On 5/12/2014 20:49, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 May 2014, John Marino wrote: > >> I commit PR patches that are 6 to 18 months old fairly frequently. >> There is obviously a huge backlog but many PRs are processed daily. The >> PRs that aren't getting processed quickly are "[NEW PORT]" PRs (and >> apparently anything mentioning fuse-fs for some reason). A staging PR >> is going to jump the line; it has a higher priority. >> >> Why would you even entertain the idea that a staging PR will fall >> between the cracks? > > Perhaps the better question is: what are the factors that will make > committers shy away from a PR, even if it's summary contains stage? [1] > Maybe we (maintainers) can do better? > > [1]
Heh, 54 out of 2000+ PRs isn't too bad. :) I doubt most cases are people intentionally passing over an ugly PR. I am sure it happens but staging is generally straightforward so the PR itself isn't going to scare someone off. John _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
