think the biggest controversy is that binary names are suffixed, which
may not be what upstream projects like and/or document.
It may be confusing to users as well.
If we can get rid of the suffix for PYTHON_CONCURRENT_INSTALL for
whichever version is PYTHON_DEFAULT, it should be a net pos
On 2015-12-07 17:44, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/ 7/15 09:08 PM, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
On 12/07/15 13:40, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
Hey Nikolai,
I've just heard that Ansible 2.0-RC2 has been released.
Do you plan to do a por
2.0 when it's released as sysutils/ansible and
move 1.9 to sysutils/ansible1. If it's valuable to track RC releases,
I'm not opposed to creating something like sysutils/ansible-devel.
I have not tracked any RC releases in the past (1.9, 1.8, etc.).
Thoughts?
- Nikolai Lifanov
_
Wouldn't it be better to package it as an extra file *with* setuptools?
If it's only used by setuptools, creating a separate dummy port seems
odd.
Just add it to files/ or something.
- Nikolai Lifanov
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.or
both?
Here is a WIP patch so far.
Thanks!
- Nikolai Lifanov
Index: devel/awscli/Makefile
===
--- devel/awscli/Makefile (revision 326419)
+++ devel/awscli/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
# $FreeBSD$
PORTNAME= a
On 2013-07-06 11:54, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 7/6/2013 10:43 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 7/07/2013 12:51 AM, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
Hello.
I maintain sysutils/ansible, and I keep wanting to @dirrmtry
%%PYTHON_SITELIBDIR%% and perhaps %%PYTHON_LIBDIR%%.
portlint tells me that this is a wrong
On 2013-07-06 11:43, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 7/07/2013 12:51 AM, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
Hello.
I maintain sysutils/ansible, and I keep wanting to @dirrmtry
%%PYTHON_SITELIBDIR%% and perhaps %%PYTHON_LIBDIR%%.
portlint tells me that this is a wrong thing to do, while poudriere
testport
