On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:45:16AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>>but not to be turned into closed source products. > >> > >>What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called > >>"forcible, viral open source". I think we can all see the difference. Open > >>your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball... > > > >Give him a break. His heart is in the right place, though his choice of > > GNU licence is nothing about freedom, it just says it is freedom. > > But what really is important for FreeBSD is if it can be used. IMHO > nothing from GPLv3 prevents it, and it is no licence based reasons > to use clang.
1. This has nothing to do with what I said. 2. I prefer Clang. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
