On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > >> > >> I think these two are not an issue. Default Python version is switched to > >> 2.6. > >> > >> But how this report generated? Switching happened before > >> databases/py25-bsddb repocpoied. > >> > > The script is in Tools/scripts/check-latest-link. Could this be caused > > by the installed python version on the system it runs on? > > Sounds possible, and that's what bsd.python.mk does. > databases/py25-bsddb is a slave port of databases/py-bsddb, > which generates python 2.5 package for some ports depend on > specified python version. When a system with python 2.5 > as the default setting, databases/py-bsddb and databases/py25-bsddb > should generate same package. So now the problem is, is it OK for them > have same LATEST_LINK? Or we can just ignore this problem, since this > should not effect official package build, and the latest links on the ftp. > As you probably saw on the ports list, this also broke INDEX (not noticed before because the INDEX script has wedged it zfs mount). It looks like overriding LOCALBASE to /nonexistent does fix both issue as the script will no longer see the locally installed python version. This solves this issue.
-erwin -- Erwin Lansing (o_ _o) http://droso.org \\\_\ /_/// The rest is silence <____) (____> er...@lansing.dk
pgpzk1GXRFJ7B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
