In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kai Grossjohann (kg) writes:
kg> Software is written for users, isn't it?
>From observation I would say that most software is written against
users.
As for FBSD, I hope it is being written for the enjoyment of those
writing it, since that is the best insurance th
"Thompson, Jimi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why should The FreeBSD project be interested in users ?
They are VERY interested in users, according to my humble experience.
And that's good: Software is written for users, isn't it?
Kai
___
[EMAIL PROTE
On Jun 15, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Chris Lynch wrote:
This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject
has been
brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of it all.
Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy dance...but,
then
we'd be stepping on the Eas
Andrew L. Gould wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:20:17 -0400
"Chris Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject
has been brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of
it all. Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a ha
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 10:39, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
> > Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy
> > dance...
>
> Too fluffy. FreeBSD is a no-fluff OS! ;-)
No, but it keeps going and going and going and going and...
Cheers,
Frank
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
r to Linux and Windoze, regardless of it's mascot.
Sincerely,
Thad Butterworth
--
Message: 29
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:53:49 -0500
From: Peter Pauly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Devil Mascot
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EM
>
> On Tuesday 15 June 2004 11:19 am, Randy Pratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:53:57 -0400
> >
> > "Mi A. Llort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> > > > Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
> > >
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 11:19 am, Randy Pratt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:53:57 -0400
>
> "Mi A. Llort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> > > Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
> >
> > Ed, it's obv
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:53:57 -0400
"Mi A. Llort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> > Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
>
> Ed, it's obvious you've hit a nerve.
>
> Many list subscribers who have neve
Hi all,
Mostly for entertainment.
Agreed. It was fun, thanks all.
EOT, please? ... Nico
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry
> McAllister
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:41 AM
> To: Mi A. Llort
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Devil Mascot
>
>
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> > &g
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:20:17 -0400
"Chris Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject
> has been brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of
> it all. Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy
> dance...but
TED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry
> McAllister
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:41 AM
> To: Mi A. Llort
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Devil Mascot
>
>
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> > >
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:20:17 -0400, Chris Lynch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject has been
> brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of it all.
> Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy dance...but,
and ate everything.
So don't mess with the Easter Bunny ... he's got contacts!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry
> McAllister
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:41 AM
> To: Mi A. Llort
> Cc: [EMA
what could
happen then!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry
McAllister
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:41 AM
To: Mi A. Llort
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Devil Mascot
>
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wr
>
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> > Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
>
> Ed, it's obvious you've hit a nerve.
>
> Many list subscribers who have never contributed before, feel
> compelled to reply, repeating the same explan
>
> On 6/13/2004 at 5:02 PM Edward Hendrie wrote:
> |
> |Look at how MSN is marketing its ISP. They use characters dressed in
> |harmless butterfly costumes.
> =
>
> Looks more like a mosquito to me.
>
I don't know about that, but it probably tracks disease all over.
And if that
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
Ed, it's obvious you've hit a nerve.
Many list subscribers who have never contributed before, feel
compelled to reply, repeating the same explanations which have
On 6/13/2004 at 5:02 PM Edward Hendrie wrote:
|
|Look at how MSN is marketing its ISP. They use characters dressed in
|harmless butterfly costumes.
=
Looks more like a mosquito to me.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.fre
Thompson, Jimi wrote:
From a marketing
perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many
people
of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying
FreeBSD
because they have religious objections to a product that is promoted
by a
devil.
Why should The FreeBSD pr
On Monday 14 June 2004 04:09 pm, Jorn Argelo wrote:
> Peter Pauly wrote:
> >I wonder if the FreeBSD daemon could be considered a "god"...
> >
> >because he can "make world".
>
> Heh, now that's a nice one.
>
> Interesting discussion by the way, but I wonder, why are we going to
> reply to an obviou
Peter Pauly wrote:
I wonder if the FreeBSD daemon could be considered a "god"...
because he can "make world".
Heh, now that's a nice one.
Interesting discussion by the way, but I wonder, why are we going to
reply to an obvious troll like that? Just let the man be, and we might
as well spend ti
I don't think there is much to worry about on that front. Please read below
and you will understand.
http://bonehead.oddballs.com/todays_bonehead.html
TODAY WE BESTOW SIX BONEHEAD AWARDS
Not Screwed Up Enough. The Stupids Try To Have A Baby
Bonehead award one goes to a German couple who, after 8
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:07:41 +0200, Ole Guldberg Jensen wrote
> Edward Hendrie wrote:
>
> > Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html
>
> > From a marketing
> > perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people
--- Jan Muenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You may think that is a small issue, but when
> you are trying to create
> > market awareness you need a mascot that evokes
> simplicity and goodwill, not
> > one that evokes evil and deception.
>
> Man... either you're a (moderately funny) trol
I wonder if the FreeBSD daemon could be considered a "god"...
because he can "make world".
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to
create
market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and
goodwill, not
one that evokes evil and deception.
... and here I thought that giving software away for free to everyone
in the world was a form of altruism and
Greg Pavelcak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 08:31:40AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > This has come up 1 times. It's simply not going to happen because the
> > beastie has too much historical significance. It's a matter of pride that the
> > beastie mascot has m
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
> perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people
> of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD
> becau
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot?
You might want to look at the output of "whois antichristconspiracy.com"
before wasting your time responding to this.
Then you can construct much more amusing replies.
-- Richard
___
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 08:31:40AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> This has come up 1 times. It's simply not going to happen because the
> beastie has too much historical significance. It's a matter of pride that the
> beastie mascot has more history than the Linux penguin and the Microshit
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cordula's Web (cw) writes:
cw> Tux looks cute, but does it stand for (code) bloat? ;-)
It's quite simple:
BSD: Daemon, evil, 'nuff said.
Linux: Penguin, it's never going to fly.
Windows: Distorted windowframe, lets crooks in.
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
> perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people
> of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD
> because they have relig
> For clarity: it refers to background server processes, not evil. The
> penguin refers to nothing.
Tux looks cute, but does it stand for (code) bloat? ;-)
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.fre
> > You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to create
> > market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and goodwill, not
> > one that evokes evil and deception.
For the original inspiration, look up Maxwell's daemon on google. In
the 19th century, Maxwell us
Btw, I wonder what sane sysadmin would base his choice between OS'es
upon their mascot. At least I wouldn't drop an excellent OS such as
FreeBSD just for the mascot.
For clarity: it refers to background server processes, not evil. The
penguin refers to nothing.
And if you really want BSD
> From a marketing
> perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many
people
> of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying
FreeBSD
> because they have religious objections to a product that is promoted
by a
> devil.
Why should The FreeBSD project be in
Hello all.
We are proud of it. Period.
At 08:33 a.m. 14/06/04 -0400, you wrote:
On 13/06/04 17:02 -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
> perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many
people
> of various religio
On Jun 13, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Edward Hendrie wrote:
Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many
people
of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying
FreeBSD
because they have religi
Please realize that I am not an official
representative of FreeBSD, nor any organization
associated to it.
--- Edward Hendrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot?
Daemon...
> From a marketing perspective,
Blasphemy...
> you are shooting yourselves
If some people are put off from FreeBSD because the "devil" mascot
evokes "evil and deception", they are not people I personally would want
using the same OS as me. Good riddance! Speaking only for myself, of course.
Now MSN, and its behemoth parent Microsoft, on the oth
On 06/13/04 05:02 PM, Edward Hendrie sat at the `puter and typed:
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a
> marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot.
> There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will
> be dissuaded from trying
On 13/06/04 17:02 -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote:
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
> perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people
> of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD
> because they have reli
"Edward Hendrie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
> perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people
> of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD
> because they have religi
> You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to create
> market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and goodwill, not
> one that evokes evil and deception.
I think it looks friendly, not evil at all. Moreover, it says "FreeBSD,
the power to serve". Sounds goo
Edward Hendrie wrote:
Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot?
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html
From a marketing
perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people
of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD
because the
> You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to create
> market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and goodwill, not
> one that evokes evil and deception.
Man... either you're a (moderately funny) troll or *you're* the one with
some serious issues here.
It's
On Monday 14 June 2004 02:02, Edward Hendrie wrote:
Hi,
> Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot?
It's not a devil, it's a daemon.
> Look at how MSN is marketing its ISP. They use characters dressed in
> harmless butterfly costumes.
... looking ridiculous, IMHO...
> You m
Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing
perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people
of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD
because they have religious objections to a product that is promoted by a
dev
50 matches
Mail list logo
