Re: Specific svn/git package update use case

2021-04-08 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
mmits on a branch does not require doing them one by one to get the net effect. You may want to inspect after checkouts (or similar activity) that "git status" does not display any surprises that need to be cleaned up in the local file system via some variant(s) of git restore or/and git c

Re: Specific svn/git package update use case

2021-04-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
ned in your use that should be cleaned up. > On 09/04/2021 1:23 pm, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: >> Simon Wright simon.wright at gmx.net wrote on >> Fri Apr 9 02:48:47 UTC 2021 : >> >>> I'm still not clear though whether checking out this commit brin

Re: devel/llvm10 (and 11) on aarch64: only BE_AMDGPU registered targets despite OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=BE_NATIVE also being set

2021-04-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-Apr-8, at 10:46, Mark Millard wrote: > Building devel/llvm10 via poudriere-devel on a Cortex-A57 > system (OverDrive 1000), I ended up with just: > > # /usr/local/llvm10/bin/llc -version > LLVM (http://llvm.org/): > LLVM version 10.0.1 > Optimized build. >

Re: SVNWEB not updated for ports

2021-04-19 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
range of lines and it will show the author, committer, dates, and the one-line summary for the commit identified. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail

Re: When will git be supported for ports?

2021-04-28 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
0, 2020-Dec-02, and 2020-Dec-03. So it was updated a little from the 2020-Sep blog variant. The changes may not be important. I've not gone through them. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ fre

Re: When will git be supported for ports?

2021-04-29 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
dates shown. The hashes/links that I supplied were there to copy in the web browser during this sequence, so that I what I did to supply them. > > It's the old saying: Give a man a fish, so he will not be hungry > for a day, teach him to fish and he will be fed for a livetime 8-} I

Re: Xoscope nuisance console messages on Pi4 running -current

2021-05-03 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
extension to 64 bits before the value started being treated as unsigned. If it had used an unsigned type instead, the padding would have been a zero fill instead (presuming that I've guessed right). === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) _

Re: Xoscope nuisance console messages on Pi4 running -current

2021-05-03 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-3, at 08:23, bob prohaska wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 01:00:03AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > wrote: > [detailed code tour omitted] > >> >> My guess would be xoscope used a signed 32-bit type >> that got a value with sign extension

Re: pkg builders order of jobs

2021-05-09 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
approximate bisect" via artifact builds has become much more painful/impractical. (It has never helped that architecture is in a deeper layer but is also partial: only some architectures might build for the commit in question. One has had to inspect to find examples of the architecture of interest.)

Re: pkg builders order of jobs

2021-05-10 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
me text now used in the name. The use of the date/time encoding as a prefix avoids dealing with picking between the port and system "rev-list --first-parent --count" figure or having to list both in some order --and avoids the computational effort to find those counts. === Mark Millard mark

ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel, lang/rust (for example), and USE_TMPFS that includes wrkdir (or yes)

2021-05-10 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
ir included in USE_TMPFS shows over 130 GiBytes in the tmpfs earn the end of the builder's activity. (This is a amd64 context with 128 GiBytes of RAM and 192 GiBytes of swapping/paging space.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)

Re: FreeBSD:13:aarch64 packages are outdated

2021-05-11 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
hrough to something like: http://ampere2.nyi.freebsd.org/jail.html?mastername=main-arm64-default === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mail

Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-12 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
-06. (I've not checked other dependencies, beyond the basicis of the python3 change.) This may get into things like poudriere based builds vs. some other ways of building that are more sensitive to context oddities. But you were not explicit about that aspect of things. === Mark Mi

Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-12 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-12, at 20:48, bob prohaska wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:17:37PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > wrote: >> bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on >> Wed May 12 21:10:02 UTC 2021 : >> >>> Attempts to compile x11/x11-wm/lxqt on a P

Re: Troubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-12 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-12, at 22:28, bob prohaska wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:16:29PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > wrote: >> On 2021-May-12, at 20:48, bob prohaska wrote: >> >>> >>> Moving to /usr/ports/json-glib and using >>> make -D

Re: Troubles compiling lxqt on RPi4 [out of date Mk/Uses/meson.mk in use]

2021-05-12 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-12, at 23:13, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2021-May-12, at 22:28, bob prohaska wrote: > >> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:16:29PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports >> wrote: >>> On 2021-May-12, at 20:48, bob prohaska wrote: >>> >&g

Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-13 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
# portmaster -o lang/python38 python37 # REINSTALL="$(pkg info -o "*py37*" | awk '{printf "%s ", $2}')" # pkg delete -f "*py37*" # portmaster $REINSTALL # REBUILD=$(pkg query -g "%n:%dn" '*' | grep py3 | grep -v py38

Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-13 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
ns of python in use (or other such potential conflicts). So: It will not be me that tests such commands for handling such contexts. May be Bob P. will test your sequence. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-14 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on Fri May 14 01:35:28 UTC 2021 : > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:35:50PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > You have apparently chosen to build/update ports via a > > technique that requires you to manage the dependencies, at > > least s

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-15, at 16:37, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:29:15PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on >> Fri May 14 01:35:28 UTC 2021 : >> >>> Would use of poudriere help with this sort of problem? >>

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
default) END QUOTE There is also: QUOTE -n Do not be recursive -r Remove port options instead of configuring them -s Show port options instead of configuring them END QUOTE See: man poudriere-options === Mark Millard marklmi at yaho

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-16, at 00:16, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote on 2021/05/16 10:57: >> In the form that I use poudriere I use something >> like the following. I presume here that /usr/src >> is populated and has the source for the system >> i

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-16, at 15:33, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Mark Millard wrote on 2021/05/16 17:11: >> On 2021-May-16, at 00:16, Tatsuki Makino >> wrote: >> >>> poudriere jail -c -j main -m 'src=/usr/src' -v `make -C /usr/src/release/ >>> -V VERSION VER

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-17 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
tive. It is not for me to declare how well it would end up fitting their goals, context, preferences, and so on vs. other alternatives overall. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-17 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on Mon May 17 23:46:38 UTC 2021 : > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 12:28:24PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > wrote: > > bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on > > Mon May 17 15:55:21 UTC 2021 : > > > > > The exis

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-19 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
ment is so messed up that pkg delete -a would fail. I'll note that if pkg instead still points to the FreeBSD servers (such as quarterly), the same 2 command sequence should re-establish those builds. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-19 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-19, at 10:29, Mark Millard wrote: > bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on > Wed May 19 16:09:32 UTC 2021 : > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:24:00AM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: >>> >> >> [portmaster background omitted] >> >>&

Re: Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4

2021-05-19 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-19, at 14:17, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-19, at 10:29, Mark Millard wrote: > >> bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on >> Wed May 19 16:09:32 UTC 2021 : >> >>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:24:00AM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: >>>

On aarch64: "sysutils/hpacucli dependency on misc/compat4x has wrong PKGNAME"

2021-05-19 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
nch: main merge-base: b309895b3544ffba9e8df8786062ec6013c752ff merge-base: CommitDate: 2021-05-17 06:32:36 + b309895b3544 (HEAD -> main, freebsd/main, freebsd/HEAD) x11-themes/kde-icons-black-and-white: add LICENSE, take MAINTAINER n545993 (--first-parent --count for merge-base) === Mark Millard marklmi at y

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
JOBS=yes > ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS_PACKAGES will let a single package build using more cores. Even when MAKE_JOBS is otherwise disabled: # List of packages that will always be allowed to use MAKE_JOBS # regardless of ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS. This is useful for allowing ports # which holdup the rest

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-20, at 11:11, Mark Millard wrote: > Andrea Venturoli ml at netfence.it wrote on > Thu May 20 14:54:50 UTC 2021 : > >> On 5/20/21 4:11 PM, Alexis Praga wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the suggestions. >>> >>>> At least, if your m

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
ords, aarch64 was missing. I had to pick BE_STANDARD or BE_FREEBSD to get something that would target aarch64 on aarch64. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
CV vs. WITH_LLVM_TARGET_RISCV WITHOUT_LLVM_TARGET_X86 vs. WITH_LLVM_TARGET_X86 Some of the mixes would simulate the various devel/llvm* ports BE_NATIVE's intent for various platforms. (BE_NATIVE does not work in all contexts, last I tried it anyway.) === Mark

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on Thu May 20 21:37:28 UTC 2021 : > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:48 PM Mark Millard wrote: > > > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > > Thu May 20 19:21:24 UTC 2021 : > > > > > You can greatly reduce the build

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2021-May-20, at 21:10, Chris wrote: > On 2021-05-20 13:47, Mark Millard wrote: >> Chris portmaster at bsdforge.com wrote on >> Thu May 20 20:09:29 UTC 2021 : >>> On 2021-05-20 12:21, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> > . . . >>> >> >>>

poudriere-devel cross update-builds of ports build-depends failures: "pkg-static: wrong architecture: FreeBSD:12:armv7 instead of FreeBSD:12:amd64" (similarly for FreeBSD:12:aarch64 )

2018-01-28 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
4:35] [16] [00:00:00] Building net/rsync | rsync-3.1.2_8 [00:04:39] [18] [00:00:08] Finished misc/freebsd-release-manifests | freebsd-release-manifests-20171003: Success [00:04:39] [24] [00:00:21] Finished print/libpaper | libpaper-1.1.24.4: Success . . . === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( m

aarch64-none-elf-gcc V6.3.0_2 from -r465491 fails to package because of 3 referenced-but-missing include-fixed files (amd64 context)

2018-03-25 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r331499M amd64 amd64 1200060 1200060 === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Attempting a xtoolchain-gcc head amd64->aarch64 cross buildworld failed for liblto_plugin.so loading error

2018-04-07 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
ib/libc/string /usr/src/sys/libkern /usr/src/contrib/cortex-strings/src/aarch64 /usr/src/lib/libc/aarch64/sys /usr/src/lib/libc/sys /usr/src/lib/libc/secure /usr/src/lib/libc/rpc /usr/src/li b/libc/. /usr/src/lib/libc/uuid /usr/src/lib/libc/xdr /usr/src/lib/libc/yp /usr/src/sys/kern /usr/src/lib/

amd64-binutils file name structure for utils vs. for powerpc64-binutils and aarch64-binutils

2018-04-07 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
in binutils does not have such conventions.) Is this expected/intended? For reference: # uname -apKU FreeBSD FBSDFSSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r332181M amd64 amd64 1200061 1200061 === Mark Millard marklmi26-fbsd at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.n

Re: Attempting a xtoolchain-gcc head amd64->aarch64 cross buildworld failed for liblto_plugin.so loading error

2018-04-07 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2018-Apr-7, at 3:35 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 15:23:50 -0700 > Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: > >> My attempted, xtoolchain-gcc based, amd64->aarch64 >> cross-buildworld-buildkernel failed with: >> >> --- libc.so.7.full -

head amd64->aarch64 buildkernel: clang using aarch64-binutils gets /tmp/cloudabi_vdso_armv6_on_64bit-2f26ed.o: error adding symbols: File in wrong format

2018-04-07 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
eBSD 12.0-CURRENT r332181M amd64 amd64 1200061 1200061 # pkg info "*binutils" aarch64-binutils-2.30_2,1 amd64-binutils-2.30_2,1 binutils-2.30_2,1 powerpc64-binutils-2.30_2,1 # svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]" Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.

Re: Attempting a xtoolchain-gcc head amd64->aarch64 cross buildworld failed for liblto_plugin.so loading error

2018-04-07 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[The static build of binutils is what gets the lto involved.] On 2018-Apr-7, at 5:29 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2018-Apr-7, at 3:35 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > >> On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 15:23:50 -0700 >> Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >> >>> My attem

Re: svn commit: r466933 - head/devel/amd64-binutils

2018-04-13 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
_64-unknown-${OPSYS:tl}${OSREL} Should something have been done to force the port to rebuild after a svnlite update picks up this change? The change has significant file name differences in what would be installed but poudriere bulk did not classify my reference to devel/amd64-xtoolchain-gcc as needing to u

Re: svn commit: r466933 - head/devel/amd64-binutils

2018-04-13 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2018-Apr-13, at 8:09 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> Author: kan >> Date: Tue Apr 10 01:00:30 2018 >> New Revision: 466933 >> URL: >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/466933 >> >> >> Log: >> Catch up with changed binutils

<    1   2   3   4   5   6