On 24 November 2012, at 16:36, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 11/24/2012 05:58 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:38:35 -0600
>> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>
>>> I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that
>>> provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a sma
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I use the amd64 install DVD.
With or without deleting, I can't format a bootable FreeBSD partition to
ada0s1, aka Linux /dev/sda1. FWIW if I reinstall GRUB legacy
to /dev/sda, the boot flag will be set for the extended
partition. /dev/sda1 is an empty ex
--On November 24, 2012 10:38:35 AM -0600 Tim Daneliuk
wrote:
I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that
provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a small domain. This is not
a high arrival rate environment but it does need to be rock solid (which
FBSD 4-8 have been).
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 11/24/2012 03:48 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
It is not however sufficient to get you a completely upgraded system:
you will still have to re-install all of your ports. Otherwise, as you
end up trying to upgrade ports by ones and twos over time, you'll
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 02:34 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 00:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > I meant the "really manual mode" (CLI) as to be seen in
> > Fig. 3-10, named "Shell" (that's why the confusion, sorry).
PS: Don't worry, it was clear what you wanted to say. As a newbi
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 00:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> I meant the "really manual mode" (CLI) as to be seen in
> Fig. 3-10, named "Shell" (that's why the confusion, sorry).
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/bsdinstall-partitioning.html
"Manually Create Partitions" does
On 11/24/2012 06:16 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 25/11/2012 04:06, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
But I have had essentially no problems doing in-place major rev
updates with FreeBSD thus far. The only breakage I am worried about
now is whether the new compiler change breaks things that used to
work just f
- Sent via BlackBerry from Thai Citrus
-Original Message-
From: Walter Hurry
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.orgDate: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:02:51
To:
Subject: Re: Another question about pkgng
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walte
On 11/24/2012 05:58 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:38:35 -0600
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that
provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a small domain. This is not
a high arrival rate environment but it does need to
On 25/11/2012 04:06, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
But I have had essentially no problems doing in-place major rev
updates with FreeBSD thus far. The only breakage I am worried about
now is whether the new compiler change breaks things that used to
work just fine. For example, will my make.conf settings
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote:
>> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote
>> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the
>> remote repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against r
Hi,
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:38:35 -0600
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that
> provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a small domain. This is not
> a high arrival rate environment but it does need to be rock solid
> (which FBSD 4-8 have been).
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 00:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> I'm just too stupid to use a computer. :-)
I once wanted to delete a broken Linux, before restoring it from a
backup, but by accident deleted the broken Linux + the only backup too.
No drugs involved. In around 20 years using computers, I was
On 11/24/2012 05:13 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 24 November 2012, at 14:37, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 11/24/2012 03:25 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 24 November 2012, at 12:32, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Can someone kindly explain what is going on here:
Machine A: FreeBSD - was running 8, just upgraded
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:07:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 23:35 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > >Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > > /dev/sda1 63 12127468460637311 83 Linux
> >
> > This is the partition you're going to inst
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 23:35 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> You can also switch to "manual mode"
I did this first and it didn't work.
Regards,
Ralf
PS: I very often receive mails two times :(, from the list and directly
send to me. I notice that "mailing list" options for the MUA are broken.
Is mailm
On 24 November 2012, at 14:37, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 11/24/2012 03:25 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 24 November 2012, at 12:32, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>
>>> Can someone kindly explain what is going on here:
>>>
>>> Machine A: FreeBSD - was running 8, just upgraded to 9.1-PRE
>>>
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 23:35 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> >Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > /dev/sda1 63 12127468460637311 83 Linux
>
> This is the partition you're going to install FreeBSD to?
> Good, just delete it and let the installer do th
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:14:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I use the amd64 install DVD.
>
> With or without deleting, I can't format a bootable FreeBSD partition to
> ada0s1, aka Linux /dev/sda1.
You mention ada0s1. This is not a partition. It's called
a slice (different term: "DOS primary partiti
On 11/24/2012 03:48 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
It is not however sufficient to get you a completely upgraded system:
you will still have to re-install all of your ports. Otherwise, as you
end up trying to upgrade ports by ones and twos over time, you'll end up
with a complete rat's nest of contra
On 11/24/2012 03:25 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 24 November 2012, at 12:32, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Can someone kindly explain what is going on here:
Machine A: FreeBSD - was running 8, just upgraded to 9.1-PRE
(I don't recall seeing the behavior described below
in V8, but
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Paul Kraus wrote:
> I am seeing very poor response time running the VitrualBox GUI via X11
> tunneled over SSH via the Internet. The issue _appears_ to be limited
> to the VBox GUI as Firefox is reasonable. I am well aware of the
> latency issues tunneling X11 over
I use the amd64 install DVD.
With or without deleting, I can't format a bootable FreeBSD partition to
ada0s1, aka Linux /dev/sda1. FWIW if I reinstall GRUB legacy
to /dev/sda, the boot flag will be set for the extended
partition. /dev/sda1 is an empty ext3 partition, size 57.83 GiB.
Regards,
Ralf
On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote:
> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote
> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remote
> repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite.
>
> That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg upda
On 24/11/2012 16:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am contemplating moving to the FBSD 9 family. Is this branch ready
> for production or should I wait a while yet? I ordinarily avoid x.0
> releases of anything and I know 9.1 is soon going to be with us.
9-STABLE works for me. I've run into a few qui
On 24 November 2012, at 12:32, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Can someone kindly explain what is going on here:
>
> Machine A: FreeBSD - was running 8, just upgraded to 9.1-PRE
>(I don't recall seeing the behavior described below
> in V8, but then, I don't think I ever tried it).
Thank you Damien, Lucas and Juergen :)
btw. the off topic on multimedia is my bad, I wasn't subscribed to
FreeBSD questions.
While reading howtos I missed
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/disks.html#grub-loader
I'll add
title FreeBSD 9.0
root (hd0,a)
kernel /boot/loader
to my men
Can someone kindly explain what is going on here:
Machine A: FreeBSD - was running 8, just upgraded to 9.1-PRE
(I don't recall seeing the behavior described below
in V8, but then, I don't think I ever tried it).
Machine B: Linux Mint Desktop
- Machine A acts as an NFS
When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote
repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the remote
repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite.
That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first?
__
While no expert, I would advise against running the kernel directly.
The loader allows you to boot in single user which may come handy at times.
On 24 Nov 2012, at 18:08, "Lucas B. Cohen" wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> On 2012.11.24 17:06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Perhaps later today I'll install 9.0 am
Paul Kraus writes:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Lowell Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> Yup, I just have not had a chance to chase that one down, and
> given that it happens once per SSH session, has not been a high
> priority. I mentioned it in the spirit of full disclosure.
>
>>>
Tim Daneliuk writes:
> On 11/24/2012 11:19 AM, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
>> I wouldn't
>> blindly trust and drop an operating system on production servers, no
>> matter how good the feedback from outside my organization sounds.
>
> In general, I'd agree with you. Certainly, that's been the case
> wi
In article <1353768334.2641.21.camel@q> you write:
>Thank you!
You're welcome!
>
>On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 15:14 +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
>> Don't want to try 9.1RC3?
>
>I thought it would be better to start with something "stable" as a
>newbie and now burning already is in progress.
>
Well I don'
On 2012.11.23 22:11, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> Well friends, it's that time of year again... yep, it's shop till you drop
> time!
For me it's usually *after* Christmas season, but whatever works :)
> I can't imagine
> that there is really that much different about the pricey ones to make
> t
On 11/24/2012 11:19 AM, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
I wouldn't
blindly trust and drop an operating system on production servers, no
matter how good the feedback from outside my organization sounds.
In general, I'd agree with you. Certainly, that's been the case
with Linux, AIX, and so on over the ye
On 2012.11.24 17:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I am contemplating moving to the FBSD 9 family. Is this branch ready
> for production or should I wait a while yet?
This probably won't help much, but I wouldn't call any system
"production ready" until I've tested it as thoroughly as possible and
quali
Hi Ralf,
On 2012.11.24 17:06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Perhaps later today I'll install 9.0 amd64. If possible I'll keep my
> Linux GRUB legacy. Can I use my menu.lst [1] and add a chainloader or
> something similar to boot FreeBSD from /dev/sda1?
I don't know if GRUB v1 allows that, on a multiboot s
Hi,
I have about 120 FBSD routers - diskless. I use FBSD 8.2, with no problems. But
now I am trying 9.0, the same configuration
I found difference of behavior command arp between 8.2 and 9.0.
In 8.2 I can see arp of ip on all devices, physical and vlans.
vlan356: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that
provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a small domain. This is not
a high arrival rate environment but it does need to be rock solid (which
FBSD 4-8 have been).
I am contemplating moving to the FBSD 9 family. Is this branch rea
Hi,
as a long time Linux user I'll test FreeBSD, because I've got issues
with my sound card on Linux. I'm already subscribed to FreeBSD
multimedia.
Perhaps later today I'll install 9.0 amd64. If possible I'll keep my
Linux GRUB legacy. Can I use my menu.lst [1] and add a chainloader or
something
On 23/11/2012 15:58, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
On Nov 23, 2012, at 3:46 PM, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I would like to disable the network traffic for specific IPs, for the
moment I just add to my pf.conf a rule that will block everything for a
specified table like this :
table
[...] other
I've upgraded squid from 3.1 to 3.2. Starting squid 3.2 with the same
configuration file now gives me errors in cache.log when one tries to
access any site, and of course no access!
2012/11/24 16:24:56 kid1| WARNING: Forwarding loop detected for:
Reverting back to 3.1 works.
I know there ar
On 24 November 2012 10:14, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 22 November 2012 06:19, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
>> whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
>> The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
>> show dmesg?
>>
>> Please advise
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, free...@johnea.net wrote:
One of the complications was getting old metadata off of the drive. After
trying a couple of 'dd' invocations:
# overwriting the first sector
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ada0 bs=512 count=1
# also tried overwriting the last sector
diskinfo ada0 | cut -
On 22 November 2012 06:19, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
> whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
> The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
> show dmesg?
>
> Please advise
>
> Thanks
> Anton
>
>
> hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x060
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Wednesday, November 21, 2012 a las 09:19:24PM -0700, Warren Block
escribió:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Warren Block wrote:
The fdisk/bsdlabel section of my disk setup article has been rewritten
to use gpart. Feedback welcome.
http://www.wonkity.
46 matches
Mail list logo
