On 04.01.2016 11:38, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> Agreed, its just not a 'current practice' thing that makes that relevant :)
True. But insisting on changes of current practice needs a good reason.
> How does the figure change only including py-* ports?
The share drops from 25% to 9.5%:
% awk -F\| '
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205789
Vladimir Krstulja changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pyt...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205789
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Krstulja ---
(In reply to neil from comment #3)
It's okay for ports to require specific Python version, since Python versions
can be installed concurrently. The defaults matter when no specific version is
prefe
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:44:24 -0500
"Mikhail T." wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I built py-numpy only a few weeks ago with default config options (I
> think). I'm trying to port some numpy-using software now and its
> self-tests fail with the following error:
>
> ...
> import numpy
> File "/
On 04.01.2016 14:34, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> Can you post the complete backtrace?
>
Well, here goes:
___ ERROR at setup of
TestAPI.test_can_post_image
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/spare/usr/
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:56:06 -0500
"Mikhail T." wrote:
> On 04.01.2016 14:34, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> > Can you post the complete backtrace?
> >
> Well, here goes:
>
> ___ ERROR at setup of
> TestAPI.test_can_post_image _
On 04.01.2016 16:31, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> After all it's perhaps Numpy's problem, but nobody reported this issue.
Well, I decided to try figuring this out myself and got the following
error from a very simply one line script consisting of "import numpy;":
Traceback (most recent call last
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205789
--- Comment #6 from Giel van Schijndel ---
Patch looks good to commit.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:29:56 -0500
"Mikhail T." wrote:
> On 04.01.2016 16:31, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> > After all it's perhaps Numpy's problem, but nobody reported this issue.
> Well, I decided to try figuring this out myself and got the following
> error from a very simply one line script con
Olivier Duchateau(duchateau.oliv...@gmail.com)@2016.01.04 23:17:57 +:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:29:56 -0500
> "Mikhail T." wrote:
>
> > On 04.01.2016 16:31, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> > > After all it's perhaps Numpy's problem, but nobody reported this issue.
> > Well, I decided to try figurin
On 04.01.2016 16:29, Mikhail T. wrote:
> ImportError:
> /opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/multiarray.so: Undefined
> symbol "cblas_cdotc_sub"
Ok, the above went away, when I rebuilt all of the Fortran-using
dependencies of numpy with gfortran5. Don't know, if they were built
incorrectly s
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:00:44 -0500
"Mikhail T." wrote:
> On 04.01.2016 16:29, Mikhail T. wrote:
> > ImportError:
> > /opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/multiarray.so: Undefined
> > symbol "cblas_cdotc_sub"
> Ok, the above went away, when I rebuilt all of the Fortran-using
> dependencies
On 04.01.2016 18:59, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
>> > I wonder, if this has something to do with my setting PYTHONPATH -- I
>> > need the not-yet-installed mediagoblin packages to be found in ${WRKSRC}
>> > by the tests. What is the proper way of to do this?
> You can add module (and submodules) with
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
diks...@sfc.wide.ad.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #164187|maintainer-approval?(dikshi |maintainer-approval+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #28 from diks...@sfc.wide.ad.jp ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #26)
@Koobs thank you for the reminder. I just add + maintainer-approval.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205789
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Krstulja ---
(In reply to Giel van Schijndel from comment #6)
Please set maintainer-feedback+ on the issue, and maintainer-approval+ on the
patch if you think it's good to go.
However, this does not build agai
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205789
Vladimir Krstulja changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||205907
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205907
Vladimir Krstulja changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pyt...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205907
Vladimir Krstulja changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #165085||maintainer-approval?(mopsfe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, patch-ready
--
You are rec
2016-01-05 0:13 GMT+01:00 Mikhail T. :
> On 04.01.2016 18:59, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
>
>> I wonder, if this has something to do with my setting PYTHONPATH -- I
>> need the not-yet-installed mediagoblin packages to be found in ${WRKSRC}
>> by the tests. What is the proper way of to do this?
>
> Yo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060
Martin Wilke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203872
Martin Wilke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203872
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: miwi
Date: Mon Jan 4 09:04:29 UTC 2016
New revision: 405224
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/405224
Log:
A command line tool to do EN
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205859
Vladimir Krstulja changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #165028|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205859
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|x11/xcb-proto: Make it |x11/xcb-proto: Fix build
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205859
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-qa|patch-ready
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205859
Antoine Brodin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunp...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205807
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205859
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Only Me
CC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205869
Bug ID: 205869
Summary: security/py-clamav: DEPRECATE, obsoleted by upstream
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
URL: http://xael.org/pages/projects.ht
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205869
Vladimir Krstulja changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|security/py-clamav: |security/py-clamav: Mark
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205762
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
It looks like all errors except for textproc/py-diff-match-patch are unrelated
to the patch and the ports have been broken for a while.
It's worth considering the problems in devel/py-cycler an
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
--- Comment #2 from Zane C. Bowers-Hadley ---
Created attachment 165045
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=165045&action=edit
deskutils_py-khal_Makefile.diff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
--- Comment #3 from Zane C. Bowers-Hadley ---
Created attachment 165046
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=165046&action=edit
deskutils_py-khal_distinfo.diff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
--- Comment #4 from Zane C. Bowers-Hadley ---
Created attachment 165047
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=165047&action=edit
deskutils_py-khal_files_patch-setup.py
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
Zane C. Bowers-Hadley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People
--
Yo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #27 from John W. O'Brien ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #26)
Are you suggesting that I need to do something? There are two patches attached
to this bug, one received maintainer approval and has already been committ
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
--- Comment #5 from Zane C. Bowers-Hadley ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)
... the unified diffs were already included in the shar as there i no way to
include more than one file on initial submission...
But sure, went and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Kubilay
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205762
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||merge-quarterly?
Keyword
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
--- Comment #7 from Zane C. Bowers-Hadley ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #6)
Hmm... cool, thanks. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205869
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #165043||maintainer-approval+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205869
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||merge-quarterly?
--- Comment #1 fr
Hi list.
As I can see there are two ways of doing pkg-plist routine.
For pkg-plist which was made for python2 just including USE_PYTHON=
py3kplist would do the trick.
For new python3 ports it's not so straight forward, and when they don't
use setup.py conventions people usually do something
On 5/01/2016 2:13 AM, clutton wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> As I can see there are two ways of doing pkg-plist routine.
>
> For pkg-plist which was made for python2 just including USE_PYTHON=
> py3kplist would do the trick.
>
> For new python3 ports it's not so straight forward, and when they don't
>
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:26 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 5/01/2016 2:13 AM, clutton wrote:
> > Hi list.
> >
> > As I can see there are two ways of doing pkg-plist routine.
> >
> > For pkg-plist which was made for python2 just including USE_PYTHON=
> > py3kplist would do the trick.
> >
> > F
On 5/01/2016 2:35 AM, clutton wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:26 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> On 5/01/2016 2:13 AM, clutton wrote:
>>> Hi list.
>>>
>>> As I can see there are two ways of doing pkg-plist routine.
>>>
>>> For pkg-plist which was made for python2 just including USE_PYTHON=
>>> py
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:37 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 5/01/2016 2:35 AM, clutton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:26 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> > > On 5/01/2016 2:13 AM, clutton wrote:
> > > > Hi list.
> > > >
> > > > As I can see there are two ways of doing pkg-plist routine.
> > > >
On 04.01.2016 10:23, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy [...] Feedback very welcome.
>
Well, you asked for it... I propose removing the lowercase-requirement.
Instead, the portname should match the capitalization found in PyPi.
This will better match the current prac
Vladimir Krstulja has asked FreeBSD Python
for maintainer-feedback:
Bug 205881: devel/py-pip: Add a warning against installing into system
site-packages with pip!
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205881
--- Description ---
If pip is used to install software into system's site-
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205881
Bug ID: 205881
Summary: devel/py-pip: Add a warning against installing into
system site-packages with pip!
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
Vladimir Krstulja has reassigned Bugzilla
Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to FreeBSD
Python :
Bug 205881: devel/py-pip: Add a warning against installing into system
site-packages with pip!
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205881
--- Description ---
If pip is used
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205881
Vladimir Krstulja changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pyt...@freebsd.org |ko...@freebsd.org
On 5/01/2016 2:54 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 04.01.2016 10:23, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy [...] Feedback very welcome.
>>
> Well, you asked for it... I propose removing the lowercase-requirement.
> Instead, the portname should match the capitalization found
On 5/01/2016 2:50 AM, clutton wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:37 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> On 5/01/2016 2:35 AM, clutton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:26 +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 5/01/2016 2:13 AM, clutton wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> As I can see there are two ways of
On 04.01.2016 11:04, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> No discussion archive
Well, if it is not a result of a discussion arriving to a consensus,
then, perhaps, the rule is not as hard, is it? What are you reasons
behind it?
> also PyPI is case insensitive
Ah, good to know. Perhaps, that's because Python has
On 5/01/2016 3:32 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 04.01.2016 11:04, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> No discussion archive
> Well, if it is not a result of a discussion arriving to a consensus,
> then, perhaps, the rule is not as hard, is it? What are you reasons
> behind it?
>> also PyPI is case insensitive
>
Hi!
I built py-numpy only a few weeks ago with default config options (I
think). I'm trying to port some numpy-using software now and its
self-tests fail with the following error:
...
import numpy
File "/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py", line
180, in
60 matches
Mail list logo
