https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|exp-run?|exp-run+
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
--- Comment #8 from Marcus von Appen ---
Just a minor change to be done:
"Enforce the default version provided by the ports tree."
should be
"Enforce the version required by the port or the default."
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-qa|needs-patch
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
--- Comment #9 from Marcus von Appen ---
And while here: should not be CMAKE_ARGS+= only be set, if USES contains cmake?
Just to keep the set environment clean?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
--- Comment #10 from Max Brazhnikov ---
(In reply to Marcus von Appen from comment #9)
> And while here: should not be CMAKE_ARGS+= only be set, if USES contains
> cmake? Just to keep the set environment clean?
Seems like overcomplication
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
--- Comment #11 from Max Brazhnikov ---
(In reply to Marcus von Appen from comment #8)
> Just a minor change to be done:
> "Enforce the default version provided by the ports tree."
> should be
> "Enforce the version required by the port
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
--- Comment #12 from Marcus von Appen ---
(In reply to Max Brazhnikov from comment #11)
> (In reply to Marcus von Appen from comment #8)
> > Just a minor change to be done:
> > "Enforce the default version provided by the ports tree."
> >
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
Max Brazhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #157311|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168159
--- Comment #14 from Max Brazhnikov ---
(In reply to Marcus von Appen from comment #12)
> (In reply to Max Brazhnikov from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Marcus von Appen from comment #8)
> > > Just a minor change to be done:
> > > "Enforc
On 02/02/2015 14:07, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 3/02/2015 1:03 AM, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>>
>>> On 2 февр. 2015 г., at 2:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> At FOSDEM I have been reported by Sevan (CCed) that the python's configure
>>> scripts thinks it is forbidden to have a lib
http://bugs.python.org/issue23817
Committed to the default branch. I tried to get it committed to the 2.7/3.4
branches but there was an upstream lack of confidence on backward
compatibility.
I can reopen the issue if need be.
On 3 Jun 2015 11:09 am, "Sevan Janiyan" wrote:
>
>
> On 02/02/2015 14
On 03/06/2015 02:17, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue23817
>
> Committed to the default branch. I tried to get it committed to the 2.7/3.4
> branches but there was an upstream lack of confidence on backward
> compatibility.
>
> I can reopen the issue if need be.
Apologies,
12 matches
Mail list logo
