On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:38:10 -0600, Alexander Churanov
<alexanderchura...@gmail.com> wrote:
2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik <p...@freebsd.org>
That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions coexist in
a single system?
That's a real problem. To my mind there are no problems for shared
libraries, but for header files the suggested solution would require
placing
headers under /usr/local/include/boost-134/boost and modify all ports'
build
processes to include /usr/local/include/boost-134 in a search path.
I rather to put only a version and fix the rest port. With that
include/boost-134 hack is going to require hack in every port that depend
on it.
Cheers,
Mezz
I'll carry out this experiment.
Another thing I've heard about port versioning is that Gentoo Linux
handles
different versions of the same port installed on a system. Probably,
it's a
good idea to examine how they do that slotting.
Sincerely,
Alexander Churanov
--
me...@cox.net - m...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
