On 4/13/2014 17:46, Matthew Rezny wrote:
>>> On this list I see cfv, which I've used for years, marked just because
>>> it's
>>> not maintained. It works great, it needs no changes. You want someone to
>>> bloat it with a useless non-feature to prove people still use it? I see
>>> there's a few oth
On 4/13/2014 19:52, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> On Sunday 13 April 2014 18:16:15 John Marino wrote:
>> On 4/13/2014 17:46, Matthew Rezny wrote:
>>>>> On this list I see cfv, which I've used for years, marked just because
>>>>> it's
>>>>&g
On 4/16/2014 15:53, Ivan Voras wrote:
> What do you think of the idea of syncing versions in general, and this
> example of PostgreSQL in particular?
The example of PostgreSQL isn't really good because people have been
asking for change in default for probably two years now. I have no clue
as to
On 4/17/2014 15:25, Ryan Frederick wrote:
> I think the updates may have broken INDEX. Running `pkg version -Ivl
> "<"` (or `pkg_version -Ivl "<"` on my non-pkgng systems) produces the
> following:
>
> libGL-7.6.1_4 < needs updating (index has 9.1.7)
> libdrm-2.4.17_1
On 4/17/2014 15:40, Ryan Frederick wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 08:27 AM, John Marino wrote:
>> On 4/17/2014 15:25, Ryan Frederick wrote:
>>> I think the updates may have broken INDEX. Running `pkg version -Ivl
>>> "<"` (or `pkg_version -Ivl "<"
Oops, accidentally sent this to ports-comitters@ instead of the intended
ports@, so forwarding.
-- John
Original Message
Subject: Time to dissolve eclipse@ team? Others want to maintain / team
concept in general
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:29:57 +0200
From: John Marino
Reply-To
On 4/28/2014 04:40, Philips Root wrote:
> Hi,
> i try to install workbench on freebsd 10, i have errors :
> configure: error: Library ctemplate not found in system. Install package
> libctemplate-devel, ctemplate-devel or libctemplate-dev
> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
> Please re
On 5/8/2014 11:12, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> Am 08.05.2014 05:14 (UTC+1) schrieb Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh:
>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>>> My latest port upgrade (from source via portmaster) on
>>> 10.0-RELEASE/amd64 fails at astro/wcslib, which has been bumped after
On 5/9/2014 18:33, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Big Lebowski"
>
>
>> Well, the EoL was announced in January, and it is what its name is:
>> end of
>> life. There have been changes waiting to happen just for the 8.3 to go
>> away, so when the day was reached, they'
On 5/9/2014 22:22, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:44:22PM +0200, John Marino wrote:
> | I'll stress the previous point again. The change that broke this was
> | desired 8 months ago. It was applied as soon as it was legal to do so.
>
> FYI, because some mi
On 5/11/2014 04:02, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> On 05/10/2014 08:48 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>> On 11 May 2014 03:33, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> [...]
>>> So we will be DEPRECATING and resetting maintainer on all unstaged ports
>>> on June 31st.
>>>
>>> These ports will be set to EXPIRE on Aug
On 5/12/2014 10:01, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 10/05/2014 17:33, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain.
>>
>> In September 2013, the Ports framework learned how to Stage ports.
>>
>> On June 31st, all unstaged ports will be marked DEPRECA
On 5/12/2014 20:49, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 May 2014, John Marino wrote:
>
>> I commit PR patches that are 6 to 18 months old fairly frequently.
>> There is obviously a huge backlog but many PRs are processed daily. The
>> PRs that aren't getti
On 5/14/2014 09:42, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> Hi!
> After this commit to regular ports tree both zabbix (2.0 and 2.2)
> ports was messed.
> For example:
> > Options available for the single DB: you have to select exactly
> one of them
> MYSQL=on: MySQL database support
> PGSQL=off: Post
On 5/25/2014 07:04, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> Some months ago, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> ... if you need any help staging your ports I can provide reviews.
>
> I have a couple of ports that need staging support added, and I've
> finally managed to find time to look into it. Having read such
On 5/25/2014 09:09, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> 2014-05-25 7:04 GMT+02:00 Perry Hutchison :
>> post-install:
>> - @[ -f ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf ] \
>> - || ${CP} -p ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf.sample \
>> - ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf
>> + @[ -f
On 5/26/2014 09:52, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone have any idea on "is referring to /wrkdirs/usr/ports/" sort of
> errors specifically for py-* and p5-* modules in Poudriere.
>
> Thanks in advance.
You probably have a symlink that points at ${WRKSRC} when it should
point to the
On 5/29/2014 09:22, Raghu HB wrote:
> Thanks Michelle for your time.
>
> Neither your answers nor the link provide the details which I am looking
> for.
The links you have been given do contain the detail that you are looking
for. As far as "example" ports go, there are 25,000 of them. The
bott
On 6/3/2014 14:41, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Anything that would allow me to participate without using an account
> would be very much appreciated.
Why? You've already spent more energy protesting than it would have
taken create an account. I have a feeling I'm going to cringe at an
honest answer
On 6/3/2014 18:57, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> 2014-06-03 14:16 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall :
>
> A mood point for me, as I'll need a full account, but the Project should
> not make reporting bugs harder than it is already ... have you considered
> using reCATPCHA or something to fend of at least some o
On 6/3/2014 22:06, Stephen Hurd wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Surely there may be valid and sometimes useful comments by people who
>> aren't the original reporter, but for the common case that the bug
>> evolves into a discussion between a developer and a reporter having a
>> valid BIDIRECTIO
On 6/4/2014 02:34, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 01:50:23PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> I don't concede killing anonymous means killing trivial bug reporting,
>>> but if that was the case: Oh well, I guess we have to focus on
>>> non-trivial bugs.
>>
>> Trivial bugs are important
On 6/4/2014 09:46, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
>>
>> I know for certain that people in the past have given up after submitting
>> PRs that were never answered. While I know we don't have the manpower to
>> deal with all of them, that should at least be our ideal.
>
> Yes. It is really frustrating
On 6/5/2014 23:43, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On June 5, 2014 at 11:18:31 PM +0200 "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven"
> wrote:
>
>> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>
>>> That decided it was a good idea to completely break ports to force
>>> people to upgrade? You couldn't come up with a warning system instead
>>> of ou
On 6/6/2014 05:37, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Something like that would have been more than adequate. As I pointed
> out, the warning you get about pkgng and the 9/1/2014 deadline is
> perfect. It's been there for a couple of months, and it pops up ever
> time you do a port. If you miss that and don't
On 6/6/2014 09:31, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's an outstanding PR which brings Eclipse up to 4.3.2:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188659
>
> Unfortunately, this has been rejected as it clones a git-repo in order
> to run a build. I've had a look around the 'Net,
On 6/6/2014 10:18, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Sure, but really a couple of lines to warn people and wave them towards
> next steps is probably advisable next time.
>
Maybe we can alter the "uname -a" string to show the EOL so that every
time the machine boots you see it on top of the MOTD.
:)
Of
On 6/6/2014 16:19, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On June 6, 2014 at 8:35:06 AM +0200 John Marino
> I have no idea why you've decided to assume the role of preacher and
> tell me what to do, but I can assure you that you are completely
> ignorant of the circumstances behind my compl
On 6/7/2014 18:52, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I've searched. There's no notice in UPDATING. There was no
> announcement on the ports list. I found NOTHING to warn me of this
> problem except other people complaining of the same problem. 8.4 went
> EOL in September 2012. This problem was introduced w
On 5/17/2014 17:23, joeb1 wrote:
I am listed as the maintainer of the security/ppars port.
The Maintained by: fbsd_u...@a1poweruser.com email address is
incorrect.
That email address got harvested and got targeted by spam senders, so I
had
to change it.
Would like to change the port "Maint
301 - 330 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
