On 2012-12-21 11:28, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 12/21/12 14:06, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:49 AM, yudi v wrote:
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be
using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and
On 12/21/12 14:06, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:49 AM, yudi v wrote:
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and would like to know what
file systems to choo
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:49 AM, yudi v wrote:
> I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be using 2
> disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
> I have gone through some of the documentation and would like to know what
> file systems to choose.
>
> According to the docs,
Hi all,
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and would like to know what
file systems to choose.
According to the docs, ufs is suggested for the system partitions but
On 29 November 2010 10:54, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 11/29/10 09:56, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>
>> Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build
>> a backups server to store sensitive data ?
>>
>> In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ?
>>
>
> That's a regular theological debat
On 11/29/10 09:56, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build
a backups server to store sensitive data ?
In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ?
That's a regular theological debate round here, and some people will say
yes, and others an emphatic
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ?
>
Yes.
But do it with a machine with a lot of memory and run 64bit.
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hello
Would it be safe to use a FreeBSD + ZFS based machine to build
a backups server to store sensitive data ?
In a word is FreeBSD + ZFS stable and mature ?
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Hi folks,
I'm expecting to receive two harddisks which I've
bought to put in a old pc to act as backup server. Now
I'm planning it all and got stuck because of the
options and particularly I'm having the following two
choices:
a) install a pure freebsd 6.1 box with geom
On 7/23/05, Hornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/22/05, perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/22/05, lars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > perikillo wrote:
> > > > Hi people.
> > > >
> > > > I like to hear some experienced about this situation and see if
> > > > is possible:
> >
On 7/22/05, perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/22/05, lars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > perikillo wrote:
> > > Hi people.
> > >
> > > I like to hear some experienced about this situation and see if
> > > is possible:
> > >
> > >We have in the company i work, one backup system
On 7/22/05, perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/22/05, lars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > perikillo wrote:
> > > Hi people.
> > >
> > > I like to hear some experienced about this situation and see if
> > > is possible:
> > >
> > >We have in the company i work, one backup system
On 7/22/05, lars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> perikillo wrote:
> > Hi people.
> >
> > I like to hear some experienced about this situation and see if
> > is possible:
> >
> >We have in the company i work, one backup system running Windows NT
> > 4 with some Seagate Backup Exec 7.8 over o
perikillo wrote:
Hi people.
I like to hear some experienced about this situation and see if
is possible:
We have in the company i work, one backup system running Windows NT
4 with some Seagate Backup Exec 7.8 over one SCSI system HP SuRestore
Ultrium 230, this system has working good
Hi people.
I like to hear some experienced about this situation and see if
is possible:
We have in the company i work, one backup system running Windows NT
4 with some Seagate Backup Exec 7.8 over one SCSI system HP SuRestore
Ultrium 230, this system has working good for some years, but
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 10:03:07PM -0800, Jeffrey S. Kaye wrote:
> We have two servers, one mirrors the other. The backup server showed
> the following a couple days ago. It's still down. Any ideas? The
> primary is working just fine.
> -jk
>
> FreeBSD/i386 bootstr
We have two servers, one mirrors the other. The backup server showed
the following a couple days ago. It's still down. Any ideas? The
primary is working just fine.
-jk
FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 0.8
([EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thu Apr 3 08:41:
Do any of you have experience with 200/400GB LTO scsi
tape drives in general, and Dell's model in particular?
I need opinions on reliability and speed.
hal
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To u
t; On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 03:30 am, samy lancher wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > > I have a 4.5 FreeBSD server. It is our Email,
> web and database server. I
> > > would like to setup a backup server so that when
> the main server goes down
> > > the backup server
3:30 am, samy lancher wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I have a 4.5 FreeBSD server. It is our Email, web and database server. I
> > would like to setup a backup server so that when the main server goes down
> > the backup server takes over its job. Could some one please tell me the
>
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 03:30 am, samy lancher wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a 4.5 FreeBSD server. It is our Email, web and database server. I
> would like to setup a backup server so that when the main server goes down
> the backup server takes over its job. Could some one please tell m
Or even just create the tars on the machines nightly and have my box
just go in and download them?
-Matt
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 17:41, David Varieur wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:28:44 -0500
> Matthew Juszczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But there would only be one client .. the machine be
On Dec 29, 2003, at 5:28 PM, Matthew Juszczak wrote:
But there would only be one client .. the machine behind my
firewall...connecting to the two servers, which are publically
available.
No problem. Set up a cron job on your machine behind it's firewall,
which does something like:
1 1 * * * /
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:28:44 -0500
Matthew Juszczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But there would only be one client .. the machine behind my
> firewall...connecting to the two servers, which are publically
> available.
>
> -Matt
>
Why not (from the client box)?
ssh remotehost "cd /path/to/dir;
But there would only be one client .. the machine behind my
firewall...connecting to the two servers, which are publically
available.
-Matt
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 17:19, Dave McCammon wrote:
> --- Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 29, 2003, at 3:21 PM, Matthew Juszczak wrote:
>
--- Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2003, at 3:21 PM, Matthew Juszczak wrote:
> > With rsync, it appears that my machine would need
> to run the server
> > software, and the two servers would run clients.
> That just wouldn't
> > work.
>
> While one can run rsync as a daem
--- Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2003, at 3:21 PM, Matthew Juszczak wrote:
> > With rsync, it appears that my machine would need
> to run the server
> > software, and the two servers would run clients.
> That just wouldn't
> > work.
>
> While one can run rsync as a daem
On Dec 29, 2003, at 3:21 PM, Matthew Juszczak wrote:
With rsync, it appears that my machine would need to run the server
software, and the two servers would run clients. That just wouldn't
work.
While one can run rsync as a daemon (which might not be suitable for
your purposes given what you've s
and Curtis Preston put part of his O'Reilly book online:
> http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html
>
> But... Amanda would not be a great choice because it's really a
> backup system and you'd end up having to write scripts to restore from
> dump files created by Amanda to the
part of his O'Reilly book online:
http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html
But... Amanda would not be a great choice because it's really a
backup system and you'd end up having to write scripts to restore from
dump files created by Amanda to the backup server filesystem. If you
I read somewhere about the AMANDA project. Is that any good for a
situation like this?
> On Friday 26 December 2003 12:30 pm, samy lancher wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I have a 4.5 FreeBSD server. It is our Email, web and database
>> server. I would like to setup a backup server
On Friday 26 December 2003 12:30 pm, samy lancher wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a 4.5 FreeBSD server. It is our Email, web and database
> server. I would like to setup a backup server so that when the main
> server goes down the backup server takes over its job. Could some one
> ple
On 27 Dec 2003 10:15:06 -0500, Lowell Gilbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
samy lancher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have a 4.5 FreeBSD server. It is our Email, web and database server.
I would like to setup a backup server so that when the main server goes
down the backup serve
samy lancher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a 4.5 FreeBSD server. It is our Email, web and database server. I would like
> to setup a backup server so that when the main server goes down the backup server
> takes over its job.
> Could some one please tell me the best way
Hello all,
I have a 4.5 FreeBSD server. It is our Email, web and database server. I would like to
setup a backup server so that when the main server goes down the backup server takes
over its job.
Could some one please tell me the best way to setup a backup server and also suggest
some good
> Greetings,
> I have an NT 4 server
Sorry to hear that. I'm sure you realize MS no longer officially supports
NT4 right? Well, no matter, on to the real questions...
> that I wish to back its data up to a
> FreeBSD box running Samba. The thought being that
> since I cannot back all the NT 4 da
Greetings,
I have an NT 4 server that I wish to back its data up to a
FreeBSD box running Samba. The thought being that
since I cannot back all the NT 4 data up to one tape
(24GB compressed), that I could back it up every other night.
The nights it didn't go to tape, it would go to the Freebsd box
On Sunday, Mar 30, 2003, at 14:18 US/Pacific, Ralph Dratman wrote:
I'm trying to create an offsite "hot backup" of a FreeBSD server. If
the primary server fails, I want to transport the spare machine to the
existing site and bring it up as a replacement, with little or no
reconfiguration necess
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 05:18:54PM -0500, Ralph Dratman wrote:
> I'm trying to create an offsite "hot backup" of a FreeBSD server. If
> the primary server fails, I want to transport the spare machine to
> the existing site and bring it up as a replacement, with little or no
> reconfiguration nec
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 17:18:54 -0500
Ralph Dratman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to create an offsite "hot backup" of a FreeBSD server. If
> the primary server fails, I want to transport the spare machine to
> the existing site and bring it up as a replacement, with little or no
> recon
I'm trying to create an offsite "hot backup" of a FreeBSD server. If
the primary server fails, I want to transport the spare machine to
the existing site and bring it up as a replacement, with little or no
reconfiguration necessary.
Nightly mirroring would be adequate in this situation. The sys
41 matches
Mail list logo
