login*
Could it be a dud /root/.tcshrc? Or /etc/login.conf?
The accounts which try to ssh login also login on host proper and do not
have any login issues when logging-in directly on host - so I think we can
eliminate these problems.
I'm now really guessing - I've not tried 9.2-RELEASE. Giv
rc? Or /etc/login.conf?
The accounts which try to ssh login also login on host proper and do not
have any login issues when logging-in directly on host - so I think we can
eliminate these problems.
Thanks and Regards
-----
FreeBSD-9.2-stable_amd64_root-on-zfs_clang-only-world
--
View this message
On 10/12/13 20:37, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 11:52 +0200, David Demelier wrote:
I don't like much chrome but I'll give a try to see.
+1 It's not a browser I like.
Since I'm using my computer for audio production my FreeBSD isn't
maintained, I need to use Linux, so I don't know
is root's home directory valid? Why not
post /etc/passwd and we'll check :-)
Could it be a dud /root/.tcshrc? Or /etc/login.conf?
I assume you've configured sshd to allow direct root logins. If you
hadn't I think you get a different rejection m
m for root from
192.168.1.10 port 33248 ssh2
Oct 13 19:42:37: Received disconnect from 192.168.1.10: 11: disconnected by
user
Thanks for any advice on how to resolve these two issues.
-
FreeBSD-9.2-stable_amd64_root-on-zfs_clang-only-world
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 11:52 +0200, David Demelier wrote:
> I don't like much chrome but I'll give a try to see.
+1 It's not a browser I like.
Since I'm using my computer for audio production my FreeBSD isn't
maintained, I need to use Linux, so I don't know if Chrome is available
for FreeBSD. When
On 12.10.2013 11:02, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> If you really need to visit sites that need Adobe Flash, you perhaps
> should use the google-chrome browser. For some websites with flash
> content, we don't need flash anymore, just modern HTML5 capable web
> browsers. For *nix there never will be a curre
If you really need to visit sites that need Adobe Flash, you perhaps
should use the google-chrome browser. For some websites with flash
content, we don't need flash anymore, just modern HTML5 capable web
browsers. For *nix there never will be a current version for flashplayer
again.
__
Hi,
The current linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.310 version has some troubles
on my machine (with Firefox).
Sometimes, when a flash component is displayed and you scroll a bit the
window the flash break and goes grey, you're forced to reload the page.
I'm using the Intel new KMS driver if that ma
I am running vanilla 9.2-RELEASE on an HP Z230.
Strangely, my USB keyboard and mouse don't work. When I attach, here is
what shows:
Oct 11 12:36:39 waridi kernel: usb_alloc_device: device init 2 failed
(USB_ERR_IOERROR, ignored)
Oct 11 12:36:39 waridi kernel: ugen0.2: at usbus0 (disconn
Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
>
> # mptutil show adapter
> mpt0 Adapter:
>Board Name: UNUSED
>Board Assembly:
> Chip Name: C1068E
> Chip Revision: UNUSED
> RAID Levels: none
> #
>
> The problem is, I can
I used 'freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE' to upgrade a test system.
All went well, until the point at which it said:
Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run
"/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates.
Stupidly, I did NOT reb
On 8 October 2013, at 16:40, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Relea
Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>>
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I tried downloading the src with:
>
> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>
> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>
> 20130705:
> hastctl(8)'
iles have been updated. There must be network
>>> issues between me and the server. I'll let it run tonight but I am
>>> going to crash now. Long day. More tomorrow.
>>> -- Doug
>>
>> Have you checked the dmesg output, specifically to see if there are any
;> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>>>> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>>>>>> The exact sequence was:
>>>>>>>
ere is what I consider as steps for 9.2:
freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE
freebsd-update install
nextboot -k GENERIC
freebsd-update install
portsnap fetch
portsnap extract
do all pkg steps
freebsd-update install
kernel rebuild
reboot
I might be making some misunderstandings in order of
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 10:58, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > Use PACKAGESITE=http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest
> >
> > That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository;
> > it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why
> > it's calling itself '
> Use PACKAGESITE=http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest
>
> That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository;
> it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why
> it's calling itself 'pkg-test'
>
> Oh -- there isn't an A record in the DNS for
wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
The exact sequence was:
Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
is definitely part of what should be updated?
System is not bootable - can't verify anything…
ober 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>>>> The exact sequence was:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
>>>>>
>&g
Colleagues,
I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
# mptutil show adapter
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: UNUSED
Board Assembly:
Chip Name: C1068E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: none
#
The problem is, I cannot configure any RAIDs (please see
I have a Netgear FA511 PCMCIA NIC that worked fine under 9.1. Under 9.2 I
get the following message:
Oct 6 21:38:11 monitor4 kernel: dc0: port 0x1100-0x11ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on cardbus0
Oct 6 21:38:11 monitor4 kernel: dc0: attaching PHYs failed
This used to work under 9.1, does anyone
Le 06/10/2013 à 18:24:27-0400, ill...@gmail.com a écrit
> On 6 October 2013 10:47, Albert Shih wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to known what is the best 10 Gbits/s copper ethernet card for
> > FreeBSD 9.2 on Dell hardware :
> >
> > I got on the Dell
On 6 October 2013 10:47, Albert Shih wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to known what is the best 10 Gbits/s copper ethernet card for
> FreeBSD 9.2 on Dell hardware :
>
> I got on the Dell's website
>
>
>
> Broadcom 57800 2x10Gb BT + 2x1Gb BT Network Daughter Car
Hi,
I would like to known what is the best 10 Gbits/s copper ethernet card for
FreeBSD 9.2 on Dell hardware :
I got on the Dell's website
Broadcom 57800 2x10Gb BT + 2x1Gb BT Network Daughter Card
Broadcom 57810 DP 10Gb BT Converged Network Ad
ting various checksums,
nothing to do with groups and GIDs. This suggests that your libc.so is
somehow incompatible with your /usr/bin/install. Which really shouldn't
be the case given that you'ld previously used freebsd-update to upgrade
your userland to 9.2-RELEASE.
Things to double ch
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 08:08:42 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 05/10/2013 21:41, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> >> I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
> >> be able to do a
>
On 05/10/2013 21:41, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
>> I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
>> be able to do a
>>
>> cd /usr/src
>> make buildworld
>> make installworld
&g
.
Eric
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> > I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should
> just
> > be able to do a
> >
> > cd /usr/src
> > make buildworld
>
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
> be able to do a
>
> cd /usr/src
> make buildworld
> make installworld
> reboot
>
> and I'll be running up on the 9.2 kernel an
Ah, yes, when this particular box was a 9.0-release, I had compiled a
custom kernel to enable ipsec. When I check the strings, it's a 9.1
release kernel.
I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
be able to do a
cd /usr/src
make buildworld
make install
On 05/10/2013 20:11, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade to
> 9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches by
> doing
>
> freebsd-update fetch
> freebsd-update install
>
> I went righ
I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade to
9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches by
doing
freebsd-update fetch
freebsd-update install
I went right to
freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE
freebsd-update install
rebooot
freebsd
2013/10/5 Polytropon
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:40:31 +0300, Juris Kaminskis wrote:
> > i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following
> errors
> > before it stops:
> >
> > procfs registered
> > panic: No usable event timer found!
> > cpuid=0
> > KDB: stack backtrace:
> > db_tra
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:40:31 +0300, Juris Kaminskis wrote:
> i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following errors
> before it stops:
>
> procfs registered
> panic: No usable event timer found!
> cpuid=0
> KDB: stack backtrace:
> db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper
i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following errors
before it stops:
procfs registered
panic: No usable event timer found!
cpuid=0
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a
panic() at panic+0x1d8/frame
initclocks()
mi_startup(
; On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >>>> The exact sequence was:
> >>>>
> >>>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
> >>>
> >>> Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
> >>
>>>
>>>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
>>>
>>> Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
>>> is definitely part of what should be updated?
>>
>> System is not bootable - can't verify anything…
>
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >> The exact sequence was:
> >>
> >> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> The exact sequence was:
>>
>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
>
> Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
> is definitely
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> The exact sequence was:
>
> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
is definitely part of what should be updated?
> Step 2: make buildworld
> Step 3: m
On 4 October 2013, at 09:22, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system u
Hello,
I am desperate trying to build FreeBSD 9.2. The same happens with
FreeBSD-Current. When I build 9.1 kernel without building world everything
is ok.
My svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: http://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/base/release/9.2.0
Repository Root: http://svn0
On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses
a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed.
>> Howev
On 3 October 2013, at 11:58, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything
On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
> kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
> noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry stil
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry still
says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct
03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote:
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
During the
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
--
Thanks,
Dean E. Weimer
http
On 02/10/2013 21:07, Winston wrote:
> Summary:
>
> Where is the (U.S.) pkg(ng) repository for amd64 9.2-RELEASE (i.e.,
> what's the right URI for PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf)?
>
>
> Things I tried that didn't work:
>
> * pkg_add -r pkg didn't create /usr
Summary:
Where is the (U.S.) pkg(ng) repository for amd64 9.2-RELEASE (i.e.,
what's the right URI for PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf)?
Things I tried that didn't work:
* pkg_add -r pkg didn't create /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
* pkg.conf.sample suggests "http://pkg.freebsd.org/${
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013, at 18:54, ot...@ahhyes.net wrote:
>
> * I run powerdns recursor for resolution of domain names. Despite
> having the recursor as being one of the first things
> in rc.conf to start (certainly before ntpdate), ntpdate decides to run
> before the recursor has started. This cau
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote:
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
lists. It's never clear until the release drops wh
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote:
>> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be?
For me freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 went smooth on my workstation
laptop, the userland works fine :-)
I remember myself
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote:
> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
> improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
> messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
> lists. It's never clear until
Le Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:26 -0600,
Brett Glass a écrit :
Hello,
> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
> improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
> messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
> lists. It's
On FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA1 it worked very good but for me 3D is not important. I
installed FreeBSD 9.2 one hour ago without problem and run "portsnap fetch
extrac"t and I like to install Xorg and KDE. Do I need to have in make.conf
"with_new_xorg=yes", please? Does xorg t need ha
On 9/30/2013 15:01, Brett Glass wrote:
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The improvements
are welcome, but there have been a few troubling messages about kernel
panics and VM issues on the various mailing lists. It's never clear
until the release drops whether thes
How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The
improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling
messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing
lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are
actual problems with the softwa
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:46:39 -0300, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> Walter Hurry writes:
>
>> Running 9.2-RC4 in a VirtualBox VM, I am having a few problems.
>>
>> FreeBSD freebsd.vm 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #1 r254965: Wed Aug 28
>> 04:17:40 BST 2013 r...@freebsd.vm:/
Walter Hurry writes:
> Running 9.2-RC4 in a VirtualBox VM, I am having a few problems.
>
> FreeBSD freebsd.vm 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #1 r254965: Wed Aug 28
> 04:17:40 BST 2013 r...@freebsd.vm:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VM4 amd64
>
> At this stage I am reluctant to file PRs, as
Running 9.2-RC4 in a VirtualBox VM, I am having a few problems.
FreeBSD freebsd.vm 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 #1 r254965: Wed Aug 28
04:17:40 BST 2013 r...@freebsd.vm:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VM4 amd64
At this stage I am reluctant to file PRs, as doubtless some of these are
of my own making
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:16:01AM +0200, Terje Elde wrote:
>
> Two options:
> ...
Thanks - helps alot.
-ewald
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
On 25. sep. 2013, at 09.00, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
o) Will upgrading kernel/system using
> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/ /usr/src
> bring a 9.2-RC4 installed system up to date once 9.2 final is released?
Two options:
base/stable/9 - track 9-STABLE
base/releng/9.2 - track 9.2-se
Hi,
Since I'm about to set up a new system from scratch I'm thinking
whether I should install 9.1 and upgrade it to 9-STABLE or to install
9.2-RC4 right away.
To be specific:
o) Will upgrading kernel/system using
svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/ /usr/src
bring a 9.2-RC4
t; by setting it in /boot/loader.conf:
> loader_logo="orb"
>
> Thanks for the info.
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >Patrick Dung writes: >>>Do you know what is this logo means, or the story
behind it? >>I thought the BSD daemon (logo) has been around for many years in
the past. >>It's a movie reference ("Die Hard"). >>The Beastie
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Patrick Dung writes:
Do you know what is this logo means, or the story behind it?
I thought the BSD daemon (logo) has been around for many years in the past.
It's a movie reference ("Die Hard").
The Beastie logo is still there, in the /boot directo
go at boot (Nakatomi Socrates BSD 9.2)
Patrick Dung writes:
> Do you know what is this logo means, or the story behind it?
> I thought the BSD daemon (logo) has been around for many years in the past.
It's a movie reference ("Die Hard").
The Beastie logo is still there, in t
Patrick Dung writes:
> Do you know what is this logo means, or the story behind it?
> I thought the BSD daemon (logo) has been around for many years in the past.
It's a movie reference ("Die Hard").
The Beastie logo is still there, in the /boot directory, if you want it.
___
2013/9/4 Patrick Dung
> Hello,
>
> Do you know what is this logo means, or the story behind it?
> I thought the BSD daemon (logo) has been around for many years in the past.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Patrick Dung
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_Daemon
--
Hello,
Do you know what is this logo means, or the story behind it?
I thought the BSD daemon (logo) has been around for many years in the past.
Thanks and regards,
Patrick Dung
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
I recently upgraded a system to
FreeBSD t42.umpquanet.com 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254977: Wed
Aug 28 19:58:37 PDT 2013
r...@t42.umpquanet.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I then deleted all the installed ports, and am rebuilding the
ones I still use.
I&#x
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1619404
It is helpful too…
On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote:
>
>>
>> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is
>> it su
When I svnup and make buildworld, I get a failure at xinstall.
THings
Any chance that FreeBSD will be fixed to allow upgrading in place from 9.1?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/181344
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:22:15 +0100, John wrote:
> > If you don't use a custom kernel, why not use freebsd-update
> > and follow the 9.2-RELEASE path with the security updates?
>
> Not sure if this is logic or "religon", but freebsd-update makes me
> nervous
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:17:02AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> 9.2-RELEASE hasn't been released yet. :-)
well yes, there is that I suppose ;)
> If you don't use a custom kernel, why not use freebsd-update
> and follow the 9.2-RELEASE path with the security updates?
Not sure
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:28:25 +0100, John wrote:
> Is it "safe" to start using 9.2 in the svn repos? I have a line like
> this in a daily crontab:
>
> svn co svn://svn.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src
>
> Can I change that 9.1 to 9.2 now, or should I wait?
Hello list,
Is it "safe" to start using 9.2 in the svn repos? I have a line like
this in a daily crontab:
svn co svn://svn.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src
Can I change that 9.1 to 9.2 now, or should I wait? I aim to follow
9.2-R with security updates.
thanks
Thank you very much.
I will wait for 9.2 release or switch to Linux which works but it is not hat I
want it…
On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote:
>
>>
>> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I lik
i'm having trouble compiling libGL on 9.2-PRERELEASE using portmaster.
firefox requires it. here's how the compile log file that i created ends:
gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `default'.
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/libGL/work/Mesa-8.0.5/src/mesa/x86
On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote:
>
> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is
> it supported?
>
> I try Linux Mint and it works perfect. I am downloading live CD for NetBSD
> (jibbed) and I will see how is works but I like to in
Type: GPU
Bus: PCIe
PCIe Lane Width: x16
VRAM (Total): 512 MB
Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth mouse. Is it
supported?
I try Linux Mint and it works perfect. I am downloading live CD for NetBSD
(jibbed) and I will see how is
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:22:33 +0200
Terje Elde wrote:
> On 13. aug. 2013, at 16:30, "O. Hartmann"
> wrote:
> > What is going wrong?
>
> Are you unable to connect, or do you get an error message? If you do,
> what is it?
>
> Terje
I always get this message:
psql postgres pgsql
Password for use
On 13. aug. 2013, at 16:30, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
> What is going wrong?
Are you unable to connect, or do you get an error message? If you do, what is
it?
Terje
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:55:06 +0300
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> > 13.08.2013 17:30, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> For the past I ran PostgreSQL 9.2 servers on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
> >> successfully. But by now, out of the blue, login as the database's
> >> supervis
13.08.2013 17:30, O. Hartmann wrote:
For the past I ran PostgreSQL 9.2 servers on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
successfully. But by now, out of the blue, login as the database's
supervisor "pgsql" remotely isn't possible any more.
The appropriate lines in pg_hba.conf are:
lo
13.08.2013 17:30, O. Hartmann wrote:
For the past I ran PostgreSQL 9.2 servers on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
successfully. But by now, out of the blue, login as the database's
supervisor "pgsql" remotely isn't possible any more.
The appropriate lines in pg_hba.conf are:
lo
For the past I ran PostgreSQL 9.2 servers on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
successfully. But by now, out of the blue, login as the database's
supervisor "pgsql" remotely isn't possible any more.
The appropriate lines in pg_hba.conf are:
local all pgsql md5
hostssl all pgsql
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:14:52 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:01:14 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
>> Sorry again. Anyway, I have it nailed down now. For anyone who is
>> interested, the missing entry was:
>>
>> options ATA_CAM
>
> Correct. Line 84 and 264 have it commente
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:01:14 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> Sorry again. Anyway, I have it nailed down now. For anyone who is
> interested, the missing entry was:
>
> options ATA_CAM
Correct. Line 84 and 264 have it commented out. This is
the "new" method of talking to disk devices, simi
0 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> > >> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching
> > >> the source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
> > >>
> > >> The kernel compiles and runs fine using the s
Hello :-)
I just have setup some service on 9.2-RC1. I want this service to be
available on WAN but still I want to have stateful firewall running. I
am using workstation firewall type and put the service port on
firewall_myservices. However by default only TCP connections are
accepted, still I
0 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> > >> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching
> > >> the source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
> > >>
> > >> The kernel compiles and runs fine using the s
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 479, Issue 8, Message: 10
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 09:43:57 + (UTC) Walter Hurry
wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> >> This is 9.2-RC1 on
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
>> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
>> source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
>>
>> The kernel c
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
