Re: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-30 Thread Jonathon McKitrick
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:00:03AM +, Martin Hepworth wrote: : Jonathon : : presumably all the nameserver is doing is forwarding requests to your : ISP, as set in the named.boot file? also I guess you're running bind in : which case it will cache automatically. I believe so. I set up a c

Re: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-30 Thread Martin Hepworth
Jonathon presumably all the nameserver is doing is forwarding requests to your ISP, as set in the named.boot file? also I guess you're running bind in which case it will cache automatically. probably best to just have it running on the gateway then it will cache requests from all clients. hav

RE: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-29 Thread Subhro
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathon McKitrick > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 2:15 > To: Peter Risdon > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Caching DNS for dialup > > On Wed, Nov 2

Re: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-29 Thread Peter Risdon
Jonathon McKitrick wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:07:20PM +, Peter Risdon wrote: : A caching DNS server would help conserve bandwidth on a dialup : connection - I generally run one myself with any connection with limited : bandwidth. After RTFM, I believe I have it up and running. ;-) Na

Re: Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-29 Thread David Jenkins
On Mon, 29 November, 2004 20:44, Jonathon McKitrick said: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:07:20PM +, Peter Risdon wrote: > : A caching DNS server would help conserve bandwidth on a dialup > : connection - I generally run one myself with any connection with > limited > : bandwidth. > > After RTFM,

Caching DNS for dialup

2004-11-29 Thread Jonathon McKitrick
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 05:07:20PM +, Peter Risdon wrote: : A caching DNS server would help conserve bandwidth on a dialup : connection - I generally run one myself with any connection with limited : bandwidth. After RTFM, I believe I have it up and running. ;-) Named is running, but how c