http://bugs.python.org/issue23817
Committed to the default branch. I tried to get it committed to the 2.7/3.4 branches but there was an upstream lack of confidence on backward compatibility. I can reopen the issue if need be. On 3 Jun 2015 11:09 am, "Sevan Janiyan" <ventur...@geeklan.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 02/02/2015 14:07, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > > On 3/02/2015 1:03 AM, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > >> > >>> On 2 февр. 2015 г., at 2:36, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> At FOSDEM I have been reported by Sevan (CCed) that the python's > configure > >>> scripts thinks it is forbidden to have a lib named libpython2.so.X.Y > on FreeBSD > >>> which is wrong. > >>> > >>> Here is a patch that fixes it on python2 unfortunatly as a result that > means > >>> everything linked to libpython2.so.1 will need a bump. (same thing > should be > >>> done for other pythons) > >>> > >>> I would prefer that you guys decides when how and so on to make that > change > >>> happening. > >>> > >>> > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/respect-the-libname-decided-by-upstream.diff > >>> > >>> I modified the configure script and not the configure.ac because the > patch is > >>> not worth have to depend on autotools to regenerate the configure. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Since this is the explicit case for FreeBSD it would be nice to see > what commit log for that change in Python's repo was. > >> > > > > For reference: > > > > https://hg.python.org/cpython/diff/6fc10306bf31/configure > > http://bugs.python.org/issue1044395 > > > > ./koobs > > > > Hi Guys, > Any luck with this? was just digging into Python 2.7.10 for a unrelated > manner and noticed the change is still there to trim the library name. > > > Sevan > _______________________________________________ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"