Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ?

Hi! > > pkg upgrade -f pkg > > Updating ... repository catalogue... > > ... repository is up to date. > > All repositories are up to date. > > So what repo is that and what does it offer? That's repo.nepustil.net, which is mostly up2date. > > Installed packages to be DOWNGRADED: > > pkg

Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ?

Hi! > > Trying to upgrade on a machine recently upgraded from 11.1 to 11.3, > > this happens: > > > > pkg upgrade -f pkg > > Updating ... repository catalogue... > > ... repository is up to date. > > All repositories are up to date. > > The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): >

Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ?

Hi! > > > So what repo is that and what does it offer? > > That's repo.nepustil.net, which is mostly up2date. > Are you sure you got the right path there? Yes. > Any leftovers in /etc/pkg/ or /usr/local/etc/pkg/ ? None that I'm aware of. > You could grab packagesite.txz from your repo, untar

Re: Updating py27-* ports

Hi! > I use 'poudriere' to maintain my ports. I still have a few ports that > depend on the depreciated py27. What is the recommended method to > update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the > "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7 > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python2=

Re: Updating py27-* ports

Hi! > >> update these ports? I was thinking of placing this in the > >> "poudriere.d/make.conf" file: [...] > What I have never been able to get a definitive answer to is exactly > what the "+" does or if it is even needed, I have seen > 'default_versions" both with and without it. The file is re

Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ?

Hi! > > You could grab packagesite.txz from your repo, untar that and then > > grep '"name":"pkg"' packagesite.yaml > > Any brokenness in /var/db/pkg/ ? > > How would I recognize brokenness ? The files that should be there > are there. > > > There's a per-repo sqlite3 database which you could qu

Re: why does pkg try to install an older version of pkg ?

Hi! > So, had a second system, same pkg-version before, and > it has the same problem. Found a fix with: pkg update -f Then pkg upgrade does the necessary stuff. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd

Re: bugzilla messages about issues related to freebsd-ports, freebsd-multimedia, ...

Hi! > why as MAINTAINER a full discussion(!) mailing list is used? Having individuals as maintainers can cause delays in approving patches and providing updates. So at some time in the past, some groups of port maintainers choose to band together and have a mailing list -- and changed the MAINTAI

Re: [NEW PORT] PyCharm Professional

Hi! > Would someone please commit this new port to the ports tree? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242705 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [NEW PORT] unifi-poller

Hi! >Can somebody please have a look at the new port I have created and > commit it to the ports tree, or give me feedback on how to improve it > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247338 > >This is my first port so I am not sure if I need to do anything else to > get it

Re: [NEW PORT] unifi-poller

Hi! > >Can somebody please have a look at the new port I have created and > > commit it to the ports tree, or give me feedback on how to improve it > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247338 Committed, thanks. If you have time, take a look at the output of portlint -AC

Re: LibreOffice 7.0 call for testing

Hi! > Pre-built packages for 11 and 12 amd64 are available at > https://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/libreoffice/ The downloads seems to have problems: fetch https://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/libreoffice/12_amd64/libreoffice-7.0.0.2.txz libreoffice-7.0.0.2.txz 9% of 109 MB

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

Hi! > > * This migration away from portsnap fits well with the planned > > migration to git. > Please tell me that this doesn't mean a > > [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of subversion > > is on the horizon. There's a list where the git topic is discussed: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/f

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

Hi! > > > > * This migration away from portsnap fits well with the planned > > > > migration to git. > > Have a look at the archive, and yes, subversion as version control > > system for the FreeBSD project will probably be replaced by git. > This is very bad news for us. I can make so many argu

Re: www/caddy: Major version upgrade hanging without maintainer feedback

Hi! > The www/caddy port has an open bug with a patch to upgrade it to a new > major version (Bug 246623) [1]. The version that's currently in the > ports is not supported by upstream anymore. > > The original patch was submitted over two months ago, but there has been > no response by the mainta

Re: PR commit request

Hi! > Please could a committer take a look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > show_bug.cgi?id=247771[1] - mail/filtermail: Fails to build. > > I provided maintainer feedback a month ago with an updated patch which > should solve the problem but the status still shows as 'maintainer- > feedb

Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hi! > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be the > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm > to allow for Jinja2 template files. Committed, thanks!

Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request

Hi! > > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port textproc/py-j2cli > > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I will be > > the > > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of sysutils/yadm > > to allow for Jinja2 template files. > > C

Re: new port - net/quiche

Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248424 > > Can anyone take a look? It has been in the queue for 10 days. > I updated to the new version. Thanks, committed! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: x11-wm/piewm: "ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno"

Hi! > | A quick fix is to add CFLAGS+=-fcommon to your make.conf, but that is > | rather a big hammer. It is better to add it to just the ports that show > | problems due to duplicated symbols. And ideally, those duplicated > | symbols should be patched out of the ports. > > So: apparently *a* w

Re: What are my options regarding deprecated PyPy port?

Hi! > I am not above getting the PyPy devs on this if necessary. I find > it hard to believe that an implementation they say will be around > hard-depends on an implementation that will not. I've checked the port itself, and the build of the port depends on python 2.7. Do you think you can tinke

Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?

Hi! > Is there any documentation explaining how port man pages are generated > for man.cgi The man.cgi script itself is in the docs svn repo: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/cgi/man.cgi?revision=54262&view=markup We find that each released version has that version's p

Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?

Hi! > > Any ideas on how man.cgi can be made to also display ports head man > > pages ? > One way would be to extract man pages from the binary packages we > provide - this would allow to have man pages for head and quarterly > branches. [...] man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it'

Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?

Hi! > > man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it's only missing > > some job to regulary extract the latest > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/13.0-CURRENT/ports.txz > > > > for the current tree of the manuals. > > How does it actually create the pages though?

Re: Fwd: [package - head-i386-default][astro/opencpn] Failed for opencpn-5.0.0_1 in build

Hi! > Should I consider the following or just trash it, given the warning? The 'jail is newer' warning can be ignored, most of the time. The 'package build' error is probably real. Reason: Very recently, llvm11 was imported, see: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2020-August/20

Re: Squid 4.13 (security update)

Hi! > I see Squid 4.13 was released 8 days ago: it's "strongly suggested" > everyone updates, as it fixes "serious" security issues. > > I don't see it coming in the port tree and neither in the pkg audit > vulnerability database. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248856 has a p

Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?

Hi! > > > > man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it's only missing > > > > some job to regulary extract the latest > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/13.0-CURRENT/ports.txz > > > > for the current tree of the manuals. > > > How does it actually create the page

Re: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored

Hi! > P.S. Apologies for using the word "ignored" - it's an emotive word, and > that wasn't the intent - I didn't mean it in a critical way. Well, the correct word would be 'drowned' 8-} Those PRs drowned in the flood of PRs -- and the committers drowned with them 8-} At least the rtc one is com

Re: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored

Hi! > net-p2p/gtk-gnutella https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247914 This one fails on i386 current. See the PR itself for details. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: Availability of samba 4.12.x

Hi! > I was just wondering why the current stable version of samba -- samba > 4.12.7 is not available in the post tree? Because the maintainer did not yet got the time to create a port. Maybe you want to try to create one ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now wha

Re: committer for mongodb-tools

Hi! > Anybody interested in committing the latest mongodb-tools before the new > Q-branch? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249426 distinfo was somehow out of date. After make makesum, it builds fine. Would that be OK to commit ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013

Re: Committer needed for PR 249433

Hi! > Can I get a committer to take a look at PR 249433? I'd kind of > like to get these cleanups in before the Q4 branch is split. Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: contributing to PHB

Hi! > Please advise me how to contribute a possible new section to PHB. [...] > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-July/119000.html > > It seemed that such a text needs a sort of approve from this list > freebsd-ports@ in the first place, but that message was ignored. > > Do

Re: When to set / keep MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE?

Hi! > In its Makefile MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE is set and I'm trying to figure out if > it's acutally needed or not. If you build it on a box with more CPUs cores, will it fail or not ? What number of CPUs cores did you try ? I've just tried it without MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE on a 32 and it built fine. So I g

Re: Commiter need: net-im/openfire: Update to 4.5.4

Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250284 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsub

Re: Could a comitter take a look at new port?

Hi! > I will be very pleased if a commiter could take a look at 250426 > . > I'm very happy that (Open)Diablo2 runs nice on FreeBSD :) Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? _

Re: committer for python3 fix for mongodb36

Hi! > This issue contains a patch for python3 support for building > databases/mongodb36. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249597 > > It is approved by the maintainer. Is anybody willing to commit it? > > It will save net-mgmt/unifi[56] from removal at the end of the year also

Re: sysctl patches

Hi! > A recent revision changed kern_sysctl.c, > so I' m looking for a porter to commit some patch: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/showdependencygraph.cgi?id=250151 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? __

Re: sysutils/zfsnap2 fails to build - committer needed

Hi! > zfsnap2 is unbuildable if Bash or Zsh option is swtiched off. There is a > patch for pkg-plist to fix this. Can somebody commit this fix, please? Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@f

Re: What's the procedure to rename a port?

Hi! > I maintain a port where the original author is now gone. > I intend to take over maintenance, and make some additions/ > improvements. > it's devel/tkcvs -- a GUI for cvs/svn management. But it's > *really* an RCS management utility, and as I am also adding > GIT support. I feel it's name, a

Re: find libglvnd dependency

Hi! > > > trying to do a `pkg upgrade` gives me a: > > > > > > ... > > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > > > libglvnd: 1.3.2 > > > ... [...] > So it could be a dependency of on of the newly downloaded packages for > the upgrade? > > Is there a way to inspect the to-be-installed packages for th

Re: Committer required for a new port security/py-onlykey

Hi! > > I've created a new port to use with hardware password manager OnlyKey. > > It would be super nice if some kind committer could take a look and > > commit it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250601 > Last time for this new port I got a list of things to fix. I've fixed >

Re: Committer needed: x11-wm/ctwm, PR 251520

Hi! > ctwm's build-time detection of the manpage location is being defeated > by the minimalist /usr/local available in poudriere builds, so it > needs to be nudged in the right direction. > > Can somebody land the patch in the approved attachment to > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

Re: DMA -- difference between base and port?

Hi! > At the day job we've been using mail/dma port for a number of years now, > and the rollout and config of files in /usr/local/etc/dma is part of our > deploy process. > > It only recently occurred to us that there was a "dma" in base since > probably 11.0 (whomever wrote the release notes mi

Re: Need a commiter

Hi! > Could a commiter take a look at PR251982 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any

Re: portmaster new development

Hi! > How is poudriere in that regard? I never used poudriere, have been > intimidated by not wanting to use zfs or dialog4ports, or such an elaborate > setup just to update one or a few ports. poudriere is really, really useful. Because it delivers a complete, consistent package repo of all t

Re: Committing New Ports on Bugzilla

Hi! > * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252314 > * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252226 > * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252224 > * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 > * https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Can someone please have a look at a few PRs

Hi! > I know it's easy to miss PRs so this is just a friendly reminder of a few > PRs that I'd appreciate if someone could have a look at. Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma

Re: Need a commiter

Hi! > and 252740 :) Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs

Re: Removing sysutils/polkit dependency from sysutils/libudisks?

Hi! > Personally, I'm still very much of the opinion that the less polkit is > used the better. Can you tell us the reason behind this opinion ? Is it generally buggy, does polkit violate some general design policy for apps etc ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372No

Re: sysutils/beats7: fix in head to 2020Q1

Hi! > could someone please pull the fix > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=560735 to 2020Q1? Done. I added this to 2021Q1, which was probably what you asked for... -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? __

Re: port dist location

Hi! > net/repeater port maintainer change of files location > > old url http://newestvision.com/freebsd/pkg/ > new url https://freebsd.newestvision.com/ports/distfiles/ > > Change url at svn please. What about version 0.17 ? Would this patch be fine ? Index: Makefile =

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

Hi! > Unfortunately make for bind9.16.11 stops with > exec: /usr/local/bin/autoreconf-2.69: not found If you're really still at a very old bind version, which version of FreeBSD are you running ? autoreconf comes from package autoconf-wrapper-20131203 > The same error has been presented by at

Re: Question on figuring out category for new port

Hi! > Hello so I was wanting to make a new port for python-adblock > (https://github.com/ArniDagur/python-adblock) so it can be added as a > dependency of www/qutebrowser but I'm not quite sure what is the correct > category for such a port. I can easily see it falling under net, net-mgmt, or >

Re: Mailman 3 port

Hi! > Is anyone working on a mailman 3 port? > > (I'm guessing it would be several ports, actually, as mailman 3 is > several different moving parts). There already is one. Can you have a look at it and report if there's any issue with it ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: ncurses update

Hi! > On FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p4 I cannot install the last version of ncurses: > > /zenith39-ansi:No such file or directory > pkg-static: Unable to access file Can you show the result of make showconfig ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? _

Re: ncurses update

Hi! > make showconfig > ===> The following configuration options are available for > ncurses-6.2.20210213_1: DEBUG=off: Build with debugging support > DOCS=on: Build and/or install documentation > EXAMPLES=on: Build and/or install examples > MANPAGES=on: Build and/or install manual

Re: Looking for a committer

Hi! > Hello, I'm looking for a port committer to take a look at the following port: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253782 Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd

Re: FreeBSD Port: unifi6-6.0.45

Hi! > AFAIK, Unifi license forbids redistribution of controller > (https://www.ui.com/eula/): [...] > Do we have prior written consent of Ubiquiti? Not that I'm aware of. Can the FreeBSD foundation get in touch with Unifi to get approval ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: Guidance Requested

> All, > > Mentor support requested. I am the maintainer of OpenDMARC, but haven't > done much with the port since being handed it, mainly because development > on opendmarc seemed to be stalled. > > There's a new version of OpenDMARC out, version 1.4.0 (needed a few > patches from the github-re

Re: Firebird 2.5 Core Dump - Possible solution

Hi! > We all know that Firebird Server 2.5 can be installed by pkg or ports, but > when you try to use it it crashes with the core dump. [...] > I think we need a patch file to apply this to the ports if the machine is > amd64 architecture. I don't know how to do this because i never did this.

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

Hi! > Why does our work have so little value that portmgr@ is unwilling > to keep us all in the loop, or consider our opinions on such matters? The portmgr@ role is a huge task and all the reasons (limited time, dayjobs, etc) ares valid for those folks from portmgr as for the rest of the ports m

Re: No update for a day on ports?

Hi! > did somebody encountered this issue? I am using svn daily to update > ports tree on some (maybe 15, exact number not important) boxes. No new > updates today. I noticed it first actually yesterday afternoon or early > evening, but I did not consider asking then. The repo moved/is moving to

Re: No update for a day on ports?

Hi! > > The repo moved/is moving to git, so svn is no longer updated. > I did not catch any notice about the move. I know it was planned, but > not announcing actual move is... not that nice. The announcement was this post, although it was maybe a bit terse on the exact date: https://lists.free

Re: No update for a day on ports?

Hi! > As a minor aside, has anyone stated the reason why the user-base of base > or ports are moving to git? Yes: https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/git-why.md -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? __

Re: Updating poudriere to use gitup

Hi! > With the change in the FreeBSD ports system, I have started to use > "gitup". I have this working fine. Unfortunately, I cannot figure out > how to get poudriere, version 3.3.99.20210303_1 to use 'gitup' too. It > insists on using 'portsnap'. This is on a FreeBSD 11.4-p9 system. > > Is ther

Re: FreeBSD Port: tautulli-2.5.5

Hi! > there is a new version of Tautulli available. Verson 2.6.10 > > I would be very grateful for an update in the FreeBSD Ports tree. It would surely help if you can provide a patch ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? __

Re: rclint: two thoughts

Hi! > Second: > > In trying to play with rclint both to validate the port I maintain, as > well as some internal rc.d scripts we use at the day job, I'm finding > *most* ports (and a good portion of base) don't pass rclint cleanly. Is > this something worth pushing pr's (with patches) for, or wo

Re: Ports INDEX

Hi! > I just switched from using 'portsnap' to 'git'. I removed everything in > the directory, then used 'git' to build it. That worked fine. I had to > manually recreate the 'distfiles' directory, but I expected to have to > do that. > > Now, if I run a 'make search' in the directory, I receive

Re: Boost versions

Hi! > Ceph has moved to Boost 1.75, so now it is build with the project. > Which is of course a pity. > > Are there any plans to also get Boost 1.75 in ports? There is this one PR which touches the topic: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246106 It looks like a major undertakin

Re: Boost versions

Hi! > > > > Ceph has moved to Boost 1.75, so now it is build with the project. > > > > Which is of course a pity. [...] > > > It looks like a major undertaking! > Why is that? > If I look at what is in phabricator, the largest part is diffs on the > plist? Getting the port to build is one thing.

Re: Mariabackup core dump

Hi! > > > This was posted 3 years ago, and I am having the identical issue. From what I > can see on that page, no activity has taken place. Anyone have any ideas? > > (It does seem to work fine if you give the full path, but needless to say, > I'm

pkg install fails in some strange way on 14.0

Hello, since the last upgrade from 14.0 (main-c256294-g2cf84258922f) to 14.0 (main-n246143-16e0391f8e21), I have the following problem with my local poudriere repo: If I run pkg upgrade it says: opsec repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. pkg: Repository opsec cannot be op

Re: pkg install fails in some strange way on 14.0

Hi! > So even if I have newer pkg's in the repo, pkg upgrade does > not find them. Any ideas what's going on ? pkg calls with -d option (debug) can be found at: https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/pkg-bug.txt -- p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ? _

Re: pkg install fails in some strange way on 14.0

Hi! > > > So even if I have newer pkg's in the repo, pkg upgrade does > > > not find them. Any ideas what's going on ? > > > > pkg calls with -d option (debug) can be found at: > > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/pkg-bug.txt > Please try with: pkg -o DEBUG_LEVEL=4 Ah, much more output

Re: pkg install fails in some strange way on 14.0

Hi! > > I do not see obvious reasons for the problem -- any hints ? > > I don't see anything obvious, (I don't see any error actually there). The webserver for the repo and pkg run on the same machine. The apache server was no longer serving a valid TLS protocol (!), and pkg did not really comp

Re: When will git be supported for ports?

Hi! > Maintainer for some ~160 ports, and attempting to fix some > bugs. But as I understand it 'git' is supposed to be the new > source of truth. While I know svn by heart. I have near zero > understanding of git, or for that matter, why anyone would > rather use it. The 'why' was explained here

Re: When will git be supported for ports?

Hi! > > The 'why' was explained here: > > > > https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/ [...] > That was a draft repository used before the document migrated to use AsciiDoc. > > These changes have been pushed into the FreeBSD tree. See the committer’s > guide. > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/ar

Re: When will git be supported for ports?

Hi! > > > The 'why' was explained here: > > > > > > https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/ Ah, here's the link to the 'why' post: https://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2020/09/freebsd-subversion-to-git-migration.html -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?

Re: When will git be supported for ports?

Hi! > > https://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2020/09/freebsd-subversion-to-git-migration.html > > The https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/ material > for git-why.md is still available via: > > https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/commits/483527525db5cd7cf27141a2ca21059d9a3b158e/git-why.md >

bash: Undefined symbol "rl_filename_rewrite_hook" referenced from COPY re location in /usr/local/bin/bash

Hello, on a recently updated system I have this problem with shells/bash, it fails to start: ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol "rl_filename_rewrite_hook" referenced from COPY relocation in /usr/local/bin/bash I do not have this on similar systems, also recently updated, so any idea where this might

Re: bash: Undefined symbol "rl_filename_rewrite_hook" referenced from COPY re location in /usr/local/bin/bash

Hi! > Run ldd against the bag binary and see if it's picking up /use/lib/ > libreadline.8.so It shows /lib/libreadline.so.8, yes. > If it is a FreeBSD 12.x system, then just delete (or rename) > that file. Run ldd again, and it should pick up the readline library from > /usr/local/lib. Yes, tha

Re: libpqxx - Postgres client interface C++ library.

Hi! > ** Port deleted on 2012-11-28: databases/postgresql-libpqxx > Has expired: No more public distfiles > I am new to FreeBsd and the ports system. I am also doing database > support with Postgres in this environment. > > libpqxx has been a very useful package and seems stable I do

Re: Some ports options is broken

Hi! > After ports unfreeze there was commit ( > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=308598 I think) that > introduces new mechanism for selecting ports options. And it has broken > many ports options. > > Example 1. databases/freetds-devel. > Now you can't select any option. In

Re: Some ports options is broken

Hi! > I have done a fast fix already, your patch is wrong is the way that > OPTIONS_SET > is a end user thing to put in make.conf where OPTIONS_DEFAULT is the one to be > used inside a port Ah, thanks for the hint. > Do you want the PR to remain open because you will add some modification on >

Re: [RFC/HEADSUP] portmaster default -w (preserve shared libraries)

Hi! > > (As maintainer) I'm proposing to make -w the default for portmaster. > > This will preserve old shared libraries when upgrading. This helps 2 things: > > > > [...] > > I have a few question about what happens if you always use this flag: > * Do you keep every version of the shlibs you e

Re: 9.1-RC3: xorg-input-mouse, xfce4-panel

Hi! > Yea, btw why FreeBSD does not use GIT? http://wiki.freebsd.org/Git points to some text that describes this topic: http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitDrawbacks -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go ! ___ free

Re: Regarding portscout

Hi! > In this case, should a maintainer wait until the previous PR is taken > care of? I didn't read information regarding this in the handbook. The maintainer should not wait for the previous PR. He can update his PR with a new patch for the new version, so that the committer can just commit the

Re: pecl-APC-31.1.14 port

Hi! > I currently meet a problem with updating the pecl-APC-31.1.14 port; > please see the portupgrade error log: > > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade20130202-32532-1fuwga3-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade > UPGRADE_PORT=pecl-APC-3.1.14 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3.1

Re: LibreOffice 3.6.5 on amd

Hi! > [ build LNK ] Library/libofficebean.so > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljawt Same here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175856 -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 7 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.

Re: LibreOffice 3.6.5 on amd

Hi! > > [ build LNK ] Library/libofficebean.so > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljawt > > Same here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175856 Pointer to http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office/2013-February/001706.html from jkim@ says: cd /var/db/pkg pkg_delete libcmis-0.

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

Hi! > Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from > Firefox 18 to 19. Am I the only one to notice this? > > Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this: > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Bison_skull_pile_edit.jpg I have the same pro

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

Hi! > >>> Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this: > >>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Bison_skull_pile_edit.jp > >> g > >> > >> I have the same problem with 17.0.1 on 9.1-amd64. > > > > I'm seeing it with 18.0.2 on amd64 with 9.1-stable r247548 > >

Re: CFT: google-earth crash fix (ports/160422 [1])

Hi! > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/google-earth-6.0.3.2197-crashfixp-001.patch Works on 9.1-amd64. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 7 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: Python 3.3 don't build

Hi! > Just report the > > > /usr/ports/lang/python33 > > don't build on > > FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #3 r250807: Sun May 19 17:48:52 CEST 2013 > > all other ports are up2date. Same problem here, rm@ is working on it, as far as I know. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: Python 3.3 builds with clang 32 on FreeBSd 9.1

Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > I can say that it builds with FreeBSD 9.1 and clang 3.2 > from /usr/bin/clang (native clang)... Thanks for the pointer. I tried that, the build works and installs, but it seems it still has some issues ? Full build log here: http://opsec.eu/backup/20130520-py332-c

Re: Recent Mk/bsd.perl.mk changes (r320679)

Hi! > - Why the major.minor.patchlevel --> major.minor path change in the > first place. Probably this: Currently, if the perl port is updated to the next patchlevel, one has to recompile a lot of ports. One of my reference hosts still compiles, started approx. a week ago. -- p...@opsec.eu

devel/gamin recursive dependency ?

Hi! While installing set of pkg files to a server, I found the following problem: /var/db/pkg/gamin-0.1.10_6/+CONTENTS has @comment PKG_FORMAT_REVISION:1.1 @name gamin-0.1.10_6 @comment ORIGIN:devel/gamin [...] @pkgdep gamin-0.1.10_6 @comment DEPORIGIN:devel/gamin which led to many instances o

Re: devel/gamin recursive dependency ?

Hi! > While installing set of pkg files to a server, I found the following > problem: > > /var/db/pkg/gamin-0.1.10_6/+CONTENTS > > has > > @comment PKG_FORMAT_REVISION:1.1 > @name gamin-0.1.10_6 > @comment ORIGIN:devel/gamin > [...] > @pkgdep gamin-0.1.10_6 > @comment DEPORIGIN:devel/gamin > >

Re: Cacti vulnerable? / vuxml update

Hi! > > In ports we have Cacti 0.8.8a. > > According to 0.8.8b release notes > > (http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_0_8_8b.php), "multiple ... SQL > > injection vulnerabilities" were fixed in that release. > > Portaudit doesn't bring up any warning. > > I just send a PR to update the vuxml dat

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >