On 11/13/10 16:08, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:08:51 -0500
Chris Brennan wrote:
Did you know...
If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages,
but what's worse is when you play it forward
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Maciej Milewski wrote:
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 08:37:51, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Apparently only the version for kde4 is on the ports and I could not find a
package for 3.5. Building the available source had some interesting results
but ultimate did not work. What I
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:08:26 -0600
> Adam Vande More articulated:
>
>> While I agree with your point in this context, the statement "The
>> number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an infinite
>> one." is false.
>>
>> http://www.unsw.edu
On Friday, November 19, 2010 07:25:10 pm Gary Gatten wrote:
> I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing
> NAT. Said Juniper had a "smart" DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on
> DNS packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the
> DNS ALG t
On 11/15/10 21:06, Chris Rees wrote:
On 15 November 2010 19:59, Peter Boosten wrote:
He's consistent in any case (a quick google search reveals this 2008
message):
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg192926.html
Consistent, but still just spouting uninformed FUD.
A
I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing NAT.
Said Juniper had a "smart" DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on DNS
packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the DNS ALG to
fix the "problem".
If your ns is behind a NATing device, start
I have a weird DNS problem I am hoping someone can help me with.
I have server running FBSD 8.0. /etc/resolv.conf is set to use my ISP's DNS
servers for name resolution.
If run dig @ns3.socket.net .yyy. the INTERNAL ip address of the server
is returned.
If I run d...@ns3.socket.net
[Originally from freebsd-hackers@ / Feb 2008; freebsd-net Jun 2010]
All:
pf conf/63700 got the ball rolling on fixing cloned/VLAN
interface management with rc.d/netif, but a very specific problem
still remains.
For example, adding an alias to a VLAN and running:
/etc/rc.d/netif restart
Hi Alex, thanks for this even better feedback.
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:22 +0100, Alex Dupre wrote:
> This is not the correct fix, the correct "fix" is to enable threads in
> php, using the appropriate OPTION.
Ok, so probably this one:
LINKTHR=off (default) "Link thread lib (for threaded exten
2010/11/20 Коньков Евгений :
> Hi, Freebsd-questions.
>
> I ran FreeBSD 9-Current.
> System sometimes page faults.
> Does FBSD comunity need core dumps? If so where I can put dumps for
> you?
-CURRENT is 'bleeding-edge'; and if you're using it you should be
subscribing to freebsd-curr...@freebsd.o
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:53:11 -0600
Adam Vande More articulated:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jerry
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:08:26 -0600
> > Adam Vande More articulated:
> >
> > > While I agree with your point in this context, the statement "The
> > > number of _UNDISCOVERED_
Hello and thanks for your feedback!
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 13:03 +0100, end...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> [...@pandora ~]$ php -v -c /usr/local/etc/php.ini-production
> >> PHP 5.3.2 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Jun 14 2010 18:11:48)
> >> Copyright (c) 1997-2009 The PHP Group
> >> Zend Engine v2.3.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:08:26 -0600
> Adam Vande More articulated:
>
> > While I agree with your point in this context, the statement "The
> > number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an infinite
> > one." is false.
> >
> >
> http://www.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:08:26 -0600
Adam Vande More articulated:
> While I agree with your point in this context, the statement "The
> number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an infinite
> one." is false.
>
> http://www.unsw.edu.au/news/pad/articles/2009/sep/microkernel_breakthrough.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> _authoritative_ answer: You _cannot_.
>
> Statement rationale:
> "The number of discovered bugs in any system is a finite number.
>The number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an infinite
> one.
>By definition."
>
While
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Nov 15 09:38:53 2010
> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:40:27 +0300
> From: c0re
> To: FreeBSD
> Subject: Re: openssl version - how to verify
>
> 2010/11/15 Jerry :
> There are still too many broken ports with openssl from ports, I do
> not like debug it a
Hi, Freebsd-questions.
I ran FreeBSD 9-Current.
System sometimes page faults.
Does FBSD comunity need core dumps? If so where I can put dumps for
you?
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
___
freebsd-questions@fre
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:58 AM, krad wrote:
> A few people have mentioned labelling the drives. Its a good thing to do,
> but take it a step further. Before you put the drives in the system,
> physically label them with something identifiable (colored sticker, number
> whatever). Then when you cr
On 19 November 2010 10:25, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 19/11/2010 10:00, krad wrote:
> > If you already have a 3ware card and you are familiar with them, why not
> let
> > it do the raid and just plonk zfs on top of the lun presented to the
> system?
> > Will make booting off pure zfs much easier.
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Peter wrote:
>
>> I tend to stay away from raid cards. With ZFS pools all you need is ZFS
>> and any OS [easily move drives around servers], vs. raid cards have to
>> be
>> the same if moving/replacing/card fails.
>>
>> With 'ZFS: do not give it all your HDD'
>>
On 19/11/2010 10:00, krad wrote:
> If you already have a 3ware card and you are familiar with them, why not let
> it do the raid and just plonk zfs on top of the lun presented to the system?
> Will make booting off pure zfs much easier.
There's a lot of duplication of function there -- both ZFS an
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:44:12 +
Paul Wootton wrote:
> Here is a copy from smartctl
> 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 092 092 000Old_age
> Always - 5958
> 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032 001 001 000Old_age
> Always - 885346
>
> The drive
On 19 November 2010 09:48, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Peter wrote:
>
> > I tend to stay away from raid cards. With ZFS pools all you need is ZFS
> > and any OS [easily move drives around servers], vs. raid cards have to be
> > the same if moving/replacing/card fails.
On 18 November 2010 13:51, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 7:16 AM, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm going to build a server that's intended to store uncompressed
> videofiles
> > (where 1 hour film equals about 500GB). I plan on using Western Digital
> 2TB
> > or 3TB SATA harddrives. Total
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Peter wrote:
> I tend to stay away from raid cards. With ZFS pools all you need is ZFS
> and any OS [easily move drives around servers], vs. raid cards have to be
> the same if moving/replacing/card fails.
>
> With 'ZFS: do not give it all your HDD'
> [ http://ww
> Thanks a lot to all who responded to my post.
>
> I have learned lots here. Too bad I have to find another use for my 4 x
> 2TB
> green WDC drives I have laying around. Anyways - they'll probably end up
> as
> a temp/work drive on a few Windows stations.
>
> Btw. will these drive work better in a
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Andy Wodfer wrote:
> I have learned lots here. Too bad I have to find another use for my 4 x 2TB
> green WDC drives I have laying around. Anyways - they'll probably end up as
> a temp/work drive on a few Windows stations.
>
> Btw. will these drive work better in a
Thomas Exner wrote:
> when running fsck the first error message is "ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED"
> ...
> Is there a chance to get the data back?
Dunno about current versions, but IIRC some earlier versions of
dump(8) could handle even a badly-corrupted FS. No harm in trying,
since it will not try to
Thanks a lot to all who responded to my post.
I have learned lots here. Too bad I have to find another use for my 4 x 2TB
green WDC drives I have laying around. Anyways - they'll probably end up as
a temp/work drive on a few Windows stations.
Btw. will these drive work better in a ZFS "pool/tank"
29 matches
Mail list logo
