Hi again list,
Is it possible to run a VM machine in your freebsd server in which inside
that VM you are running on it a Linux environment? coul it be?
You would rather want to know why do I want that set up? Simply because I
want to install a Quickbooks Enterprise solutions Database
manager in Li
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Mel wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:07:02 Matthew Seaman wrote:
You can configure named to always send packets using a
fixed port number (which can be helpful for firewalling)
Purely outof interest, which (useful) firewall/nat rules cannot be
> What should I do?
In theory,
clri {special-file} 306176
should wipe the inode containing the bad pointer and allow fsck to
continue, perhaps recovering the files pointed to by that directory
into lost+found.
Definitely try this on a copy first if at all possible.
___
Thanks for responding. My problem is different.I think it is in boot
stage 2 possibly a problem with the loader. Hence my problem does not
resemble yours. I am able to run the install disk just fine nd
complete installation. Its the installed Os that I cannot boot.
Kind Regards
>
> On Sun, Jul 6,
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Polytropon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since last week I'm in big trouble: After an power outage my main
> system didn't boot up anymore, so I checked its hard disk (FreeBSD
> 5.4) in my new system (FreeBSD 7.0).
>
> I booted the system in SUM and ran fsck on the partitions. / on
> /d
Hi,
since last week I'm in big trouble: After an power outage my main
system didn't boot up anymore, so I checked its hard disk (FreeBSD
5.4) in my new system (FreeBSD 7.0).
I booted the system in SUM and ran fsck on the partitions. / on
/dev/ad1s1a could be repaired, /var on 1d too, /usr on 1e l
As soon as I log into my gmail account, and several other sites.
Running 7-STABLE, amd64 - FF is 2.0.0.14, gecko is 20080628. I'm
writing this on my really old Windows laptop
Below are the last few lines from a representative set of output from
session launched from the commandline. Is it flash, o
Kris,
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You may be running out of memory. Increase kmem_size until it goes
away. I use 1500M on my systems, which are stable. Yes, ZFS is a
memory hog.
Boy, ZFS sure does sound like it's earned the title of memory hog. Oddly
I'd been running for ab
I've run into a bit of a problem and if I don't solve it soon, I'm going
to be without e-mail (and so will a lot of other people). This is a bit
long, I'm trying to include anything that may help.
The problem is that qmail-smtpd and/or rblsmtpd get stuck and don't close.
After a while the se
On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Mel wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:07:02 Matthew Seaman wrote:
You can configure named to always send packets using a
fixed port number (which can be helpful for firewalling)
Purely outof interest, which (useful) firewall/nat rules cannot be
made with
dest por
Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
Saturday I finally found one of those "round tuits" and switched my
home PC from Debian to FreeBSD.
I probably should have mentioned that the box in question is a slightly
older hyperthreaded Intel Pentium 4 box, an HP m260n to
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Frank Shute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
>>
>> First, my apologies - I sent my last missive to Conrad, and not to the
>> list. I'm replying to myself with an update. Details below.
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> On Sun, Ju
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
ZFS can be installed on partitions and share disks with other things,
but the performance will be bad.
There is nothing ZFS-specific about this statement.
ZFS - contrary to every other filesystem that use FreeBSD disk I/O
scheduler - does it's own I/O scheduling, so it
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
ZFS on FreeBSD is GEOM-ified. While I believe what Wojciech said about
needing a full disk is correct under Solaris, it's not the case in
i never said it requires full disk. but it will work very slow sharing a
disk with non-ZFS things.
Well, of course if you are load
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote:
>
> First, my apologies - I sent my last missive to Conrad, and not to the
> list. I'm replying to myself with an update. Details below.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 6,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Mel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:07:02 Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> You can configure named to always send packets using a
>> fixed port number (which can be helpful for firewalling)
>
> Purely outof interest, which (useful) firewall/nat rul
Hi Vince,
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Vince Hoffman wrote:
|> |> I need to switch the users connections between two POP3 servers based
on
|> |> login information.
|> |> Since the login is part of the pop3 handshake, I'm stuck on how to
|> |> "transfer" the connection and pass the info already s
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Matthew Seaman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Allen wrote:
>
>> There was a post recently (Matthew Seaman's name comes to mind) that
>> suggested binding jails to addresses in the loopback range and then
>> using firewall rules to redirect the traffic accordingly
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:24:33 Mel wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
> > Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
> > connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
> > using the jailhost's IP address, or so I'd lik
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 03:32:10 David Gurvich wrote:
> How does one configure a wireless connection using wpa and dhcp on some
> networks and wpa with a static ip on others?
Tough.
I'd probably configure the interface as "WPA inet 127.0.0.2 netmask 255.0.0.0"
and then put a script in /usr/local
right named...
thanks
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
kalin m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
brand new install of freebsd 7. some httpd and named.
what are these?
Use sockstat(1) to find out?
udp6 0 0 *.54168*.*
udp4 0 0 *.54167
At 08:14 PM 7/7/2008, lyd mc wrote:
Greetings,
I setup my mail server on freebsd7.0R and it is working great!
However, I have a problem on quota. It suppose to block any incoming
message to specific user which is under quota. But sendmail can still send
to the user under quota if the mail siz
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 16:48:26 Vincent Barus wrote:
> does anyone have an idea what's the difference or what _could_ be the
> difference on loading a kernel module during boot or manually?
There's one major difference. File systems aren't mounted at loader stage, so
any reference to modules/li
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:07:02 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> You can configure named to always send packets using a
> fixed port number (which can be helpful for firewalling)
Purely outof interest, which (useful) firewall/nat rules cannot be made with
dest port 53, that can be made with source port
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:14:54PM -0400, kalin m wrote:
> brand new install of freebsd 7. some httpd and named.
> what are these?
> udp6 0 0 *.54168*.*udp4
> 0 0 *.54167*.*
>
> thanks
Try using so
Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Hello,
* Something like a loopback address inside the jail. It may be
127.0.0.2 instead of 127.0.0.1 but most software can be persuaded
to use it for loopback style things.
* The ability to map several IPs onto the jailed system by use of
NAT and re
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
kalin m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
brand new install of freebsd 7. some httpd and named.
what are these?
Use sockstat(1) to find out?
udp6 0 0 *.54168*.*
udp4 0 0 *.54167*.*
Almost certainly
Hi all
I am using ipf associated with ippool. When I need to change
/etc/ipf/ippool.conf, say add a new member in a group, ippool -F and ippool -f
/etc/ipf/ippool.conf doesn't seem to work. I also tried reloading the ipfilter
rule by 'ipf -Fa -f /etc/ipf/ipf.conf', but ipf doesn't seem to re
Hello,
>* Something like a loopback address inside the jail. It may be
> 127.0.0.2 instead of 127.0.0.1 but most software can be persuaded
> to use it for loopback style things.
>
>* The ability to map several IPs onto the jailed system by use of
> NAT and redirect within
Okay - I've tried this against two devices in the system. The devices
queried are report as ad0 and ad2. When using the following command against
either device I get the following response:
"usage: atacontrol channel [args]"
Now, it must be noted that I am using a ccd device that's has both t
kalin m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> brand new install of freebsd 7. some httpd and named.
> what are these?
Use sockstat(1) to find out?
> udp6 0 0 *.54168*.*
> udp4 0 0 *.54167*.*
>
> thanks
>
>
> # netstat -a
> A
brand new install of freebsd 7. some httpd and named.
what are these?
udp6 0 0 *.54168*.*
udp4 0 0 *.54167*.*
thanks
# netstat -a
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Sen
David Allen wrote:
There was a post recently (Matthew Seaman's name comes to mind) that
suggested binding jails to addresses in the loopback range and then
using firewall rules to redirect the traffic accordingly. There's a
possibility that may help in this case, but that layer of added
complex
> > What does your getmailrc look like?
> >
> > I've got this section in there. You should have similar:
> >
> > [destination]
> > type = MDA_external
> > path = /usr/local/bin/procmail
> > user = frank
>
> Here is the entry I use:
>
> [destination]
> type = MDA_external
> path = /usr/local/bin
I've run into a bit of a problem and if I don't solve it soon, I'm going to
be without e-mail (and so will a lot of other people). This is a bit long,
I'm trying to include anything that may help.
The problem is that qmail-smtpd and/or rblsmtpd get stuck and don't close.
After a while the serv
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:52:33AM -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
> On 2008.07.08 16:46:18 +, Frank Shute wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:22:19PM -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Probably the wrong forum for this, but since it's on a freebsd system:
> > > > >
> > > > >
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
>
>> Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
>> connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
>> using the jailhost's IP addr
On 2008.07.08 16:46:18 +, Frank Shute wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:22:19PM -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > Probably the wrong forum for this, but since it's on a freebsd system:
> > > >
> > > > I have mutt installed on two other freebsd computers. I fetch pop
> > > > mai
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:22:19PM -0700, Rem P Roberti wrote:
>
> >
> > > Probably the wrong forum for this, but since it's on a freebsd system:
> > >
> > > I have mutt installed on two other freebsd computers. I fetch pop
> > > mail via getmail, and procmail puts things where they belong. I j
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:45:55AM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to make sure my USB hard drive will be available when system
> has finished booting. So:
> $ grep usbd /etc/rc.conf
> usbd_enable="YES"
>
> and
> $ grep backup /etc/fstab
> /dev/ad3s1d /backup ufs
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:19:09AM +0200, Anselm Strauss wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2008, at 13:25 , Anselm Strauss wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >originally I had the following labels on my ad0 disk (no partitions,
> >directly labeled /dev/ad0):
> >
> ># /dev/ad0:
> >8 partitions:
> >#size offset
I don't know what the difference is, but there is one. I have a system
that automatically reboots if nvidia is added to /boot/loader.conf on
FreeBSD7. If the module is loaded from the loader prompt the system
boots and xorg works. I now use solaris on that system as FreeBSD had
all sorts of issue
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, DSA - JCR wrote:
> but I think that if he/she want to make CTRL-C to the shell task, he can
> stop the task and then enter in the system and look whatever he wants
> (for example, how the things are done).
Use "sudo" to allow non-root users to run that script as root. If
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:01 PM, George Hartzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did you take the necessary steps to restrict the IP addresses on which
> sendmail on the host and the jail listen? The jail man page only
> says:
I don't think anyone would get too far with jails in general if the
jail
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Vincent Barus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> is there a difference between loading a kernel module during the boot process
> and loading a module manually after the login?
> I'm asking this on a general basis and because of pr: kern/123563.
> I don'
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 20:45:49 +1000, Fraser Tweedale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:26:56PM +1000, Warren Liddell wrote:
>> ===> Building package for apr-gdbm-db42-1.3.2
>> Creating package /usr/ports/packages/All/apr-gdbm-db42-1.3.2.tbz
>> Registering depends: libiconv-1.11
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:26:56PM +1000, Warren Liddell wrote:
> ===> Building package for apr-gdbm-db42-1.3.2
> Creating package /usr/ports/packages/All/apr-gdbm-db42-1.3.2.tbz
> Registering depends: libiconv-1.11_1 db42-4.2.52_5 gdbm-1.8.3_3 expat-2.0.1.
> Registering conflicts: apr-*.
> Creati
DSA - JCR wrote:
I want to make an user for the only task of remove/insert the usb copy disk.
I have made a new user (operator group), and a shell task that ask for the
GELI password and fsck and mount the USB disk. This work fine under root.
but I think that if he/she want to make CTRL-C to th
No, I am right.
Try it yourself and you will see that solves the issue. I have several
jails on different machines and this way the system works without any
error or problem.
Try it and see it :)
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08.07.2008 12:38
Am Dienstag, 8. Juli 2008 10:57:39 schrieb Mel:
> On Monday 07 July 2008 17:38:55 Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I have setup amd and it works fine. Only one special situation is making
> > me crazy. When I want to use a USB-Stick without data on it, amd is
> > mounting it with the 8
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:13:04 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast
> adrresses for the jails.
> It should be:
>
> inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
> inet 10.0.1.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
> in
On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
> Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
> connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
> using the jailhost's IP address, or so I'd like to think. If it doesn't,
> then the scenario is
Hi all
I use FreeBSD 6.2, and GELI
I want to make an user for the only task of remove/insert the usb copy disk.
I have made a new user (operator group), and a shell task that ask for the
GELI password and fsck and mount the USB disk. This work fine under root.
but I think that if he/she want to
Hi,
I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast
adrresses for the jails.
It should be:
inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet 10.0.1.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet 10.0.1.4 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
Regards,
Ivailo Ta
On Monday 07 July 2008 17:38:55 Stevan Tiefert wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have setup amd and it works fine. Only one special situation is making me
> crazy. When I want to use a USB-Stick without data on it, amd is mounting
> it with the 8.3-limitation. I've added the option longname in my map-file
Hello,
Odhiambo Washington:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Zbigniew Szalbot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to make sure my USB hard drive will be available when system has
finished booting. So:
$ grep usbd /etc/rc.conf
usbd_enable="YES"
and
$ grep backup /etc/fstab
/dev/ad
===> Building package for apr-gdbm-db42-1.3.2
Creating package /usr/ports/packages/All/apr-gdbm-db42-1.3.2.tbz
Registering depends: libiconv-1.11_1 db42-4.2.52_5 gdbm-1.8.3_3 expat-2.0.1.
Registering conflicts: apr-*.
Creating bzip'd tar ball in '/usr/ports/packages/All/apr-gdbm-db42-1.3.2.tbz'
=
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Zbigniew Szalbot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to make sure my USB hard drive will be available when system has
> finished booting. So:
> $ grep usbd /etc/rc.conf
> usbd_enable="YES"
>
> and
> $ grep backup /etc/fstab
> /dev/ad3s1d /back
On Monday 07 July 2008 19:24:36 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> atacontrol cap device
_Really_nice_ ...
Will add it to my repertoire :)
thanks for the hint Wojciech !
--
Blessings
Gonzalo Nemmi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
Dear all,
I am trying to make sure my USB hard drive will be available when system
has finished booting. So:
$ grep usbd /etc/rc.conf
usbd_enable="YES"
and
$ grep backup /etc/fstab
/dev/ad3s1d /backup ufs rw 2 2
But when I restart the system (FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p1), it com
On Jun 28, 2008, at 13:25 , Anselm Strauss wrote:
Hi,
originally I had the following labels on my ad0 disk (no partitions,
directly labeled /dev/ad0):
# /dev/ad0:
8 partitions:
#size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
a: 1048576 04.2BSD 1024 8192 46248
c:
On Jun 28, 2008, at 13:15 , Anselm Strauss wrote:
Hi,
I have a small router that has no video output, it only supports a
serial console. I configured the serial console in /boot/
boot.config, /boot/loader.conf and /etc/ttys. It's working in the
BIOS, on the boot prompt before the loader st
Papp Tamas wrote:
mt -f /dev/sa0
I mean mt -f /dev/sa0 status
But actually I recogniozed, it was a cleaning tape.
I'm sorry:)
Thank you,
tamas
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
Anders Trobäck wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:21:15 +0200
Papp Tamas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi All,
I have a new Exabyte VXA-320, I show it in dmesg as sa0.
When I try to access it for example by mt, it says, "Device not
configured", and of cource is not working.
sa0 at ahd0 bus 0 targ
64 matches
Mail list logo
