Re: Question about a possible missing line/entry for file UPDATING (from http://svnweb.freebsd.org) - 8.4-RELEASE plus branches

be added by someone to 8.4 releng branch). If this is > the case, shouldn't be sent this 'missing entry' to anyone by the means of > 'PR' ? > > Thank you very much for your patience :) > > Regards, > Pablo. > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:51 AM, D

Re: Question about a possible missing line/entry for file UPDATING (from http://svnweb.freebsd.org) - 8.4-RELEASE plus branches

last) > > Thanks a lot! > > Regards, > Pablo Carboni. > > P.S.: The same happens for > svn0.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4/UPDATING. > <http://svn0.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4/UPDATING> > > (Maybe I'm afraid for local syncing problems on my fbsd ser

Re: Question about a possible missing line/entry for file UPDATING (from http://svnweb.freebsd.org) - 8.4-RELEASE plus branches

From: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 75631 Aug 27 12:46 /usr/src/UPDATING 20130607: 8.4-RELEASE. On 3 September 2013 18:16, Pablo Carboni wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > Just for curious, today I was looking for the date/entry that belongs to > FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE inside UPDATING file, with n

Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

On 6 Jul 2013, at 21:34, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez wrote: > On Saturday 06 July 2013 01:55:31 Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote: >>> On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Is this normal in your experience? >>> >>> Did you do them in that o

Re: HP ILO FreeBSD 8.3 Installation problem

On 5 Jul 2013, at 00:01, "bw.mail.lists" wrote: > On 7/4/2013 4:59 PM, Emre Çamalan wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm trying to install FreeBSD with an HP ILO 4 advanced, web interface. I >> tried to install FreeBSD 8.2, FreeBSD 8.3 and FreeBSD 8.4. I tried to use >> acd0 and cd0 as media. I got the same r

Re: ZFS install on a partition

On 18 May 2013, at 01:15, Joshua Isom wrote: > Your hardware raid should be faster than ZFS raid. Don't use zfs raid > because there will be no benefit. Self healing much ? I wouldn't dream of dropping it for a 20mb/s performance increase from a HW controller. What if the controller der

Re: Proper way to update ports with svn

On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree wrote: > I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up > /usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using > 'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would > seem like a much better tool. Perhaps I

Re: external hdd

On 30 March 2013 02:14, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 30/03/2013 09:43, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >> Hi-- >> >> On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> >>> On 29 March 2013 18:06, Chuck Swiger wrote: >>> >>>> Time Machine is on

Re: external hdd

On 29 March 2013 18:06, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Laszlo Danielisz wrote: > > If I'm sharing an external 1TB HDD with FreeBSD and OS-X (I wan to use > Time Machine), what is the best file system to use? > > Time Machine is only supported on top of journaled HFS+; I'm not

Re: Current Way To Update Sources & Rebuild World/Kernel?

On Mar 17, 2013 11:07 PM, "Drew Tomlinson" wrote: > > I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world and kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported. The handbook talks about freebsd-update. I do no

Re: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive

On Mar 15, 2013 12:48 AM, wrote: > > Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. I am attempting to install FreeBSD 9.1 on a dual-boot configuration with Windows XP. I am using bsdinstall. I do not wish for the partition table to be changed. How do I instruct bsdinstall to skip the re-partitioning st

8.4-RELEASE (was Re: svn & new pkg system)

On 14 Mar 2013, at 23:47, "Michael Ross" wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:57:25 +0100, Giorgos Keramidas > wrote: > >> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:25:22 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> Is svn going to become part of the base system in 9.2-RELEASE? >> >> No. > > I'd like to reference a thread on the @sta

Re: I just had a crash, core dump

On 14 Mar 2013, at 12:57, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > My system > 9.1-RELEASE > > > ll /var/crash/ > total 697996 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 14 Mar 12:51 bounds > -rw--- 1 root wheel 577047 14 Mar 12:52 core.txt.0 > -rw--- 1 root wheel460 14 Mar 12:51 info.

Re: Issue with building custom kernel

On 13 Mar 2013, at 22:26, "Andre Goree" wrote: > I seem to be having trouble building my custom kernel. I've removed several > things that I believe were unnecessary, and added Linux support, but I don't > think I'm missing anything that is very important. Here is the last few > lines of th

Re: Grepping though a disk

On 4 Mar 2013, at 01:36, Polytropon wrote: > Due to a fsck file system repair I lost the content of a file > I consider important, but it hasn't been backed up yet. The > file name is still present, but no blocks are associated > (file size is zero). I hope the data blocks (which are now > proba

Re: Ports & Packages [Stable] in sync

On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no > packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the > RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need non-default options > or

Re: vmstat -w not honored

On 15 Feb 2013, at 21:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Fleuriot Damien writes: > >> I'm running 8.3-STABLE and apparently, vmstat won't honor both -i >> (interrupts) and -w (repeat display every wait delay seconds) flags at >> the same time. >> The problem also arises with -z. >> >> The manual do

Re: 3 TB disk troubles

On 14 Feb 2013, at 17:01, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Scott Bennett wrote: > >>The confusing thing is that the kernel says it's a 3 TB device, >> but the utility programs say otherwise. > > There are more than a few SATA to USB adapters that are not capable of > dealing wit

Re: how to configure host login account to use jail?

On 23 Dec 2012, at 03:43, Fbsd8 wrote: > Have jails up and running on host with ip address of > 10.0.10.10 10.0.10.11 10.0.10.12 10.0.10.13 10.0.10.14 > The host rc.conf has > ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" # nix connected to isp > ifconfig_rl0="inet 10.0.10.2" #lan nic > > I want lan users to login to

Re: uname -r output values?

On 21 Dec 2012, at 18:51, Fbsd8 wrote: > Fleuriot Damien wrote: > >> On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> When issuing the uname -r command what are the different values possible to >>> expect? >>> >>> So far I have this list. >>> >>> Where X.X = major release . Sub release numbers

Re: Somewhat OT: Is Full Command Logging Possible?

On 8 Dec 2012, at 03:13, Devin Teske wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> --On December 7, 2012 10:23:56 AM +0100 Fleuriot Damien wrote: >> >>> >>> On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: >>> --On December 6, 2012 1:19:00 PM -0600 Tim Daneliuk

Re: Somewhat OT: Is Full Command Logging Possible?

On 6 Dec 2012, at 20:19, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 12/06/2012 12:55 PM, n j wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >>> ... >>> Well ... does auditd provide a record of every command issued within a >>> script? >>> I was under the impression (and I may well be wrong) that

Re: Somewhat OT: Is Full Command Logging Possible?

On 6 Dec 2012, at 00:19, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > sudo chown root:wheel my_naughty_script > sudo chmod 700 my_naughty script > sudo ./my_naughty_script > > The sudo log will note that I ran the script, but not what it did. > > wow, way to complicate matters. sudo csh > So

Re: Anyone using squid and pf?

On 30 Nov 2012, at 08:30, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > Damien Fleuriot skrev 2012-11-29 00:28: >> On 27 November 2012 22:01, Leslie Jensen wrote: >>> >>> >> >> >> Well, that depends on what you want to do. >> >> If you want

Re: using new pkgng system on 9.0 system

Used it on 8.3 boxes here, no complaints so far. Gonna slowly transition all our ~60 firewalls to pkgng. Note that I used pkg2ng on firewall boxes with ~180 installed ports each. On 29 Nov 2012, at 22:48, Frank wrote: > It is safe yet to use pkg2ng in production? > > -- > Frank > > > On

Re: CARP within VirtualBox Does it work?

On 29 Nov 2012, at 21:07, dweimer wrote: > On 2012-11-29 12:53, Fleuriot Damien wrote: >> On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:43 PM, dweimer wrote: >> >>> I was trying to setup a test of CARP on two virtual machines running in >>> VirtualBox 4.2.4r81684 I am not sure if I have something wrong with my CARP

Re: denyhosts, fail2ban, or something else?

On 27 November 2012 23:25, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > Finally got sick of seeing tons of ssh break-in attempts in my logs. Am > considering using denyhosts, or fail2ban. Anyone have any experience > with these? > > I'm already using the AllowUsers facility of ssh to only allow specific > users in

Re: Anyone using squid and pf?

On 27 November 2012 22:01, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > Volodymyr Kostyrko skrev 2012-11-26 21:50: >> >> 26.11.2012 20:40, Leslie Jensen: >> >>> Rules from pf.conf >>> >>> >>> # macros >>> ext_if="xl0" >>> int_if="bge0" >>> >>> tcp_services="{ 22, 993, 59

Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be Updated?

On 26 November 2012 21:15, jb wrote: > Tim Daneliuk tundraware.com> writes: > >> ... >> One wonders if using svn to keep the ports tree up-to-date might not be >> simpler, and perhaps, more reliable ... > > As managed by portsnap: > $ du -hs /usr/ports/ > 850M/usr/ports/ > > As managed by svn

Re: Multi-boot Linux + FreeBSD

While no expert, I would advise against running the kernel directly. The loader allows you to boot in single user which may come handy at times. On 24 Nov 2012, at 18:08, "Lucas B. Cohen" wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > On 2012.11.24 17:06, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Perhaps later today I'll install 9.0 am

Re: high performance server design approach

That's a shame, nginx is definitely a robust and fast server, it's well maintained, it's patched quickly... If you need proof of its prowess to convince your upstream managers, I'd be inclined to provide you with a diagram of our architecture for this particular project, as well as the graphs (net

Re: lagg interface not created at reboot ( 9.0 )

On 2 Nov 2012, at 10:56, Frank Bonnet wrote: > hello > > I use the lagg feature on a server and it seems the lagg pseudo interface > is not created when the machine reboots , the server runs 9.0-p3 > > here is the incriminated part of the /etc/rc.conf file > > ifconfig_bce2="up" > ifconfig_bc

Re: py-bittornado gone

On 26 Oct 2012, at 19:05, Artifex Maximus wrote: > Hello! > > py-bittornado gone and I accidentally delete with portmanager at > upgrade. cfv uses and I use cfv for testing torrent so I need > py-bittornado (or py-bittorrent). How can I restore that package? > > Bye, > a > How about getting

Re: BIND - slaving the root zone and signature expired

On 25 October 2012 18:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 25 October 2012 18:33, Warren Block wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> >>> Anyone else experienced this problem today ? >>> >>> We slave the root zone and have received "

Re: BIND - slaving the root zone and signature expired

On 25 October 2012 18:33, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > >> Anyone else experienced this problem today ? >> >> We slave the root zone and have received "signature expired" errors. > > > Found this: > > https:/

BIND - slaving the root zone and signature expired

Hello list, Anyone else experienced this problem today ? We slave the root zone and have received "signature expired" errors. We slave the root zone like so: zone "." { type slave; file "/etc/namedb/slave/root.slave"; masters { 192.5.5.241;// F.RO

Re: 8-STABLE base BIND version number typo ?

On 27 August 2012 10:11, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > Hello list, > > > > We're currently running Nessus PCI DSS scans on our infrastructure to > eliminate known vulnerabilities and problems. > > The scan reports that my version of BIND is vulnerable to exploits I >

8-STABLE base BIND version number typo ?

Hello list, We're currently running Nessus PCI DSS scans on our infrastructure to eliminate known vulnerabilities and problems. The scan reports that my version of BIND is vulnerable to exploits I *know* it isn't. The problem, to me, seems to be with the version number as reported by named -V

Re: implications of adding root to a group

On 23 Aug 2012, at 17:26, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:51:10 -0700 > Krims G wrote: > >> Hello, I've been looking at the /etc/group and have noticed that some >> groups have root included in them, for example "operator". Is it not >> implied that root has access to all th

Re: FreeBSD on SSD

On 28 Jul 2012, at 11:58, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:44:35 +0300 > Vladimir Videscu wrote: > >> Good day. I have recently bought a Seagate Momentus XT for my laptop. >> >> The specs for the drive are : >> >> RPM : 7200 >> Buffer : 32 MB >> HDD Memory : 750 GB >>

Re: On-access AV scanning

On 7/27/12 1:47 PM, Daniel Bye wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:19:45AM -0400, Daniel Feenberg wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Daniel Bye wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > Are there any current options available to support on-access antiv

Re: Support

Wow wait a sec here ... You've installed a boot loader but no the OS itself and then shut down the computer ? Have you tried booting from the CD again ? On 7/26/12 4:10 PM, Andy Recker wrote: > yes i booted from a cd the fist time and i almost had it installed but then > i turned my computer o

Re: Freebsd build problem

On 7/26/12 2:08 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > Hi, > Please find my repsonses in line. > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Damien Fleuriot <mailto:m...@my.gd>> wrote: > > > On 7/26/12 12:48 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > > Hi, > > I'

Re: Freebsd build problem

On 7/26/12 12:48 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > Hi, > I'm unable to compile the kernel code (for that matter any kernel module > also). The following is the error. > My guess is that it is trying to compile the code for x86 instead of amd64 > as you can a symbolic link create for x86 includes. > Ple

Re: Security - logging of user commands

On 7/25/12 6:15 PM, jb wrote: > Damien Fleuriot my.gd> writes: > >> ... >> >From my syslog.conf: >> auth.info;authpriv.info /var/log/auth.log >> >> Yet I'm seeing not a trail in /var/log/auth.log , or messages, or even >

Re: Securituy - logging of user commands

On 25 Jul 2012, at 18:15, jb wrote: > Damien Fleuriot my.gd> writes: > >> ... >>> From my syslog.conf: >> auth.info;authpriv.info /var/log/auth.log >> >> Yet I'm seeing not a trail in /var/log/auth.log , or messages, or

Re: Securituy - logging of user commands

On 7/25/12 3:41 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Peter Boosten wrote: >> Have you ever considered the audit function of FreeBSD? > > Does it really log user commands? At best, it logs executed processes. > >From the handbook, it seems to be able to log executed commands and even arguments. That wou

Re: Securituy - logging of user commands

On 7/25/12 2:42 PM, jb wrote: > Damien Fleuriot my.gd> writes: > >> ... >> I notice it also exists on FreeBSD as /usr/ports/security/snoopy . >> >> However I face several problems with it, mainly it doesn't seem to log >> anything. >>

Re: FreeBSD Stable production version.

@seibercom.net >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stable production version. >> >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:19:53 +0200 >> Damien Fleuriot articulated: >> >>> I'd say it's a matter of personal preference. >>> &

Re: Securituy - logging of user commands

No I haven't. That's a good suggestion, I'll look into it and see if it fits the purpose :) On 7/25/12 2:04 PM, Peter Boosten wrote: > Have you ever considered the audit function of FreeBSD? > > > Peter Boosten > > On 25 jul. 2012, at 13:47, Damien

Securituy - logging of user commands

Hello list, We're currently working towards the PCI DSS certification (Payment Card Industry) for a project at work. One of the prerequisites is that all user commands be logged. We're currently using a very bad hack that takes the last command from a user's history and sends it to a log serv

Re: FreeBSD Stable production version.

On 7/25/12 1:13 PM, Marwan Sultan wrote: > > Hello all and Good Morning, Afternoon or evening :) > > I finally decided to take off my FreeBSD 7.2 server which is onlin esince > 2009. > > I will go for a new FreeBSD version and will move out all data. > > My Server is mainly is a MAIL s

Re: Apache vs. nginx

On 7/17/12 4:40 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million > hits/mo). We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start > from scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering > if anyone on this list has switched

Re: Messages not reaching the lists

On 6/29/12 6:40 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Lately I've been noticing that almost without fail, any messages I send > to the FreeBSD mailing lists never actually appear on the list. > > Just wondering if maybe my ISP (cox.net) has been flagged as a known > spam source, or what? > > This is v

Re: portupgrade -- is there a way to only build and update ports that actually NEED it?

On 6/25/12 9:53 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > Hey there, > > I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8 > to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump. > > Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as > the libtool2.4 fu

Re: Intel X520-DA2 Supported in stable/8?

On 22 Jun 2012, at 22:02, Rick Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote: >> The ixgbe driver creates devices named ix0, etc. >> >> I believe you need to run 'ifconfig ix0 up' before it will attempt to get >> link. > > Thanks for clarifying that tidbit. At least I

Re: question about prblem with raid 1 for freeBSD

On 6/22/12 11:11 AM, dude golden wrote: > HI there, > > hope my email find you well, i recently order a server with below > configuration > > INTEL > 1x Quad-Core i5-2500 3.3GHz, 6M Cache > 16GB DDR3 > 2x 500GB SATAII > > then ask from my COLOCATION to install FreeBSD 8.2 or 8.3 with RAID 1, a

Re: apache PHP suhosin load

On 21 Jun 2012, at 08:34, n dhert wrote: > On FreeBSD 8.3 I have apache22 web server with PHP. PHP is PHP52 for > compatibility with existing applications, but the most recent version > in the php52 branch > $ php --version > PHP 5.2.17 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: May 7 2012 08:45:58

Re: New to FreeBSD - Some questions

On 6/20/12 2:32 PM, Fred Morcos wrote: > Hello all, > > I am new to FreeBSD, coming from a GNU/Linux background (most > comfortable with Archlinux). I compiled a series of questions I would > like to ask in different areas and categories. Should I send them all > in a single email message or sho

Re: seems i cannot fully understand {/,/usr/local/}/etc/rc.d/*

On 6/20/12 11:09 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 20/06/2012 09:51, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> >>> Create a new file in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/precedence with the following >>> contents: >>> >>> #!/bin/sh >>> # >>> # Persuade vboxheadless to start before samba. >>> >>> # PROVIDE: precedence >>> # REQU

Re: rm returns 0 although directory didn't exist and wasn't deleted ?

place). > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> I've stumbled upon this *so weird* behaviour. >> >> >> >> # ls -la /var/tmp/stunnel/ >> ls: /var/tmp/stunnel/: No such file or directory >> >>

rm returns 0 although directory didn't exist and wasn't deleted ?

I've stumbled upon this *so weird* behaviour. # ls -la /var/tmp/stunnel/ ls: /var/tmp/stunnel/: No such file or directory # rm -Rf /var/tmp/stunnel/ # echo $? 0 Anyo

Re: Trigger action on link state change

On 6/15/12 12:32 PM, Michael Ross wrote: > > Hi all, > > i was wondering if there is any ready-made method to trigger an action > as soon as a link changes state. > Along the lines of > onifdown_em0="/run/this/script" > in rc.conf > > Background: > Discussing physical data security with a cl

rc.conf ifconfig ipv6 address fails at boot

Hello questions, I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong here. Trying to get a static IPv6 on a server at boot time from rc.conf, and that fails. Notice I haven't set ipv6_network_interfaces , so it defaults to "auto". = ipv6_enable="YES" ipv6_defaultrouter="2a01:e35:2f1b:e2a0::1" # VLAN

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 9 Jun 2012, at 18:48, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:42:37PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> >> On 6 Jun 2012, at 21:52, Dave U. Random >> wrote: >> >>> Polytropon wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/7/12 3:43 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote: >>> But my point is that MS doesn't issue the updates, they have to ask the >>> BIOS vendors to do so, and then the MB vendors have to take the update, >>> and then the users have to install the update. The incentive at each >>> level is generally very small.

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?]

On 6/6/12 9:55 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jerry wrote: >> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:49:53 -0400 >> Daniel Staal articulated: >> >>> On 2012-06-05 17:20, Jerry wrote: >>> The question that I have not seen answered in this thread is what FreeBSD intents to d

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?]

On 6/5/12 10:19 PM, Colin Barnabas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:19:26AM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: >> UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries >> http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/ >> >> This would seem to make compiling from source

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/6/12 9:43 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > >> >> >> On 6/6/12 6:45 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >>> >>>>>

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 7 Jun 2012, at 01:54, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 6 18:13:09 2012 >> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:09:54 +0100 >> From: Bruce Cran >> To: Robert Bonomi >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeB

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6 Jun 2012, at 21:52, Dave U. Random wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > >> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> Having to pay Verisign instead of Microsoft makes no difference: the >>> point is why should I have to pay anything to a third party in order to >>> run whatev

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/6/12 7:23 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: >> >>> I do wonder about that. What incentive does the possesor of a signing key >>> have to keep it secret? >> >> Contract penalty clause maybe ? Lawyers ? > > Contract with _whom_? The party you pay money to -- Verisign --

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/6/12 6:45 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >>> I do wonder about that. What incentive does the possesor of a signing >>> key >>> have to keep it secret? >> >> Contract penalty clause maybe ? Lawyers ? > > A limited-liability company with no a

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/6/12 1:57 AM, Chris Hill wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, G?k?in Akdeniz wrote: > >> For the time being only ARM platform is restricted. > > True, but I would be astonished if this restriction were not expanded by > MS in the future. Just my opinion, but I believe their ultimate goal is > to a

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/5/12 9:12 PM, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote: >> >> UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel >> binaries http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/ >> > > That's restriction is only for ARM devices which have a label that says > "Desgined for Windows8". In

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/6/12 1:19 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 05/06/2012 23:10, Jerry wrote: >>> I thought this URL also shown >>> above, answered that question. >> >> Signing bootloaders and kernels etc. seems superf

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/6/12 9:32 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/06/2012 23:10, Jerry wrote: >> I thought this URL also shown >> above, answered that question. > > Signing bootloaders and kernels etc. seems superficially like a good > idea to me. However, instant reacti

Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?

On 6/6/12 1:36 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100 > Matthew Seaman articulated: > >> On 06/06/2012 11:24, Jerry wrote: >>> I think you are in error there Matthew. From what I have read The $99 >>> goes to Verisign, not Microsoft - further once paid you can sign as >>> many bina

Re: FreeBSD ports patch count

On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote: > Hiya > > I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen > on the FreeBSD ports. > > To show you what I mean. > > [root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update; > pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch inst

Re: How to use an external USB3.0 drive with 4k sectors?

On 31 May 2012, at 17:57, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: > hello, world\n > > so I decided to try two HW technology advancements in one go. > I have a brand new shiny 1TB USB3.0 external disk, that when plugged > to an USB2(two!) reports > >da5 at umass-sim2 bus 2 scbus6 target 0 lun 0 >da5:

Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers?

As a side note and in case you were considering, I strongly advise against Linux + fuse ZFS. On 31 May 2012, at 18:05, Oscar Hodgson wrote: > That helps. Thank you. > > This is an academic departmental instructional / research environment. > We had a great relationship with Sun, they provide

Re: why I am upset

On 26 May 2012, at 03:12, ajtiM wrote: > Why I am upset but not just me? > > I am running KDE 4.8 from January on my Linux computer. Now is almost June > and > we got KDE 4.8 on FreeBSD too. 5 months testing and it works? No. The modern > OS for the desktop computer doesn;t works. O.K. OS w

Re: kldxref: /boot/kernel/kernel: too many sections

On 26 May 2012, at 13:41, Martin Laabs wrote: > Hello, > > while updating my system I got the following error message while make > installworld: > > ===> syscons/green (install) > install -o root -g wheel -m 555 green_saver.ko /boot/kernel > install -o root -g wheel -m 555 green_saver.ko

Re: freebsd-update not updating reported patchlevel

On 4 May 2012, at 16:45, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2012 04:14:05 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote: >> What is required is a differentation between the _kernel_ revision level, >> and the patchlevel of the entire base system. >> >> Store the kernel revision level -in- the kernel. Use th

Re: Re[4]: Problem with vlans on igb (was: fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3)

Well, you see me glad that this fixes your problems. You might want to see with Jack Vogel who maintains the Intel drivers, if you can track down the issue and perhaps even find a fix for it. Taking the liberty of CCing you Jack. 2012/4/18 Eugen Konkov : > Hi, Damien. > > With this configurat

Re: Re[2]: Problem with vlans on igb (was: fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3)

Yes, I suggest you try with "-vlanhwtag" as well. If that stops your unwanted reboots, you may want to remove it and see if the situation changes. 2012/4/12 Коньков Евгений : > Now i350 is configured as: > > /etc/rc.conf > ## TCP/IP > ifconfig_igb0="-rxcsum -txcsum -lro -tso up" > ifconfig_igb1="

Re: Problem with vlans on igb (was: fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3)

Try disabling hardware VLAN tagging like so, I know we had problems a few years back with it. in /etc/rc.conf : ifconfig_igb2=" -vlanhwtag -tso -lro up" 2012/4/11 KES : > > > Пересылаемое сообщение   > 11.04.2012, 13:14, "KES" : > > 10.04.2012, 08:50, "Da Rock" : > >>  On 04/10/

Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

hannel-group) On 3/16/12 5:31 PM, Snoop wrote: > That's the STP configuration on my two switch ports: > > spanning-tree portfast > spanning-tree bpduguard enable > > > > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 12:10 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> You're not looking

Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

ts LACP then that should be used instead." > > > > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 10:45 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> Sorry top posting from phone. >> >> >> Show your switch's port configurations. >> >> We're using VLAN tagging over lagg fa

Re: LAGG bug or misconfiguration???

Sorry top posting from phone. Show your switch's port configurations. We're using VLAN tagging over lagg failover interfaces at work and I have already tried the tests you described, to much better results. We're also running 8.2 so the only thing that seems to differ between us is the switch

Re: apache22 + mod_fastcgi

tes > Content-Length: 17 > Content-Type: application/x-httpd-php > > mbp:~ alexus$ > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> I think you're naming your module incorrectly. >> >> First, try just setting the handler in your vhost w

Re: apache22 + mod_fastcgi

I think you're naming your module incorrectly. First, try just setting the handler in your vhost w/o the ifmodule stuff. If that works, you know where you've gone wrong. On 9 Mar 2012, at 21:12, alexus wrote: > i'd like to follow up with this question if possible > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:

Re: Fwd: Some questions about Link Aggregation and Failover

will *NOT* use *BOTH* links for a single "source ip - destination ip" pair. On 3/9/12 2:15 AM, bo wang wrote: >Hi. Maybe you can't understand me. I mean that how can I do Link > Aggregation for increasing the top speed between two server and a > switch. > 2012/3/8

Re: Fwd: Some questions about Link Aggregation and Failover

>From your switch, run the following tests: core1.drt.hi-media#test etherchannel load-balance interface port-channel 2 ip 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 Would select Gi1/1/1 of Po2 core1.drt.hi-media#test etherchannel load-balance interface port-channel 2 ip 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.9 Would select Gi2/1/1 of Po2 core1.d

Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ?

On 3/6/12 12:30 PM, krad wrote: > > apart from a major bump in the version of pf. Still the old syntax though, what I'm eager for is 10.0 with the upgrade to 4.8 openbsd PF. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm

Re: Some questions about Link Aggregation and Failover

Sorry top post, not so smartphone. Do this on your c3750, in privileged mode: Show ether 1 sum On 7 Mar 2012, at 05:41, bo wang wrote: > Hello: > Recently I want to do Link Aggregation for increasing the > speed. I use a Cisco 3750 Switche and two IBM Server R with BSD > 9.0 .I d

Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ?

On 3/6/12 7:01 AM, Allen wrote: > On 2/28/2012 3:03 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> This is an entirely subjective question and one that only you can answer. >> >> For example, given the number of problem reports I'm seeing on the >> lists, I'm going to stick

Re: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes.

On 3 Mar 2012, at 16:37, "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:55 +0800 > netroby wrote: > >> Thanks . >> I had resolved the problem : >> >> 1. restart FreeBSD to single user mode. >> 2. umount all device then run fsck -f >> 3. after finished the fsck, restart FreeBSD , retu

Re: request a quote

On 2/29/12 10:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 29/02/2012 09:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> This does, however, raise an interesting question. >> >> Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and >> engineering ? >> Like, a la RHEL

Re: request a quote

5-star rating this gem right now. This does, however, raise an interesting question. Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and engineering ? Like, a la RHEL or SLES. Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the real support.

  1   2   3   >