On 13 September 2011 09:05, b. f. <bf1...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> This problem has been going on for a number of years, and as far as I
>> can see there isn't a proper and elegant solution.
>>
>> A fix is at [1], which should solve the problem, and I'm going to
>> tinderbox test and commit it if no-one complains.
>
> As Kozlov said earlier, that's a bit ugly. I think it would be better
> to avoid attempting to build the module in the first place, by simply
> adding something like:
>
> .if !exists(/usr/bin/ypcat) # the world with NO_NIS
> ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|rpcsvc/yp_prot.h|${NONEXISTENT}|' \
> ${PATCH_WRKSRC}/setup.py
> .endif
>
> to the pre-patch target, or something like:
>
> .if !exists(/usr/bin/ypcat) # the world with NO_NIS
> ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '\|disabled_module_list =|s|]|, "nis"&|' \
> ${PATCH_WRKSRC}/setup.py
> .endif
Good point, and thanks for the idea, even if it did take me ten
minutes to work out how the hell your REINPLACE line worked ;) I've
simplified it a little.
Is it better now? It works in tinderbox so far....
http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/python-nis_failed-fix-bffix.diff
Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
