On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:10 PM, b. f. wrote:
>
> Okay. Maybe we'll see a convergence of the two in the medium/long
> term. Right now, interested parties need to look at the available
> hardware, and then talk to the vendors about whether they would be
> willing to support a port of their softwa
On 21.08.2010 11:01, "C. Bergström" wrote:
*snip*
> (Hope I don't come across negative... I'm just trying to give real
> feedback based on our experience)
No coming-across-as-negative interpreted. ;)
As I said, my two 5970s sit in a windows box...
//Svein
--
+---+--
Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
On 18.08.2010 18:20, "C. Bergström" wrote:
Hi Oliver,
The problem behind the subject is a little bit frustrating, so I do
not know were to start.
Yeah it's a pretty big problem, but I can say others are looking at it
and taking small steps
On 18.08.2010 18:20, "C. Bergström" wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
>> The problem behind the subject is a little bit frustrating, so I do
>> not know were to start.
> Yeah it's a pretty big problem, but I can say others are looking at it
> and taking small steps in the right direction.
>> First, and this h
On 8/20/10, Eduardo wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:24:16 +
> "b. f." wrote:
> Reading documentation, thanks b. f. I'm already on freebsd-hackers
> list. Is that the correct list for this topic?
If you have a specific technical question about FreeBSD internals,
then freebsd-hackers is proba
Hi b. f.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:24:16 +
"b. f." wrote:
> ...
>
> > MPI is typically dependent on the network not OpenMP. OpenMP 3.0
> > can be made more scalable if there's tasks built-into the kernel
>
> http://www.bsdcan.org/2010/schedule/events/169.en.html
>
> , and I'm sure the
...
> MPI is typically dependent on the network not OpenMP. OpenMP 3.0 can
> be made more scalable if there's tasks built-into the kernel that can
> be cleanly exposed to userland. (Like OpenSolaris + libtask from
> Moinak is a good example)
If you have a specific set of modifications in mind,
Sorry for the dalay:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:26:16 +0700
"C. Bergström" wrote:
> No, PathScale has a full NVIDIA replacement. From front-end
> programming model to kernel driver. (I'm happy to give more
> information, but don't want to spam the list)
Oks,
> > FreeBSD has better OpenMP capab
emor...@xroff.net wrote:
Hi Christopher,
"C. Bergström" escribió:
PathScale and CAPS recently announced HMPP as a new manycore GPGPU
open standard and there's a chance you'll see it ported to FBSD. In
addition to this you could see other open standards working well on
FBSD, but that depend
Hi Christopher,
"C. Bergström" escribió:
PathScale and CAPS recently announced HMPP as a new manycore GPGPU
open standard and there's a chance you'll see it ported to FBSD. In
addition to this you could see other open standards working well on
FBSD, but that depends on market demand and
Hi Oliver,
The problem behind the subject is a little bit frustrating, so I do not
know were to start.
Yeah it's a pretty big problem, but I can say others are looking at it and
taking small steps in the right direction.
First, and this
hasn't changed since the last 15 years, FreeBSD lack in
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending
it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following
link:
[1]Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Webmaste
> There are some other "problems" (please note that i don't follow the
> -current nor -kernel lists)
>
> a) Who knows how to implement Kernel Mode Settings for this?
> b) Are KMS drivers desirable in FreeBSD?
> c) Is it in the roadmap for FreeBSD9 or 8.x?
> d) Anyone wants to do the work?
proba
Pieter de Goeje escribió:
The amd64 driver was an illustration of something where raising awareness or
whatever you might call it actually helped IMHO.
Unfortunately this is a chicken-and-egg problem. No HPC users means no demand
means no incentive to do something about it means no HPC users
On Monday 16 August 2010 23:00:52 Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 08/16/10 21:13, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> > On Monday 16 August 2010 16:50:01 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly ab
On 08/16/10 21:13, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:50:01 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for
On 08/16/10 16:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for HPC and
that they very much would like to see OpenCL/CUDA
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:50:01 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > > I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
> > > To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for HPC and
> > > that they very much
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
> > To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for HPC and
> > that they very much would like to see OpenCL/CUDA supported.
how is this different fro
> I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
> To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for HPC and
> that they very much would like to see OpenCL/CUDA supported.
http://nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=152742
__
On Monday 16 August 2010 15:47:13 emor...@xroff.net wrote:
> Ivan Klymenko escribió:
> > В Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:53:10 +0200
> > "O. Hartmann" пишет:
> >
> > I think that OpenCL can be activated in FreeBSD, if you add the
> > necessary extensions for clang/llvm ...
> > http://clang.llvm.org/docs/L
Ivan Klymenko escribió:
В Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:53:10 +0200
"O. Hartmann" пишет:
I think that OpenCL can be activated in FreeBSD, if you add the
necessary extensions for clang/llvm ...
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#vectors
Yes, you can compile OpenCL but you can't execut
В Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:53:10 +0200
"O. Hartmann" пишет:
I think that OpenCL can be activated in FreeBSD, if you add the
necessary extensions for clang/llvm ...
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#vectors
and a few links on the topic ...
http://www.khronos.org/message_boards/viewtop
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:53:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> First, and this
> hasn't changed since the last 15 years, FreeBSD lack in support of
> professional Compiler vendors.
I feel your pain.
I'd say that at present FBSD cannot be used as HPC platform.
Even if some things are possible
Hello.
The problem behind the subject is a little bit frustrating, so I do not
know were to start.
I use FreeBSD at my lab and private for scientific stuff. In most cases,
FreeBSD performed sufficiently for tasks we/I had to do. But this
picture has changed.
Modelling atsrodynamical problems I
25 matches
Mail list logo
