On 13 Dec 2012 18:01, "Li-Wen Hsu" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 21:25:03 +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 00:00:20 +0400, wrote:
> > > On 10/5/12 9:23 AM, wrote:
> > > > On 01.10.2012 21:39, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks fo
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 21:25:03 +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 00:00:20 +0400, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> > On 10/5/12 9:23 AM, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> > > On 01.10.2012 21:39, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for working on this, I am looking forward to your patch.
>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 17:51:12 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
> Random thought: can we make 'python', 'python2', and 'python3' a
> simple C wrapper (you can't use a shell script because an interpreter
> can't be interpreted) that selects the correct version instead of a
> symlink?
I'm not sure w
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 00:00:20 +0400, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> On 10/5/12 9:23 AM, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> > On 01.10.2012 21:39, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for working on this, I am looking forward to your patch.
> >>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Please consider the attached patch for pyt
On 10/5/12 9:23 AM, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
On 01.10.2012 21:39, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
Thanks for working on this, I am looking forward to your patch.
Hello,
Please consider the attached patch for python2/python3 symlinks.
As I proposed earlier in this thread, I think it is sane to make these
On 2 October 2012 08:04, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Dmitry Sivachenko wrote on 26.09.2012 13:14:
>>
>> On 26.09.2012 13:07, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Rees wrote on 26.09.2012 13:03:
On 26 Sep 2012 08:13, "Dmitry Sivachenko" wrote:
>
>
> Hello!
>
> It
On 01.10.2012 21:39, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
Thanks for working on this, I am looking forward to your patch.
Hello,
Please consider the attached patch for python2/python3 symlinks.
As I proposed earlier in this thread, I think it is sane to make these symlinks
for latest python2.X/python3.X versio
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote on 26.09.2012 13:14:
On 26.09.2012 13:07, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Chris Rees wrote on 26.09.2012 13:03:
On 26 Sep 2012 08:13, "Dmitry Sivachenko" wrote:
Hello!
It is common to have both python-2 and python-3 packages installed.
To help transition it is convenient
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 00:18:07 +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> On 10/1/12 10:44 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> > However, it is still possible to have the "first installed wins" logic
> > using a pkg-install script instead of in the Makefile, this would
> > solve the package problems. Are you intere
On 10/1/12 10:44 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
However, it is still possible to have the "first installed wins" logic
using a pkg-install script instead of in the Makefile, this would
solve the package problems. Are you interested if I were to implement
that? Chris
I think that "first wins" logic i
On 1 October 2012 18:39, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 15:22:03 +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>> On 26.09.2012 17:00, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>> >
>> > I think this patch is good. And I am thinking about also modifying
>> > other lang/python{2,3}X ports, thus we may need to beware of
>>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 15:22:03 +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> On 26.09.2012 17:00, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >
> > I think this patch is good. And I am thinking about also modifying
> > other lang/python{2,3}X ports, thus we may need to beware of
> > confliction on bin/python{2,3} between lang/pyth
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 17:17:20 +0400, Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote:
> On 9/26/12 5:00 PM, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >
> > I think this patch is good. And I am thinking about also modifying
> > other lang/python{2,3}X ports, thus we may need to beware of
> > confliction on bin/python{2,3} between lang/pytho
On 26.09.2012 17:00, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
I think this patch is good. And I am thinking about also modifying
other lang/python{2,3}X ports, thus we may need to beware of
confliction on bin/python{2,3} between lang/python2X or lang/python3X
ports. It is not so common but still possible to have mor
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote on 26.09.2012 15:18:
On 26.09.2012 13:20, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote on 26.09.2012 13:14:
I don't have a patch but I can make one if you like.
Please do.
Please consider the attached patch.
The patch seems good to me. The only thing: I'd ra
On 9/26/12 5:00 PM, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
I think this patch is good. And I am thinking about also modifying
other lang/python{2,3}X ports, thus we may need to beware of
confliction on bin/python{2,3} between lang/python2X or lang/python3X
ports. It is not so common but still possible to have more
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> On 26.09.2012 13:20, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>
>> Dmitry Sivachenko wrote on 26.09.2012 13:14:
>>>
>>> I don't have a patch but I can make one if you like.
>>
>>
>> Please do.
>>
>
> Please consider the attached patch.
>
I think this
On 26.09.2012 13:20, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote on 26.09.2012 13:14:
I don't have a patch but I can make one if you like.
Please do.
Please consider the attached patch.
Index: pkg-plist
===
--- pkg-pl
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote on 26.09.2012 13:14:
On 26.09.2012 13:07, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Chris Rees wrote on 26.09.2012 13:03:
On 26 Sep 2012 08:13, "Dmitry Sivachenko" wrote:
Hello!
It is common to have both python-2 and python-3 packages installed.
To help transition it is convenient
On 26.09.2012 13:03, Chris Rees wrote:
Also, what do other OSes do?
I found one linux box near me:
{zamarashka}/usr/bin# ls -la python*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Apr 17 21:20 python -> python2.7
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Apr 17 21:20 python2 -> python2.7
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2989
On 26.09.2012 13:07, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Chris Rees wrote on 26.09.2012 13:03:
On 26 Sep 2012 08:13, "Dmitry Sivachenko" wrote:
Hello!
It is common to have both python-2 and python-3 packages installed.
To help transition it is convenient to have bin/python to point to
python-2 binar
Chris Rees wrote on 26.09.2012 13:03:
On 26 Sep 2012 08:13, "Dmitry Sivachenko" wrote:
Hello!
It is common to have both python-2 and python-3 packages installed.
To help transition it is convenient to have bin/python to point to
python-2 binary.
Now for every X in python3X we have a bin/py
On 26 Sep 2012 08:13, "Dmitry Sivachenko" wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> It is common to have both python-2 and python-3 packages installed.
> To help transition it is convenient to have bin/python to point to
python-2 binary.
>
> Now for every X in python3X we have a bin/python3.X binary.
>
> So for every
Hello!
It is common to have both python-2 and python-3 packages installed.
To help transition it is convenient to have bin/python to point to python-2
binary.
Now for every X in python3X we have a bin/python3.X binary.
So for every new python3.X release one should change shebang line in script
24 matches
Mail list logo
