Including the correct (python version) include path

-I for my needs. If the user has 3, or 4 versions it seems harder. Not to mention if malloc option was added, which appends an m to ${PYTHON_SUFFIX} How does everyone deal with this sort of thing? Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris __

Re: Including the correct (python version) include path

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:41:59 +1100 ko...@freebsd.org said On 4/03/2020 5:58 am, Chris wrote: > I'm dragging some code into the 21st century. I'm happy to > say the python37 AST now gives it a clean bill of health. > But I'm (currently) only able to build it by prependin

How to best remove sphinx18 dependency from ports tree?

ng this error. As a side question related to llvm80; why is an AMD GPU even involved? --Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Where are, or how do I generate python man pages?

(man||pod) page away. :-) Thank you in advance for any insight into all this. --Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

simple python 2 to python question

and it returned: chmod(self.pw_file, 0o600) which just seems wrong. What am I missing -- aside from more familiarity with python3 ;-) Thanks! --Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To un

Re: simple python 2 to python 3 question

On 2020-12-11 14:06, Chris wrote: Hello all, I'm working on a port I maintain to become py3x compatible. I'm down to one lousy error: passwd.py", line 25chmod(self.pw_file, 0600) ^ SyntaxError: invalid token I tried to sort it, but failed. So allow

Re: simple python 2 to python question

On 2020-12-11 14:41, Douglas Thrift wrote: On 12/11/2020 2:06 PM, Chris wrote: Hello all, I'm working on a port I maintain to become py3x compatible. I'm down to one lousy error: passwd.py", line 25    chmod(self.pw_file, 0600)    ^ SyntaxError: invalid

Re: svn commit: r558197 - head/devel/py-pip

w (I do not). mcl I mentioned it in the related bugzilla pr(1). But'll repeat it here; I can take a stab at devel/bzr. I should have something useful by (or before) the end of the week. --Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists

24:10: fatal error: 'Python.h' file not found (how to prepend FLAVORDIR?)

course provides: include/python3.7m/ changing the include to: #include solves this. But this is not a tenable solution. Does the ports framework provide for this? I think FLAVOR only returns py(flavor.number) not python(flavor.number) Thanks for any insight. --Chris _

Re: Question: How to add a configuration file with autoplist ?

ou want to view the final generated plist then in the normal ports directory: % make package % less `make -VTMPPLIST` (those are backticks). It's probably harmless to have a file listed twice, but if you list the actual config file it gets blown away on each update. Cheers, Chris -- T

Re: ports/115940: Missed one file in lang/python25 if NO_NIS defined

Hi, This problem has been going on for a number of years, and as far as I can see there isn't a proper and elegant solution. A fix is at [1], which should solve the problem, and I'm going to tinderbox test and commit it if no-one complains. Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~cre

Re: ports/115940: Missed one file in lang/python25 if NO_NIS defined

list =|s|]|, "nis"&|' \ >                ${PATCH_WRKSRC}/setup.py > .endif Good point, and thanks for the idea, even if it did take me ten minutes to work out how the hell your REINPLACE line worked ;) I've simplified it a little.

Re: ports/115940: Missed one file in lang/python25 if NO_NIS defined

Committed. Thanks! Thanks also goes to bf@, who has taught me how to use a delimiter other than / at the beginning of a sed command. Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean

Re: bin/python3 symlink for python3X ports

you think? I think it's a great idea, at least minimising weird breakage when python is updated. Have you a patch? Also, what do other OSes do? Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-

Re: bin/python3 symlink for python3X ports

Yes. It means that a deliberate decision by the user has been made that that particular version is there. However, it is still possible to have the "first installed wins" logic using a pkg-install script instead of in the Makefile, this would solve the package problems. Are

Re: Python distribution: switching to tar.xz

on :). Is this acceptable to do this, > because it will require all the distinfos change "w/o a reason"? I didn't > see anything criminal there, but other people may know better. No, it's fine. People just get jumpy about distinfo changes with no version change

Re: Python distribution: switching to tar.xz

(py-sqlite3, py-bdsdb, py-gdbm, py-tkinter) and everything seems fine. I also diffed all the four pairs tgz/tar.xz of each python version - and, as it was expected, their content is equal. > > Any objections, suggestions etc? > > [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/tgz-to-tx-conversion.diff.txt My suggestion is to do it :) Thanks for doing the work. Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Postgresql + Python

-lm > /usr/bin/ld: --just-symbols may not be used on DSO: > /usr/local/lib/python3.2/config > gmake: *** [plpython3.so] Error 1 > *** Error code 2 > > It worked before, and I'm not sure how to fix this one. Python2 build works > as expected. Any ideas? (Mostly asking Pa

Re: Postgresql + Python

On 1 December 2012 12:57, Chris Rees wrote: > On 27 November 2012 13:24, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> Rafael Espíndola wrote on 27.11.2012 16:29: >> >>> Well, if I'm not mistaken had tested "CONFIGURE_ARGS = - with-python'', >>> but had no

Re: bin/python3 symlink for python3X ports

- Introduce PYTHON3_DEFAULT_VERSION, which will handle bin/python3 link. > > It is a bit hacky, but I don't have better idea at this point. > > And we might still need to change this to PYTHON2_DEFAULT_VERSION > > when we change default

Re: [PATCH] finish converting python@ to new options framework

logic for pyPgSQL? Looks fine to me. Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Fwd: python33-3.3.0_2 failed on amd64 9.1-glib]

Přeposlaná zpráva [OK, it's not really Pav.] http://www.bayofrum.net/medusatb/9.1-glib-20130131165817/python33-3.3.0_2.log I've been doing a mini-exp-run for Koop Mast, and discovered that python33 fails to packa

Re: [Fwd: python33-3.3.0_2 failed on amd64 9.1-glib]

ou think that broken on latest release is unacceptable? Is there anything we can fiddle python-side to fix this? Chris > On 01.02.2013, at 21:53, Chris Rees wrote: > >> Přeposlaná zpráva >> >> [OK, it's not really Pav.] >> >> http://ww

Re: [Fwd: python33-3.3.0_2 failed on amd64 9.1-glib]

On 2 February 2013 11:29, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > On 02.02.2013, at 15:28, Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 1 February 2013 18:51, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >>> Upgrade to 9-STABLE and it will package correctly. >>> >>> See http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?

Re: [Fwd: python33-3.3.0_2 failed on amd64 9.1-glib]

On 2 February 2013 11:52, Chris Rees wrote: > On 2 February 2013 11:29, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >> >> On 02.02.2013, at 15:28, Chris Rees wrote: >> >>> On 1 February 2013 18:51, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >>>> Upgrade to 9-STABLE and it

Re: [Fwd: python33-3.3.0_2 failed on amd64 9.1-glib]

On 3 February 2013 06:51, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 3/02/2013 12:33 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 2 February 2013 11:52, Chris Rees wrote: >>> On 2 February 2013 11:29, Dmitry Sivachenko >>> wrote: >>&

Re: building scons with default python3

y The port is very out of date; the latest version claims to only support Python 2.7, they are hoping to support Python 3. What does the maintainer think? Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ports/178242: bsd.python.mk injection of @exec easy_install to PLIST creates inappropriate post-install scripts for pkgng

The following reply was made to PR ports/178242; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Dukes To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, chris.dukes@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/178242: bsd.python.mk injection of @exec easy_install to PLIST creates inappropriate post-install scripts for pkgng

Re: ports/178242: bsd.python.mk injection of @exec easy_install to PLIST creates inappropriate post-install scripts for pkgng

The following reply was made to PR ports/178242; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Dukes To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, chris.dukes@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/178242: bsd.python.mk injection of @exec easy_install to PLIST creates inappropriate post-install scripts for pkgng

Re: Multiple Python eggs within one port

Background of my question is that I maintain the Tryton application framework which consists of ~50 small modules. Currently each of them has its own port. I might bundle them together on one port to simplify maintenance. Usually a master/slave configuration is more appropriate. Are you

Re: ports/133081: [bsd.python.mk] PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP=yes makes broken packages

The following reply was made to PR ports/133081; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Rees To: "bug-follo...@freebsd.org" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/133081: [bsd.python.mk] PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP=yes makes broken packages Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:46:01 +0100 The solution to th

Re: ports/133081: Fix PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP=yes packages

patch now fixes the problem in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/133081. I've tested it and it works, and all the affected ports pass tinderbox. Any comments before I commit? http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/python-filthy2.diff

Fwd: svn commit: r250991 - in head: contrib/jemalloc/include/jemalloc include lib/libc/stdlib/jemalloc

Hi all, I don't know how many of you were following this, but it looks fine to me... any of you mind if I commit it? Chris -- Forwarded message -- From: Marcel Moolenaar Date: 3 June 2013 15:50 Subject: Re: svn commit: r250991 - in head: contrib/jemalloc/include/jem

Re: [PATCH] devel/py27-distribute: Fix reinstall

Why symbolic instead of hard? Chris ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [PATCH] devel/py27-distribute: Fix reinstall

On 16 June 2013 14:57, nemysis wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:34:27 +0100 > Chris Rees wrote: > >> Why symbolic instead of hard? >> >> Chris > > When is in Makefile > > ${LN} ${EASYINSTALL_PTH}.dist ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/distribute.pth > > /usr/lo

Re: Re: Python Subprocess Crontab Problem

crontab isn't using a PATH for your specified user, so you need to give an absolute path. On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:02:06 -0700 Craig Rodrigues wrote On Wed, Jun 10 > Here is how I'm calling the script in crontab: > PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin > I can't remem

without_threads

can you tell me the correct way to define python25 to compile without_threads? ive tried various guesses, none have worked (as reported by mod_python) - thank you SO much ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis