e web.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-question
ot;, which is what
should be showing during DST in the Eastern (US) time zone. When it's
not DST, what should be showing in the Eastern time zone is "EST"
instead. From what you said, though, it seems you had set it to "EDT"
when it was not yet daylight saving time.
o I set fetchmail and sendmail to fetch
> such emails?
You might want to try out the mail/fdm port instead of fetchmail. I have
found fetchmail to be obtuse and cantankerous; I stopped using it a long
time ago.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
_
560 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 8716C)
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched!
Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT []...
carp0: link state changed to UP
carp1: link state changed to UP
-Chad
___
freebsd-que
d zfs set sync=disabled but HAST still outputs those lines in
the log file.
Any suggestions?
Thank you,
Chad
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu
ile over, etc., nothing I did worked except the above. There is probably
a cleaner/better way but I was not able to find it.
-Chad
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
s.
Is there another scenario I'm thinking of where both data health and no
application outage could be achieved?
Regards,
Chad
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
=c {print
> $4;}{a=$1;b=$2;c=$3}' \
I'm never comfortable calling something like that a "one-liner". If it
runs over 80 columns of width, that (to me) doesn't really qualify as a
one-liner.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
finally get this
> sorted out.
>
> So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
> evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
> buggy *&^%$#@ acroread ?
The first thing to do should simply be to uninstall acro
to find out what's going on with the wait. That doesn't mean I want
anyone prioritizing speed over quality, though.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
pair is really a
helpful form of verbosity.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e case
endings.
>
> Again, a hyphen after the 1st word would it much more readable.
>
>
>
>> (and "playboy -- everything that is fun for men" [in German] is
>> 100% understandable in German, because there is a real dative case
>> in German, unlike in english.)
>
> In _that_ translation, you've used the hyphen correctly (which was
> missing in the german version discussed).
>
Yes, my bad. I was trying to write it the same but fixed it unconsciously.
regards
Chad
t; ist 100% verständlich auf deutsch,
da es einen richtigen Dativ Kasus gibt, im Gegensatz zu englischer Sprache.
(and "playboy -- everything that is fun for men" [in German] is 100%
understandable in German, because there is a real dative case in German, unlike
in english.)
Gruss aus Utah
Chad
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:57:49PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > Is there some way I could get the number of unique IPs hitting FreeBSD
> > servers for software updates? I'm curious about the direct comparison of
> &g
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:45:12PM +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
> Must resist the urge to post...
>
> 10
>
> (I am weak)...
There are 10 types of people in the world. . . .
(You're the 10nd type.)
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.o
Is there some way I could get the number of unique IPs hitting FreeBSD
servers for software updates? I'm curious about the direct comparison of
numbers between FreeBSD, Ubuntu, Fedora, and SUSE for this metric.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheo
t a pdf viewer from ports that might help.
>
> evince? Did you try it? I do not have it installed at the moment, so I
> am not able to tell you.
Zathura might be worth a try, too.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
quot;.
The more we can avoid code written by Poettering and anything remotely
like it, the better off we will be, I'm sure. Luckily, he wants to help
us; he has stated that he believes writing quality, portable code somehow
hinders "innovation", and
On Aug 11, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Chad Leigh - Pengar LLC wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a FreeBSD 9 system with ZFS root. It is actually a VM under Xen on a
> beefy piece of HW (4 core Sandy Bridge 3ghz Xeon, total HW memory 32GB -- VM
> has 4vcpus and 6GB RAM). Mirrored gpart partitions
proximately the same severity and
frequency. (Wanted to see if the system was "churning" with cache upkeep).
What is strange is that this server ran fine for 3 months straight without
interruption with the same level of work.
Thanks for any hints or clues
Chad
some data points
On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
>> Hmm
>> I added that and rebooted the jail host sy
(78)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
Thanks!
Chad
Hi. I'll try this again.
I run systems using FreeBSD 9.0
FreeBSD utah.XXXcom 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #1: Wed Mar 21 15:22:14
MDT 2012 chad@underhill:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNDERHILL-XEN amd64
and on those systems run a bunch of jails. I have Apache 2.2 built and running
i
reward someone receives; in all too many cases that is just
> not so. The socialists still feel they are entitled to something for
> nothing.
. . . which need not have *anything* at all to do with a discussion of
whether a system of patents
really fair one. If the word "fair" can be used for lawyers at all.
>
> Most often they just want court cases to have "work".
I'm not sure you understood what I said, because what *you* said here
seems irrelevant to what I said.
--
Chad Perr
he opposite of a free market. In fact,
the socialistic "labor theory of value" is a much more effective basis
for justifying a patent system than any concepts of economic schools of
thought more oriented toward free market capitalism, because patents are
designed to "protect" a l
peed will
> gonna be the differentiator.
The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do
you have some benchmarks for that?
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@fr
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 08:14:33AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:57:59 -0600
> Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 01:39:21PM +, Traiano Welcome wrote:
> > > >
> > Unfortunately, patent law and copyright
c.
>
> The european patent office system pressures examiners towards granting
> if they can't quickly find prove the application is already known.
The same applies in the US.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
_
light produced by a hand-held laser apparatus onto the floor ...
> in the vicinity of the cat, then moving the laser ... in an irregular way
> fascinating to cats,..." -- US patent 5443036, "Method of exercising a cat"
That's hilarious, and awfully depressing.
--
Chad Perri
ovement/change to it to not qualify under that, then they would
> be well within patent law to apply for a patent.
. . . in theory. In practice, if you don't have the resources to mount a
serious defense against a deep-pockets patent holder, prior art isn't
going to get you far.
--
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:20:08AM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > It is possible that Microsoft is going the way of SCO -- into its grave,
> > having hung all its hopes on litigation. Along the way, though, it will
> >
s far as the FreeBSD project or any
FreeBSD users before things come crashing down.
(disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. Et cetera.)
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
Hi
I run systems using FreeBSD 9.0
FreeBSD utah.XXXcom 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #1: Wed Mar 21 15:22:14
MDT 2012 chad@underhill:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNDERHILL-XEN amd64
and on those systems run a bunch of jails. I have Apache 2.2 built and running
in the jail in question, and
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:04:27PM -0700, Ryan Noll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 25, 2012 7:34 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
> > You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
> > of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a pota
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:33:36PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
> of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a potato with two
> pieces of metal stuck in it as a power source.
s/bar/bare/
Now
d if you've ever seen 'ps' report that it had
> itself been swapped out. Yep, again.
>
> Ah, good times.
>
> I think I still have some memory _chips_ (zip scrams, not dips) around
> here somewhere
You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand wit
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 07:18:13PM +0800, lei yang wrote:
>
> Aha,I just want to learn want to know how to build the netcat for
> freebsd version on a no-freebsd platform
I'm really curious, now:
Why?
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://ow
new ...
>
> > still - any ftp client will no go faster than ftp protocol allows.
>
> That's sure. But I think it's an option for the laptops what Chad
> mentioned. Such scripts for backup are set up in minutes and it happily
> copies the files to the server. If the
not that it provides features that can't be managed
> directly by rsync.
Actually, a Wake-On-LAN feature is not at all necessary for me in this
case. It's a simple enough task to just trigger a backup manually at the
command line via a script that automates the process
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:14:34PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> > backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the ne
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:09:03AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I'm setting up a "new" backup server using FreeBSD. It will be used for
> > backing up laptops, which will not be connected to the netwo
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:24:57AM -0500, Reid Linnemann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I disagree with the assessment by others that FreeBSD is in some way
> > effectively a subsidiary of its corporate users, but it does have
> > corporate
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:16:09PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:06:12PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > i already proposed (but not publically) to turn FreeBSD into
> > > commercial system.
> > >
>
are all you see. It is
ludicrous to watch you close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears,
and shout "lalalalalalalala" so consistently to prevent any other factors
involved in compiler choice from entering your mind -- such as good
output from a compiler that will be stable and
e for any help I can get in figuring this out.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e it and have not
bothered to actually read and understand it) is just "politics", go
ahead, as long as it doesn't perpetuate this wholly unnecessary griping
on the mailing list.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
everyone else at
fault for the fact you cannot see past your nose to note that the whole
world does not revolve around some dubious benchmarks.
I doubt you're convincing anyone of anything you seem to think we should
all accept as gospel.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content license
ve you a mistaken
impression that there was not much discussion of the matter.
. . . and thanks for calling the concerns of everyone who wants to be
able to use FreeBSD as the basis of other projects without having to deal
with problematic licensing restrictions as "stupid" and &qu
red to
> Clang.
>
> That would help explain why FreeBSD is switching to Clang.
Related (perhaps somewhat indirectly):
Advancement Through License Simplicity
http://univacc.net/?page=license_simplicity
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
ld. In fact,
one of the biggest problems in the Linux world is the fact that GNU
projects have a tendency to degrade in quality over time and pretty
thoroughly undermine the Unix philosophy in egregious ways, which means
that the sooner we can divest ourselves of GNU tools (including GCC) the
al Vimperator project used a copyleft license (the GPL), and
the new Pentadactyl project used a copyfree license (I don't recall
which, probably either the Simplified BSD License or the MIT/X11
License).
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
s
that apply, and doesn't even *want* to know, picks one thing he thinks he
understands and argues about it in an attempt to make the entire project
change course.
Well, dammit, I *like* blue, and he can take his bucket of red paint home
with him to paint his *own* bikeshed.
--
Chad Perr
ible performance difference is . . . negligible
I'm pretty sure he's not running compute clusters on FreeBSD, after all.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
h circumstances are the people who make up the open
source development community.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
ged in, and the laptop display when the
external monitor is *not* plugged in. From the sound of the request,
that is the use case the orignial querent in this thread had in mind as
well.
Your tip could well be useful for some use cases, though.
--
Chad Perrin [ origin
ed and using pcc
> >now. And they are fine with that one.
>
> their problem.
No -- it's their solution. It would be a problem only if the previous
statement said "and they are *not* fine with that one."
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.a
Clang as
the sole compiler in the base system (last I heard).
This is what happens when you use a more standards-compliant compiler:
you get more stable and predictable behavior.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
nipulationg reactions of many people on
> that list shows that above sentence is true.
When you refuse to assume good faith at first encounter in discussion,
you just make everyone into your enemy. This pretty well ensures that
the majority of people will ignore your concerns, no matter how val
w drivers until something that replace FreeBSD will be available.
> Assuming there will at all.
>
> Wish i am wrong. Twice i wasn't
When you set your own standards for "success", regardless of anyone
else's thoughts on the matter, you'll probably always be right,
think of at least one big reason: the FreeBSD base system should
favor the 2-clause Simplified BSD License (aka New BSD License aka
FreeBSD License) and compatible licenses. GPLvN, where N is *any*
version number currently extant, is *not* a compatible license: it is a
one-way valve.
--
Chad Perri
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:44:50PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >licensed gcc or b) A maintained and current GPLv3 gcc with GPLv3
> >licensed libc.
> FreeBSD doesn't use GNU libc. am i missing something?
Yes. Users are not identical to the FreeBSD base system.
--
Ch
FreeBSD is if it can be used. IMHO
> nothing from GPLv3 prevents it, and it is no licence based reasons
> to use clang.
1. This has nothing to do with what I said.
2. I prefer Clang.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
aptop display won't act "funny" because
it "thinks" there's a larger external monitor still attached.
I hope that helps. Let me know if you want any more information about
how this works.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
e
> of those licenses is about freedom. Hint: freedom is not defined as forcing
> people to do what you want.
This would probably be a better-received statement if the rest of your
commentary in the same email was not mostly about (probably entirely
inaccurate) insults flung at someone for fa
y errors.
I guess you're either some kind of rare genius or suffering from
Stockholm syndrome. Everyone I've encountered with something to say
about warning and error reporting with regard to Clang vs. GCC has
remarked about how much nicer it is with Clang.
--
Chad Perrin [ original conte
parts of the code. That sort
of thing is required probably 70% of the time, in my experience.
With Clang, by contrast, I find that's required only about 20% to 30% of
the time. Otherwise, the warning and error messages tend to get me a lot
closer to the actual point of failure than GCC.
*T
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:47:55PM +, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > No power conditioning (implied by no UPS) is nothing to brag about.
>
> If your utility power is very -- common now in places with buried
> utilities -
nothing to brag about -- no UPS, combined with 'unreliable' public
> utility power, does have an impact.
No power conditioning (implied by no UPS) is nothing to brag about.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
er of these is set up for public access. They're just
neglected single-purpose machines.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:53:11PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
>
> . . .
You obviously aren't serious. I can't believe I let you string me along
with this fantasy for so long.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:46:49PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:44:11 -0600 Chad Perrin articulated:
> >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:59:46PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> >>
> >> Your paranoia is kicking in again isn't it Chad. Anyway, to address
> >&
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:59:46PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:11:11 -0600 Chad Perrin articulated:
>
> >On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 07:23:20AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> >>
> >> It is fairly easy to understand both sides in this discussion. When
> >
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 06:26:16AM +, jb wrote:
> Chinese advertising of soccer championship Euro 2012
>
> http://avaxnews.com/wow/Chinese_Advertising_UEFA_Euro_2012.html
That . . . was nuts. What just happened?
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apo
d
its users in venues like this mailing list, where it's trollish, does not
contribute anything positive, and directly offends large numbers of
people subscribed to the list.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
fre
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 03:27:25AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Jun 2012, at 18:48, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:42:37PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6 Jun 2012, at 21:52, Dave U. Random
> &
houghtful refutation of some specific point(s)? I hope you have more of
value to contribute than your obvious disdain for people who disagree
with you about something (without even specifying on what points you
disagree).
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
ch are even
more likely to get FreeBSD installed, and none of this has anything to do
with corporate accounts or bulk purchases.
Yes, my evidence is anecdotal, but I think your notions of the frequency
of FreeBSD use other than in a corporate setting are also based on
anecdotal observations, s
;authority" charging money to allow people to control their own
system security in what amounts to a vacant lot scam.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
was basically scanning for more open
JBOSS stuff. The attack had just barely happened (the server had just been
installed). I disabled the JBOSS and cleaned everything up and scanned the
jail for problem files etc. Customer fixed the JBOSS vulnerability (
t. I think may make a great difference.
Okay, thanks. You've provided a pretty good representative selection, I
think. I guess there are two problems: the third edition index is
woefully incomplete, and the fourth edition text has for some reason
basically traded FreeBSD for AIX -- which m
On May 11, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On May 11, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a request and
>> is awaiting a reply?
>
> That's right.
>
>> One of the jails
0 0 host.52551 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT
tcp4 0 0 host.52550 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT
thanks
Chad
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscri
rlooked something.
Is there something else I should try to find in the index or table of
contents that would be in the third edition but not the fourth? Can you
give me some examples of the sorts of things you'd expect to find in the
table of contents
t sure -- I've never taken advantage of
that discount, because I only started collecting ebook copies of O'Reilly
books after getting an e-ink reader, which I find every bit as good for
many (though not all) reading purposes as a physical dead tree format
book. Your mileage may vary, I suppo
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:23:47PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:01:56 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:01:13AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:36:13 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2
On Apr 30, 2012, at 4:41 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>
>>> - Enermax Platimax 600W
>
> I do not know about your location but at mine power supplies have the
> tendency to have a short life due to lightning strikes in the area. Get a
> cheaper model but buy two. I just ran into this problem but
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:01:13AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:36:13 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:33:29 -0700 David Brodbeck articulated:
> > > >
> >
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:33:29PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > Indeed -- and the employer who bucks this trend does him/her self a huge
> > service, because large numbers of very skilled and/or talented people are
> &
x27;re correctly identifying the skills
they actually need from their employees. A big part of this entire
discussion has been about the fact that many "responsible" parties in the
hiring process are utterly without capacity for correctly i
ou can pull it off. No legitimate employer is going to change
> his criteria to accommodate your skills.
Good job completely bypassing my actual statements to make a point about
something else entirely. Congratulations on your irrelevance.
--
Chad Perrin [ origin
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:57:10PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:32:24 -0600 Chad Perrin articulated:
> >On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 06:43:06PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> >> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:52:56 -0600 Chad Perrin articulated:
> >> >On Thu, Apr 26, 2
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:32:24AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 06:43:06PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:52:56 -0600 Chad Perrin articulated:
> > >On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:45:53PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> > >>
> >
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 06:43:06PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:52:56 -0600
> Chad Perrin articulated:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:45:53PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> >>
> >> Generic skills aren't recognized because they're ha
ates who would be
great at the job waiting for someone else to give them a chance.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On Apr 20, 2012, at 5:12 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> This is not the correct syntax. From the rc.conf manual page:
Thanks Nikos. Not sure how I came up with the incorrect syntax, but correcting
that fixed my issue.
-Chad___
freebsd-questions@fr
On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:54:46 -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
>
>> Anyone have some suggestions how I can fix this?
>
>
> I'm guessing having the default route on a tagged vlan was not tested and the
> default route
fe80::211:43ff:fedc:ba98%em0 U em0
ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 U lo0
ff02::%vlan4/32 fe80::211:43ff:fedc:ba98%vlan4 U vlan4
ff02::%vlan7/32
On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC
> wrote:
>
>> No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they share
>> the routing tables. It works. Try it.
>
> You're clear
hare the network stack under Jails v1 they share the
routing tables. It works. Try it.
The question is, is it possible to do something similar with FreeBSD 9 jails
(v2 I guess) without the overhead of running NAT? The jail with the private
IP *can* access the HOST's public services but no
1 - 100 of 1904 matches
Mail list logo
