On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:10:31AM -0600, John wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:46:03PM -0800, Joshua Tinnin wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 February 2005 09:01 pm, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:53:21PM -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:46:03PM -0800, Joshua Tinnin wrote:
> On Thursday 10 February 2005 09:01 pm, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:53:21PM -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:10:00AM -0600, John wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 0
On Thursday 10 February 2005 09:01 pm, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:53:21PM -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:10:00AM -0600, John wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:05:22PM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
> > > > Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:53:21PM -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:10:00AM -0600, John wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:05:22PM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
> > > Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:06:17PM -0600, John wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>OK, I mus
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:10:00AM -0600, John wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:05:22PM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
> > Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:06:17PM -0600, John wrote:
> > >
> > >>OK, I must be dumb as a rock, because this has to have been discussed
> > >>and docu
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 09:25:08AM -0700, Pat Maddox wrote:
> I don't think I ever saw that message you got, but I remember that it
> did download a ton of Xorg stuff because there was a motif dependency
> or something. As far as linux goes...you need to have linux emulation
> enabled, because you
I don't think I ever saw that message you got, but I remember that it
did download a ton of Xorg stuff because there was a motif dependency
or something. As far as linux goes...you need to have linux emulation
enabled, because you use a linux JDK to build the native one. So make
sure you've got l
I'm not sure if you've seen the below link or not, but it worked
perfectly for me as I was trying to get Java working.
http://www.brettsbsd.net/~estrabd/blog/index.php?/archives/21_Java_1.4_on_FreeBSD_4.10_in_8_steps.html
Hope that helps some.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:10:00 -0600, John <[EMAIL P
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:05:22PM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
> Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:06:17PM -0600, John wrote:
> >
> >>OK, I must be dumb as a rock, because this has to have been discussed
> >>and documented 16 ways from Sunday, but I've looked in the FAQ,
> >>and lo
Chuck Swiger wrote:
If you choose not to see any distinction between software which is
freely available and comes with source code, and between other forms of
software which neither comes with source nor is free, fine.
No. "Open" has for a long time referred to "industry standard", before
it was
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Even Apple doesn't show up in their radar... what do you expect.
This is untrue.
The Mac Runtime for Java is a high-priority environment for both Apple
When I go to java.sun.com, I can download the jdk for: Linux, Windows,
Solaris. That's what I meant.
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Even Apple doesn't show up in their radar... what do you expect.
This is untrue.
The Mac Runtime for Java is a high-priority environment for both Apple
When I go to java.sun.com, I can download the jdk for: Linux, Windows,
Solaris. That's what I meant.
Java is as proprietary
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 07:04:42PM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 11:34:04PM -0600, John wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:05:22PM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
> > > Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:06:17PM -0600, John wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>OK, I mus
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Jonathan Chen wrote:
Blame Sun; they don't make it easy for organizations like FreeBSD
to release a binary version of Java.
Even Apple doesn't show up in their radar... what do you expect.
This is untrue.
The Mac Runtime for Java is a high-priority environment for both Apple
Jonathan Chen wrote:
Blame Sun; they don't make it easy for organizations like FreeBSD
to release a binary version of Java.
Even Apple doesn't show up in their radar... what do you expect.
Java is as proprietary as it gets. (Unfortunately many of us need it.)
mkb.
_
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 11:34:04PM -0600, John wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:05:22PM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
> > Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:06:17PM -0600, John wrote:
> > >
> > >>OK, I must be dumb as a rock, because this has to have been discussed
> > >>and docu
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:05:22PM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
> Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:06:17PM -0600, John wrote:
> >
> >>OK, I must be dumb as a rock, because this has to have been discussed
> >>and documented 16 ways from Sunday, but I've looked in the FAQ,
> >>and lo
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:06:17PM -0600, John wrote:
OK, I must be dumb as a rock, because this has to have been discussed
and documented 16 ways from Sunday, but I've looked in the FAQ,
and looked in the Handbook, and I've gone through my copy of the
latest edition of _The Co
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:06:17PM -0600, John wrote:
> OK, I must be dumb as a rock, because this has to have been discussed
> and documented 16 ways from Sunday, but I've looked in the FAQ,
> and looked in the Handbook, and I've gone through my copy of the
> latest edition of _The Complete FreeBS
OK, I must be dumb as a rock, because this has to have been discussed
and documented 16 ways from Sunday, but I've looked in the FAQ,
and looked in the Handbook, and I've gone through my copy of the
latest edition of _The Complete FreeBSD_, but I simply do NOT get
how to get Java support for FreeBS
20 matches
Mail list logo
