On Mar 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Amit Dev wrote:
> This is using 165MB of memory. I really don't understand where the
> additional memory usage is coming from. [Size of both lists are same]
>
> Python 2.6.4 on FreeBSD 7.2. On Linux and windows both uses around
> 100mb memory only.
It's possible that
Hi--
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Xin LI wrote:
>> If python needs to be compiled with HUGE_STACK_SIZE on FreeBSD, is there a
>> reason
>> to provide the option to not compile python with it, or at the very least,
>> should it default to
>> being on?
>
> Ah, yes this is the thing I turn on on a
On Nov 6, 2007, at 6:20 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2007-Nov-6, at 17:40 , Chuck Swiger wrote:
Aside from /bin/sh...? :-)
/usr/bin/awk ?
Sure-- I very nearly put a footnote in suggesting awk & make as
additional candidates.
But I figured it was a bit of a moot point, as I agree
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Chuck Robey wrote:
my question here is, is it possible that Python might someday be
brought into the FreeBSD base
It is very, very, unlikely that any interpretive language will be
in the base again.
Aside from /bin
