On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:55:02 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:54:51AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:37:40 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I think these two are n
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:54:51AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:37:40 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I think these two are not an issue. ?Default Python version is
> > > >> switched to 2.6.
> >
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:37:40 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I think these two are not an issue. �Default Python version is switched
> > >> to 2.6.
> > >>
> > >> But how this report generated? �Switching happened before
>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> >>
> >> I think these two are not an issue. Default Python version is switched to
> >> 2.6.
> >>
> >> But how this report generated? Switching happened before
> >> databases/py25-bsddb repocpoied.
> >>
> > The script is in Tools/scrip
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports confli
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports confli
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 22:55, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48:41AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:32, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>> > LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER
>> > ==
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports confli
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48:41AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:32, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER
> > ==
> > py25-bsddb databases/py-bs
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports confli
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:32, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER
> ==
> py25-bsddb databases/py-bsddb pe...@freebsd.org
> py25-bsddb databases/p
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports confli
12 matches
Mail list logo
