-dumpspecs is a gcc internal thing that clang will never support (it doesnt use
specs). It's wrong for ports to mess with the internals of the compiler and
this should be fixed in a clean way.
Ie. we have to replace the -dumpspec | grep something with a saner check.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:07:
other
ports from building).
Thank you for helping us!
Roman Divacky
pgpFKX1RRwGhM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
if some of the ports
you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them. A small introduction into
the Clang+Ports can be read at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang.
Please focus on the biggest offenders (ie. ports that prevent the most other
ports from building).
Thank you for he
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 05:18:29PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> You might have noticed a thread on the mailing list called "ports system
> woes". The submitter pointed out an inefficiency in pkg_delete routine,
> that parses the whole /var/db/pkg over and over again for every
> dependency of a pac
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:18:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Roman Divacky wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 05:18:29PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >>You might have noticed a thread on the mailing list called "ports system
> >>woes". The submitter poin
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:49:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > You might have noticed a thread on the mailing list called "ports system
> > > woes". The submitter pointed out an inefficiency in pkg_delete routine,
> > > that parses the whole /var/db/pkg over and over again for every
>
> Note: almost all linuxolator changes where merged from 8-CURRENT to
> 7-STABLE. But I'm not sure if the default compat.linux.osrelease is
> ever changed to 7.x.
I am against ever switching to 2.6 on default in 7.x
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
Can we arrange exp builds with FORCE_BASE_CC_FOR_TESTING=clang that
will report all ports with USE_GCC=* but build with clang?
Lets say every three months or so?
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 07:45:23PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> The commit mail hasn't gone through yet, so I guess I need to post this
> Acroread will use linux system calls to start the shell. This results
> in the linux shell (/compat/linux/bin/sh) to start (linuxulator
> directory prefixing). The linux shell will use the same linuxulator
> directory prefixing to start /compat/linux/usr/bin/lpr. So we're in
> the same si
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:34:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >> I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
> >> index" and pkg_version and things like th
> If you find a glibc-2.4 for FC4 we can import it somehow. If you
no we cant. glibc-2.4 requires 2.6 kernel. ie. its the same operation as
switching to newer FC
> don't, we need to wait for the possibility to go to FC^ or newer. But
> as from FC5 on, we need 2.6.x emulation for the linuxulat
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:46:39PM +0800, Thomas Zander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> recently I had a look at the upcoming version of the PCB layout tool
> eagle, in beta test at the moment. I am currently maintaining both the
> international (cad/linux-eagle) and german ports of this tool.
> This new beta ve
> > There was a report on -current a while ago that a preliminary patch
> > to fix the non-threadsafeness of mmap(2) MAP_FIXED also makes flash9 work,
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-August/075968.html
I wrote that and I was wrong... it doesnt seem to fix the f
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:02:47PM -0700, Zephiris wrote:
> Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> >
> > I too am confused, if you have flash 9 working in firefox on RELENG_7
> > please give us a detailed how to there are just a TON of people
> > looking for this. I have 5 systems I would test it out on right n
on the state of flash9 in linuxulator...
I tried to debug it but it's (firefox+flash9) a huge program that generates
like
1.5 million of lines of trace. I spend several hours staring at that but didn't
find
anything obvious... I would be more than happy if someone proved I am stupid
and I
ove
The cmake test just tries to compile:
#include
std::atomic x;
int main() {
return x;
}
What happens if you try to compile this small code with your host compiler?
Roman
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:42:49AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> [I experiment with system-clang based
> buildworld and/or b
16 matches
Mail list logo
