On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:32:42PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>
> I've been struggling with this on my own for ages now, and I was
> determined to try and sort it myself. But I'll now eat my humble pie and
> ask for some help :)
>
> I have (I believe I have mentioned this before) 5 dvb tuners in a
>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:10:30PM +0100, Terrence Koeman wrote:
>
> Could someone point me to the right mailinglist to discuss adding
> support for the MCS9904 chip to uart? I'm working on it, but I have
> some questions regarding FIFO sizes and how they are currently
> determined.
>
> Thanks.
>
On 02/19/2012 10:39, Terrence Koeman wrote:
> I'm just done converting from named.root to slaving the root, I
> checked which servers allow axfr (at least for me...) and added them
> all as masters.
Given that some of the root server operators don't really like people
doing this routinely it woul
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 22:23, Daniel Lewis wrote:
> I just install free bsd 8.2 and i can send mail out but cant recieve. From
> recipient end its combining the hostname and domain name.
>
>
Hi Daniel,
In order to be able to "receive" e-mails on your server, a lot more is
involved than just inst
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 06:00:50PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 19/02/2012 17:49, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
> > If it will feel you more confident that everything is OK, I too have -p3
> > reported from the kernel, but -p6 in newvers.sh. I remember a
> > discussion shortly after FreeBSD-SA-11:05
Daniel Lewis gmail.com> writes:
>
> I just install free bsd 8.2 and i can send mail out but cant recieve. From
> recipient end its combining the hostname and domain name.
> ...
Check sendmail in /etc/hosts.allow
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Lewis
Date: Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 2:23 PM
Subject: Mail
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I just install free bsd 8.2 and i can send mail out but cant recieve. From
recipient end its combining the hostname and domain name.
_
I just install free bsd 8.2 and i can send mail out but cant recieve. From
recipient end its combining the hostname and domain name.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Joshua Isom gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 2/19/2012 6:44 AM, RW wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:28:29 + (UTC)
> > jb wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It's fb9-release.
> >>
> >> Why the other ps entries do not display cron ?
> >>
> >> $ top
> >> ...
> >>PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZE
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Feb 19 04:35:10 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> From: jb
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:28:29 + (UTC)
> Subject: ps output
>
> Hi,
>
> It's fb9-release.
>
> Why the other ps entries do not display cron ?
Add a 'ww' -- yes, -two- 'w' char
Could someone point me to the right mailinglist to discuss adding support for
the MCS9904 chip to uart? I'm working on it, but I have some questions
regarding FIFO sizes and how they are currently determined.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
T. Koeman, MTh/BSc/BPsy; Technical Monk
MediaMonks B.V. (www.medi
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 01:14:47, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>
>>> To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers
>>> around the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't
>>> noti
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Daniel Staal
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 11:10:57 -0500
> Message-id:
Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of February 19, 2012 3:30:15 PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey is alleged to
> have said:
>
> > Beside the point: the Wrong list was posted to.
> > questions@ list
I vote for multiple partitions with user specified names (or at least
be able to change /home mount point to something else) & allocated
space.
in message <4f3f1817.7030...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>,
wrote Da Rock thusly...
>
> On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
> > --As of February 17, 2012
On 19/02/2012 17:49, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
> If it will feel you more confident that everything is OK, I too have -p3
> reported from the kernel, but -p6 in newvers.sh. I remember a
> discussion shortly after FreeBSD-SA-11:05-unix (maybe on
> freebsd-security@ but I'm not sure) about this confusi
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 05:17:59AM -0600, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
> > Here is the thing I alluded to under option (1). The security patch for
> > the unix domain socket problem came out in two chunks. There was an
> > original patch to f
On Sunday 19 February 2012 08:20:43 ajtiM wrote:
> Skype on my FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE and KDE 4.7.4 working but after five,
> sometimes more or less minutes is sound dead. I need to recall again...
>
> In /etc/rc.conf I have:
> linux_enable="YES"
>
> Thank you.
>
> Mitja
>
> http://jpgmag
--As of February 19, 2012 3:30:15 PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey is alleged to
have said:
Beside the point: the Wrong list was posted to.
questions@ list was created to help beginners,
not to debate & invite votes to determine future design.
FreeBSD lists have remits so people can read & write lis
On 2/19/2012 6:44 AM, RW wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:28:29 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
Hi,
It's fb9-release.
Why the other ps entries do not display cron ?
$ top
...
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
COMMAND 1897 root 1 200 9644K 1208K nanslp
"Robison, Dave" wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 15:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Let the majority decide which layout is preferred for the default.
> > No. Bad idea. Not on questions@, the list of the least clued up,
> > the list raw beginners are referred to subscribe to. At least get
> > a maj
On 19/02/2012 11:17, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> I hope this is the case, but that -p3 makes me think? I am hesistant
> to move to 9.0-RELEASE as of yet. There will apparently be an
> 8.3-RELEASE and I am not sure whether I have to rebuild all ports if I
> update to newer release. I have read some
Skype on my FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE and KDE 4.7.4 working but after five, sometimes
more or less minutes is sound dead. I need to recall again...
In /etc/rc.conf I have:
linux_enable="YES"
Thank you.
Mitja
http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
___
fr
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:11:09 +0100
Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
>
> I don't know if it's the solution to your question but I asked the
> same a while back and the answer I got was that I had to recompile
> and install the kernel then you'll have p6 :-)
The only thing you gain by that is that uname r
RW skrev 2012-02-19 13:59:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:22:57 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Four possibilities, roughly in order of severity:
1) None of the security patches between p3 and p6 did actually
touch the kernel. You can tell if this was the case by looking
at the list
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:22:57 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Four possibilities, roughly in order of severity:
>
>1) None of the security patches between p3 and p6 did actually
> touch the kernel. You can tell if this was the case by looking
> at the list of modified files in the
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:28:29 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's fb9-release.
>
> Why the other ps entries do not display cron ?
>
> $ top
> ...
> PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
> COMMAND 1897 root 1 200 9644K 1208K nanslp 0 0:03
> 0.00%
Hi,
On Sunday 19 February 2012 18:17:59 Antonio Olivares wrote:
>
> I hope this is the case, but that -p3 makes me think? I am hesistant
> to move to 9.0-RELEASE as of yet. There will apparently be an
> 8.3-RELEASE and I am not sure whether I have to rebuild all ports if I
you could adapt my s
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 19/02/2012 02:06, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Robert Bonomi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Antonio,
>>> The 'upgrade' from _P5_ to P6 did not touch the kernel, hence the kernel ID
>>> did not change.
>>>
>>> Going f
Hi,
It's fb9-release.
Why the other ps entries do not display cron ?
$ top
...
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
1897 root 1 200 9644K 1208K nanslp 0 0:03 0.00% cron
...
$ ps -ax |grep cron
1897 ?? Is 0:03.16 /usr/sbin/cron
On 19/02/2012 02:06, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Robert Bonomi
> wrote:
>>
>> Antonio,
>> The 'upgrade' from _P5_ to P6 did not touch the kernel, hence the kernel ID
>> did not change.
>>
>> Going from P3 you should have seen a kernel update.
>>
>> what do you s
I have a scripted ftp download for 8.x and 9.0 distribution files.
Yes I have the correct paths.
When I target 8.x releases it downloads the multiple distribution files.
To get the complete group takes about 20 minutes and ends cleanly.
But when I try to fetch the 9.0 base.txz file it says 100% c
31 matches
Mail list logo
