On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:22:57 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Four possibilities, roughly in order of severity: > > 1) None of the security patches between p3 and p6 did actually > touch the kernel. You can tell if this was the case by looking > at the list of modified files in the security advisory. The > kernel is affected if any files under sys have been > modified other than src/sys/conf/newvers.sh > > The last advisory that did touch the kernel was > http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-11:05.unix.asc > > which should have given you 8.2-RELEASE-p4. However -- see > below. But aren't all those changes the linux kernel module, rather than the kernel itself. I think 8.2-RELEASE-p3 looks OK. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
