Am Donnerstag, den 24.01.2008, 22:45 -0800 schrieb shinny knight:
> Rakhesh Sasidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have two machines. Each have two interfaces, xl0 and fxp0. And each have
> > two carp interfaces -- carp1 (xl0 of both) and carp2 (fxp0 of both). One of
> > the ma
hi,
i am facing a problem while extracting a package
1)i created a package using pkg_create
command used is :
*pkg_create -f cwd/filelist -p cwd/avamar -c cwd/comments -d cwd/desc*
package is getting created and it is in cwd
2)extracting it using pkg_add
command used is :*pkg_add packagename.t
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 08:49 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:13:39PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 12:51 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> by not being linux at all.
> > > >
> > > > FreeBSD is more a server than a desktop system. Ubuntu pa
Peter wrote:
Drew Sanford wrote:
| Command line programs for php seem to segfault on a 7.0RC1 box (yes, I
| know, I should update to RC2) - for example:
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED](~/bin)$ php -v
| PHP 5.2.5 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: Feb 9 2008 13:03:20)
| Copyright (c) 1997-2007 The PH
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:23:56AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >use as a desktop system. Contrary to that impression, I'm sending this
>
> what is "desktop system" and "server system"?
>
> AFAIK it just depends of software installed, and it can be both..
Yup. That be the case.
I think th
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:14:04AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
[ snip a bunch of stuff ]
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:36:34AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
>
> A good rundown of some of the differences.
> Maybe you can put this on a web page and get it added to lists
> of comparrisons.
Sure.
use as a desktop system. Contrary to that impression, I'm sending this
what is "desktop system" and "server system"?
AFAIK it just depends of software installed, and it can be both..
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:49:25PM -0500, Jeff Gold wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 4:32 PM, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe, if you deleted that special 'c' partition, it made
> > the rest of the process screw up.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I'll give that a try.
Just to be
On Feb 17, 2008 1:14 PM, Dominique Goncalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Feb 16, 2008 6:41 PM, Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > On my father's computer there isn't an IPv4 loopback address being
> assigned to
> > the lo0 interface. What would cause this? I've
> Drew Sanford wrote:
> | Command line programs for php seem to segfault on a 7.0RC1 box (yes, I
> | know, I should update to RC2) - for example:
> |
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED](~/bin)$ php -v
> | PHP 5.2.5 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: Feb 9 2008 13:03:20)
> | Copyright (c) 1997-2007 The PHP
--On Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:41:43 -0600 Derek Ragona
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to all who offered suggestions. Here's a working script that creates
snort rules *and* a sid-msg.map file:
#!/bin/sh
cat file.1 | cut -d',' -f9 | sort | uniq > file.nicks
i=202
j=`wc -l file.n
On Feb 19, 2008 4:32 PM, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, if you deleted that special 'c' partition, it made
> the rest of the process screw up.
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll give that a try.
Jeff
___
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:45:25PM -0500, Jeff Gold wrote:
> I am attempting to partition a disk non-interactively using
> sysinstall, but I don't seem to be getting this right. I use the
> following script on an 80G drive:
>
> debug=true
> ufs=/6.2-RELEASE
> mediaSetUFS
> disk=ad0
> p
Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
I'm in the process of getting a new server, and have been
planning on a Dell PowerEdge 1950.
I see from this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-January/039675.html
That the PERC 6/i RAID controller seems to work fine with the
mfi(4) driver; I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:10:14 +0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject:
Re: FreeBSD 6.3 Xorg issues> > Hi,> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> > Anyone else having issues getting Xorg working with 6.3? I
get a pcidata
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:21:18 -0500
Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > ivan dimitrov wrote:
> > > After upgrading from freebsd-5.5-R to 6.3-R, I get the following
> > > message in dmesg:
> > >
> > > "/storage/pub/www/ram: optimizatio
All:
Here's an update on the PE860 w/ FBSD. See dmesg(8) for FreeBSD
6.3/amd64 (RC2) on PowerEdge 860 w/ Xeon & SATA:
http://www.nycbug.org/?NAV=dmesgd;f_dmesg=;f_bsd=;f_nick=;f_descr=;dmesgid=1935#1935
Note that the ICH7 (Yes, still ICH7, not 8-9) is a SATA300 but the WDC
Caviar run at 150 :~{
I'm in the process of getting a new server, and have been
planning on a Dell PowerEdge 1950.
I see from this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-January/039675.html
That the PERC 6/i RAID controller seems to work fine with the
mfi(4) driver; I was planning on a 4 x 73
Gary Kline wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 08:16:57 Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:20:47AM -0500, William Bulley wrote:
According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
as an implementation language. If what
This One Time, at Band Camp, Vinicius Vianna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, On Thu,
Feb 14, 2008 at 01:31:40AM -0200:
> Hi,
>
> I think something is broken with your compiler/libs, try to reinstall the
> developer packages with sysinstall, or maybe a "make buildworld" to make
> sure everything is ok
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:00:20AM -0700, Modulok wrote:
> Assume I have users logged in and I edit /etc/group...
> How do I propagate the changes to /etc/group to affect currently-logged-in
> users? I do not want to force users to logout, just to change group
> memberships.
So far as I know, tha
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 08:16:57 Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:20:47AM -0500, William Bulley wrote:
> > According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
> > > as an implementation language. If what you'
I am attempting to partition a disk non-interactively using
sysinstall, but I don't seem to be getting this right. I use the
following script on an 80G drive:
debug=true
ufs=/6.2-RELEASE
mediaSetUFS
disk=ad0
partition=all
bootManager=boot
diskPartitionEditor
diskPartitionWrite
Valerio Daelli wrote:
Hi list
we have a FreeBSD 7.0 NFS client (csup today, built world and kernel).
It mounts a Solaris 10 NFS share.
We have bad performance with 7.0 (3MB/s).
We have tried both UDP and TCP mounts, both sync and async.
This is our mount:
nest.xx.xx:/data/export/hosts/bsd7.xx.x
Services For = Your Upcoming Trade Show
For over 20 Years, = ELITeXPO has been providing
Tradeshow Shipping Services to = thousands of exhibitors
at countless events each = year.
3D""
There is a Custom Freight Service = Level to Meet Every Shipment's
Specific R
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:13:39PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 12:51 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
by not being linux at all.
FreeBSD is more a server than a desktop system. Ubuntu particularly is
FreeBSD isn't both desktop or serv
At 11:35 AM 2/19/2008, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I could do this in perl easily, but I'm trying to force myself to learn
shell scripting better. :-)
I'm parsing a file to extract some elements from it, then writing the
results, embeded in long strings, into an output file.
Here's the script:
cat
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:13:14PM +0200, Alexander Renn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to find how to change the default permissions of files created in
> /dev.
> I want /dev/bpf* to be created with 660 permissions instead of 600.
See devfs.conf(5) and devfs.rules(5).
Roland
--
R.F.Smith
Hi,
I am trying to install amd64 version of the freebsd 6.2 (also 6.3 gives
the same error).
After options presented in the loader whatever I choose ( safe mode, wo
acpi...) it directly goes to BTX Halted mode.
Has anyone in this list installed fbsd 6.2 or 6.3 to esx 3.0.2 update 1
?(I have also
Hi,
I am trying to install amd64 version of the freebsd 6.2 (also 6.3 gives the
same error).
After options presented in the loader whatever I choose ( safe mode, wo
acpi...) it directly goes to BTX Halted mode.
Has anyone in this list installed fbsd 6.2 or 6.3 to esx 3.0.2 update 1 ?(I
hav
Assume I have users logged in and I edit /etc/group...
How do I propagate the changes to /etc/group to affect currently-logged-in
users? I do not want to force users to logout, just to change group memberships.
-Modulok-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I could do this in perl easily, but I'm trying to force myself to learn
> shell scripting better. :-)
>
> I'm parsing a file to extract some elements from it, then writing the
> results, embeded in long strings, into an output file.
>
> Here's the script:
>
> cat file.1 |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Thank you for your response, but it doesn't really help with the situation,
> besides the software I'm talking about has been recompiled many time over
> since the upgrade. Just to make sure, I recompiled again and it linked to
> both libc5 and libc6 right away. That's
Paul Schmehl wrote:
I could do this in perl easily, but I'm trying to force myself to learn
shell scripting better. :-)
...
Once this file is created (or ideally *while* it's being created!) I
need to increment the sid numbers. The first one is 201. The
second needs to be 202, and
I could do this in perl easily, but I'm trying to force myself to learn shell
scripting better. :-)
I'm parsing a file to extract some elements from it, then writing the results,
embeded in long strings, into an output file.
Here's the script:
cat file.1 | cut -d',' -f9 | sort | uniq > file
Alexander Renn wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to find how to change the default permissions of files created in
/dev.
I want /dev/bpf* to be created with 660 permissions instead of 600.
Is there another way to do this instead of:
# touch /dev/bpf[n]
and then
# chmod /dev/bpf[n]
?
You want to read t
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:14:04AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
Chad,
A good rundown of some of the differences.
Maybe you can put this on a web page and get it added to lists
of comparrisons.
jerry
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:14:45AM -0800, Lone Wolf wrote:
> > But according to Wikipedia, F
Hello,
I'm trying to find how to change the default permissions of files created in
/dev.
I want /dev/bpf* to be created with 660 permissions instead of 600.
Is there another way to do this instead of:
# touch /dev/bpf[n]
and then
# chmod /dev/bpf[n]
?
--
Best regards,
Zander
___
Am Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:33:35 +1000
schrieb Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK. Tomcat is working- I managed to find out how to get direct access to
> it (had to uncomment a line in server.xml, web.xml). Still no Apache /
> Tomcat connector though. If I navigate to /webapps it says 404 -
> althoug
Just got a new motherboard, which is always painful. For once,
everything *but* the NIC works. NIC is supposedly a Realtek RTL8100C,
but it says 1000T all over the manual, and that chip is 100T. Who
knows. All the 8100 references I can find in the mailing lists are OT
about snd_hda.
Steve
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:20:47AM -0500, William Bulley wrote:
> According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
> > as an implementation language. If what you're doing involves text and
> > string manipulation, Python
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:14:45AM -0800, Lone Wolf wrote:
> But according to Wikipedia, FreeBSD is able to run Linux compatible software
> without any problems (exception for Linux Kernel 2.6)
> I can't run Linux software on FreeBSD?
>
"Linux" is technically the name of an OS kernel. FreeBS
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:26:42AM -0600, Erik Osterholm wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:39:26AM -0800, Lone Wolf wrote:
> > Hi.
> > How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
> > Thanks.
>
> Others have answered this sufficiently, but I wonder if this shouldn't
> be made into a FAQ
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:08:16AM +, Ken Palm wrote:
I doubt that anyone on this list wants to do any business
with a domeain name ripoff clod. So, go harrass some less
knowledgeable victim!
jerry
>
>We've discounted the [1]freebsdnewbie.com domain name for you...
>Over the
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:19:51AM -0800, Lone Wolf wrote:
> I'm not going to serve any one, I just want to take a small test drive
> with FreeBSD .
> Regarding my graphic card, it is 32 MB, is it ok?
I suppose it depends on the graphics card model, but probably.
Check that hardware compatibilit
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:39:03AM -0800, Lone Wolf wrote:
> Hi.
> I'm thinking to install FreeBSD on my old PC.
> ---
> Processor: Intel Celeron 1.3 GH
> RAM: 192 MB
> ---
> Is my hard ware sufficient?
> Thanks.
Sure. How much disk do you have available?
You might want to look at the hardware
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> On 08:29:19 Feb 19, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> > You bet, Perl is terrific. But, Perl is also harder to maintain and
> > less readable in the long run (IMHO and many others' too). Language
> > wars are silly, of course, one uses the right tool
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:13:39PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 12:51 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > >>
> > >> by not being linux at all.
> > >
> > > FreeBSD is more a server than a desktop system. Ubuntu particularly is
> > FreeBSD isn't both desktop or server system. it is
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Lone Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But according to Wikipedia, FreeBSD is able to run Linux compatible
> software without any problems (exception for Linux Kernel 2.6) I
> can't run Linux software on FreeBSD?
Linux emulation is for running Linux bina
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:26 -0600, Erik Osterholm wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:39:26AM -0800, Lone Wolf wrote:
> > Hi.
> > How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
> > Thanks.
>
> Others have answered this sufficiently, but I wonder if this shouldn't
> be made into a FAQ item.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:19:57PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ryan Jenkins
> > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:20 PM
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Computers that us F
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:39:26AM -0800, Lone Wolf wrote:
> Hi.
> How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
> Thanks.
Others have answered this sufficiently, but I wonder if this shouldn't
be made into a FAQ item. It's certainly asked enough.
Erik
On 08:29:19 Feb 19, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> You bet, Perl is terrific. But, Perl is also harder to maintain and
> less readable in the long run (IMHO and many others' too). Language
> wars are silly, of course, one uses the right tools for the right
> job. But as I said, having programmed fairly w
In response to Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ivan dimitrov wrote:
> > After upgrading from freebsd-5.5-R to 6.3-R, I get the following message in
> > dmesg:
> >
> > "/storage/pub/www/ram: optimization changed from TIME to SPACE"
> >
> > I use a ram disk via the md driver.
> > Here is the line from
ivan dimitrov wrote:
After upgrading from freebsd-5.5-R to 6.3-R, I get the following message in
dmesg:
"/storage/pub/www/ram: optimization changed from TIME to SPACE"
I use a ram disk via the md driver.
Here is the line from my fstab file:
md /storage/pub/www/rammfs rw,-s4m
a machine will be required (always) , i think i figured it out , ineed to
compile them using *amd64 *instead of i386 .
On 2/19/08, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Can anyone tell how do we handle this situation???
> >
> > Is there any way or i have to compile my code on 64
In line...
-Original Message-
From: Erik Norgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:23 pm
Subject: Re: My Rebuild Problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
> I wrote earlier, got one response. It was way off course, s
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 15:08:12 schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
> > Can anyone tell how do we handle this situation???
> >
> > Is there any way or i have to compile my code on 64 bit machine??
>
> what's a problem to compile on 64-bit machine?
Ugh, there can be lots of problems, at least if the or
William Bulley wrote:
According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
as an implementation language. If what you're doing involves text and
string manipulation, Python is loaded with good modules that will make
your task a sna
I tried to contact the port maintainer, but haven't heard anything back.
I'd like to use US Robotics usr5410 wireless pcmcia card on my FBSD 6.3
laptop. I understand this card is (was?) supported by port net/acx100.
However, the net/acx100/Makefile has:
BROKEN= Does not compile on FreeBS
According to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python
> as an implementation language. If what you're doing involves text and
> string manipulation, Python is loaded with good modules that will make
> your task a snap. Having code
Gary Kline wrote:
Giorgos, Joe, Paul , and Tim,
Thanks for your insights today, gentlemen. I began on what may be a very
worthwhile [ and reasonably small, *thankfully*] program that may benefit
everybody who reads text online. Or off, for that matter. I was using
a shareware version that k
brom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a short question, how I can determinate version of syslogd?
> FreeBSD 6.2
>
> I need version for resolve some issues.
> Thanks in advance!
For the binary:
> ident /usr/sbin/syslogd | grep syslogd
/usr/sbin/syslogd:
$FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c,v
software without any problems (exception for Linux Kernel 2.6) I can't
run Linux software on FreeBSD?
_Running_ Linux software and _being_ Linux(-based) are two completely
different things. FreeBSD runs (most) Linux (and glibc based) software, but
is a completely different (and mostly unrelate
I have a short question, how I can determinate version of syslogd?
FreeBSD 6.2
it is part of FreeBSD 6.2, there are no versions for it's components
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
Can anyone tell how do we handle this situation???
Is there any way or i have to compile my code on 64 bit machine??
what's a problem to compile on 64-bit machine?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
Binary compiled on 32 bit not running on 64 bit machine.
Actually i am using *sysctl* call and the *kinfo_proc* structure from
user.hin include/sys , size of structure on 32bit is 768 and on 64 bit
is around
1180 and thats why the call is failing and application coredumping.
Can anyone tell how d
Ryan Jenkins wrote:
Hello,
I currently have a Computer System that is based off the FreeBSD Operating
System and I am trying to find a new supplier of hardware. Right now I am
having a hard time finding a Computer Manufacture that can make a system
that uses FreeBSD. I currently have found a
brom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a short question, how I can determinate version of syslogd?
> FreeBSD 6.2
By looking at the source code, just below the copyright note:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c?rev=1.144.2.3;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup;only_with
Hello,
I have a short question, how I can determinate version of syslogd?
FreeBSD 6.2
I need version for resolve some issues.
Thanks in advance!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have installed wine-0.9.20 from ports, and
> there's a Win98 FAT32 slice mounted on /windoze
> How do I fix this?
I would start by upgrading and re-installing wine. You have
0.9.20; the current version is 0.9.55 and I believe there have been
Lone Wolf wrote:
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi.
How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
by not being linux at all.
But according to Wikipedia, FreeBSD is able to run Linux compatible software without any problems (exception for Linux Kernel 2.6)
I can't run
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 14:14:45 schrieb Lone Wolf:
> But according to Wikipedia, FreeBSD is able to run Linux compatible
> software without any problems (exception for Linux Kernel 2.6) I can't
> run Linux software on FreeBSD?
_Running_ Linux software and _being_ Linux(-based) are two com
But according to Wikipedia, FreeBSD is able to run Linux compatible software
without any problems (exception for Linux Kernel 2.6)
I can't run Linux software on FreeBSD?
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi.
> How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
by not being linux
Lone Wolf pisze:
> Hi.
> How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
> Thanks.
>
If you'd like use FreeBSD on desktop, try DesktopBSD[1].
I use FBSD on server last 8 years. On workstations also,
but last time I tried DesktopBSD and I really like it :)
If you would like try Freebsd withou
- Kruglosutochnaya on-lajn konsul'taciya u professional'nyh vrachej,
po vsem interesuyuschim Vas voprosam
- V udobnoj i legkoj forme, Vy smozhete poluchit' informaciyu o lyuboj
interesuyuschej Vas bolezni
- U nas sobrana polnaya informaciy
Thank you for your response, but it doesn't really help with the situation,
besides the software I'm talking about has been recompiled many time over
since the upgrade. Just to make sure, I recompiled again and it linked to
both libc5 and libc6 right away. That's my issue.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
> "/storage/pub/www/ram: optimization changed from TIME to SPACE"
This is not an error. It probably means the ramdisk changed it's
allocation policy from preserving time to conserving space. Something
what would happen if the data on it gets relatively (against available
mem) big. I guess.
Regard
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 12:51 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>
> >> by not being linux at all.
> >
> > FreeBSD is more a server than a desktop system. Ubuntu particularly is
> FreeBSD isn't both desktop or server system. it is just unix - it depends
> from the user how it's being used.
True. But
by not being linux at all.
FreeBSD is more a server than a desktop system. Ubuntu particularly is
FreeBSD isn't both desktop or server system. it is just unix - it depends
from the user how it's being used.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
B+E+R+K% 95% M+H+B+X+W+R+J+M% P+W+X+D+J+M% L+G+ShT+ L+B+X+W+R+H+
ShH+M% L+# M+K+J+R+J+M%.
L+# M+#M+J+N% L+J+? T+B+D+W+Q+ S+B+J+B+K%. #T+G+R+ E+ShR+H+
M+X+B+R+J+K% L+G+ShT+ L+B+X+W+R+H+
ShM+W+ZJ#T+ X+N% B+E+J+N+H+M% W+T+R+#H+ K+M+H+ T+J+R+W+ZJJ+M% H+M%
J+ZJJ+E+W+ B+Q+L+J+L+W+T+
您好:
草原商务网2008年大优惠,把您的生意做到草原上去,现在注册草原商务网会员即可获得免费商贸通会员一年,免费发布供求信息,免费建立企业网站,发布供求信息10条以上者还可获得首页广告位.更好地宣传您的公司,使您的网上生意更加如虎添翼。马上注册吧
www.caoyuansw.cn QQ:827951065___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
Надёжные вибропрессы "Рифей"
произодства ООО "Завод СТРОЙТЕХНИКА", Россия
подробности - на сайте www.rifey-press.ru
или по телефону (3513)66-70-88,
моб. +7 922 706 79 27
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Антон Владимирович
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
Hi,
what happens if you simply start X without any configuration?
My X runs only if I do not specify a mouse in the configuration file.
I also have had to create the file by hand.
Erich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:10:14 +0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:48 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > Hi.
> > How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
>
> by not being linux at all.
FreeBSD is more a server than a desktop system. Ubuntu particularly is
more of a desktop.
That said, because it is a server its a hell of a l
ЗАО "СТР= ОЙСНАБ"
+7 (4212) 414-221+7 (4212) 414-226
+7 (4212) 414-225+7 (4212) 391-005
к= рупнооптовые поставки
<= br>
CUT-60 Аппарат= для плазменной
резки
12900 руб с НДС и дос= тавкой в
регион заказчика
ARC-200 Аппарат= для ручной
сварки инвертор= ного т
Hi.
How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
by not being linux at all.
NTG
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi list
we have a FreeBSD 7.0 NFS client (csup today, built world and kernel).
It mounts a Solaris 10 NFS share.
We have bad performance with 7.0 (3MB/s).
We have tried both UDP and TCP mounts, both sync and async.
This is our mount:
nest.xx.xx:/data/export/hosts/bsd7.xx.xx/ /mnt/nest.xx.xx nfs
n
Hi.
How FreeBSD differ from any Linx distro like Ubuntu?
Thanks.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there, wondering, fearing,
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dreamed before.
E.A Poe
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:10:14 +0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.3 Xorg
> issues> > Hi,> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> > Anyone else having issues
> getting Xorg working with 6.3? I get a pcidata error when trying
We've discounted the [1]freebsdnewbie.com domain name for you...
Over the last few days, I've sent you a few emails about the
domain name [2]freebsdnewbie.com.
At this point I have to ask you... Are you going to just "settle"
for the .net or .org for you domain name when you the .co
90Ó¡¶È×îרҵ»úеչÀÀ»á--2008ÄêµÚ¶þ½ìÓ¡¶È£¨ÃÏÂò£©¹ú¼Ê»úе¹¤ÒµÕ¹ÀÀ»áLV
ÖÐÓ¡Á½¹ú¾¼Ã·¢Õ¹Ä£Ê½´æÔÚ׿«´óµÄ»¥²¹ÐÔ£¬Öйú¾¼ÃÒÔÖÆÔìҵΪÖ÷µ¼£¬±»ÓþΪ¡°ÊÀ½ç¹¤³§¡±£¬¶øÓ¡¶È¾¼ÃÒÔ·þÎñҵΪÖ÷µ¼£¬±»ÓþΪ¡°ÊÀ½ç°ì¹«ÊÒ¡±¡£ÔÚ2003£¬Öйú¹¤ÒµµÄ±ÈÖØÕ¼¹úÄÚÉú²ú×ÜÖµ£¨£Ç£Ä£Ð£©ÄêÕ¼52£®3£¥£»¶øÓ¡¶È¹¤ÒµÕ¼GDPµÄ±ÈÖؽüÄê»ù±¾ÉÏÍ£Ö
installation.
I would recommend to install a plain FreeBSD without X first.
me too, and never use things like gnome, kde etc.. anyway.
it doesn't offer anything more than "cool look" and fancy things like
files dragged by mouse etc. etc.
for efficient graphics environment i would recommend j
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after several years of relatively trouble free system ( 5 > 6.3 ) and port
upgrades, I started having some issues with timesieved daemon of cyrus
imap.
nothing in the software configuration has changed, but the cyrus port was
recently upgraded ( around the same time that
Hi,
this problem is caused by how the drives are installed in the machine.
Can you add a fan?
Erich
s.g. wrote:
Guys,
I notice occasional overheating of my GELI-encrypted hard drives
followed by the reboot.
This happens when there is heavy activity on the drive - eg when trying
to dump part
Hi,
Lone Wolf wrote:
I'm not going to serve any one, I just want to take a small test drive with
FreeBSD .
I run it on a smaller machine than this but with more RAM.
Regarding my graphic card, it is 32 MB, is it ok?
This sounds like an overkill. I would say anything from 4MB onwards will
Should be more then enough with the graphic card.
My desktop comp is an AMD Duron 1,2Ghz, 512MB ram and the graphic card has
32MB. X11 makes 1280x1024 in truecolor mode without much effort (is a good
graphic card what is integrated in the mainboard, SIS-chip).
Can watch videos and dragging wind
Lone Wolf wrote:
I'm not going to serve any one, I just want to take a small test drive with
FreeBSD .
Regarding my graphic card, it is 32 MB, is it ok?
Does FreeBSD come bundled with GNOME?
Vanilla FreeBSD doesn't come bundled with anything. But, yes you may
install GNOME, KDE, Xfce or any
Lone Wolf wrote:
Hi.
I'm thinking to install FreeBSD on my old PC.
---
Processor: Intel Celeron 1.3 GH
RAM: 192 MB
---
Is my hard ware sufficient?
Thanks.
Sufficient for what? What do you want to run on that computer? A
workstation? A firewall? A mail server? Apache?
Assuming you want to
I'm not going to serve any one, I just want to take a small test drive with
FreeBSD .
Regarding my graphic card, it is 32 MB, is it ok?
Does FreeBSD come bundled with GNOME?
Thanks demons!
Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm thinking to install FreeBSD on
my old PC.
> ---
> Processor
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
