2009/10/30 Adam Vande More <amvandem...@gmail.com> > > No my point was top is not accurate measure of HAL's memory usage. HAL has > shared library's just like many other applications. >
Yep, I know all about that. But it is indicative. And indeed born out by the fact that when HAL is not running I get 18MB more memory free. This is only because of your misinterpretation of data and failure to RTFM. > Not entirely true. I didn't misinterpret the data - it was accurate. I didn't read the FM, but then again if HAL worked as it is meant to, I shouldn't need to. Isn't that the whole point of HAL? Starting X and finding no keyboard or mouse working is hardly what I would call success. > Adam Vande More > MF. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
