2009/10/30 Adam Vande More
> Where's your config files, your errors logs, your stats?
>
I am not going to reply to you after this because you are blinkered. I'm not
going to waste my time with you. I've given you more than enough to feed on,
but you just can't smell the coffee.
> Adam Vande
2009/10/30 Neil Short
>
> This is comforting for many reasons: notably, that I'm not alone in this
> experience.
>
Do you know something, it's not comforting. Not really. It just means you
are another user for whom a program doesn't work properly.
MF.
__
You are arrogant because you won't accept that people have problems with
your beloved HAL, the Half Arsed Luser program. Some or many in the Linux
crowd are planning to move away from it because it doesn't work properly.
You don't accept that a 3k config file now needs 18MB of RAM. And doesn't
wor
2009/10/30 Adam Vande More
> I was part of this and the x11 mailing list during the period in which most
> made the switch to hal. I am fully aware of all the complaining which
> occurred. There was a bug which made the issue difficult. I experienced
> it, the workaround was available nearly i
2009/10/30 Adam Vande More
>
> I am unable to replicate this.
YMMV. But I did replicate it. I measured "before and after".
Show us the output of top from your box with the hal processes, as I did for
a start.
> Nowhere have you demonstrated HAL is not working as it's meant to. This is
> poi
2009/10/30 Adam Vande More
>
> No my point was top is not accurate measure of HAL's memory usage. HAL has
> shared library's just like many other applications.
>
Yep, I know all about that. But it is indicative. And indeed born out by the
fact that when HAL is not running I get 18MB more memory
I've read the responses and comments here, so don't think I'm ignoring
anyone because I haven't responded directly.
I rebuilt xorg-server without HAL. I killed hal stone dead and started up
the new (i.e. old-skool) xorg. It all works fine.
My mouse and keyboard work as specified in the xorg.conf
2009/10/29 Paul Schmehl
> Far be it from me to pile on when you're already so frustrated, but I run
> into these sorts of problems myself from time to time. It's usually because
> I didn't bother to read /usr/ports/UPDATING first, which in this case might
> have warned you.
>
Yeah, thanks for
For Christ's sake. I have an IBM X41 laptop, which was happily running
FreeBSD 7.1. Having a little free time this evening I decided to update it
to 7.2. The upgrade failed miserably so I had to install from scratch. But
that's OK, because I had backed up the machine beforehand.
The install went t
2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman
>% pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32
>Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32:
>
>Depends on:
>Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2
>Dependency: linux-f10-openssl-0.9.8g
>Dependency: linux-f10-openldap-2.4.12_1
>Dependency: linux-f10
2009/9/14 Chris Rees
>
> Isn't this a bit drastic? Listening sockets are opened by very many
> types of processes, as well as remembering that sendmail, BIND, and
> others don't actually run as root... I suppose it'd be possible, but
> would it actually be useful?
>
Sure, those open listening s
Hi,
I am not sure if this exists (but don't think so), so I am asking.
Is there a sysctl type thing to disallow non-root users, or indeed any
specified user or group, from running a program with listen() ?
What I am looking at is improving network security, such that if a user
account is comprom
2009/9/7 Jerry
> I don't think that readily addresses the OP's question. I personally
> have never gotten 'flash', or most other add-ons to work Opera. It is
> one of the main reasons that I discourage others from using it. It
> suffers even worse on a Windows machine. RoboForm does not work with
2009/7/30 Mel Flynn
>
>
> You should really be using PCBSD if you want a packaged desktop system, for
> which the developers claim responsibility and for which much (if not all)
> of
> the configuration has been done for you.
I disagree with that. It even says on the FreeBSD web site "FreeBSD® i
2009/2/7 Wojciech Puchar
> But also I am open to other brands. Especially If anyone has
>> experience on that this matter would be very very helpful. I have seen
>> that Sun has quad 10gbE adapters:
>> http://www.sun.com/products/networking/ethernet/10gigethernet/index.xml
>> I am not sure if Fre
2009/2/3 Dan Nelson
> In the last episode (Feb 03), Sandra Kachelmann said:
> > I have an NFS fileserver and would like to figure out which files are
> > being read/written to. Is there something to find that out? Something
> > similar to samba's 'smbstatus' command.
>
> The best you can do curre
Sorry, my bad. I misread you wanted the static version for 7.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
2009/1/24 Paul B. Mahol
>
> Well for 9.63 there is only static one for FreeBSD 5.
> After all this is not freebsd problem, ask opera where is
> static version for FreeBSD 7
ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/unix/freebsd/963/en/intel/static/
___
freebsd-que
2009/1/14 Mister Olli
> hi...
>
> what is the exact function of this sysctl setting?
I'm guessing it's something to do with Xen, having seen a few references in
Linux for xen.machdep.independent_wallclock.
Have a look here:
http://docs.xensource.com/XenServer/4.0.1/guest/ch04s06.html
>
> I co
2009/1/8 Jerry McAllister
>
> Beyond that, it is just the pretty pictures
> that are missing.
sysinstall also works over serial console. No use for pretty pictures
there...
> jerry
MF.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
2008/11/21 Ansar Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think you are. We should care about a KERNEL module being bug free and
> high performance.
Agreed.
We did a migration from a Windows email server a while back (about 40,000
mail boxes). As customers logged into the FreeBSD boxes, a process was
kic
On 29/11/2007, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So I do a pkg_add -r xorg. After about 70 packages I give up. I only
> used to
> > have about 65 packages in total on my old desktop, now I need more than
> 70
> > and I haven't even got x windows up yet. So I go off and have a look an
I used to find FreeBSD easy. What has happened? I have a couple of machines
I usually install new versions on, one is headless the other is a desktop
machine (which was a 100% reliable 5.4 installation). I boot the headless
machine using floppies, then install across the net. But something has
happ
Hi,
On 29/08/2007, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> dump doesn't copy files to files, but files to raw device (partition,
> tape, DVD) or to one/few big files.
Dump is used to back up a file system and can write that data to a file. It
doesn't have to write to a raw device.
To dum
Hi,
I am trying to limit the number of connections from "foreign" networks to a
server. I don't want to limit bandwidth, just the number of connections.
Let's say I have a network 192.168.1.0/24. I want to allow 192.168.2.0/24 to
have at most 50 connections. I want to allow 192.168.3.0/24 to have
Ted,
On 16/02/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know where your getting the impression that I said this was a
hardware bug.
Umm, quoted from you above: "Defects that are specific to hardware that are
not documented in the PR database generally do not get fixed. "
If I
Ted,
On 15/02/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are all ears for your suggestions to help him fix this, Frem. I'm sure
we
all expect to see some kernel patches from you any day now.
Please sort out your formatting. It looks horrible.
You didn't offer any help whatsoever.
On 15/02/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please use send-pr and include a dmesg output with debugging turned on,
and exact model of motherboard and bios revision.
questions isn't for bugs. I don't mean to be rude but you won't get the
problem fixed by bitching about it on this
Ruben,
On 31/01/07, Ruben de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not exactly. Solaris, especially Solaris 10 is relying more and more on
pseudo filesystems.
# uname -srpi
SunOS 5.10 sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210
# mount | grep '^/devices'
/devices on /devices read/write/setuid/devices/dev=47c on T
Kris,
On 29/01/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To put it bluntly, it's something you're just going to have to get
over :-)
That's unhelpful. It is, in my opinion, a bad idea to have to mount up 1400
instances of devfs just to get a few device nodes. It just doesn't seem
right.
Kris,
On 28/01/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I not understand this no sentence :)
Sorry, I didn't read what I typed. I meant to type "Was the effect of this
considered at all?"
What reasons, other than cosmetic, do you have for not wanting to do
this?
Well, I am sure you
Kris,
On 26/01/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, it's the only way.
Was the considered at all? There's simply no way that I would mount up 1400
devfs. It is a backward step.
Kris
Frem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
Kris,
On 26/01/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Set up and mount numerous devfs file systems ;)
That is exactly what I am trying to avoid. One of the servers has 1400 sites
on it, and I really don't want 1400 devfs mounts. If the only way to do this
now is by having so many devfs
Hello,
I have a web server still running FreeBSD 4.7 which I want to update to
FreeBSD 6.2. There are quite a few sites on this machine, and each of them
has a chroot containing their own /dev. In their /dev are things like null,
zero, random and so on.
I don't really want to set up or mount num
On 11/01/07, Jeff Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The basic reason is that a ../.. walk invalidates cached metadata, and
you end up with a pipe full of getattr's all of the time. Freebsd-fs
has discussed this a bit, but no fixing is coming soon. We use linux
to compile builds, we'd like to
On 10/01/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A reason why you have less problems is I expect you using premium
hardware such as scsi, currently I am lucky enough to not be using
realtek lan cards although I am still having problems with intel nics.
I wouldn't term SCSI as premium. Maybe it
On 10/01/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I think freebsd needs.
1 - To fix stuff that works in linux but goes to crap in freebsd, one
such example is NFS.
I don't actually have a problem with FreeBSD and NFS. This is using about
20+ clients and 2 NetApp filers. What problem are yo
On 06/09/06, White Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is a totally unqualified evaluation.
No it's not. It's in response to YOUR comment that "A very large majority of
users simply want to use their PCs for email, occasional word processing and
possible game playing". And OpenOffice fits th
On 06/09/06, White Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Immaterial. the singularly most important feature is
suitability to task. If it is free and it does not
work, what good is it?
It depends what you are using it for. You made a comment about "occaisonal
word processing" (pasted below). For suc
On 06/09/06, White Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have
tried Open Office. No matter what anyone says, it is
just not as full featured as Word 2003. It is not even
close.
True, but also compare the cost. Not even close...
He/she does
not want to read tons of manuals and spend hours in a
f
On 08/08/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right now, if no fsck is really really important to you for your data
store, then get an OpenSolaris system and put ZFS on it. Never fsck
again as it is ALWAYS (they claim) in a coherent state. Or wait for
ZFS to show up on Fr
On 08/08/06, Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Softupdates are the FreeBSD equivalent. From my point of view they perform
better than a traditional journaling FS (do a google search for the original
usenix papers on these).
Journalling means not having to fsck the file system in the
On 08/08/06, Atom Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What exactly does a journaling file system give you? As I understand
it, it doesn't prevent corruption and it doesn't help you fix the
corruption when it occurs.
As answered by Dan Nelson. It saves time (sometimes a lot) in the event of
an u
On 08/08/06, Atom Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. I found my problem. (Sysinstall, aka fdisk, won't do more that
1.2TB.)
BTW, anybody have any good advice on how to manage a large file system?
Unfortunately I have to say "consider Solaris or Linux as they have
journalling file syst
On 05/08/06, Martin Hepworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and
unclean umount.
No it doesn't. Absolutely not.
After an unclean shutdown fsck runs in the background. And sometimes it
can't do that. Here's an example:
Jul 23 1
On 04/08/06, Joseph Le-Phan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, it'd be fantastic if mc was slated for inclusion. It's an
absolute necessary install once I get a system up and running.
The thing is, once you go down this route it won't stop. Other people regard
bash, or lsof, or vim, or wg
On 02/08/06, N. Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cool! Can you share with me what sort of settings you
use on your boxes? sysctl/kerneltunes/mount options?
This may be a disappointment to you but... I didn't have to do anything :-(
All I have is rw on the client.
It has taken me a over
Nicole,
On 02/08/06, N. Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have several web servers that are attached to a
Netapp (network appliance) unit via NFS-3. A few
servers are 5.5 and a few are 6.1 for comparison
testing. All seem to have lousy performance.
We have a similar setup and it run
On 01/08/06, Erik Nørgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you configure your server using LDAP or NIS for user management then
you only need to mount the root file system rw when updating the base
system or changing root password. Add the MAC and you will likely be
able to protect further against
On 01/08/06, Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On my system, "additional software" goes under the separate
partition /usr. Or are we using different definitions of
"additional"?
/usr includes a large part of the base installation. /usr/local is the usual
place for additional so
On 01/08/06, Erik Nørgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You usually don't patch up your system everyday. Remount rw do the
patching and remount ro. The problem is more that some 3rd party
applications assume that /usr is writeable. I found the problem more
annoying with / whenever I need to change
On 01/08/06, Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you may
even want to mount it read-only for security. (I think these are good
advises on any system).
I used to agree with this (specifically the mantra was "mount /usr read
only") - until I tried to patch anything! Then it's useless.
Wh
Hello,
After a power outaga (Level 3 at Goswell Road, London), all our FreeBSD
machines came up OK.
Nearly all of them had a problem though with ntpd. I'm guessing that most of
these machines booted before the the ntp servers came up. What happens is
that the machine runs two copies of ntpd:
ro
Nikolas,
On 24/07/06, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This would be like running Windows 3.1 on a brand new Xeon 5100
dual-core CPU... sure it will run fast* but what the hell are you
going to do with it? Play solitaire?
You have this the wrong way round. The correct allusion wou
Ted,
On 24/07/06, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All you have to do to see this is try booting FBSD 6 on a 80386
and compare it's performance to FBSD 3.X on a 386.
How are you going to do that, Ted? From the 6.0R release notes: "Support for
80386 processors (the I386_CPU kern
On 22/07/06, sammy sumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To Whom It May Concern:
1.Reinvent the installer and interface.
Fundamental thing like system installer is still phenomenally arcane.
There
is no excuse for FreeBSD developers not to upgrade the system installer
and
why not using dis
Hello,
I've always steered clear of using Sendmail (prefering Exim), but I thought
I would give it a try and am having real difficulties with something I think
should be simple.
I want to keep running Exim on port 25. I want Sendmail to run on a
different port. So I am trying to use the "O Daem
Oh, sorry. You already have that. It should work. It does for me.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello,
I have this problem whereby I just cannot make ntpd work as a server on
FreeBSD 5.4 and 6.0. It works flawlessly on 4.6.2, which I'm still running
somewhere.
The contents of my ntpd.conf file are:
server ntp0.bris.ac.uk
server ntp.linx.net
restrict A.B.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 notrust nomodif
Kyrre,
On 5/10/06, Kyrre Nygard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
Does anybody know where pam_userdb.so has gone?
FreeBSD doesn't appear to have ever had it, so it hasn't "gone" anywhere.
The thread you linked to below suggests exactly that.
Linux has it, but apparently FreeBSD does not.
Michael,
On 3/27/06, Michael W. Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> # netstat -na
> udp4 43414 0 *.514 *.*
That's a big queue.
I'm attaching the output of netstat -na and netstat -s for general
> informative purposes; if anyone has any further suggestions, I'm all
> ea
Hello,
I have a process which I cannot kill. It is stuck in the START state. Top
shows this:
37028 frem 1 1000 0K 0K START5:20 6.54% acroread
and ps shows this:
frem37028 6.5 0.0 0 0 v0 RE2:40PM 5:20.33 [acroread]
There is no entry for this pid und
A quick follow up to my earlier post...
I tried using FreeBSD 6.0 stable Snap 10, but the problem still exists.
I tried installing Solaris 10 (01/06) and the card is not detected by
Solaris at all.
I tried with RHEL 4 and Win 2003 and the machine works fine.
Back on FreeBSD 6.0 release, I lower
Hello,
I have FreeBSD installed on well over a dozen Dells (plus 50 other makes)
and they run without any problem. Today I have a Dell arrive and I am
getting very serious SCSI problems with it duing and after installing
FreeBSD 6 release. Basically the machine "freezes" and them comes back to
lif
Can you provide the output of nfsstat -c 1 on the web servers (and nfsstat
-s 1 on the nfs server if they are running FreeBSD)? Run them for a minute
when you are getting bad performance.
Please also quantify "moderately high traffic". What is this in Mbit/s?
Also, it may be helpful to know a litt
Hello Arden,
On 11/24/05, arden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> has this ever worked? If its a new box could be a hardware prob could try a
> loop-back test if you have the wrap plugs
Yes, on Solaris 10 before I wiped it today. I just can't see what I am
doing wrong. During the boot up sequence I ca
Hello,
I have a dual amd64 machine on which serial console is not working
properly. I've configured dozens of Intel machines without a problem.
I have set up boot.config and /etc/ttys. If I boot the machine some
data is printed to console. Rather than paste the whole lot here,
here's the last few
Ted,
On 11/22/05, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snipped a massive load of nonsense]
Why don't you do us all a favour and shut up. Your posts are off-topic
and a waste of storage bytes. AFAIK this mailing list is not your
personal soap box.
Frem.
___
I have a puzzling problem with dump and restore. I'm looking to implement a
dump and restore pipe to automatically make copy of a file system onto
another system completely. I've used / only as an example (because it's
small) and I'm not overwriting /.
I do the following:
1. Level 0 dump and resto
Hello,
I have some data on a NetApp which I am in the process of migrating to a
machine running FreeBSD. I dump the data off the NetApp to one big file on
the FreeBSD machine. When I restore the data I get some odd file flags like
this:
-rw-r--r-- 1 www www schg 73 Jul 27 22:04 foo.txt
I unde
Hello,
I'm not sure where I should send this. /sbin/restore on FreeBSD 6.0
beta 3 does not recognise dump files off a netapp:
zoe# /sbin/restore -if ./vol1_LEVEL1_2005-08-23
Tape is not a dump tape
restore on a FreeBSD 4.7 box does however and works fine.
Frem.
___
On 8/15/05, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> As someone mentioned, there is a FAQ on this. You should read it.
>
> It is going negative because you have used more than the nominal
> capacity of the slice. The nominal capacity is the total space
> minus the reserved proportion
Kris,
On 8/1/05, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See the chapter on kernel debugging in the developers' handbook.
It should be obvious from my post that I did look at the handbook. I
have a dump and I've extracted the line where the kernel has crashed.
I do have a backtrace (not poste
Hello,
I have a machine which I've installed afresh with 5.4R last week. It
is a dual Xeon machine with hyperthreading. Since I've updated it, it
has crashed regularly. So regularly that I have had to remove it from
service.
I built a debugging kernel and from my last crash dump I get the followi
Gayn Winters wrote:
> What I get from reading this article is that if the use of the file
> system is to store lots of small files, then use a small block size. Am
> I missing something?
No and yes! There is a minimum block and fragment size. In this case
there were not enough contiguous fragme
On 7/28/05, Bob Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why is it unnecessary to defragment UFS?
> >
>
> In normal use, files never become fragmented enough to affect performance. In
> a (loose) sense, files are intentionally fragmented in a controlled way so
> that fragmentation doesn't cause pr
Hello,
I have a FreeBSD 5.4R box running BIND 9.3.1 from base on a dual Xeon
with hyperthreading enabled.
According to the man page for named:
-n #cpus
Create #cpus worker threads to take advantage of multiple CPUs.
If not specified, named will try to determin
Hello,
I have a number of FreeBSD machines mounting two NetApps via NFS. I
updated one of the machines to 5.4 release. I have no prolems mounting
the filers, but I am getting the following log entry every so often:
Jul 27 16:36:33 fred rpcbind: connect from 192.168.1.5 to
getport/addr(nlockmgr)
I have a FreeBSD 5.4 machine with a SCSI hard drive. I dump all our
machines onto a nfs-mounted filer. There are some files which it's
important not to clobber during the dump, so I've been experimenting
with dump using the -L flag like so: dump auLf /var /mnt/dump/var
What I have noticed is that
On Apr 11, 2005 2:51 PM, Tim Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clearly the file is owned by root, and I kept it as part of my group. I've
> read the man pages, and believe that when I call the script, it will assume
> root's permissions. It doesn't, so where am I going wrong?
FreeBSD does n
Interesting. Host can look it up:
bash-2.05b$ host mr-chips-.deviantart.com
mr-chips-.deviantart.com has address 69.28.181.43
But the host name is itself invalid. From RFC 1035:
The labels must follow the rules for ARPANET host names. They must
start with a letter, end with a letter or digit
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:46:40 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I don't really know for sure, because nothing is documented, and
> nobody here knows anything.
So you keep telling us. So why do you bother posting in the first
place if you don't expect an answer that pleases
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:51:36 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And _hope_?
Yes, hope someone looks into it. You get the support you paid for...
> --
> Anthony
Frem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:13 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Freminlins writes:
> No, FreeBSD doesn't work very well with the hardware. As a matter of
> fact, it doesn't work very well with the hardware on my production
> server, either.
So
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:25:14 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly. With _identical_ hardware. So if the hardware ran under the
> other OS, but not under this OS, where do you look first for the
> problem?
Both, actually.
> If your car runs perfectly for years with one
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 04:19:25 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It ran for eight years without errors.
On a different OS.
> So your saying an anciety copy of NT is more reliable than a current
> copy of FreeBSD?
Don't try and put your words in my mouth. On your ancient hardw
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:39:11 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Show me that it's not a bug in FreeBSD first.
Alternatively, show us it is not a firmware problem first.
> I never had the problem
> in Windows NT.
Yawn. I had loads of problems with NT, virtually none with Win
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:29:24 -0500, Madhusudan Singh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyways, where are the certs installed in FreeBSD ?
There are no default certificates in FreeBSD. They are easy to create
however. Look in the Handbook here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbo
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:56:44 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an easy way to combine a backup and verify when doing backups
> with dump?
With the FreeBSD version of dump, no. You can use the L flag to ensure
a consistent dump, though this is not the same thing as verif
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:22:50 +, db <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /var: create/symlink failed, no inodes free
> foo.domain.topdomain - error opening scoreboard: No space left on device
This means what it says - you have run out of inodes. Do df -i /var
and you will see all your inodes have been
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:26:26 +0100, Frank Staals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey everyone, I have a question:
>
> I am running FreeBSD 5.3 with the default ftp-server ( ftpd ) as ftp
> deamon, everything works fine but I'd like to see what files peolpe are
> trying to download and when people log
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:52:16 -0800, Tim Traver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ok, I've searched far and wide, but I have to ask the FreeBSD gurus
> about it...
>
> I'm using a Netapp NFS server to serve up content to FreeBSD clients,
> and I am seeing terrible write performances.
I don
kernfs was removed some time ago (about 4.8 I think). It certainly
exists on a 4.7 machine I have.
Frem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL P
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:36:36 +0100, Jorn Argelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think that they would. That'll be a massive migration involving lots
> and lots of costs. They have to pay for RedHat Enterprise too. The only reason
> I can think off is that they want support.Perhaps I missed a
"But in December, Yahoo started to port its homegrown infrastructure
applications from its custom operating system to Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 4.0, which was in beta at the time and was released last week.
Plans call for a gradual migration of more applications to Linux, but
the timing and number w
95 matches
Mail list logo
