On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Florent Peterschmitt
wrote:
> For the GNOME question, if an option in the GNOME configuration port says
> "[x] Yelp, will break help menus if not set", then no problem, don't you
> think ?
It doesn't make any sense to do that. KDE and GNOME are a bloat
desktop, a
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Jul-12 10:01:10 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>What is pkg
>>---
>>pkg is a new package manager for FreeBSD. It is designed as a replacement for
>>the pkg_* tools, and as a full featured binary package manager.
>
> A coup
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/07/2012 05:22, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> It's one of reason why I do not agree to remove the shared library
>> version from the LIB_DEPENDS, so that way in future someone can add
>> support in the package
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Reko Turja wrote:
> I'm testing out the pkgng system and somehow a port managed to pull
> devel/pkg-config into one low level port polluting whole db. "pkg check"
> just wants to install the annoying thing. Is there any way to get rid of
> that erroneous dependenc
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> For those that are confused about why they are receiving this message,
> ongoing discussion in ports@ as to the fact that pkg-config should not
> be a run-dep for any ports.
>
>
> On 07/20/2012 15:26, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> http://people.freeb
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/21/2012 13:48, Jason E. Hale wrote:
>
>> IMO I don't really see what the hurry is. This has been the behavior for
>> years.
>
> Yes, and some of us have been annoyed by it for years as well. :)
>
> The current behavior is wrong, and beco
of them are currently relying on the run-dep side effect. I can't see
> any reason NOT to do this, but if you have an objection please speak up
> sooner rather than later.
>
> On 07/21/2012 21:33, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 09:51:40 -0500 Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> You need to start to respect the people's work and plan, Doug. Also I
>> am part of team that maintaining the bsd.gnome.mk. Yes it will be
>> re-add i
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/22/2012 07:51, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> You need to start to respect the people's work and plan, Doug. Also I
>> am part of team that maintaining the bsd.gnome.mk. Yes it will be
>> re-add if anyone plan to re
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 7/26/2012 7:41 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>>
>> Jase Thew wrote:
>> > On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> > > because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific
>> is the
>> > > options file.
>> > >
>> >
sword for some
reasons. I will clean up the x11/lightdm and pass on to anyone that
who want to finish it (got bored with it for me when I found
x11/slim).
Please continue to read to the bottom.
Cheers,
Mezz
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jeremy Messenger
Date: Fri, Jul 27, 20
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeremy Messenger
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The MATE base desktop (x11/mate-base) is ready to use and test. The
> MATE base is a very lite and lean desktop.
A bit of FAQ:
Q: There is problem with pkg-plist.
A: Yes, I know about that. The reason
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On 7/27/12 3:44 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeremy Messenger
>> wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> The MATE base desktop (x11/mate-base) is ready to use and test.
Finally got mate-utils ported that has screenshot app. Here's two
screenshots. It's what it looks like for default of MATE Desktop. It
looks pretty much same with GNOME 2 beside that background and
probably themes.
http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/freebsd-mate0.png
http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeremy Messenger
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The MATE base desktop (x11/mate-base) is ready to use and test. The
> MATE base is a very lite and lean desktop. The MATE base list can be
> viewed at http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/building . I will add more
May I commit the update of www/linux-opera to 12.00? Here's patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/linux-opera.diff
Thanks,
Mezz
--
mezz.free...@gmail.com - m...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org
__
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 01.08.2012 04:19, schrieb Jeremy Messenger:
>> May I commit the update of www/linux-opera to 12.00? Here's patch:
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/linux-opera.diff
>
> Not speaking on behalf of t
Hello all,
I have promised about that I will clean up and post the unfinished
LightDM port for anyone that who want to finish it. When I discovered
about x11/slim and I have lost interest to work more on LightDM as I
have enough stuff on my plate. Keep in mind, it only will taking you
to the log i
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 5 August 2012 04:15, RW wrote:
>>> On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:38:44 -0700
>>> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>>> Why isn't it? In that scenario /var/cache wouldn't be writable.
>>
>> IMHO the dire
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
>> I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
>> /var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a
>> database into the port installation/sta
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe
> wrote:
>> It was recently posted on,
>> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/
>> that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:33:22PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:25:27 +0200
>> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:18:50PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> > > Hi
>> > >
>> > > I noticed
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jeremy Messenger
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:33:22PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:25:27 +0200
>>> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jeremy Messenger
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeremy Messenger
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> The MATE base desktop (x11/mate-base) is ready to use and test. The
>> MATE base is a very lite and lean desktop.
>
>
>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:33 AM, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman)
wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> I have made suggests on what to do. Please contact with A.J. Kehoe IV.
>> I suggested him to create a team to work on get rid of HAVE_GNOME. He
>> even ha
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 9:03 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
>> I used poudriere to build pkgng packages from the latest round
>> of port updates since the freeze. I know in the commit message
>> for xcb-util it bumped some other ports, but it seems like no
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> (As maintainer) I'm proposing to make -w the default for portmaster.
>> This will preserve old shared libraries when upgrading. This helps 2 things:
>>
>> 1. Prevents a broken system
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 10:21 AM, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Bryan Drewery
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/11/2012 9:03 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
>>>> I used poudriere to build pkgng package
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> On 11 Dec 2012 16:44, "Alex Dupre" wrote:
>>
>> Jeremy Messenger ha scritto:
>>
>> >> Absolutely yes from me. The -w option is real lifesaver and should be
>> >> on by default.
&g
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Jeremy Messenger
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Bryan Drewery
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/11/2012 10:21 AM, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:09 AM, b.f. wrote:
>>I received a lot of complaint about ocaml being in a bad shape: lang/ocaml
>>being
>>outdated, lots of ocaml ports not being carefully maintained and updated.
>>
>>I personnally know nothing about ocaml so I'm not able to actually be helpful
>>to
>>
On Mar 18, 2013 12:42 PM, "Baptiste Daroussin" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our
defaults
> values for a couple of things, and prevent the "slow" and possibly wrong
> autodetection.
>
> Here is a patch that makes use of it:
> http://people.f
On Mar 18, 2013 2:24 PM, "Baptiste Daroussin" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:15:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > On Mar 18, 2013 12:42 PM, "Baptiste Daroussin" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The autotools al
Sorry, this is way too long to read. I will just skip the read and
post my suggest of solution to this problem in the top of your email.
I think the OPTIONS needs to change from ${UNIQUENAME} to
${PKGORIGIN:S/\//_/}. It will be looked like
"${PORT_DBDIR}/cat_port/options". Here's example:
In bsd.o
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Koop Mast wrote:
> On 19-3-2013 17:56, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, this is way too long to read. I will just skip the read and
>> post my suggest of solution to this problem in the top of your email.
>> I think the O
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 22.03.2013 08:25 (UTC+2), Leslie Jensen wrote:
>>
>> According to /usr/ports/UPDATING
>>
>> One should do
>>
>> portmaster -r poppler-0
>>
>> Unfortunately it gives me this:
>>
>> ===>>> Launching child to reinstall libreoffice-4.0.1
>>
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Anton Shterenlikht
> wrote:
>> From andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com Mon Mar 25 18:09:38 2013
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Gerald Pfeifer
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jeremy Messenger
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Anton Shterenlikht
>>> wr
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Jeremy Messenger
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jeremy Messenger
>>> wrote:
>>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jeremy Messenger
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Jeremy Messenger
>>> wrote:
&
>> @@ -238 +238 @@
>> -sys_lib_search_path_spec="/usr/lib "
>>
>> +sys_lib_search_path_spec="/usr/local/lib/gcc47/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0/4.7.3
>> /usr/local/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0/lib /usr/local/lib/gcc47 /lib
>> /usr/lib "
Do you know if this part is need too? You can try
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2013 14:53, "Robert Huff" wrote:
>>
>>
>> Matthew Seaman writes:
>> > On 30/03/2013 13:17, Robert Huff wrote:
>> >
>> > >Am I too much of a zombie this morning, or is there nothing in
>> > > the man page about how to do this?
>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-04-17 21:18:21 -0400, Jim Pazarena wrote:
>> On 9.1 amd, something has changed within my ports. This compiled
>> fine the very first time I installed 9.1, but a recent re-install
>> g
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Once again I hit a case where a port being upgraded by portmaster asked for
> options configuration (dialog4ports) nd fails to either save it correctly
> or to find the saved options.
>
> I ran portmaster to upgrade ruby18-bdb43. I was asked
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
> from Chris Rees:
>
>> What new features are you trying to take advantage of with png?
>
> I went to the libpng website and couldn't find the desired changelog, but
> found libpng 1.4.x and 1.5.x were still in active development, and there w
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
> W dniu 2013-05-02 20:29, Oliver Heesakkers pisze:
>
>> Op do 02 mei 2013 16:22:41 schreef Łukasz Wąsikowski:
>
>>> /usr/bin/env is not good in all the situation. Look at
>>> www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177481 - /usr/bin/env is not
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> I've just been looking at devel/rubygem-multi_json and was
> perplexed by how it wasn't saving my options.
>
> It seems that how the new port options infrastructure determines
> where to load and store its configured options from is quite
>
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 24 May 2013 22:23, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
>>
>> Hello all. The editors/vim port is currently a mess and needs some changes.
>>
>> - It fetches almost 700 patches from what seems like a dial-up connection in
>> AUSTRALIA.
>>
>> You might as w
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> On 28 May 2013 06:08, "Jeremy Messenger" wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> > On 24 May 2013 22:23, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:49:27 -0500, Helko Glathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi
I've installed firefox-3.0_2,1 on FreeBSD 7.0 Release.
Firefox3 starts without warnings.
But entering URLs into the adress field there are no reactions. No
request to
the URL is made.
Only the Home Button work
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:01:57 -0500, Helko Glathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:40:10 +0200, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:49:27 -0500, Helko Glathe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I've installed firefox
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:06:02 -0500, Naram Qashat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I was trying to modify the VLC port to enable the Firefox plugin, but
when I added firefox3 to the list of USE_GECKO and tried to build the
port, it complained saying it couldn't find firefox3-config. I checked
m
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:56:09 -0500, Naram Qashat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:06:02 -0500, Naram Qashat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was trying to modify the VLC port to enable the Firefox plugin, but
when I added firefox3 to
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:53:23 -0500, Jean-Pierre Bergamin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear FreeBSD folks
Boost 1.36.0 will soon be released. Are there any plans to make a port
of this new release? The one for version 1.35 was already missing.
If I can help you in preparing the port in any way,
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:13:58 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Florent Thoumie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
"Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:3
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:57:38 -0500, Simon Barner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't what happened to him. I am hoping that he will be back soon. I
already have tested and respone back to him with the result. The result
was work perfect for me with deluge and other ports.
Hello Mezz & others,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:09:11 -0500, Marcin Wisnicki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:30:50 +0100, RW wrote:
I think Bill probably understands that. The issue, as I see it, is that
the warning will just be a warning if you build manually, but if you
build through portupgrade
Hello Stanislav,
Your three ports need to add CONFLICTS:
djvulibre and djvulibre-nox11 conflict: Install same nox11 stuff, the real
solution is to force djvulibre to not install nox11 stuff then depend on
djvulibre-nox11 to resolve the conflict and avoid use CONFLICTS.
djview4 and djvulibre
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:10:04 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I installed firefox 3 from ports in the pre-release phase (via
marcusmerge) and rebuilt it as needed to keep it current with the port
after it was committed. I have since noticed that if I start firefox 3
and keep it
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:25:06 -0500, Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:15:50 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
Hello Stanislav,
Your three ports need to add CONFLICTS:
djvulibre and djvulibre-nox11 conflict: In
Hello folks,
I think I have finished with Makefile.webplugins[1] (USE_WEBPLUGINS) for
web plugins that use in browser. It's ready for you to test it, and make
bug report or/and feedback. There are four ports left that are not finish,
these are *jdk* (Java) ports and are being work on. I hav
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:08:19 -0500, Erwin Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: transmission-gtk2-1.31: no entry for
/usr/ports/ww
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:36:42 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:08:19 -0500, Erwin Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_inf
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:47:28 -0500, Erwin Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 11:45:43AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:36:42 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Au
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:57:07 -0500, Erwin Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 11:53:57AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:47:28 -0500, Erwin Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 11:45:43AM -0500, Jeremy
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:01:29 -0500, Andrey A. Belashkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello.
When i try to install mplayer from ports at FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p3 i got
error:
gmake -C libvo libvo.a
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer/work/MPlayer-1.0rc2/libvo'
cc -O2 -fno-
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:26:31 -0500, Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A fair amount of third party software in ports still uses
which in our system is like this:
/* $FreeBSD: src/include/malloc.h,v 1.5 2001/11/07 23:14:31 obrien Exp
$ */
#if __STDC__
#error " has been
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:57:03 -0500, Mark Evenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dan Reinholz wrote:
Since updating to the latest revision of Evince (to
2.22.2_3 from 2.22.2_2) I am no longer able to open
.pdf files. Anytime I try to do so I now get the
error:
"Unhandled MIME type: “application
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:56:55 -0500, Mark Evenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:57:03 -0500, Mark Evenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dan Reinholz wrote:
Since updating to the latest revision of Evince (to
2.22.2_3 from 2.22.2_2) I
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:52:49 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
The script fluxbox-generate_menu shipped with current versions of
fluxbox (fluxbox-1.1.0.1_1 and 1.1.1 too, I think) produces
menu with all known programs. The reason for it is find_it* family
of functions us
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:10:44 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:35:20PM -0400, Randy Pratt wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:16:35 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree for 'which' is best thing
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:17:47 -, Desmond Chapman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's dependent upon kbuild. Since the developers have no intention of
fixing the issue, I would like a tutorial on converting the kmk file to
a normal Makefile.
I think you are barking at the wrong tree. :-) I
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:48:21 -, Eitan Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2008-Oct-17 10:32:41 -0400, Eitan Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Here is the list I generated from pkg_info when I was first able to run
the X s
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:42:26 -0600, Marco Alberoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello, is this FreeBSD port still mainteined? Version 0.6.8 is very
old...
Thank you for your kind attention
We (FreeBSD GNOME Team) have 0.8.x in MarcusCom CVS that will be merging
into FreeBSD ports when it'
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:29:42 -0600, Emanuel Haupt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Emanuel,
Copying devel/boost to devel/boost-devel sounds reasonable.
However, I'd like to suggest moving devel/boost to devel/boost-134 and
having devel/boost updated to 1.37. For me '-devel' is always felt like
som
On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:13:33 -0600, Flex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also agree with you Jeremy. devel/boost-devel makes no sense as it is a
stable and not a development version.When there are so much ports that
depend on devel/boost (as version 1.34) then I see two approaches to
solve
this.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:06:04 -0600, John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I updated from 6-stable to 7-stable and got the following error
when portupgrading graphics/tiff...
.
.
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link c++ -O2
-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -L/usr/local/lib -o li
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:55:31 -0600, John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote at 16:35 -0500 on Nov 13, 2008:
> John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So my question is: is this documented and/or widely known? A full
> > portupgrade wouldn't help if you were up to date on
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:09:23 -0600, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:39:10 -0500 Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
1) The handbrake build system unmodified uses wget to download all
it's dependencies itself. The patches to modify the build s
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:23:25 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
* Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is what Debian and Gentoo does. Remember we don't have to pass
DESTDIR variable to 'make -C /usr/ports/editors/emacs-cvs' instead it
will be passed to th
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane
wrote:
Hello,
I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works
pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable
using the system versions of a number of libraries, rather than relying
upon statically lin
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:56 -0600, Coleman Kane
wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it
works
> pretty well,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:47:56 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov
wrote:
* Garrett Cooper (yanef...@gmail.com) wrote:
> It's useful for me too sometimes, but it's already not 100% reliable,
> as some ports still generate it dynamically, some use PLIST_FILES,
some
> use PLIST_SUB so it's not apparent und
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:38:02 -0600, Mikhail T.
wrote:
Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:16:43PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
The throbber is pretty important UI for a browser. If you break it,
people will complain.
Uhm, what is "throbber"? Could you elaborate?
The little
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:56:44 -0600, Doug Barton wrote:
Eitan Adler wrote:
We should add --disable-tests to MOZ_OPTIONS unless WITH_DEBUG is
enabled.
I took advantage of the .19 upgrade to test this and it works fine, FWIW.
You do not need to add it since all gecko ports (from Mk/bsd.geck
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:54:42 -0600, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.."/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line
784: Inconsistent operator for post-install
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
===> editors/xemacs failed
*
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:42:48 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:54:42 -0600, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.."/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line
784: Inconsistent operator for post-install
m
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:39:50 -0600, Michal Varga
wrote:
Hello guys,
I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
with the recent session management fuckup? I mean this:
Because we don't know about th
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:13:45 -0600, Stacey Roberts
wrote:
Hello Joe!
Can you let us know when associated updates to The FreeBSD-Gnome
site will be updated
to reflect the new version, including recommended upgrade procedures,
please?
I'm referring to: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/.
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:38:10 -0600, Alexander Churanov
wrote:
2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik
That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions coexist in
a single system?
That's a real problem. To my mind there are no problems for shared
libraries, but for header files the suggested s
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:47:38 -0600, Florent Thoumie wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Dmitry Marakasov
wrote:
* Florent Thoumie (f...@xbsd.org) wrote:
> If it's just a single file, the preferred way is to add
>
> PLIST_FILES=bin/program_name
>
> to the Makefile and not use pkg-p
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:56:39 -0600, Victor Popov
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone,
Replying to myself, sorry.
Victor Popov wrote:
| Deluge bittorrent client is great, and has a flexible architecture,
which
| allows user to run a downloading daemon, on
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:56:39 -0600, Victor Popov
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone,
Replying to myself, sorry.
Victor Popov wrote:
| Deluge bittorrent client is great, and has a flexible architecture,
which
| allows user to run a downloading daemon, on
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:40:27 -0600, Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hello List,
I'd like to be better safe than sorry, but... You know, things may
happen.
I prefer to use packages for installing/updating since there are at
least five personal machines which I should take care of (at work, at
home, my
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:40:08 -0600, Boris Samorodov wrote:
"Jeremy Messenger" writes:
You already can do that. WITHOUT_GNOME=yes or WITHOUT_GNOME=esound.
Thanks for the tip!
2. Create slave ports to build (non-default so far) packages for those
who want to use package
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:35:02 -0600, Boris Samorodov wrote:
"Jeremy Messenger" writes:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:40:08 -0600, Boris Samorodov wrote:
"Jeremy Messenger" writes:
2. Create slave ports to build (non-default so far) packages for
those
who want to u
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:03:47 -0600, Alex Goncharov
wrote:
I am trying to disengage from the latest X, and have had reasonable
success in this (thanks to everybody who had made the suggestions!):
1. Got the old (2008.12.23) ports tree and rebuilt the X-based
components as necessary.
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:53:30 -0600, Martin Wilke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy,
I've started work on QT 4.5 RC1 and I'm almost finished,
but I've run into some problemes and I need your help.
QT 4.5 now has gtk20 support which means x11-toolkit/qt4-gui
now depend
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:23:43 -0600, Thomas Schmitt
wrote:
Hi,
i am trying to provide libraries for FreeBSD
and Linux via a build system based on autotools.
My problem is that the .so numbers get produced
differently on both systems.
E.g.
libburn.so.31 on FreeBSD
libburn.so.4.27.0 o
personal choice. It was
already in use when i became upstream of libburn.
Its main advantage is its social standing in
the community of distro packagers.)
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/libtool.txt
That's hard to read but seems to be exactly about
my problem.
201 - 300 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
