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 7 binaries for FreeBSD 6.1/i386: Affected package: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 Type of problem: jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability. Reference:

Re: Can you install diablo-jdk for 6.1 on 6.0?

2006-09-08 Thread Napoleon Dynamite
I think there was a vulnerability on it, so I installed the Sun version of JDK 15 from ports and blackdown-jdk-14 instead. I wanted the package to avoid the long compile time, but it wasn't too bad. HTH, Eric Buchanan On Friday 08 September 2006 22:31, Henry Lenzi wrote: > Hi -- >

Can you install diablo-jdk for 6.1 on 6.0?

2006-09-08 Thread Henry Lenzi
Hi -- Can you install diablo-jdk for 6.1 on 6.0? One can no longer find the original package for 6.0 on the FreeBSD foundation web site. TIA. Henry ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: JDK 1.5 in a Jail

2006-08-18 Thread Christian Hiris
On Friday, 18. August 2006 18:54, Bret J Esquivel wrote: > Hi Chad, > > Yeah I've tried below inside the master: > > mount -t linprocfs linprocfs /usr/jails/ox1.immense.net/compat/linux/proc > > with df containing: > > linprocfs 4 40 100% > /usr/jails/ox1.immense.n

Re: JDK 1.5 in a Jail

2006-08-18 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
--Original Message- From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 11:54 AM To: Bret J Esquivel Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: JDK 1.5 in a Jail On Aug 18, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Bret J Esquivel wrote: ox1# make install ===> Bui

RE: JDK 1.5 in a Jail

2006-08-18 Thread Bret J Esquivel
hanks, Bret J. Esquivel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Immense Networks LLC http://www.immense.net -Original Message- From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 11:54 AM To: Bret J Esquivel Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: JDK 1.5 in a

Re: JDK 1.5 in a Jail

2006-08-18 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Aug 18, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Bret J Esquivel wrote: ox1# make install ===> Building for jdk-1.5.0p3_3 ERROR: You must have LINPROCFS mounted before starting to build the native JDK 1.5.0. You may do it with the following commands: # kldload linprocfs and # mount -t linprocfs linpro

JDK 1.5 in a Jail

2006-08-18 Thread Bret J Esquivel
Hi, I am trying to install the JDK 1.5.0 port inside of a FreeBSD 6.1 Jail. (/usr/ports/java/jdk15) I have linux compat configured on the main host on the box, along with the linprocfs enabled. Chad Shire had posted about this same issue before, stating that he posted the answer earlier in the

Re: How to build azureus port with diablo-1.5.0-b00 jdk

2006-08-04 Thread Micah
Gautham Ganapathy wrote: On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 17:39 -0700, Micah wrote: Gautham Ganapathy wrote: Hi I have installed the diablo jdk package downloaded from the freebsd foundation page. Now, when I try to build the azureus port, it also tries to build jdk1.4.2 because log4j depends on that

Re: How to build azureus port with diablo-1.5.0-b00 jdk

2006-08-04 Thread Gautham Ganapathy
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 17:39 -0700, Micah wrote: > Gautham Ganapathy wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have installed the diablo jdk package downloaded from the freebsd > > foundation page. Now, when I try to build the azureus port, it also > > tries to build jdk1.4.2 b

Re: How to build azureus port with diablo-1.5.0-b00 jdk

2006-08-03 Thread Micah
Gautham Ganapathy wrote: Hi I have installed the diablo jdk package downloaded from the freebsd foundation page. Now, when I try to build the azureus port, it also tries to build jdk1.4.2 because log4j depends on that port. How can I get the ports system to use the installed jdk instead of

How to build azureus port with diablo-1.5.0-b00 jdk

2006-08-03 Thread Gautham Ganapathy
Hi I have installed the diablo jdk package downloaded from the freebsd foundation page. Now, when I try to build the azureus port, it also tries to build jdk1.4.2 because log4j depends on that port. How can I get the ports system to use the installed jdk instead of building 1.4.2? I am using

Re: jdk port

2006-07-21 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
ng directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' > gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' > gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. > *** Error code 1 > &g

Re: post re jdk port

2006-07-21 Thread eoghan
Donald J. O'Neill wrote: On Friday 21 July 2006 04:54, eoghan wrote: Hi I postd a question about the jdk port but didnt see my message get to the list. Since Im using a gmail account it may be something to do with this, but I do remember seeing previous posts I made. Can someone let me kn

Re: post re jdk port

2006-07-21 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 21 July 2006 04:54, eoghan wrote: > Hi > I postd a question about the jdk port but didnt see my message get to > the list. Since Im using a gmail account it may be something to do with > this, but I do remember seeing previous posts I made. Can someone let me > know if it

post re jdk port

2006-07-21 Thread eoghan
Hi I postd a question about the jdk port but didnt see my message get to the list. Since Im using a gmail account it may be something to do with this, but I do remember seeing previous posts I made. Can someone let me know if it got through and if not I can post the same again. Thanks Eoghan

jdk port

2006-07-20 Thread eoghan
tory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. *** Error code 1 Are the suggested zip for jdk the same for amd64? How would I go about fixing this problem? Thanks Eoghan

Re: diablo-jdk vs jdk1.5

2006-05-28 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:51 -0300 (ADT) "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Norberto Meijome wrote: > > > Hi all, > > 2 questions re. JDK 1.5 : > > - is .15 considered now stable? ( I remember reading that it was still

  1   2   3   >