.168.4.155,
> length 46
> 14:53:00.821098 ARP, Reply 192.168.4.157 is-at 00:0b:ab:4f:d4:2a (oui
> Unknown), length 46
> 14:53:01.837654 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.4.157 tell 192.168.4.155,
> length 46
> 14:53:01.837672 ARP, Reply 192.168.4.157 is-at 00:0b:ab:4f:d4:2a (oui
>
14:53:01.837672 ARP, Reply 192.168.4.157 is-at 00:0b:ab:4f:d4:2a (oui
Unknown), length 46
it seems that bridging just can be done by two interfaces:(
i use "ifconfig bridge0 create" and "ifconfig addm igb1 addm igb2" for
bridging two interfaces. i test by putting the below comm
> wrote:
On 12/11/11 23:31, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in
addm gbeth1 up
what is wrong here? it's so necessary for me to doing this:(
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Da Rock <
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
> On 12/11/11 23:31, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
>
>> hello everybody
>> i have a problem in brid
On 12/11/11 23:31, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in doesn'
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in doesn't what is expected. you know i want to have
if_bridge(4) says:
The if_bridge driver currently supports only Ethernet and Ethernet-like
(e.g., 802.11) network devices, with exactly the same interface MTU size
as the bridge device.
Am I correct to assume then that I can bridge a gigabit interface and
a fast ethernet interface and that one of
Howard Jones wrote:
> I'm trying to use Dummynet+IPFW and bridging to make a packet shaper
> that runs across multiple VLANs. So my intended set up is:
>
> [users]->[Aggregate Switch]=>[FreeBSD]=>[Upstream Switch (with IP
> interfaces for each vlan)]->The World
>
I'm trying to use Dummynet+IPFW and bridging to make a packet shaper
that runs across multiple VLANs. So my intended set up is:
[users]->[Aggregate Switch]=>[FreeBSD]=>[Upstream Switch (with IP
interfaces for each vlan)]->The World
where -> is a single VLAN, and => is a
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> > i noted that, following information is missing
> > member: sk0 flags=143
> > ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 200
> > member: sk1 flags=143
> > ifmaxaddr 0 port 2 priority 128 path cost 20
> >
> > Now i need to know how to add the interfaces
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:28:01 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > &
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:05:09 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> >
&
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:05:09 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date:
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:48:40 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> &g
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:48:40 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0700
From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
To: faiz...@hotmail.com
CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
fb...@a1poweruser.com
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Hi
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0700
> From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
> To: faiz...@hotmail.com
> CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
> fb...@a1poweruser.com
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
&
Hi,
> > Are you using properly crossed cables?
> Isnt it enough check for the that two linux can ping each other..
Yes and no. You must used crossed Ethernet cable between your FreeBSD
bridge and each of your Linux boxes.
As someone suggested, what is ifconfig saying on the FreeBSD box? You
sh
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:28:10 +0700
> From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
> To: faiz...@hotmail.com
> CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
> fb...@a1poweruser.com
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
>
Hi,
> I connected two linux PCs with these two interfaces (sk0 and sk1)
> and tried to ping between them but didnt get any
> success.configuration seems to be ok, but still no traffice is being
> passed. Can any one give any sugestion ?
Stupid question, but if you connect the 2 Linux boxes direct
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure but as per some internet guide, I have configured the bridge on
Freebsd(7) Machine with two LAN cards on it
I have compiled my KERNEL with (device if_bridge)
and then added code to rc.conf
cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
ifconfig_bridge
Hi,
I am not sure but as per some internet guide, I have configured the bridge on
Freebsd(7) Machine with two LAN cards on it
I have compiled my KERNEL with (device if_bridge)
and then added code to rc.conf
cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
ifconfig_bridge0="addm sk0 addm sk1 up"
ifconfig
Michael Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to run Qemu on FreeBSD 7.0 and be able to connect from the Qemu
> instance to the internet. For this to work, I'd like to use a tap device
> and bridge it with a wireless (wpi) device. But it seems like both lagg
> and if_bridge doesn't yet support WPA se
Hi,
I'd like to run Qemu on FreeBSD 7.0 and be able to connect from the Qemu
instance to the internet. For this to work, I'd like to use a tap device
and bridge it with a wireless (wpi) device. But it seems like both lagg
and if_bridge doesn't yet support WPA security (or wireless clients).
Any
On Thursday 25 October 2007 00:11:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oct 24 12:33:35 nightmare ppp[859]: tun0: Debug: deflink: PPPoE:ed1:
> Cannot determine bandwidth
>
> I presume this is a result of the lost LQR packets.
No, bandwidth isn't known to ppp. You can ignore this warning.
There is no conne
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
You said you had wrong encapsulation type. Did you make any progress?
Yes.
Changing the encapsulation type brought the line up,
and things hobbled along...
However, the line is dropped after a few minutes,
apparently a result of not being able to determine line quality
ATM/DSL combination :)
>
> The modem is set to use VC-based multiplexing, vpi=0, vci=100
> These are the parameters used for PPPoE, and I presume are still
> required as part of the ATM layer when bridging.
>
> I am assuming there should be no need for my ISP to be notified that
vpi=0, vci=100
These are the parameters used for PPPoE, and I presume are still
required as part of the ATM layer when bridging.
I am assuming there should be no need for my ISP to be notified that I
am trying to use bridging in the modem, since it should be transparent
on their end. They claim n
; I can't try my other modem, a cisco 678,
because it doesn't support a vci > 63.
The modem is set to use VC-based multiplexing, vpi=0, vci=100
These are the parameters used for PPPoE, and I presume are still
required as part of the ATM layer when bridging.
I am assuming there shoul
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:50:15 -0600
Gary Aitken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
> to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
>
> I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 05:31:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
> to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
>
> I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
> properly
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it
y.
>
> You could probably use 192.168.1.2 as your default router, as long as
> you created a static route `route add 192.168.1/24 192.168.2.2', telling
> the system that to get to 192.168.1/24, the next-hop is 192.168.2.2.
> This seems needlessly complex when you can just configure 1
long as
you created a static route `route add 192.168.1/24 192.168.2.2', telling
the system that to get to 192.168.1/24, the next-hop is 192.168.2.2.
This seems needlessly complex when you can just configure 192.168.2.2 as
your default router and skip the static route configuration all
together
UC0 0
rl0
192.168.2.255ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffUHLWb 187
rl0
On 9/29/07, Christopher Cowart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:06:55PM -0600, Simon Timms wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I seem to be having some
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:06:55PM -0600, Simon Timms wrote:
> Hello,
> I seem to be having some trouble bridging interfaces in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE.
> What I have are two interfaces
>
> rl0 - 192.168.2.2
> sis0 - 192.168.1.2
>
> and a bridge I've set up follow
Hello,
I seem to be having some trouble bridging interfaces in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE.
What I have are two interfaces
rl0 - 192.168.2.2
sis0 - 192.168.1.2
and a bridge I've set up following the pages in the handbook. However
frames don't seem to be routed from one interface to the o
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 12:29:30PM -0400, Brian McCann wrote:
> I've poked around on the web, but come up empty. And I find it hard
> to believe there's not a simple way to do this, if it hasn't been done
> before.
>
> I've got a server with two nics configured
On Sep 13, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Brian McCann wrote:
I've got a server with two nics configured for bridging and running
bunches of ipfw rules. I'd like to add a 3rd NIC and have it mirror
the 2nd NIC (so all traffic into and out of nic2 goes to nic3), so I
can run an IDS on another serve
I've poked around on the web, but come up empty. And I find it hard
to believe there's not a simple way to do this, if it hasn't been done
before.
I've got a server with two nics configured for bridging and running
bunches of ipfw rules. I'd like to add a 3rd NIC and h
s not very friendly to casual bridging, so just
ifconfig bridge0 addm tap0 addm ath0 up seems to be out.
I was thinking of an ip tunnel (gif) from the desktop to a machine
that is using wired ethernet. Then bridge the gif interface on the
desktop with the tap interface from qemu and finally bridgi
Thanks for the reply,
I followed the instructions in the handbook for ethernet bridging. In
Freebsd 6.1 release you could compile the bridge and tap modules into the
kernel, then enable ethernet bridging and actually bridge two interfaces
using sysctl.conf. I found that this brought a tap
"Pete Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know anything about ethernet bridging to a tap interface
> in Freebsd 6.2. I have compiled the bridge option and the tap device
> into the kernel, but the tap device has not appeared. I have tried
> this on a vi
Does anyone know anything about ethernet bridging to a tap interface in
Freebsd 6.2. I have compiled the bridge option and the tap device into the
kernel, but the tap device has not appeared. I have tried this on a virtual
machine and a separate box with the same results, yet it works with
I'm trying to get my feet wet with an ethernet bridging setup
under OpenVPN.
I have two hosts on a 10.0.0.0/24 network that I want to
connect: dl360 is the server, and t30 is the client. These
hosts are resolvable by /etc/hosts. TLS seems to be working
from certs I created at cacert.org.
On Jan 17, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Kailas Ramasamy wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks a lot. This is what I was looking for.
-Kailas
On 1/17/07, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kailas
Ramasamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Hi Mike,
> I read through fork() and exec() man pages
erate as expected?
I've looked at the handbook PPPoE info and it seems clear enough and there
are a few sites with info on bridging the router, I'm looking for
clarification before
I start changing the current setup that bridging the router is what I
want, that
the router is transparent to
ould be slower, I thought FreeBSD 5.x had gone to
great lengths to improve the SMP performance. Would it be better to just
implement a more powerful single processor machine to do the bridging?
Dynamic rules do get generated (see ipfw rule set above) because FTP was
having issues when I started to not
> I've also had problems with the bridge running out of dynamic rules. I've
> raised them to silly figures however I'm always wary that if a machine had a
> Trojan or some other form of malware that attempted a DoS attack, the bridge
> would probably fall over after exhausting its dynamic rule coun
details, maybe as files in a directory being served by HTTP, and sending a link.
> I've put together a bridging firewall using FreeBSD 5.X. The traffic routes
> through fine and presently I'm using IPFW, default policy is set to deny,
> with certain rules/ports allowed to pass throu
Hi there. I wonder if somebody could help me with an issue I'm experiencing.
I've put together a bridging firewall using FreeBSD 5.X. The traffic routes
through fine and presently I'm using IPFW, default policy is set to deny,
with certain rules/ports allowed to pass thr
---
From: Peter Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 January 2006 08:29 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging a Cisco Trunk
Dave,
> I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of
> them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set t
2 on
> switch1 it can ping a device on
> > port 2 on switch2.
>
> I do this quite often, and it works very well
> on 6.0 for me. You haven't
> mentioned what version your using, but I will
> assume you have if_bridge.
> If you don't and you're go
t works very well on 6.0 for me. You haven't
mentioned what version your using, but I will assume you have if_bridge.
If you don't and you're gonna use this machine alot for bridging, I'd
recommend moving to 6.0.
So presumably, you have two interfaces, plugged into th
Hi all,
I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of
them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set to trunk between the two
switches. If I have a device on port 2 on switch1 it can ping a device on
port 2 on switch2.
If I break the link between the two switches,
here is the solution:
http://qemu.dad-answers.com/viewtopic.php?t=554
Jan ZACH wrote:
Hi,
I'm configuring qemu. Everything works fine except networking between
the bsd host and the qemu computer (I cannot ping from bsd to qemu and
vice versa). Networking with other computers works fine. Am
Hi,
I'm configuring qemu. Everything works fine except networking between
the bsd host and the qemu computer (I cannot ping from bsd to qemu and
vice versa). Networking with other computers works fine. Am I missing
anything in my configuration?
Thanks a lot
Jan
bge0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
Hi all,
I've done some research on bridging vlans and can't get it right
with FreeBSD bridge. What I want to do is bridge an undefined number of
vlans through a BSD machine. For example. Vlan 10 from em0 out em1.
Now I can't create each vlan and bridge those, because y
Hi,
This what I would like to do ...
Switch <->[sis0 bridge ngeth0.(mesh protocol).ath0] <-wireless->
[ath0.(mesh proto).ngeth0 bridge sis0] <-> switch
The above configuration should allow me to have layer 2 access from
the switch to switch. It's either I'm doing som
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 09:08 PM 8/11/2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Okay, here's the situation. PLEASE let me know if there's a better place
to ask. (isp@, kernel@, something)
I'm setting up a bridging firewall where the packets are passing th
At 09:08 PM 8/11/2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Okay, here's the situation. PLEASE let me know if there's a better place
to ask. (isp@, kernel@, something)
I'm setting up a bridging firewall where the packets are passing through
on dot1q trunks.
The bridge works.
Okay, here's the situation. PLEASE let me know if there's a better place
to ask. (isp@, kernel@, something)
I'm setting up a bridging firewall where the packets are passing through
on dot1q trunks.
The bridge works. Packet counts work (so I assume the bridge at least
s
TECTED]> writes:
their is a bridge software in linux which can do that...
http://bridge.sourceforge.net
That doesn't do what you described. That's just regular bridging, to
connect two links into a single subnet. FreeBSD can do that quite
well (there's a whole chapter titled &
go ahead with making my server a gateway offering combined
> > > bandwidth to our lan?
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand your message, but:
> > How do you do it with the Linux machine?
Sushubh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> their is a bridge software in l
their is a bridge software in linux which can do that...
http://bridge.sourceforge.com
On 20 Jul 2005 09:38:22 -0400, Lowell Gilbert <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sushubh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
> >
> > Now, we have
Sushubh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
>
> Now, we have 2 lines of internet coming to our place through 2
> separate lan modems. I want the server to take these 2 lines and
> combine the speeds to form a single line which can b
I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
Now, we have 2 lines of internet coming to our place through 2 separate
lan modems. I want the server to take these 2 lines and combine the speeds
to form a single line which can be used by our lan to access the internet.
I'm not so sure about your case. But as for as I know, all coming
traffics
catch the first rule ( as you stated .. any MAC any) before the second
one
so only the counter of the first rule is increment. No more for the second
rule.
pjn
Yes and no. In any case, I have tried assigning t
Tried that one myself, but I tried it again. No impact whatsoever!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin House
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 3:27 PM
To: George Breahna
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging and IPFW
On
On 6/1/05, George Breahna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..
According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to
properly filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
$IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC any 00:0E:A6:02:4D:A4 $IPFW
10 add allow ip from any to any MAC 00
1, 2005 11:43 AM
To: George Breahna
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging and IPFW
On 6/1/05, George Breahna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to
> properly filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
&
On 6/1/05, George Breahna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to properly
> filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
>
> $IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC any 00:0E:A6:02:4D:A4
> $IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC
Hey guys, hope I posted this to the right list!
I recently installed version 5.4 on a computer that acts as a
gateway/firewall/bridge for a LAN.
There are 30 or so computers sitting behind interface rl1 which has no IP
address assigned.
rl1 is bridged to rl0 which is the external interface and w
Thank you for your answers ...
Ruben, just a question.
How could I check if my tap device works great or not?
I've already tryed unlucky with tcpdump: I see nothing, even if the
tap0 is in promiscue mode.
Could you help my troubleshooting?
Thanks for your support
Regards
Andrea
__
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli typed:
Andrea Riela wrote:
but I don't see a tap interface in /dev or with ifconfig ...
You won't see any network interface in /dev; just run ifconfig -a and
check: you won't find any of the listed devices in /dev.
T
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli typed:
> Andrea Riela wrote:
>
> >but I don't see a tap interface in /dev or with ifconfig ...
>
> You won't see any network interface in /dev; just run ifconfig -a and
> check: you won't find any of the listed devices in /dev.
That's ri
Andrea Riela wrote:
Hi folks,
I would test openvpn with bridging options, then I need a tap interface.
I've compiled my kernel with
devicetap
then 'kldload if_tap' via command line
These are mutually exclusive: either you compile your kernel with tap or
you load it as a module,
Hi folks,
I would test openvpn with bridging options, then I need a tap interface.
I've compiled my kernel with
device tap
then 'kldload if_tap' via command line, but I don't see a tap interface
in /dev or with ifconfig ...
Obviously:
tcpdump -i tap0
tcpdump: BIOCSET
On 2/13/2005, "Lowell Gilbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On a quick look, I think you might be on the right track. The
>bridging code seems in a number of spots to be built specifically for
>Ethernet. I have always maintained that bridging unlike media was a
just be a quick hack and I don't even know if it would work.
Dummynet works on the IP level, so it wouldn't solve my problem. Else
I'd jump all over it. =(
On 2/13/2005, "Lowell Gilbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Reid Linnemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Reid Linnemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm bridging the devices so that the wired and wireless nets will appear
> to be on the same physical network to eachother.
Well, yes, that's what bridging means. Why do you want that? [Is it
a Microsoft thing?]
&
>
>I think that you mixed up the terms "wired" and "wireless" in some
>(but not all) of the uses above. This makes it somewhat harder to
>follow the problem.
>
>I would actually suggest that you make the wireless link a separate
>subnet from the Ethernet
would actually suggest that you make the wireless link a separate
subnet from the Ethernets. 802.11 really is a different protocol than
802.1, and I don't think you'll get any performance benefit from
bridging in this case.
___
freebsd-questions@fr
RL> I have a question that is more of a networking question than a BSD
RL> question, but I am hoping someone out there has faced this same dilemma
RL> before and has some advice:
RL> I have a FreeBSD machine running -current that servers as a router for my
RL> home LAN, using nat. I recently toss
I have a question that is more of a networking question than a BSD
question, but I am hoping someone out there has faced this same dilemma
before and has some advice:
I have a FreeBSD machine running -current that servers as a router for my
home LAN, using nat. I recently tossed in a DLink DWL-G5
Hi,
I have a firewall in bridging mode, using ipf.
I upgraded to 4.10-p5 and now I have a bunch of error message:
bdg_forward drop MULTICAST PKT
/usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c line 609
Any clue what I am missing (sysctl or kernel)
Thank you,
Olivier
I have been trying to create an isolated virtual LAN with the following
configuration. A single FreeBSD v4.10 server with one physical NIC (fxp0)
is connected to two remote client Windows XP machines via OpenVPN tunnels.
OpenVPN v1.6 on the server and v2.0 on the clients. There are therefore two
. I'd like to connect
another part of the LAN on it, so I thought bridging would be good.
The machine hosting the bridge is my internet router, so every machine
on the
LAN has this machine as router. xl0 has an IP, xl1 has not (the
handbook says
better not to give an IP to the second NIC)
I am not 100% sure of what I speak about. Bridge works in layer 2 i.e.
the data link layer. The virtual interface does not have a data link
layer so it is not possible to get the bridging done as the way you
are saying
Regards
S.
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:42:09 +0300, SharkTECH Maillists
<[EM
backbone side.
The problem is although bonding seems to work fine as I can assign IPs at
fec0/ngeth0 and send/receive packet with both cards using the virtual
interface, I cannot get bridging to work at all between ngeth0/fec0(virtual)
and em2(switch). There are no errors in logs, it just doesn't se
Maybe I should post this to the CURRENT mail list or
maybe STABLE(even though releng_5 isn't stable yet)
but I wanted to try here first.
I can't seem to get bridging working on a new install
of 5.3 beta. I set up the system correctly as far as I
can tell(see info below). I gave one nic(
Hello,
In using FreeBsd 5.2.1-Release I am running into some trouble. I have successfully
recompiled the kernel with support for atheros based wireless cards. I have also been
able to setup the card into access point "Hostap" mode correctly. I have tried the
bridging recommend in t
My box has 3 ethernet cards, fxp0, xl0 and another 4-port card.
Is it possible to bridge all the interfaces like this:
net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=xl0,fxp0
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=vr0,fxp0
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=vr1,fxp0
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=vr2,fxp0
net.lin
> I find no reference to MAC rules showing up in 5.2.1. Any help or advice
> would be appreciated.
That's because bridge(4) doesn't do Layer 2 filtering. Neither does ipfw (as
well it shouldn't). I don't know if there are any plans to add this
capability to FreeBSD's bridge, but I know that OpenBS
I am using this document –
HYPERLINK
"http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/filtering-bridges/filte
ring-bridges-contributors.html"http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/ar
ticles/filtering-bridges/filtering-bridges-contributors.html
I find no reference to MAC rules showi
I originally wrote:
I've got a bridge(4) issue on a BSD 5.2.1 box. The bridging box has
three ethernet interfaces, two bridged together in a single cluster,
and one connected to the internet. The box acts as a bridge for the
two network segments, and as a router to the Internet (it&
I asked:
I've got a bridge(4) issue on a BSD 5.2.1 box. The bridging box has
three ethernet interfaces, two bridged together in a single cluster,
and one connected to the internet. The box acts as a bridge for the
two network segments, and as a router to the Internet (it's th
På Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:56:56 -0700 (MST), skrev Aaron D. Gifford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
PROBLEM SUMMARY:
I've got a bridge(4) issue on a BSD 5.2.1 box. The bridging box has
three ethernet interfaces, two bridged together in a single cluster, and
one connected to t
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
