Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 22:57:14 +1000, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
Given the experimental nature of Python 3.0, and the fact that 3.1 is
out, it seems to me that Python 3.0's time in the ports collection
should not be extended.
Yes. But as long as we do not set Python 3.0 as t
Li-Wen Hsu schrieb:
However, is there any need for keeping python 2.3, or even 2.4 in the
ports tree?
Yes, 2.4 for example is needed for Zope 2.x and I am glad that the ports
system lets me choose the needed python version with a simple setting in
/etc/make.conf. :)
bye,
Uwe
___
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 22:57:14 +1000, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
> Given the experimental nature of Python 3.0, and the fact that 3.1 is
> out, it seems to me that Python 3.0's time in the ports collection
> should not be extended.
Yes. But as long as we do not set Python 3.0 as the default Pytho
Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
Hi all,
After reviewing python31 port and freebsd-python's PRs,
I propose this patch for lang/python30:
http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/python30.diff
Changes are:
- Honor EXAMPLESDIR, DATADIR and NOPORTEXAMPLES, NOPORTDATA
- Remove bsddb module in pkg-message since it's rem
